100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Community > Posts By > HotRodDeluxe
|
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Thu 02/13/14 08:48 PM
|
|
Let's face it, all political discourse is loaded with rhetoric, and it goes on and on....ad infinitum.
Bring out the BoobToob videos! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I love reading your spin, it's great!
Yeah and has backup too... Vladimir Putin: The US Administration is Lying Shamelessly about Syria Ironically, the link above led me to a video of "Blurred Lines"!
Kudos to you for bothering with it. I knew it would just be more of Putin's crap. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Thu 02/13/14 06:05 PM
|
|
I love reading your spin, it's great!
Yeah and has backup too... Vladimir Putin: The US Administration is Lying Shamelessly about Syria LOL, what? More spin? And a BoobToob video to boot! The rest was just irrelevant. I hope you realise how much Putin has invested in this campaign, and how desperately he needs Assad to remain in office? Somehow, I don't think you do... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
teaching kids to be gay?
|
|
How long did it take Rome to fall? Over a thousand years. The Roman Empire ceased to exist with the Fall of Constantinople in 1453. The Imperial system began with Augustus Caesar in 31 BC, but the empire came into existence under the Roman Republic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Then we handled Japan by ourselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I didnt forget to include Iran and Russia in the list of countries that USA dread.I will post deails when i'm done with my investigations GLOBARESEARCH is a good start for you! SOTT another one! 
You'll have to remover your brain first. That's the only way GR and SOTT will make any sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent piece but what about all the stuff that Russia is shipping to Syria and Iran due to US aggression? Also, Putin has pledged to stand behind Syria and Iran as has China. I love reading your spin, it's great!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
teaching kids to be gay?
|
|
IM complex, I don't fit rigidly in any political box, something in all of them is worthwhile and some things in all of them are not imho I'm the same. Idealogues are the bane of human history. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fine line again.
It is not anti-Semitic to criticise Israel's politics, but many anti-Semites single Israel out and criticise then people repeatedly while ignoring the atrocities committed by the Palestinians. One can easily spot the anti-Semites because they make ridiculous generalisations regarding the Jews, they are often Holocaust deniers and see Jews as manipulators of government, media and finance. They often spend an inordinate amount of time trying to disprove the validity of Jewish ethnicity and spew lies like the myth of the Ashkenazi Jews etc... There is rise in anti-Semitism in modern times, and the likes of Stormfront and other racist hate groups, coupled with the stupidity of conspiracy theorists promulgating their bilge via the medium of the internet are largely responsible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Wake me up when Iran gains a real navy. 
This. Any engagement would be over in minutes with tenders lining up for salvage contracts.
As if there would be anything left to salvage. 
True, it probably wouldn't be worth any investment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Wake me up when Iran gains a real navy.
This. Any engagement would be over in minutes with tenders lining up for salvage contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/UnNews:Illuminati_celebrates_Facebook_success_in_NWO_plan 18 January 2011 WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve and a spokesperson for an all-powerful conglomerate of the Bilderberg Group, the Rothschilds, and the Illuminati, announced that they are all celebrating the amazing success of Facebook. For centuries, this mysterious, clandestine conspiracy of one-worlders has planned for the "New World Order (NWO)," which would bring all nations and all peoples under the control of a single world government, a United States of Earth, secretly controlled by themselves. And the key to their success was the ability to catalog, track and control everyone on Earth--not just take a census, but create a single database categorizing and locating everyone. The Illuminati, who are fronted by the Federal Reserve Board and the World Bank, knew they could not force the freedom-loving peoples of Earth to agree to such an intrusive database. Therefore, they hatched a plan to trick the people to personally and voluntarily sacrifice their freedom and privacy. “The people would never agree to be catalogued, but we got this Zuckerberg kid to trick them into creating the database themselves,” Mr. Bernanke laughed. “The idiots fell right into the trap! Now we have everyone who counts in one Database – their whereabouts, friends, preferences, everything.” When Mr. Zuckerberg was asked about his connection to the Illuminati and New World Order plan, he replied with a laugh, “It was so easy to fool the entire world into starting the NWO database that it makes me laugh! They call me a nerd. What a bunch of total suckers. And I got paid a fortune to do it.” Meanwhile, President Barack Obama had glowing praise for Facebook, “Sure, it’s exactly what we always needed to create the NWO. But the only way it could happen was to fool the people into accepting it.” When asked about his constituents without Internet access, Mr. Obama replied, “I've filed new legislation to close a 'loophole' in the Health Care Affordability Act. We've already enabled the IRS to fine citizens for not having health insurance; it's a small matter to fine them for not having an Internet Service Provider too. 