Topic: I'm just asking for clarification.... | |
---|---|
Edited by
sgtpepper
on
Mon 09/08/08 04:17 PM
|
|
Eljay wrote: There is a certian group of individuals who feel the need to draw EVERY topic into an attack on Christianity. Yes, you could call us pissed off atheists. Remember us? Your kind tried to kill us off years ago when our logic challenged the ground your "very" fairy tales where created upon. Don't mind us though, ignorance is bliss. |
|
|
|
Edited by
OneMoreTimeAround
on
Mon 09/08/08 05:34 PM
|
|
IMHO Fear, The Bible has been translated many times. The Bible was written by men, even if it was thru God's divine intervention, anything that has the element of human in it, there will be an error, you can bet on it. I don't believe the Bible to be stone cold right or hell hot wrong. It is a guide! It comes down to what one believes. If someone truly believes something then for that person it is THEIR truth..but theirs only. I think some people need something to validate their existance. Some people need to belong to something even if it's to follow a mass of people to jump off a cliff. Religion will always be debated because there is NO tangible proof but God accepts those who doubt (doubting Thomas). So - before I comment on this post. Do you believe in God? The one the bible describes, or some different God? Eljay, And before I answer your question, please let me make this clear, whatever you believe I respect and I have no desire to change anything you believe. It is your truth and it works for you. I only ask that you grant me the same respect. Your question concerning do i believe in the God the bible describes or a different God... For me, there is only ONE God. He/She may have many names and there may be many religious that call him/her by some other name then God. Still, for me, there is only ONE God, so your question is moot. The God I believe in, is as the Bible says...God is LOVE. Again, I'll state, if I know LOVE then I know God and vice versa. The God I believe in knows each person's heart, I don't care what religion or non-religion they may follow. He/She loves them. God says he created us in his/her likeness, which TO ME...means I am capable of LOVE..on God's level, no, because it's also stated that we cannot look upon his face because we could not withstand the power of his LOVE. So if I am created in his/her image, I have the ability to love man/woman. I do not care what religion that man or woman is, I do not care what he/she calls her God for God is still LOVE. I can meet a muslim woman/man and I can love them because of who or what they are in their heart, I can love a agnostic because of who or what that person is, I can love an atheist because of what that person is, I can love a pagan because of what that person is...not because of their religious beliefs or lack thereof. My PERSONAL belief is that all religions have some truth in them but no religion has all the truth..and I am talking about religion not GOD. My God is more powerful then any MAN, or any EVIL that might persists in this world. My God is more powerful then me or anything I might think, do or say. I am here to simply LOVE another as God has and does LOVE ME. That is my reason for existance. I will not argue your points or beliefs for they are yours and if you believe them they are YOUR truth and for YOU they are right. That does not mean they are right for all human kind any more then mine are. I will not argue the Bible for anyone can pick and choose passages to make their point and then another can find another passage to, in their mind, disprove. That is why my statement "Religion (not God) will always be debated because there is NO proof...tangible proof that one is truly right and the other is truly wrong. That is about religions. Still, as far as I am concerned there is only ONE GOD, there are alot of religions. So, again, your question to me which God I believe in...is moot because there is only ONE and that God is LOVE! |
|
|
|
IMHO Fear, The Bible has been translated many times. The Bible was written by men, even if it was thru God's divine intervention, anything that has the element of human in it, there will be an error, you can bet on it. I don't believe the Bible to be stone cold right or hell hot wrong. It is a guide! It comes down to what one believes. If someone truly believes something then for that person it is THEIR truth..but theirs only. I think some people need something to validate their existance. Some people need to belong to something even if it's to follow a mass of people to jump off a cliff. Religion will always be debated because there is NO tangible proof but God accepts those who doubt (doubting Thomas). So - before I comment on this post. Do you believe in God? The one the bible describes, or some different God? Me? |
|
|
|
what does his/her belief matter?
|
|
|
|
Eljay wrote: There is a certian group of individuals who feel the need to draw EVERY topic into an attack on Christianity. Yes, you could call us pissed off atheists. Remember us? Your kind tried to kill us off years ago when our logic challenged the ground your "very" fairy tales where created upon. Don't mind us though, ignorance is bliss. I am am totally disappointed in the sgtpepper no wonder you band was lonely......arr arr arr |
|
|
|
Edited by
feralcatlady
on
Mon 09/08/08 05:18 PM
|
|
I am a Christian and proud of it....Try and change that.....hmmmmm good luck....Love me or not your choice.....Love the God the Father, His Son Jesus Christ or not again your choice. But do not under any circumstances tell me what or what not to believe....
