100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Abortions | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I am for choice. Not used as a general form of birth control, though. It's not my place to impose my beliefs on another. Exactly! I am neutral, it is the pregnant womans problem to deal with. I remember as a child, my mom saying.. "Worry about yourself-Thats a full time job". but most of the world is worrying about what everyone else does..When they can't even get a realistic handle on their own lives. As long as government / tax money isn't paying for the abortion.. then we shouldn't have any say. Although I respect the sentiment, I think it is much too broad to cover all situations. There are times when things are more significant than who foots the bill. how terrible would it be if we turned a blind eye to domestic violence because its not our business. At some point we have to at least CARE about others enough not to discourage people from speaking up about the mistreatment of others. Perhaps the legal ramifications can be debated around who is paying but certainly , as humans, we are not just all laws and no substance or character.  For a real medical reason or rape.. I don't mind helping flip the bill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been.
If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 11/21/09 01:23 PM
|
|
I am for choice. Not used as a general form of birth control, though. It's not my place to impose my beliefs on another. Exactly! I am neutral, it is the pregnant womans problem to deal with. I remember as a child, my mom saying.. "Worry about yourself-Thats a full time job". but most of the world is worrying about what everyone else does..When they can't even get a realistic handle on their own lives. As long as government / tax money isn't paying for the abortion.. then we shouldn't have any say. Although I respect the sentiment, I think it is much too broad to cover all situations. There are times when things are more significant than who foots the bill. how terrible would it be if we turned a blind eye to domestic violence because its not our business. At some point we have to at least CARE about others enough not to discourage people from speaking up about the mistreatment of others. Perhaps the legal ramifications can be debated around who is paying but certainly , as humans, we are not just all laws and no substance or character. For a real medical reason or rape.. I don't mind helping flip the bill.
Im sure many people wouldnt and that is noble. I really dont stress over my taxes the way that many do so the finances arent an issue for me. My belief that human life is being taken is what fuels my opinion against abortion. If you ask me about war or the death penalty, I will have the same answer,, for the same reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother.  I know you are joking here right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am for choice. Not used as a general form of birth control, though. It's not my place to impose my beliefs on another. Exactly! I am neutral, it is the pregnant womans problem to deal with. I remember as a child, my mom saying.. "Worry about yourself-Thats a full time job". but most of the world is worrying about what everyone else does..When they can't even get a realistic handle on their own lives. As long as government / tax money isn't paying for the abortion.. then we shouldn't have any say. Although I respect the sentiment, I think it is much too broad to cover all situations. There are times when things are more significant than who foots the bill. how terrible would it be if we turned a blind eye to domestic violence because its not our business. At some point we have to at least CARE about others enough not to discourage people from speaking up about the mistreatment of others. Perhaps the legal ramifications can be debated around who is paying but certainly , as humans, we are not just all laws and no substance or character. For a real medical reason or rape.. I don't mind helping flip the bill.
Im sure many people wouldnt and that is noble. I really dont stress over my taxes the way that many do so the finances arent an issue for me. My belief that human life is being taken is what fuels my opinion against abortion. If you ask me about war or the death penalty, I will have the same answer,, for the same reason. some cases of abortion are necessary, most are not. some I don't mind, some really upset me. but my point is.. I don't think it is my place to force my beliefs or views on anyone else.. unless it affects me directly. What would be next? force obese people to eat certain foods.. to force them to loose weight? I know.. make an all you can eat buffet into **you can eat all you can get on one 10inch plate! and no more* 
Sorry, just isn't my call to make on abortions. and I wouldn't think it right for anyone to tell me how to run my life either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. I know you are joking here right?
Why do so many assume that abortions are done by poor trashy women??? That is crazy.. MANY types of women do this, married, women, rich women..white, black. Why is everyone assuming if a woman chooses abortion she is just to poor to take care of the kid..what kind of thinking is that.. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. I know you are joking here right?
to a slight degree, I agree with her. I know way too many gals that have a child and go on welfare. Then have 2-3-4 more kids that we have to pay for. using the kids as a way to make a free living. This is the abuse of the system that needs to stop! easy answer.. if you go on welfare..NO more babies. if you do.. welfare gets cut off. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with some women so desperate to have a child that they actually go kill another woman and cut the baby out of them...