'Universal coverage' is my total focus this year....Or was it jobs?” Great humor, but then half truths... What is truly astounding is the theme of the story is right on, not the way it happened but what has happened and the sheeple just keep eating it up. And you forgot to mention these smart phones and twitter, keeping track of exactly where you are. BTW,what makes you such an expert on everything,especially the NWO? They share Insider-Info with you? I'm not the expert, my talent is finding them when I need to know something. Called research, the essence of my life. And with these internet search engines when you get them away from paid content are fast and easy compared to the manual methods of yesteryear that was so slow and laborious. what is the difference,Truth-wise? It's still the same INFO! Or has the Internet somehow reversed all that? Actually, I would posit that there are more lies and silly notions in circulation because of the internet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am more interested in the pentagon site myself. I am sure we could trade photo bucket dumps all day long or argue about how steel bends before it breaks or any number of petty details. I have never been more certain of any debated topic that 911 was an inside job and was used to usher in the patriot act and destroy our democracy if we ever had one. what about the pentagon site? There are several pictures of the plane debris and there are thousands of eyewitnesses that saw the plane flying over the beltway.. OH those bankrupting wars killing hundreds of thousands of people unfunded and unsupported by the vast majority of americans. Well news flash. the criminals have turned a fine dollar on all this and we americans have paid the price. What type of world could we have built without all this waste and suffering? Another fine point, but what about the supposed confiscated tapes from private sources near the pentagon? what about them? Yes that is the question. Why were they confiscated and where did they go? Of the 85 tapes, many were irrelevant and the rest are available to view in the evidence for the Moussaoui trial. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Me, what am I afraid of.... But it's not for me that I fear, if I were to die today I have no regrets to this point. But what I fear most are the future generations that I would be leaving behind, they don't deserve this. I fear that I haven't done all that I could to correct the errors of my, my fathers and grandfathers eras. We had life grand but each succeeding generation has started to be worse than the one before it and we allowed it to happen. As a result you have but to look in the mirror to see the damage we have done. Personal attack noted. Do you realise that your complaint is as old as western civilisation (cf. Socrates)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Question! No plane hit it, and whatever debris hit it would have hit the outside of the building. Grasping at Straws? Part of the friggen Towers fell on it,THAT's What! 
I'm sorry, were you there? Is there some definitive proof of something falling on it? Do you have photos? actually there are plenty Pictures of the damage of WTC7! Go look for them! I am tired going through the same Crap again and again! I hear you on that one. The same things year in and year out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sun 02/09/14 03:01 PM
|
|
In order to understand the improbability of the government’s explanation of 9/11, it is not necessary to know anything about what force or forces brought down the three World Trade Center buildings, what hit the Pentagon or caused the explosion, the flying skills or lack thereof of the alleged hijackers, whether the airliner crashed in Pennsylvania or was shot down, whether cell phone calls made at the altitudes could be received, or any other debated aspect of the controversy. You only have to know two things. One is that according to the official story, a handful of Arabs, mainly Saudi Arabians, operating independently of any government and competent intelligence service, men without James Bond and V for Vendetta capabilities, outwitted not only the CIA, FBI, and National Security Agency, but all 16 US intelligence agencies, along with all security agencies of America’s NATO allies and Israel’s Mossad. Not only did the entire intelligence forces of the Western world fail, but on the morning of the attack the entire apparatus of the National Security State simultaneously failed. Airport security failed four times in one hour. NORAD failed. Air Traffic Control failed. The US Air Force failed. The National Security Council failed. Dick Cheney failed. Absolutely nothing worked. The world’s only superpower was helpless at the humiliating mercy of a few undistinguished Arabs. It is hard to image a more far-fetched story–except for the second thing you need to know: The humiliating failure of US National Security did not result in immediate demands from the President of the United States, from Congress, from the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and from the media for an investigation of how such improbable total failure could have occurred. No one was held accountable for the greatest failure of national security in world history. Instead, the White House dragged its feet for a year resisting any investigation until the persistent demands from 9/11 families for accountability forced President George W. Bush to appoint a political commission, devoid of any experts, to hold a pretend investigation. http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/09/11/the-11th-anniversary-911-paul-craig-roberts/ I was wondering when you'd post this flawed opinion piece. You always use it, and it is full of nonsense and lies. Got anything like proof? No, 12 years and nothing but internet silliness from 9/11 truth. But then that would only be your opinion with no support in that opinion.