This message will self destruct in 30 seconds. |
|
|
|
Naturally - being Agnostic - the question is moot, but I have more respect for your ability to respond with logic, rather than from a presumption of faith - of any dogma, not just christian. I'm more interested in your perception of the flaws that christianity presents on this matter of Justice. And if there seems a more viable approach to a "measuring stick" for retribution. Of course - I also see where it would not be worth your time of even considering the question. Alrighty then, let me paint you a more emotional picture... Picture this: a courtroom with a judge and jury, and defendants like Dahmer and Gacy. After the trial is done and jury has found the defendants guilty and recommends the death penalty, the judge asks the murderers if they have anything to say in their defense. The fall on their faces and praise the judge laviously for his being powerful and wise enough to spare them, they appeal to his vanity in the most flattering ways possible, they rend their breasts before him. Then the judge passes sentence- he acknowledges a jury of their peers has found them guilty of the very laws the judge has on a plague behind him and sentences them to death. But then commutes the sentence because he was moved by their appeal to his grandeur and majesty. But it doesn't stop there. He turns to the jury and says "And ladies and gentleman of the jury, I find YOU guilty of murder in your hearts of one who would worship me. Bailiff, take them into custody immediately and execute them at dawn." The foreman of the guilty stands up and says, "You may be able to do this and get away with it, but this day will live in infamy." The next morning, the jury is lined up, ready to be shot, but is given one last chance to recant. They all say, "I would rather die than live in a land where such kangaroo courts can dispense such injustice with impunity." Then, a la, 'V for Vendetta', the executioner says, "Now you are truly free, and can't be corrupted by fear, ready to seek Justice with a perspective unavailable to the vast majority of people. We'll escort you to a safe place. " The firing squad fires blanks into the air for the benefit of the throngs outside the walls. There. Verily, and all that stuff jazz. -Kerry O. |
|
|
|
Eljay wrote: There is a certian group of individuals who feel the need to draw EVERY topic into an attack on Christianity. Yes, you could call us pissed off atheists. Remember us? Your kind tried to kill us off years ago when our logic challenged the ground your "very" fairy tales where created upon. Don't mind us though, ignorance is bliss. I am am totally disappointed in the sgtpepper no wonder you band was lonely......arr arr arr lol. I dont want to change your beliefs. They are your own. I listen to the other side "christian opinion" every day. I have also done more research on my own spirituality than most christians. again your beliefs are you own but remember that understanding is a conscience effort. As they say... Its always lonely at the top. |
|
|
|
Eljay wrote: There is a certian group of individuals who feel the need to draw EVERY topic into an attack on Christianity. Yes, you could call us pissed off atheists. Remember us? Your kind tried to kill us off years ago when our logic challenged the ground your "very" fairy tales where created upon. Don't mind us though, ignorance is bliss. I am am totally disappointed in the sgtpepper no wonder you band was lonely......arr arr arr lol. I dont want to change your beliefs. They are your own. I listen to the other side "christian opinion" every day. I have also done more research on my own spirituality than most christians. again your beliefs are you own but remember that understanding is a conscience effort. As they say... Its always lonely at the top. I was just messing and of course all can believe as they wish that is a no brainer for me. And no one would ever get a battle from me....Only when you call God, Jesus Christ and the Bible a myth will I get my hackles up. Say you don't believe it and that's ok......but it is not a myth imo |
|
|
|
....Only when you call God, Jesus Christ and the Bible a myth will I get my hackles up. Say you don't believe it and that's ok......but it is not a myth imo
