Community > Posts By > Sojourning_Soul
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 08/06/16 01:35 PM
|
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfRtbIQ1kTw The elections have been rigged since the founding of political parties. The best evidence is the network bias of the corporate sponsored media to a 2 party system. They own the media networks, control the debates and exposures, the polling stats, and what you hear or see about a candidate in the media to base an opinion on. With citizens united and unlimited cash flowing to the campaigns from corporations controlling the narrative for one candidate or the other of the two parties, and a third party unable to play in this over priced political arena, it can't be considered anything but rigged! Sure, we are given a choice, but our choices are selected for us. One party or the other, never allowing anyone outside the 2 party system the ability to be seen or heard (due to the price of admission to media coverage). Case in point..... look what the DNC did to Sanders (an Independent running on the Dem ticket) and the RNC did to Ron Paul (a Libratarian running on the Rep ticket) And then there are the electoral colleges..... either Rep or Dem.... but they are non-partisan ![]() And they wonder why people stay home ![]() |
|
|
|
Clinton’s Former Employer, LaFarge, Faces Allegations of Funding ISIS LaFarge CEO Frederic Jolibois may have negotiated with ISIS in order to continue doing business in Syria Between 1990 and 1992, Clinton served on Lafarge’s Board of Directors. “Shortly before Bill Clinton was elected president in 1992, Lafarge was fined $1.8 million by the Environmental Protection Agency for pollution violations at its Alabama plant. A year later, the Clinton administration reduced that fine to less than $600,000,” reported The Washington Post in 2007. While Clinton served on the board for Lafarge, the company was embroiled in controversy over its use of hazardous waste to fuel its U.S. cement plants. Interesting reading here: http://observer.com/2016/08/clintons-former-employer-lafarge-faces-allegations-of-funding-isis/ |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 08/05/16 08:58 AM
|
|
You must have respect for anyone who runs towards trouble while everyone else is running away from it. I do. While some few may dishonor whatever uniform they may wear their numbers are not in the majority and should not be the examples used to condemn their service as a whole. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 08/05/16 08:17 AM
|
|
He's still a turncoat in my opinion, an opportunist who would side with whichever group serves his interest at the time. He made a career with a government spy agency and raked in the daugh for as long as it was convenient to him. Now that he feels the wind turning again his employer he goes out and speak against it like the weasel he is. He has no honor and he lies whenever it suits him. What would make me believe his story? Nothing. Over 30 years with the agency doesn't sound like someone who got out because it wasn't his cup of tea or things weren't going his way ![]() You think being under the gun of the alphabet agencies is something anyone looks forward to? That it's some kind of profitable or retirement career change for the better? What rock have you been living under? |
|
|
|
Yep. The ATF never lies and always complies ![]() Great track record right along with the justice dept, especially under Holder and his Fast and Furious debacle just to name one. Of course there was Waco, Ruby Ridge and so many other good examples of their compliance with the law..... as they see it |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 08/04/16 02:44 PM
|
|
yep, and I blame the Repubs as well. Where the hell have they been? Standing in line at the Goldman Sachs, BofA lobbyist window on their way to fund raise at Monsatan and the Big Pharma stock holders meetings. The Military Industrial Complex window is always open! Hillary is at the head of all lines! ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 08/04/16 02:27 PM
|
|
So you place an oath to govt over an oath to a nation, its laws and its people? When the government and its employees represents the people of a nation, an oath to government in tantamount to an oath towards its laws and its people. Unless you like anarchy. Are you a communist, socialist, or just a fascist in general under whatever banner a govt calls itself? Oh there! That was a lot of complicated words in that sentence ![]() I'm for law and order, regardless what form of government upholds them. Incidentally, I live under a Monarchy. I love my King my country, I support our troops and differ to our police force. The point of a whistleblower is to expose the illegal or unlawful acts of a given group or person. It is only upon the commission of these acts that a person exposing them can gain that title. Those acts become a breach of contract to any "oath" they may have sworn in accepting that position, therefore a whistleblower is in his right, under law, to expose them! That is abiding by their oath, not breaking it! America was founded by such people! A certain amount of govt is necessary to protect the rights of the people. It was never meant (in a Republic) for the govt to control. They are elected to act and fulfill the wishes and protect the rights of the "governed", NOT control them! Within a Republic even the smallest voice has a vote, is born with certain unalienable rights, and among them are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Nowhere does it state that you swear an oath to govt! You swear to uphold the laws of the Constitution, to protect and defend them. When govt breaks those laws it becomes the sworn duty of the governed to oppose, expose, and take any and all actions allowed under the law to correct it up to and including (sadly) rebellion or revolution against it. The Declaration of Independence: A partial Transcription IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776. The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. ************** An oath of office is an oath or affirmation a person takes before undertaking the duties of an office, usually a position in government or within a religious body, although such oaths are sometimes required of officers of other organizations. Such oaths are often required by the laws of the state, religious body, or other organization before the person may actually exercise the powers of the office or any religious body. It may be administered at an inauguration, coronation, enthronement, or other ceremony connected with the taking up of office itself, or it may be administered privately. In some cases it may be administered privately and then repeated during a public ceremony. Some oaths of office are a statement of loyalty to a constitution or other legal text or to a person or other office-holder (e.g., an oath to support the constitution of the state, or of loyalty to the king). Under the laws of a state it may be considered treason or a high crime to betray a sworn oath of office. ************************ I don't see anywhere where it says an oath is to a govt! It actually states everything to the contrary! But again, the USA is a Republic, NOT a Monarchy, a Democracy, or an Oligarchy |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 08/04/16 01:48 PM
