100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Community > Posts By > dantaylor28
|
|
|
OK ,OBAMA TOOK THAT LADYS MCNUGGETS AND HER MONEY TO FOR BAILOUTS ,NOW THATS A GOOD REASON TO CALL 911...........  
that woman was funny |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
very very interesting 
what on earth can we do to CHANGE things... or to jsut survive??? all we can do is sit back hold on and hope for the best . there is no quick sollution to this problem bush burried us so deep it's going to take alot of digging. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
dantaylor28
on
Thu 03/05/09 12:05 PM
|
|
the cops in that video of katrina didn't look like zombies to me. dan, those cops didn't get in trouble, they did their job. they were given wide berth to do these attrocities. in fact, they had to sign, along with the national guard, a contract that stated that they would shoot a civilian if said civilian refused to relinquish any weapons stored in their home. that aside . the rate of fire of an ak-47 is 600 rounds per min. for the average citizen to own a weapon like that is hanous . most civilians who use there weapons for hunting and target shooting wouldnt even know how to handle a weapon like that and do more damage then good . in the millitary we had to train with these weapons on a regular basis , and requalify with them every year just to handle them . why does our average citizen need a weapon like that ? these WEAPONS are not like you see on rambo they are not that easy to controll . they are designed to kill as many people possible as quickly as possible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your fathers ak-47 . fully automatic? Yes. He was a LEO let me ask you a question was that weapon used for anything other then target shooting . a fully automatic was designed to fire off as many rounds as quickly as possible with the single pull of a trigger . i forget what the rate of fire of an ak is but i will look it up . what is the purpose of anyone other then millitary or police to own a weapon like that ? suppression fire or evil coffee cans, zombies.. lol yeah we all know those coffee cans are taking over |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your fathers ak-47 . fully automatic? Yes. He was a LEO let me ask you a question was that weapon used for anything other then target shooting . a fully automatic was designed to fire off as many rounds as quickly as possible with the single pull of a trigger . i forget what the rate of fire of an ak is but i will look it up . what is the purpose of anyone other then millitary or police to own a weapon like that ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My Darkest Hour----Megadeth Freebird----Skynyrd Cemetary Gates----Pantera cemetary gates awsome song |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For instance, I was surrounded with firearms when I was growing up. My dad had numerous handguns and so called "assault weapons" , meaning simply an AK-47 rifle and such, hunting rifles and shotguns. I knew where they all are. I was expressly prohibited from handling any of the firearms in his absence. There never were any locks on anything. I have never once touched any firearm, because my dad said no. I was taken out for hunting, and was shown how to use arms properly. Now, what is the problem with kids and guns? I say it is not the guns or locks or kids. It is the parents. your fathers ak-47 . fully automatic? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hahaha, Raider, My home is not even like a prison. I had glass block windows put into the basement of a home built in 1903. Guess which looks better and is safer? I replaced wooden doors with windows with steel doors on the back and in the basement and have a nice fiberglass one for the front. Put the best deadbolts in them. I have a dog and security system. I bought a house in a decent area. Yep, that's some prison. There's nothing dangerous or wreckless about that. I consider it to be wreckless to have a gun in the house with a child and the child has friends coming over. never heard of a safe? a responsible gun owner is accountable for the whereabouts of all his weapons at all times. if you leave one out where a little kid can get at it, you need to have your head examined! if it's not on you, it should be in your safe if little hands and feet are about. but still.. the greatest danger children face from firearms is their parents insisting on kerping them ignorantof them. Responsible gun owners teach their children about them and, when they're old enough, how to use them. if you're a 12 yr old by and you've never shot a .22 or a 410, or been taught how or where and why to use a firearm, i'd consider that kind of a shame. i do agree with responsible gun ownership . and i raise my kids to treat everygun like it is loaded . however . my arguement has not been against responsible gun ownership it is against the ownership of assault weapons . armor peircing rounds , and explosives . you average citizen has no use for a assault rifle or landmine . or even a silencer . i am a proud responsible gun owner but the line does have to be drawn somewhere . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you write that Cat? Obama isn't taking away the guns. i didnt write it..but i cant find the link now from where i got it. all media writings are from their persepective anyhow...and i believe he is trying to enforce more gun restrictions... if you listen to him he wants to reinstate the ban on assault weapons and certain types of ammunition . these things are only good for one thing and it isnt self deffense . what part of "shall not be infringed" is hard to understand? besides, you can't get assault weapons without a class 3 FFL or NFA license. those guys aren't the ones going around shooting people. Enforce the laws that are already on the books. The problem is with street criminals who commit the crimes, not the inanimate object in his hands or clumsily shoved into the waistband of his pants. You, a former soldier, are the last person I expected to come out in favor of arms control. what a new Obama-style "assault weapons" ban