Oh Feral you are such a temptress. Of course it is a myth. It perfectly fits the description of a myth. # a traditional story accepted as history; serves to explain the world view of a people # Myth is derived from the Greek word mythos, which means "word of mouth." A story of a great but unknown age which embodies a belief regarding some fact or phenomenon of experience, and in which often the forces of nature and of the soul are personified; an ancient story of a god, a hero, the origin of a race, etc. ... # An improvable story, almost always including miraculous events, that has no specific reference point or time in history. # an anonymous story designed to explain the mysteries of life, generally with larger than life awe-inspiring characters. # A traditional story passed down through generations that explains why the world is the way it is. Myths are essentially religious, because they ... # An anonymous tale emerging from the traditional beliefs of a culture or social unit. Myths use supernatural explanations for natural phenomena. They may also explain cosmic issues like creation and death. ... So come now, lets see your hackles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think its quantity or the quality as stated. To me biblically it is a comparative and i think that is being over looked. I'm an x christian but have a good grasp on the book so to say. what is happening i believe is the coparison is being made leaving gods nature and attributes out. if we compare ourselves to one another then their for sure is lots of room for those comparisons, but if we compare ourselves to a perfect being that is without sin such as the biblical god claims, the the comparison falls short. If sin is falling short of perfection, then anything we do that is "less" than perfection, is in this beings eyes a - sin. sin meaning less than perfection, less than hitting the very dead center of the bullseye when shooting. if that's understood, then it puts a different spin on those who think that little lies or actions are not bad as compared to murder. because we look at these with our own understanding an faulty comparitive, but if god truly cannot be connected in the least way with sin, [less than anything as perfect as himself,] then he cannot look at it our way, only from his point of view. if we take a different perspective we could say that you or I are perfect but we cannot abide peanuts. big little or any type of peanut's, we cannot be connected to them in anyway, they to us are an abomination, no matter how much everyone else may love them or accept them or say to us they are not bad - will change or stand about them we have an incredible intolreance to them and even the sight of them makes us ill. we must stay disconnected from them at all cost - now i know it's not exactly the same but i'm trying to get across how gods nature is towards being connected with sin.{imperfectness}. so what the book god/jesus is saying is you need some kind of way out of this dellema - jesus is supposedly perfect and died for peoples sins - therefore if you accept him your sins will be covered with his perfection and god will only see you as perfect because when he sees you he sees christ instead - that is what is meant by being in christ as part of HIS body you no longer are you but part of him and that's what god sees. so any sins you have[imperfections] are covered by his sacrifice and acceptance of his atonement, so if you sin afterwaords, and the accuser comes before god and says look at what so and so did, god looks and sees christ and turns back and says case dismissed. now do i care whether you believe this or not - nope but it how it is seen by orthodox christians. There's a saying in engineering: "Perfection is the enemy of 'good enough'". To wit, this 'parable' by Penelope Trunk: "A ceramics teacher announced on opening day that he was dividing the class into two groups. All those on the left side of the studio, he said, would be graded solely on the quantity of the work they produced. All those on the right would be graded solely on their works’ quality. His procedure was simple: On the final day of class he would bring in his bathroom scales and weigh the work of the quantity group; 50 pound of pots rated an A, 40 pounds a B, and so on. Those being graded on quality, however, needed to produce only one pot — albeit a perfect one — to get an A. At grading time, the works with the highest quality were all produced by the group being graded for quantity. It seems that while the quantity group was busily churning out piles of work — and learning from their mistakes — the quality group had sat theorizing about perfection, and in the end had little more to show for their efforts than grandiose theories and a pile of clay." -Kerry O. |
|
|
|
Eljay wrote: There is a certian group of individuals who feel the need to draw EVERY topic into an attack on Christianity. Yes, you could call us pissed off atheists. Remember us? Your kind tried to kill us off years ago when our logic challenged the ground your "very" fairy tales where created upon. Don't mind us though, ignorance is bliss. "In the interest of logic, something that organized religion is very uncomfortable with..." George Carlin |
|
|
|