|
|
Just another cog in Oblowme's efforts to destroy "The Great Satan", the crown jewel of the infidels that is so hated by those of Islamic faith. I am not against their right to worship, only their wish to impose it on others! Their rights end where mine begin Of course for the Dems it always a boost in electoral votes in certain states |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 08/04/16 01:25 PM
|
|
So anyone who exposes the unintended or unlawful use of govt power in action or deed are the ones to be prosecuted or persecuted instead of those who commit the unlawful acts they expose? If they swore an OATH, YES! A man's word is his most valuable currency. Once that trust is gone, he's gone. So you place an oath to govt over an oath to a nation, its laws and its people? Are you a communist, socialist, or just a fascist in general under whatever banner a govt calls itself? My USA is a Republic with its power resting in the hands of its people, NOT its govt! |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 08/04/16 01:15 PM
|
|
If you've read any of the Binney statements you would know that the reason for his departure and then the blacklisting of him that followed it, was because of what it "became" under the control of the govt alphabet agencies and the lawyers who then interpreted the laws in a secret FISA court to fit its unlawful use as a "domestic" spying apparatus against American citizens as well and not just those of foreign sources it was intend for. I don't put a lot of stock in the words spies and those who facilitate their work against the entire population of the planet. Plus, this Beaney guy is transgressing on an oath he SWORE to uphold. In that light, he's not to be trusted or believed. He made his bed in the Intelligence community, he should now sleep in it. At best, he's a turncoat. So anyone who exposes the unintended or unlawful use of govt power in action or deed are the ones to be prosecuted or persecuted instead of those who commit the unlawful acts they expose? No wonder our nation is so phucked and some (like the Clintons, Lois Lerner, the banksters who created the crash, the alphabet agencies, and the POTUS himself) think themselves above the law! With logic like that it's no wonder such criminals are never brought to justice Some consider their oaths to the nation, its laws and Constitution, and "we the people" more binding than their oaths to a govt participating in criminal acts against it! Thank goodness! Because our corporate controlled media has failed us by killing true journalism and replacing it with partsan propaganda which can be purchased by the highest bidder! |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 08/04/16 12:51 PM
|
|
NSA Whistleblower: Agency Has Hillary's Deleted Emails Hillary Clinton claims that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee's emails to help Donald Trump in the 2016 race, but a NSA whistleblower disagrees with her assertion. Former NSA official William Binney, an architect of the agency's surveillance program, says that it is more likely that a disgruntled member of the U.S. intelligence community leaked the emails. On "Fox and Friends" this morning, Binney said that accusing the Russians is a way of diverting attention from the actual issues that the emails bring to light. http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/08/03/former-nsa-official-william-binney-dnc-email-hack-likely-wasnt-done-russia So now we're supposed to believe a guy who engineered programs to unconstitutionally spy on respectable citizens? ![]() If you've read any of the Binney statements you would know that the reason for his departure and then the blacklisting of him that followed it, was because of what it "became" under the control of the govt alphabet agencies and the lawyers who then interpreted the laws in a secret FISA court to fit its unlawful use as a "domestic" spying apparatus against American citizens as well and not just those of foreign sources it was intend for. As it was written was never illegal or immoral, but that can't be said for what it became under control of the govt Typical.... just as a the invention of an alternate power source became the A-Bomb and rocket science became nuclear missles |
|
|
|
The Justice Department throws Kerry and Obama under the bus
As a follow-up to its bombshell that the Obama administration airlifted $400 million in cold, hard cash to Iran — a fancy workaround of Iran’s barriers to using the dollar and other international currencies — comes this from the Wall Street Journal: Senior Justice Department officials objected to sending a plane loaded with cash to Tehran at the same time that Iran released four imprisoned Americans, but their objections were overruled by the State Department, according to people familiar with the discussions. . . . The timing and manner of the payment raised alarms at the Justice Department, according to those familiar with the discussions. “People knew what it was going to look like, and there was concern the Iranians probably did consider it a ransom payment,’’ said one of the people. This is in accord with critics of the deal who asserted this was a ransom arrangement that will induce more hostage-taking. (“[Justice officials’] concerns show that even within the Obama administration there were worries that the pallets of cash could send the wrong signal to Iran—and potentially to others—about U.S. policy when it came to hostages.”) It is even more galling considering the administration provided “intelligence assistance to a U.S. family as it tried to buy the freedom of an American aid worker in Pakistan.” Our policy of not paying ransom to terrorists is now in tatters. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2016/08/04/the-justice-department-throws-kerry-and-obama-under-the-bus/ |
|
|
|