will outlaw: all semi-auto shotguns, rifles, handguns and all the ammo that feeds them. That describes about 90% of most every gun owner's cabinet. pump action shotguns, bolt action rifles and revolvers are all that's left. meanwhile police departments spend tax-payer money on ar-15's kevelar, barret .50's, armoured vehicles. some say the miilitarizing of police departments is behind the current acute shortage of .223 ammo. Who should be afraid of whom here? there has already been rumblings about import restrictions on surplus ammo and availability of the more common calibers right now is slim at best. personally, I think he won't be happy until all that's left available for public consumption is smooth bore muzzle loaders.. yes i am a former soldier , and i am i own guns . i just feel there are guns civilians shouldnt own . i am not in the service anymore and personaly dont own anything bigger then a hunting rifle . now if they ever try to take my hand guns or rifle away i'm right with you . How you gonna protect youself with handguns and a hunting rifle when they come at you with full body armor and full automatic weapons to take those remaining guns away? more conspiracy theories . give me some evedince the evil left wing government is coming to take us over dan, watch this and tell me it's a theory. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hu0pz3UJnM&feature=related i will watch it t2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —  That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government , laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
How are we going to abolish our government if we don't have nearly the firepower they do? who is planning on abolishing the government . thats conspiracy theory malitia stuff . talk like that will make me want to take up heavier arms to defend the government flawed as it may be . against revolt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama said that he's not going to touch the guns. Even if he ever tried, SCOTUS won't let him. Many times taking a stand against something (perceived or real) spurs more interest. Unfortunately, in doing so there are more guns in the hands of more people. Unfortunately? Are you a foreigner or something? From Europe? Here in America, owning guns is our duty, written into our constitution, in order to protect from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Nogames, It's not my duty. I refuse to have one. it is a duty for soldiers and police not for civillians. that's a scary statement from someone that says he was in the military and took an oath to the constitution. yes i did proudly serve . but i dont look at owning weapons as a duty for civilians , i own weapons because it is my right and i enjoy shooting and hunting . not because i may need to take that weapon up against the enemy . i stopped worrying about that when i left the army . That's cool. I understand where you're coming from. some people see exercising their right, as you do, AS their duty. If someone like winx wants to build her home into a prison to protect herself, that's her right. To think all that's going to protect her 24/7 and think she's safe because she lives in a "nice neighborhood" while equating gun ownership to paranoia is, well, questionable to say the least. Dangerous, wreckless even, if I were to characterize it. Me personally, I'd rather just keep my doors locked and feel secure that I know I can defend my home in the 10-15 minutes it would take for the cops to get here in case someone did something stupid and tried to kick my front door in or jack my car at red light And if I hadn't said so before, Dan, thanks for your service. This American appreciates it. i realy do appriciate that . there are alot of people that would rather spit on veterans then thank the . and thank you for the peacful debate . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you write that Cat? Obama isn't taking away the guns. i didnt write it..but i cant find the link now from where i got it. all media writings are from their persepective anyhow...and i believe he is trying to enforce more gun restrictions... if you listen to him he wants to reinstate the ban on assault weapons and certain types of ammunition . these things are only good for one thing and it isnt self deffense . what part of "shall not be infringed" is hard to understand? besides, you can't get assault weapons without a class 3 FFL or NFA license. those guys aren't the ones going around shooting people. Enforce the laws that are already on the books. The problem is with street criminals who commit the crimes, not the inanimate object in his hands or clumsily shoved into the waistband of his pants. You, a former soldier, are the last person I expected to come out in favor of arms control. what a new Obama-style "assault weapons" ban will outlaw: all semi-auto shotguns, rifles, handguns and all the ammo that feeds them. That describes about 90% of most every gun owner's cabinet. pump action shotguns, bolt action rifles and revolvers are all that's left. meanwhile police departments spend tax-payer money on ar-15's kevelar, barret .50's, armoured vehicles. some say the miilitarizing of police departments is behind the current acute shortage of .223 ammo. Who should be afraid of whom here? there has already been rumblings about import restrictions on surplus ammo and availability of the more common calibers right now is slim at best. personally, I think he won't be happy until all that's left available for public consumption is smooth bore muzzle loaders.. yes i am a former soldier , and i am i own guns . i just feel there are guns civilians shouldnt own . i am not in the service anymore and personaly dont own anything bigger then a hunting rifle . now if they ever try to take my hand guns or rifle away i'm right with you . How you gonna protect youself with handguns and a hunting rifle when they come at you with full body armor and full automatic weapons to take those remaining guns away? more conspiracy theories . give me some evedince the evil left wing government is coming to take us over |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama said that he's not going to touch the guns. Even if he ever tried, SCOTUS won't let him. Many times taking a stand against something (perceived or real) spurs more interest. Unfortunately, in doing so there are more guns in the hands of more people. Unfortunately? Are you a foreigner or something? From Europe? Here in America, owning guns is our duty, written into our constitution, in order to protect from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Nogames, It's not my duty. I refuse to have one. it is a duty for soldiers and police not for civillians. that's a scary statement from someone that says he was in the military and took an oath to the constitution. yes i did proudly serve . but i dont look at owning weapons as a duty for civilians , i own weapons because it is my right and i enjoy shooting and hunting . not because i may need to take that weapon up against the enemy . i stopped worrying about that when i left the army . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you write that Cat? Obama isn't taking away the guns. i didnt write it..but i cant find the link now from where i got it. all media writings are from their persepective anyhow...and i believe he is trying to enforce more gun restrictions... if you listen to him he wants to reinstate the ban on assault weapons and certain types of ammunition . these things are only good for one thing and it isnt self deffense . what part of "shall not be infringed" is hard to understand? besides, you can't get assault weapons without a class 3 FFL or NFA license. those guys aren't the ones going around shooting people. Enforce the laws that are already on the books. The problem is with street criminals who commit the crimes, not the inanimate object in his hands or clumsily shoved into the waistband of his pants. You, a former soldier, are the last person I expected to come out in favor of arms control. what a new Obama-style "assault weapons" ban will outlaw: all semi-auto shotguns, rifles, handguns and all the ammo that feeds them. That describes about 90% of most every gun owner's cabinet. pump action shotguns, bolt action rifles and revolvers are all that's left. meanwhile police departments spend tax-payer money on ar-15's kevelar, barret .50's, armoured vehicles. some say the miilitarizing of police departments is behind the current acute shortage of .223 ammo. Who should be afraid of whom here? there has already been rumblings about import restrictions on surplus ammo and availability of the more common calibers right now is slim at best. personally, I think he won't be happy until all that's left available for public consumption is smooth bore muzzle loaders.. yes i am a former soldier , and i am i own guns . i just feel there are guns civilians shouldnt own . i am not in the service anymore and personaly dont own anything bigger then a hunting rifle . now if they ever try to take my hand guns or rifle away i'm right with you . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama said that he's not going to touch the guns. Even if he ever tried, SCOTUS won't let him. Many times taking a stand against something (perceived or real) spurs more interest. Unfortunately, in doing so there are more guns in the hands of more people. Unfortunately? Are you a foreigner or something? From Europe? Here in America, owning guns is our duty, written into our constitution, in order to protect from all enemies, foreign and domestic. Nogames, It's not my duty. I refuse to have one. it is a duty for soldiers and police not for civillians. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obama said that he's not going to touch the guns. Even if he ever tried, SCOTUS won't let him. Many times taking a stand against something (perceived or real) spurs more interest. Unfortunately, in doing so there are more guns in the hands of more people. Unfortunately? Are you a foreigner or something? From Europe? Here in America, owning guns is our duty, written into our constitution, in order to protect from all enemies, foreign and domestic. it's not our duty . it's our right . there is a difference . you average citizen has no need for anything bigger then a hunting rifle . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you write that Cat? Obama isn't taking away the guns. i didnt write it..but i cant find the link now from where i got it. all media writings are from their persepective anyhow...and i believe he is trying to enforce more gun restrictions... if you listen to him he wants to reinstate the ban on assault weapons and certain types of ammunition . these things are only good for one thing and it isnt self deffense . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Obama administration. They lie with reckless abandon. But Obama flashes his trademark smile and no one cares, especially the media. You won’t hear about the lying on ABC, CBS or NBC. Or read it in The Washington Post or New York Times either. so we should listen to the toataly honest completly moral fox news right ? lol . and i suppose all the repulican presidents weve had have been toataly honest? yeah bush was a saint . lol . get real . they all lie . it's part of being a in politics. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
i HATE the irs
|
|
and their stupid tax bracket system  Know ye not, That The Infernal Revinew Service in the collection branch of The Illuminatti Owned, Federal Reserve Banking System ??? 
Know ye not that your Income Tax is 100% volentary and that only your Wall Street Stock Share Profits are Taxable ???  what angers YOU, is the fraud that all were sucked into, if you know the LAW, it will set you free...
you do know the illuminati is dead right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
FEMA Camps Outed on Fox
|
|
right winx....that man...not the whole organization still don't see why people assume FEMA is doing concentration camps. but if this is true....they need to update their lists because at least 3 sites can be crossed off FEMA did right by St. Louis during the Great Flood of '93. The head of FEMA during Katrina was in way over his head, IMO. thays very true he never should have been appointed |
|
|
|
|
Previous
