1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 11 12 17 18
Topic: the christian god ... loving or evil ??
no photo
Fri 06/24/11 01:28 PM





You are right though, we cannot be more pure, good or know more than God. Having said that however, it's that very fact that automatically rules out a God doing the things the Bible says He does. Reason being, if he was that pure, holy, knowing and good, moreso than we are, then He would not stoop to our levels being above them. If He did, than He's no better than we are, which would mean He's not as divine as is said. You can't have it both ways, He's either all holy, acting the part, or He's not.


You still don't get it. If God is perfect, then how can you as an imperfect being question his actions? Perhaps the way God has handled things is the best way? Your limited human mind does not know. There could be incredibly important facts that are beyond your understanding made God's treatment of the Midianites the most good actions possible. You can't second guess God. Once you have accepted (even for arguments sake) that God exists, you cannot LOGICALLY OR RATIONALLY question his actions.


And you still don't get, that a just God is not gonna say: "Obey me or die". That does not a divine being make, I don't care how you try to twist it. It flat does not work.


You have it all twisted. God says "Your going to die, let me save you."


Oh give me a damn break. He's the one that goes through with allowing the torture in the first place. He could save everyone if he wanted to.


God would never want that. We are all guilty and destined to hell. Jesus has offered to take our punishment, but only if you are willing to do His work in this world. Why do so many non-Christians have a hard time imagining Heaven without unrepentant child molesters, murderers, rapists, thieves, etc?

no photo
Fri 06/24/11 01:35 PM
Edited by Spidercmb on Fri 06/24/11 01:36 PM

Karl Jaspers. General Psychopathology. Can't copy paste as i'm reading out of a real book believe it or not but here's the exact text.

"A delusion is a belief that is either mistaken or not substantiated and is held with very strong feelings or opinions and expressed forcefully."

so even evidence to the contrary, incontrovertable or otherwise, is not required to be deluded. obviously a believe in god cannot be a mistake since god cannot be known but it sure is not substantiated. but my guess is that now we'll be getting into the definition of the word "substantiated" huh?


That's not how it works.

1) If that is your source, it's 14 years old. Definitions for those sorts of things change.
2) Mine is a newer source and doesn't come from one German guy, but from the APA.
3) I can't find that quote anywhere on line, except in a couple comments and as the first line of the Wikipedia article, so I can't verify your source. You can Google my definition and read the page of the book in Google Books.

By any debate rules, your definition would be thrown out. I reject your definition and will continue to use the correct one.

jrbogie's photo
Fri 06/24/11 01:37 PM
Edited by jrbogie on Fri 06/24/11 01:38 PM
great then we reject each other's definition. btw, here you don't tell me how things work. you don't make rules.

no photo
Fri 06/24/11 01:38 PM

great then we reject each other's definition. btw, here you don't tell me how things work.


Don't worry, when I do I'll use small words.

jrbogie's photo
Fri 06/24/11 01:42 PM


great then we reject each other's definition. btw, here you don't tell me how things work.


Don't worry, when I do I'll use small words.


in what kind of debate do you find such a tactic effective? do you derive your moral and ethical values that allow you to use such personal attacks in a simple forum from your religion???

no photo
Fri 06/24/11 01:46 PM



great then we reject each other's definition. btw, here you don't tell me how things work.


Don't worry, when I do I'll use small words.


in what kind of debate do you find such a tactic effective? do you derive your moral and ethical values that allow you to use such personal attacks in a simple forum from your religion???


You are accusing BILLIONS of people of being delusional, but you get diaper rash when somebody says "I'll use small words"? Some ego you have and thin skin to match.

no photo
Fri 06/24/11 02:43 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Fri 06/24/11 02:44 PM




great then we reject each other's definition. btw, here you don't tell me how things work.


Don't worry, when I do I'll use small words.


in what kind of debate do you find such a tactic effective? do you derive your moral and ethical values that allow you to use such personal attacks in a simple forum from your religion???


You are accusing BILLIONS of people of being delusional, but you get diaper rash when somebody says "I'll use small words"? Some ego you have and thin skin to match.


Spidercmb, personal attacks are not allowed. Stick to the actual subject.

I wouldn't call people "delusional" but I would call them gullible.

Set aside your emotional attachment to your beliefs and try to think rationally just for a few minutes. Can you separate your fear and your emotion from your rational mind?

