I call BS owing to the lack of supporting evidence and the questionable nature of the OP's sources (liveleak and infowars). Furthermore, the fact that I can't find confirmation from a credible source confirms my suspicions.

More CT hysteria.

The whole case has sent a strong political message to Australia. Canberra has no business in telling the Indonesians how to conduct its Justice System, and it is somewhat hypocritical in light of the fact that the Aust. Federal Police provided information to the Indonesian authorities regarding the trafficking ring, which ultimately led to the arrests.

This is just another episode in the 'strained' relations between Australia and Indonesia.

not likely!


He once bragged on DH that he murdered an IDF soldier ( I kid you not). He's just a POS.

Being an Australian, I too find the decision OTT and extreme, however, there are political forces at play here as well, and Australia has no business in telling another nation how to conduct its Justice system.

There was a strong message to Australia throughout all of this play.

Ok, why didn't they just destroy them? The hypothesis you espouse is quite an 'over-reaction'-that was the point and it still is.

I have a dinosaur turd in my fossil collection. They are known as 'coprolites'.

No, physical evidence means just that, it's physical. All demolitions leave evidence of the explosives employed: det cord; RF shielding; explosive residue; radio control mechanisms; the Munroe effect on the steel...all these are usually found in the rubble after a CD. None of this was found after the cleanup of 7WTC.




Anyone with half a brain? What a stupid comment. Show me a CD that resembles the collapse of 7WTC (apart from just 'falling down'). I've examined many such demolitions and I haven't seen ONE that resembles the collapse of 7WTC.



No, that is touted as a demolition sequence but there were no concomitant explosions to match the lights. What you were actually seeing were fire flare-ups as the interior of the building collapsed.



No-one said they heard bombs going off that is a lie. SOME reported they heard the sound of explosions, which is normal in a large scale fire.



That is what I am talking about. Have you changed the subject?



Many of the surrounding buildings evinced damage after the debris fall from the impact. That 'unexplained' crater is a moraine-a natural geological feature underneath the site. See below:

https://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/bitstream/handle/1951/47900/moss-09.pdf;jsessionid=8D8EE0E32D11CB4BF9960EDC4D75C266.suny_101?sequence=1



No, it is just a geological feature common to Manhattan.



A glacier thousands of years ago-no mystery.



So? Debris rained down on the surrounding buildings after the impact.



I'm sure you feel that way.



All of which lack evidence.



Revise the fire fighters' testimony and the reports.



Actually, it does, and here is a link to an anthology of links to 50 academic papers that support the NIST conclusion.

http://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/294k95/compilation_of_scientific_literature_that/




Freefall is a myth, and was only noted for 2.25 seconds, 12 seconds after the initiation of the 7WTC collapse, therefore it doesn't demonstrate a CD.



No. That is not true.



Link?



This is quite a tale.



Link?

It isn't necessary to respond to the rest of this 'Gish Gallop'. If you wish to start a thread on 7WTC I'd be keen to join in, but this is off-topic.


Oops! Sorry Alle!

The building did not implode.



There is no physical evidence to support your claim.



And what about it?



No, scientific sources mostly. What about you? Jones? Ventura? Rense? Onion? presstv? RT? Global research? Beforeitsnews? etc...

AE911T has only 2,200 signatories and most of them aren't architects or engineers like they'd have you believe.

7WTC indeed fell owing to fire and damage. The water supply was cut off owing to the collapse of WTC's 1 & 2, so the firefighters could not address the fires for nearly seven hours. Moreover, they noticed the building becoming unstable owing to the ferocity of the fires and evacuated the area accordingly while they waited for it to collapse.

There is no physical evidence for a controlled demolition of 7WTC.

Yeah, right. They've never heard of wiping hard drives and shredders? This line of reasoning is stupid.

Mylie Cyrus? Kim Kardashian?

Yes, I didn't think he'd last long...not with that agenda.

Although I am too old to be eligible for such a project, I would love the opportunity of venturing into space and be a part of the early terraforming of Mars.

And during any time off, I'd be fossicking on Mars! Woohoo!!!!

And there is the typically vacuous response one can expect from a conspiretard.

And good to see you my friend. I wouldn't say I'm keeping them in line, but it is easy to show the failings in their logic, and the methods they use to interpret the evidence. As you know, my interest lies in debunking the mythology surrounding 9/11, but the truth movement is fading into obscurity owing to the crazy nature of their current batch of stories (nukes, no-planes etc.), so I'm a little bored these days.

No, you just reposted partisan nonsense from anti-Semitic sites. Let's get real here and not fall into the delusion that you actually 'proved' anything.

He posts this garbage on every site he infects.

You can check the content by examining the bibliography. It can be a good source, but one has to exercise care and check the references.

And many will believe it.

Hey MM, I've been good. I've been busy on sites that deal strictly with conspiracy theories and I haven't been around the dating sites for a while. I check in here every now and again.

I hope all is well with you.