Clinton Foundation drug contracts intersected with State Department work Amid renewed scrutiny of the Clinton Foundation's foreign ties this week, Hillary Clinton pointed to the success of its low-cost contracts with pharmaceutical firms in a rare acknowledgement of her family's controversial nonprofit network. The Democratic nominee, who has not held a press conference in 242 days and is selective about the media interviews she grants, seldom encounters questions about the Clinton Foundation despite the outsize role its past dealings have played on the campaign trail. Clinton denied on Sunday that she participated in any foundation activities while she served as secretary of state, employing a new defense of its operations by highlighting the negotiated healthcare deals. But under her leadership, at least a handful of the State Department's global health efforts relied on drug companies that were also major Clinton Foundation donors in arrangements that raise questions about the distance Clinton kept from her family's philanthropy. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/08/03/clinton-foundation-drug-contracts-intersected-with-state-department-work.html |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 08/04/16 12:15 PM
|
|
Transplanting Bruce Jenner's balls on the POTUS didn't help that pu$$y at all! Still can't man-up enough to negotiate any kind of deal, trade or otherwise, without an apology and a payment of some kind that does nothing for the USA but make us look weak and shameful. Other countries laugh as we cut our military to afford putting more people on food stamps, bankrupt our citizens and small business with a high cost socialist healthcare system that is unsustainable, and penalize and rob the wealthy for being successful to pay for it while they are being told "you didn't build that". What Oblowme hasn't been able to destroy of our nation in 8 years, Hitlery would finish in under 4! |
|
|
|
NSA Whistleblower: Agency Has Hillary's Deleted Emails Hillary Clinton claims that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee's emails to help Donald Trump in the 2016 race, but a NSA whistleblower disagrees with her assertion. Former NSA official William Binney, an architect of the agency's surveillance program, says that it is more likely that a disgruntled member of the U.S. intelligence community leaked the emails. On "Fox and Friends" this morning, Binney said that accusing the Russians is a way of diverting attention from the actual issues that the emails bring to light. http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/08/03/former-nsa-official-william-binney-dnc-email-hack-likely-wasnt-done-russia |
|
|
|
Judge Nap Blasts Obama Admin for 'Reprehensible,' 'Lawless' Stockpiling of Gun Owner Info Judge Napolitano explained that the government is supposed to gather that information for statistical purposes only, and they are mandated to destroy identifiable information such as names and addresses. The report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), however, found that the ATF is not adhering to that policy. "Congress decided that since the states regulate guns - not the federal government - the federal government would never be able to keep a list of every gun owner and every gun owned by that person," Judge Napolitano said. "But they are." http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/08/04/judge-andrew-napolitano-report-atf-stockpiling-gun-owner-info |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Thu 08/04/16 09:39 AM
|
|
http://www.steynonline.com/7216/the-undocumented-branch-of-the-electoral-college > Most people are aware that the President is elected not by the popular vote but by the votes in the Electoral College. And most people are also aware that the more densely populated states have more electoral votes than smaller states: California has 55 votes, Vermont has three. But most Americans, I would wager, assume that those proportions are based on the number of citizens in each state. Not so. As Politico reports, each state's share of the Electoral College votes is calculated by using the "whole number of persons in each state" - including those who shouldn't be there. So the more illegal immigrants you have in your state, the greater the votes you have in the Electoral College. Thus, the armies of the undocumented don't need "a pathway to citizenship" in order to change election results - or, as Politico's headline puts it, "Illegal Immigrants Could Elect Hillary": This math gives strongly Democratic states an unfair edge in the Electoral College. Using citizen-only population statistics, American University scholar Leonard Steinhorn projects California would lose five House seats and therefore five electoral votes. New York and Washington would lose one seat, and thus one electoral vote apiece. These three states, which have voted overwhelming for Democrats over the latest six presidential elections, would lose seven electoral votes altogether.< >California's illegal immigrants have a greater representation (five votes) in the Electoral College than my entire state (New Hampshire's four votes). Which seems a very perverse system. So Democrats don't need to nurse illegals through to citizenship; simply moving them into California and other blue states bulks up the Electoral College math in their favor.< Understanding that will explain the Dem stance on Sanctuary Cities and refugee placements Few understand the total rigging of the system we live under and any who seek to educate are CT or fringe in press and social media. Control the money, control the press, and the people will follow wherever you lead them ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Yeah, this happened in 1979. Get your facts straight, so you don't look like a complete idiot. Leave some room for doubt. Dude, can't read the date on a headline? ![]() |
|
|
|
I think it's only 23 states that require "picture" ID to vote and another 11 or so that require some sort of ID, but other states you can pull a piece of junk mail out of the garbage as long as there is an address on it and register to vote that day with it (if I have the figures right) Some states have mail-in ballots you can pick up anywhere and fill out a dozen and mail them in. They never get qualified until after the election but are counted when processed But all that has little to do with the electoral votes that decide elections! |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 08/03/16 07:22 PM
|
|
Where exactly did Mr Clinton tell people to commit fraud? You haven't shown this. The article only said it was "implied" by interpretation. After all, he was addressing "illegals" But without the requirement of voter ID voter fraud is inevitable |
|
|