Okay then. Explain WHY the Muslim (this is a hypothetical) victim in this case would end up being condemned to hell and the murderer would go to heaven based solely on the fact that he "found jesus" in prison or some time before passing. And before you go too far in that direction, we all know how serious the devoutly religious can take the "thou shalt not kill" commandment....Should I start bringing up some talking points in history? Because the Muslim rejected Jesus, and the Murderer accepted him. Well thats a load of crap then, plain and simple. Its exclusionary, divisive, manipulative and nothing I would want to be involved with. But the important thing to keep in mind is that just because you may feel I am bound for hell as a "non-believer" postmortem, doesn't make it automatically so. I on the other hand, am not the type of person that would presume to project my ugly thoughts and feelings of condemnation and eternal purgatory upon you. You asked to explain "Why". Thus - the response. I don't "feel" one way or the other about you. Whereever you may "end-up" has nothing to do with what you might think "I feel", and everything to do with what YOU think. Why are you projecting my response onto yourself. Don't you think I'm capable of responding to your questions without you thinking I've somehow passed judgement on you, or that you are the center of my response? Do you think you are bound for hell? What is purgatory? Well if the Muslim girl chose not to accept the same god that you seem to feel is real on some level then according to you she is bound for hell. If I choose not to accept god in the same manner that you deem necessary for me to find salvation then I can only assume that I am going to hell for this implied "shortcoming". If Joe Smith down the road does not choose to accept Jesus as his savior nor god into his life, then according to you, he is bound for hell also. "...according to you she is bound for hell..." I will mail you my paychecks for the rest of my life if you can find a quote from me stating this anywhere on this entire site. Please don't put words in my mouth. I said "she would not be spending eternity with the Christian God in his heaven." NOT that she is bound for hell. The only one's speaking about hell on this thread are the non-christians. But the killer in this situation is somehow not going to hell because he chose to accept the same god that you choose to put your own faith in and proclaim as being real and factual. In fact, he may find his way into heaven. If the "killer" comes to the realization that he is a sinner (or was...) and realizes that Jesus died for his sins to reconcile him to God and asks God for forgiveness - the bible says he will be in Heaven with Jesus. I don't say anything about where he'll be - I didn't write the book. I don't ask that you think anything about me one way or another on a personal level as that is completely irrelevant to this discussion. I am however asking you to stand behind your words, quit dancing around them and give a direct answer. Thank you. Good - then don't start saying "You think", or "Christians think", and I won't pretend to claim I know how you think. I might ask you what you think, but I don't read minds, so I don't pretend to know how you think. The thing is - I answer all of your questions directly. Always have, always will. Are you joking? Oh, for pete's sake, Eljay, get a spine. Now its well she wont go directly to hell, but she certainly wont spend eternity with some fake godhead up in the clouds wearing white robes. Please...You are embarrassing yourself Well, since I've stated I don't know where she'll go, but I know where she won't be - then you tell me, Where is she going to end up? I'm under the impression that you think you know. Or are you in agreement with me on my perception? And once again, now you are afraid to admit that you said that if the sociopath that actually brutally murdered the Muslim girl simply "finds Jesus" while in prison, he will manage to get into heaven. Now its "I didn't write this book." Hey, I wouldn't stand behind it either. Dont blame you there. I'm not afraid to admit anythig. I don't infuse my interpretation of the text with my perceptions and infer that it is representative of "fact". I will say that I find the text to be believable. So it is for that reason I can state that if he has repented and put his faith in Jesus, he will spend eternity in heaven with Him. Eljay I could not care less what you think about me on any personal level. The same would apply as it relates to my feelings towards you. I am simply asking that you show some backbone. You should have developed one by now if evolution had anything to do with it. Say what you mean and make your point here. If I ask you a direct question, I would greatly appreciate a direct response in return. I'm being very careful to respond to your questions with what the text says, Krimsa - and I do so out of respect for you (whether you believe it or not) because I do not intend to sway your opinion of what you ask one way or the other by infusing my perception on textual interpretation. The extensive exegesis on "where does one end up if blaspheming the holy spirit" would fill a book - so cutting and pasting all of that onto the site would serve no purpose. No matter what anyone posts on "where they think" someone will end up, the only person who can be spoken for is ourselves - for we ultimately stand in judgement of ourselves only. To me - this is what is meant by "giving account for your life". Now if that is a response without a backbone, then what are you asking me to do - embellish my answers and infuse them with opinion? Are you asking me where they are going - or where I "think" they should be going? I responded to the former, because that is what you asked. If what you meant was the latter - than have a backbone, and say what you mean. Purgatory definition-The word "purgatory" has come to refer to a wide range of historical and modern conceptions of postmortem suffering short of everlasting damnation, and is used, in a non-specific sense, to mean any place or condition of suffering or torment, especially one that is temporary. Purgatory is a term out of Catholicism - and is not referenced anywhere in scripture. It is religious dogma - and in my opinion, does not exist. The same would be said for "Limbo". Well so NOW your personal view (I don't believe for one minute any of this is based on actual unadulterated research on your part) is that she wont go to heaven but she will simply linger in between in some respect.Basically you are only saying that now as an attempt to appease the argument that has been generated on this thread and the outpouring of anger against the idea that the murderer of the Muslim girl will be able to spend his eternity alongside god in heaven if he only chooses to "find jesus" while in prison. That leaves his victim, the Muslim woman, according to you lingering in between heaven and hell for all eternity unless she chooses to accept Jesus as her savior. Thats a load of crap and we are back to square one. What if you will now linger in nothingness for all eternity because you have chosen to play ball with Jesus and not become Muslim? The point is, you cant disregard one belief in an invisible man over a belief in another invisible man. The same would apply to the rest of your "answer" except now its simply crumbling and falling apart. You are darn right the scripture is not based in any fact. It is a work written by men and has been utilized over the centuries to control people. You are clearly an example of this in my opinion. At least you admit it now. Its also been been reproduced several times The authorized King James Version is an English translation of the Christian Bible begun in 1604 and first published in 1611 by the Church of England. No one has been Blasphemous in this scenario. The Muslim girl had been a practicing Muslim for her entire life up until the point of her murder. She was never blasphemous of anyone. You seem to be assuming she is blasphemous in some respect simply because she never chose to accept Jesus as her personal savior. If she were to do that, then she would be turning her back on her own faith. Maybe she felt there was no reason to do that. There is a distinct difference between being disrespectful of a premise and simply having your own which you choose to adhere to. I gave you the definition of purgatory because you asked. I was kind of surprised honestly that you required that seeing as you have done such an "extended exegesis" of all of these concepts.Shouldn't you be more familiar with some of these terms as it relates to biblical reference? Cro-Mag was one thing as I know you are not strong in that area of science but "purgatory"? I have ALWAYS been straight forward with you eljay and will continue to be. Besides, purgatory would be just as likely to exist as your concept of hell. Your complete ignorance of the biblical text and Christian concepts are embaressingly obvious. What good is engaging in conversation with you on a subject you know nothing about. Find a reference in the bible on Purgatory, and then I will continue discussing these matters wih you. Do you find it hard to believe that it's ovbious you don't believe in Chrsitianity - how could you if you don't read the text? How can you even formulate an opinion about it, let alone engage in discussions concerning the concepts like you are even entitled to an opinion? What are your qualifications? Because you have a brain? Anser me this question. Why should I bother to respond to you on matters of biblical concepts when you are totally unprepared to even know how to investigate my responses in the text for yourself? Doesn't it matter to you whether or not you are prepared when you enter a discussion? And while you are at it - read my posts before you comment on them, because I have yet to see anything I've written on what you imply I'm saying. |
|
|
|
Eljay wrote: There is a certian group of individuals who feel the need to draw EVERY topic into an attack on Christianity. Yes, you could call us pissed off atheists. Remember us? Your kind tried to kill us off years ago when our logic challenged the ground your "very" fairy tales where created upon. Don't mind us though, ignorance is bliss. As you so elegantly demonstrate. "Better to be thought a fool - than open ones mouth and remove all doubt." |
|
|
|