Shouldn't adoption be made easier? It cost an arm to abopt. it such a huge profit racket that it is like legally selling babies  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. I know you are joking here right?
to a slight degree, I agree with her. I know way too many gals that have a child and go on welfare. Then have 2-3-4 more kids that we have to pay for. using the kids as a way to make a free living. This is the abuse of the system that needs to stop! easy answer.. if you go on welfare..NO more babies. if you do.. welfare gets cut off. That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard... Do you even know how much a girl gets for a kid on welfare? This idea that women have babies to get money is just...I don't even know what to say about it... Would anyone think differently if I told you I know a very wealthy married woman who choose abortion...I think not. Your stuck in the thought that it is a choice lazy, sluty young girls do for birth control. I am outa here..this thread has turned terribly ugly... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
generally against.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. I know you are joking here right?
to a slight degree, I agree with her. I know way too many gals that have a child and go on welfare. Then have 2-3-4 more kids that we have to pay for. using the kids as a way to make a free living. This is the abuse of the system that needs to stop! easy answer.. if you go on welfare..NO more babies. if you do.. welfare gets cut off. Considering you only get a lifetime of 5 years of welfare now, what you are talking about doesn't really happen anymore. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Moblodite
on
Sat 11/21/09 02:07 PM
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. I know you are joking here right?
That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard... Do you even know how much a girl gets for a kid on welfare? This idea that women have babies to get money is just...I don't even know what to say about it... Would anyone think differently if I told you I know a very wealthy married woman who choose abortion...I think not. Your stuck in the thought that it is a choice lazy, sluty young girls do for birth control. I am outa here..this thread has turned terribly ugly... Really??LMAO Do you realize how many are living this way!! fact is stranger than fiction. they do this, get free madicare, food stamps, food banks, handouts.. wherever they can get a free form of support. there are thousands upon thousands living this way. it is amazing what many people will do to keep from having to work for an honest living. I did not say they were getting rich doing so, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. I know you are joking here right?
Why do so many assume that abortions are done by poor trashy women??? That is crazy.. MANY types of women do this, married, women, rich women..white, black. Why is everyone assuming if a woman chooses abortion she is just to poor to take care of the kid..what kind of thinking is that..
I agree. Why is it always assumed that women who have abortions are poor? Why do people assume women really have babies to get more welfare? What idiot bigot thought that idea up? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Moblodite
on
Sat 11/21/09 02:06 PM
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. I know you are joking here right?
to a slight degree, I agree with her. I know way too many gals that have a child and go on welfare. Then have 2-3-4 more kids that we have to pay for. using the kids as a way to make a free living. This is the abuse of the system that needs to stop! easy answer.. if you go on welfare..NO more babies. if you do.. welfare gets cut off. Considering you only get a lifetime of 5 years of welfare now, what you are talking about doesn't really happen anymore. dream on! always way around the system. But.. back to the topic...Abortions Still isn't my right to tell a woman how to live her life. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Moblodite
on
Sat 11/21/09 02:08 PM
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. I know you are joking here right?
Why do so many assume that abortions are done by poor trashy women??? That is crazy.. MANY types of women do this, married, women, rich women..white, black. Why is everyone assuming if a woman chooses abortion she is just to poor to take care of the kid..what kind of thinking is that..
I agree. Why is it always assumed that women who have abortions are poor? Why do people assume women really have babies to get more welfare? What idiot bigot thought that idea up? "What idiot bigot thought that idea up" Thats real sweet. because anyone might see reality differently than you...resort to name calling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. I know you are joking here right?
Actually, I am at fault for going off topic in that I was looking at abortion as a financial issue when the question was ~Abortion-for or Against~ Not joking here at all and I stand by what I wrote until it's proven to me that I am mistaken. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm all over the place on abortion and always have been. If government pays for abortion then we are all killers and it's birth control for the would-be mother. If government or someone doesn't pay for abortion then the taxpayers pay for the child AND mother for at least 18 years. If the woman has an abortion odds are good she will have another=$$ If she has the child and the child isn't adopted out, the child could face a miserable life or be sold for prostitution or passed around to any boyfriends who happen through. {ref: the Shinaya case recently} Gun to my head for answer I would say...no abortion, one child on welfare and then sterilization for the mother. I know you are joking here right?
Actually, I am at fault for going off topic in that I was looking at abortion as a financial issue when the question was ~Abortion-for or Against~ Not joking here at all and I stand by what I wrote until it's proven to me that I am mistaken. There is no way to prove your personal opinion wrong... I just spoke of a wealthy married woman who choose an abortion. You either don't want to change your view or don't believe me. Either way..it is soooo easy to sit back and judge others. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a reminder of Lori's previous warning. This is a sensative subject where everyone has opinions
As a general reminder, we at Mingle2 are very careful with the topic of abortion. It can be a volatile and very emotional issue. In order to keep this thread, let's NOT debate each other; only answer the original question of whether you are for or against, and let's keep our answers directly on topic and not each other. Be well, Lori Lead Moderator for Mingle2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, the long and short of it.
neither for or against. Neutral. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would never willfully allow a mother of my child to get an abortion, yet I hold no reigns on another womans body
|
|
|
|
|