Because it was merely an observation and I've shown it to be false previously on may occasions. Please don't start employing that canard. And why would he need proof, he presented his theorem quite clearly and concisely.
No, he didn't present it as you believe, because it is merely unsupported opinion and rhetoric, THAT is why he needs proof. True, that it does not prove anything iron clad yet you are not able to poke holes in it except with conjecture and rhetoric. Obviously, you are new here and are not privy to my many posts disputing the much revered Roberts. The OP uses this propaganda piece repeatedly. I've done this to death, see 'flogging a dead horse', for illumination. I could disprove Roberts' Gish Gallop, but no-one ever reads the evidence on this in my experience, so I don't bother. If you are genuinely interested I can help you, but if you're not, sorry, I won't waste any more time on it. I have seen nothing in this entire thread that proves either way except for following the money. The ones that have profited from this disaster has been the government and the puppet masters.
And I have seen additional material that still doesn't prove the conspiracy but does cast further doubt. That means little, nothing that 9/11 truth produces proves a conspiracy, and the 'follow the money' canard is pure conjecture and rhetoric. 12 years on and the 9/11 truth movement has nothing but libel, innuendo, lies, fanciful tales and personal attacks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good Question! No plane hit it, and whatever debris hit it would have hit the outside of the building. Grasping at Straws? Part of the friggen Towers fell on it,THAT's What!
I'm sorry, were you there? Is there some definitive proof of something falling on it? Do you have photos? Reversed burden of proof=logical fallacy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sat 02/08/14 10:03 PM
|
|
Sorry, but this is just silliness. 'Sheeple' is just another dumb internet ad hominem directed at those who don't agree with the claimant. It's rather puerile to say the least, and I don't ascribe or subscribe to such games. ----------------------------------- Yeah, like liberals calling anyone who questions the answers CTs. LOL. Who are these 'liberals' exactly? No-one labels those 'who questions' as you put it, 'CT's', that is an absurd generalisation. Conspiracy theorists, along with their ignorant acolytes and sycophants are labelled CT's. See the difference? Stupidity can even be found in supposed intelligence.
You have a talent for the obvious, of course anyone can be stupid, but it would be more common among the unintelligent, if not endemic. That stands to reason, but I do understand exactly where you are going with this veiled ad hominem, just enough baiting to avoid moderation. Only a fool would never question the answers Of course, but a bigger fool would make such a banal assumption that anyone who disagrees with him or her doesn't 'question the answers'. That would be quite a failure in logic (as a process of evaluation). However, at a base level you raise the issue of how one determines causation based upon the evidence presented. One should try to disprove to one's self any posited 'theories' (using the term in a loose sense), before determining an outcome, and indentifying any prejudice and confirmation bias within one's self that may influence this outcome-basically, try to be objective. That is not to say, that any determination is to be set in stone, but the individual should remain open to the assimilation of new evidence that may conflict with the original hypothesis. To put it simply, just common sense. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