IMHO Fear, The Bible has been translated many times. The Bible was written by men, even if it was thru God's divine intervention, anything that has the element of human in it, there will be an error, you can bet on it. I don't believe the Bible to be stone cold right or hell hot wrong. It is a guide! It comes down to what one believes. If someone truly believes something then for that person it is THEIR truth..but theirs only. I think some people need something to validate their existance. Some people need to belong to something even if it's to follow a mass of people to jump off a cliff. Religion will always be debated because there is NO tangible proof but God accepts those who doubt (doubting Thomas). So - before I comment on this post. Do you believe in God? The one the bible describes, or some different God? Eljay, And before I answer your question, please let me make this clear, whatever you believe I respect and I have no desire to change anything you believe. It is your truth and it works for you. I only ask that you grant me the same respect. Your question concerning do i believe in the God the bible describes or a different God... For me, there is only ONE God. He/She may have many names and there may be many religious that call him/her by some other name then God. Still, for me, there is only ONE God, so your question is moot. The God I believe in, is as the Bible says...God is LOVE. Again, I'll state, if I know LOVE then I know God and vice versa. The God I believe in knows each person's heart, I don't care what religion or non-religion they may follow. He/She loves them. God says he created us in his/her likeness, which TO ME...means I am capable of LOVE..on God's level, no, because it's also stated that we cannot look upon his face because we could not withstand the power of his LOVE. So if I am created in his/her image, I have the ability to love man/woman. I do not care what religion that man or woman is, I do not care what he/she calls her God for God is still LOVE. I can meet a muslim woman/man and I can love them because of who or what they are in their heart, I can love a agnostic because of who or what that person is, I can love an atheist because of what that person is, I can love a pagan because of what that person is...not because of their religious beliefs or lack thereof. My PERSONAL belief is that all religions have some truth in them but no religion has all the truth..and I am talking about religion not GOD. My God is more powerful then any MAN, or any EVIL that might persists in this world. My God is more powerful then me or anything I might think, do or say. I am here to simply LOVE another as God has and does LOVE ME. That is my reason for existance. I will not argue your points or beliefs for they are yours and if you believe them they are YOUR truth and for YOU they are right. That does not mean they are right for all human kind any more then mine are. I will not argue the Bible for anyone can pick and choose passages to make their point and then another can find another passage to, in their mind, disprove. That is why my statement "Religion (not God) will always be debated because there is NO proof...tangible proof that one is truly right and the other is truly wrong. That is about religions. Still, as far as I am concerned there is only ONE GOD, there are alot of religions. So, again, your question to me which God I believe in...is moot because there is only ONE and that God is LOVE! I just wanted to be sure that I had a sense of what your understanding was before I responded to an earlier post of your. I will refer to this quote within this post. "The God I believe in, is as the Bible says...God is LOVE." followed there after by: "My God is more powerful then any MAN, or any EVIL that might persists in this world." Now, I'm not asking you to believe or interpret any of your beliefs based on my understanding - you seem to have put enough thought into this to be confident in your own. No problems here. But I am curious about this statement from the post I first responded to. The Bible has been translated many times. The Bible was written by men, even if it was thru God's divine intervention, anything that has the element of human in it, there will be an error, you can bet on it. So my question is this - if you believe that God is more powerful than any MAN, how is it possible that MAN change what was divinely inspired? Now I'm not talking about a word here, or a tense there - I'm refering to the idea that man, through his numerous transcriptions throughout the years, could not possibly have changed one intended idea of scripture if God is as you say "more powerful than any man or any evil." By believing this to be true, are you not contradiction your own understanding of God? And since by it's own admission, the scripture claims to be divinely inspired - wouldn't man's changing it be definitive proof that the God of scripture does not exist? |
|
|
|
