Topic: In Generally Speaking | |
---|---|
Maybe some are getting hung up on the word's connotation instead of the meaning. Maybe ignorant or naive is better for them, but that even sounds more harsh even though the meaning might fit. Sorry I was thinking of how to discribe not seeing something, not the word judge. We may be more LITERAL with the way we read people's words but that certainly does not imply ignorance. |
|
|
|
No I couldn't trust her cooking. She had a lazy eye. I always thought she was looking at something so I would look too. Kinda makes you paranoid and chit....... ![]() Did you try smacking her to see if it straighten out the eye? I can't believe you would disrespect me like that man. I would never strike a lady. Unless she kicked me in the nuts and I would have to shoot off her pinky toe....... ![]() |
|
|
|
i think everyone can date who they want by age or not by age :)but all i was trying to state :) that if a person don't talk to another cause of a age they judged that person by their age and not by who they are right?????????? thats a fact right???????????? and then why i said its narrow minded cause it is more narrow cause less age groups right???? and cause of the judge before you know a person is narrow too :) so simple it LOGIC lolll and a fact :) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() No no no no no... not right! There is no fact in this it is opinion based only. Having a preference does not make someone narrow or judgmental it's about freedom to make our own choices and living with those choices. I didn't see anywhere in this thread where someone said anything like "ALL YOUNG PEOPLE ARE IMMATURE" (that is a judgement). I am free to choose not to wear a yellow jacket because I do not like yellow. I'm not judging yellow, it's just my personal preference, ya dig? ![]() Maybe some are getting hung up on the word's connotation instead of the meaning. Maybe ignorant or naive is better for them, but that even sounds more harsh even though the meaning might fit. Sorry I was thinking of how to discribe not seeing something, not the word judge. Why ignorant and naive? |
|
|
|
Why ignorant and naive? Why? Because we don't agree with them so we MUST not be understanding! I'm done here, it was fun, we'll have to do it again sometime LOL |
|
|
|
That's what I said in context. you should really stay clear of twisting things and causing dissension. Cause I said nothing degrading here at all. I didn't twist anything. Those were your words. I didn't change them. |
|
|
|
Why ignorant and naive? Why? Because we don't agree with them so we MUST not be understanding! I'm done here, it was fun, we'll have to do it again sometime LOL ![]() Good to see you again, Myka! |
|
|
|
i think everyone can date who they want by age or not by age :)but all i was trying to state :) that if a person don't talk to another cause of a age they judged that person by their age and not by who they are right?????????? thats a fact right???????????? and then why i said its narrow minded cause it is more narrow cause less age groups right???? and cause of the judge before you know a person is narrow too :) so simple it LOGIC lolll and a fact :) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() No no no no no... not right! There is no fact in this it is opinion based only. Having a preference does not make someone narrow or judgmental it's about freedom to make our own choices and living with those choices. I didn't see anywhere in this thread where someone said anything like "ALL YOUNG PEOPLE ARE IMMATURE" (that is a judgement). I am free to choose not to wear a yellow jacket because I do not like yellow. I'm not judging yellow, it's just my personal preference, ya dig? ![]() I very much understand what all the words you have written mean. It would help if you used them in the correct syntax and employed some sort of punctuation. Now, back to the point. It was my observation based on your previous posts that you assumed anyone who does not wish to date outside of their age group was being judgmental. The above statement suggests a very specific occurrence that is obviously not the case all of the time. ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Why ignorant and naive? I was hunting for a word, but those aren't it. Just because someone does not agree with you, it does not make them ignorant or naive. But, thanks for letting us know what you actually think! |
|
|
|
Edited by
singmesweet
on
Thu 05/10/12 08:22 PM
|
|
MG, you used those words to describe people who were not agreeing with you. No one is putting words into your mouth.
|
|
|
|
Kindly respect the OP's thread Topic.
Everyone's opinion is equally valuable. Please direct those opinions at the Topic and not other members. soufie Site Moderator |
|
|
|
Well all I got to say is I pray that the Dali Llama ( Big hitter the Llama ) grants you with goats that are full of milk. Just squeeze squeeze squeeze........
![]() |
|
|
|
Kindly respect the OP's thread Topic. Everyone's opinion is equally valuable. Please direct those opinions at the Topic and not other members. soufie Site Moderator Sorry, I'm out of here. |
|
|
|
Kindly respect the OP's thread Topic. Everyone's opinion is equally valuable. Please direct those opinions at the Topic and not other members. soufie Site Moderator Sorry, I'm out of here. |
|
|
|
I was just having a little fun.......
![]() |
|
|
|
I was just having a little fun....... ![]() |
|
|
|
Hey, the mods have said let it drop so we should respect that.
|
|
|
|
In Generally Speaking
Generally speaking, or in general. "In Generally Speaking" is mixing two idioms that mean the same thing. I guess for effect? Or for affect? or for a fact. This is f...... |
|
|
|
Yeah we probably should but I'm still awake.......
![]() |
|
|
|
In Generally Speaking Generally speaking, or in general. "In Generally Speaking" is mixing two idioms that mean the same thing. I guess for effect? Or for affect? or for a fact. This is f...... You wouldn't recognize two idioms if you ran into them on a street corner. What the hell is an idiom?......... ![]() |
|
|
|
You all have fun now.
![]() |
|
|