Naturally - being Agnostic - the question is moot, but I have more respect for your ability to respond with logic, rather than from a presumption of faith - of any dogma, not just christian. I'm more interested in your perception of the flaws that christianity presents on this matter of Justice. And if there seems a more viable approach to a "measuring stick" for retribution. Of course - I also see where it would not be worth your time of even considering the question. Alrighty then, let me paint you a more emotional picture... Picture this: a courtroom with a judge and jury, and defendants like Dahmer and Gacy. After the trial is done and jury has found the defendants guilty and recommends the death penalty, the judge asks the murderers if they have anything to say in their defense. The fall on their faces and praise the judge laviously for his being powerful and wise enough to spare them, they appeal to his vanity in the most flattering ways possible, they rend their breasts before him. Then the judge passes sentence- he acknowledges a jury of their peers has found them guilty of the very laws the judge has on a plague behind him and sentences them to death. But then commutes the sentence because he was moved by their appeal to his grandeur and majesty. But it doesn't stop there. He turns to the jury and says "And ladies and gentleman of the jury, I find YOU guilty of murder in your hearts of one who would worship me. Bailiff, take them into custody immediately and execute them at dawn." The foreman of the guilty stands up and says, "You may be able to do this and get away with it, but this day will live in infamy." The next morning, the jury is lined up, ready to be shot, but is given one last chance to recant. They all say, "I would rather die than live in a land where such kangaroo courts can dispense such injustice with impunity." Then, a la, 'V for Vendetta', the executioner says, "Now you are truly free, and can't be corrupted by fear, ready to seek Justice with a perspective unavailable to the vast majority of people. We'll escort you to a safe place. " The firing squad fires blanks into the air for the benefit of the throngs outside the walls. There. Verily, and all that stuff jazz. -Kerry O. Sounds a little like General Washington during the revolution. Obviously - the missing point of your story is that the Judge is omniscient, and knows the hearts of everyone in the courtroom - so their words are just echo's in the wind. But that is always man's argument. They ask to formulate opinions when not all of the facts are known, and accept the truth thereof. On an emotional level - do I think Dahmer is in Heaven, and his victims in hell? Hardly. But I just don't have enough of the facts to make this claim with any certainty. Everyone one of Dahmers (or insert_a_serial_killer) victims may have cried out to God when the reality of their inpending doom was before them. Besides - it's all hypothetical anyway. From the questions straight through to the answers - no matter how logically and cleverly constructed. And Hypothetical situations are never presented with all of the necessary facts to establish an acceptable truth. |
|
|
|
....Only when you call God, Jesus Christ and the Bible a myth will I get my hackles up. Say you don't believe it and that's ok......but it is not a myth imo
Oh Feral you are such a temptress. Of course it is a myth. It perfectly fits the description of a myth. # a traditional story accepted as history; serves to explain the world view of a people # Myth is derived from the Greek word mythos, which means "word of mouth." A story of a great but unknown age which embodies a belief regarding some fact or phenomenon of experience, and in which often the forces of nature and of the soul are personified; an ancient story of a god, a hero, the origin of a race, etc. ... # An improvable story, almost always including miraculous events, that has no specific reference point or time in history. # an anonymous story designed to explain the mysteries of life, generally with larger than life awe-inspiring characters. # A traditional story passed down through generations that explains why the world is the way it is. Myths are essentially religious, because they ... # An anonymous tale emerging from the traditional beliefs of a culture or social unit. Myths use supernatural explanations for natural phenomena. They may also explain cosmic issues like creation and death. ... So come now, lets see your hackles Naturally, you would have to be refering to the Old Testament here - because non of the other accusations refer to the New Testament. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Krimsa
on
Mon 09/08/08 11:45 PM
|
|
Hmmm. Its apparent someone is having a temper tantrum here and running a muck. Well whenever you feel like sobering up and actually writing in a cohesive manner, let us know. By the way, my post still stands if you feel like responding. I dont think a bunch of crude insults will qualify as rebuttal.
Or you can go ahead and delete your last post to take my response out of context like you did on the Sodom and Gomorrah thread |
|
|
|
haha. busted.!
|
|
|