Can you look at information and facts in a clear and unbiased state of mind?

Do you want the real truth, or is it that you can't handle it?

This is as question every truth seeker has to ask them self eventually.




Kleisto's photo
Fri 06/24/11 03:30 PM






You are right though, we cannot be more pure, good or know more than God. Having said that however, it's that very fact that automatically rules out a God doing the things the Bible says He does. Reason being, if he was that pure, holy, knowing and good, moreso than we are, then He would not stoop to our levels being above them. If He did, than He's no better than we are, which would mean He's not as divine as is said. You can't have it both ways, He's either all holy, acting the part, or He's not.


You still don't get it. If God is perfect, then how can you as an imperfect being question his actions? Perhaps the way God has handled things is the best way? Your limited human mind does not know. There could be incredibly important facts that are beyond your understanding made God's treatment of the Midianites the most good actions possible. You can't second guess God. Once you have accepted (even for arguments sake) that God exists, you cannot LOGICALLY OR RATIONALLY question his actions.


And you still don't get, that a just God is not gonna say: "Obey me or die". That does not a divine being make, I don't care how you try to twist it. It flat does not work.


You have it all twisted. God says "Your going to die, let me save you."


Oh give me a damn break. He's the one that goes through with allowing the torture in the first place. He could save everyone if he wanted to.


God would never want that. We are all guilty and destined to hell. Jesus has offered to take our punishment, but only if you are willing to do His work in this world. Why do so many non-Christians have a hard time imagining Heaven without unrepentant child molesters, murderers, rapists, thieves, etc?


Number one, speak for your damn self. If you wanna believe this about yourself fine, but I don't. I am not guilty of what someone did 2,000 years ago or better, I reject that idea wholeheartedly. This is EXACTLY why people have such problems with you types, because you push your ideas of God onto those like me and Jeannie. You wanna talk persecution? That's a damn good example of it.

Second, how do you know, all things good and bad isn't a part of doing God's work? How do you know, that the entire experience isn't how God intended it, and that we all have a purpose and role in it even those that do bad? If you say I can't know God's ways, what makes you so sure you can? That statement works both ways you know.

Kleisto's photo
Fri 06/24/11 03:30 PM
Edited by Kleisto on Fri 06/24/11 03:31 PM
Double post.

no photo
Fri 06/24/11 04:30 PM
God would never want that. We are all guilty and destined to hell. Jesus has offered to take our punishment, but only if you are willing to do His work in this world. Why do so many non-Christians have a hard time imagining Heaven without unrepentant child molesters, murderers, rapists, thieves, etc?


You may believe you are "destined" to hell and you may believe you are guilty but as Kleisto said, Speak only for yourself.

Jesus has not approached me to do any work for him in exchange to take away "my punishment" for anything. Even if he did, I would tell him, no thanks. I will be responsible for my own crimes thank you anyway.

Now if you want me to believe any of that, feel free to present indisputable proof that Jesus ever existed and that Abraham ever existed.

Otherwise, your statements are not credible.




Abracadabra's photo
Fri 06/24/11 04:51 PM
Edited by Abracadabra on Fri 06/24/11 05:35 PM
SpiderCMB wrote:

We are all guilty and destined to hell. Jesus has offered to take our punishment.


You may believe that you are guilty and destined to hell, but I've never done anything in my entire life that would justify such a condemnation.

I'm truly sorry to hear that you feel that you have. That's all I know to tell you. flowerforyou

no photo
Fri 06/24/11 05:21 PM

God would never want that. We are all guilty and destined to hell. Jesus has offered to take our punishment, but only if you are willing to do His work in this world. Why do so many non-Christians have a hard time imagining Heaven without unrepentant child molesters, murderers, rapists, thieves, etc?


You may believe you are "destined" to hell and you may believe you are guilty but as Kleisto said, Speak only for yourself.

Jesus has not approached me to do any work for him in exchange to take away "my punishment" for anything. Even if he did, I would tell him, no thanks. I will be responsible for my own crimes thank you anyway.

Now if you want me to believe any of that, feel free to present indisputable proof that Jesus ever existed and that Abraham ever existed.

Otherwise, your statements are not credible.







Wait just a minute here...

Kleisto has and most likely will continue to state what Christians believe.
When I asked for proof of his statements he runs and hides but he can chastise others for doing the exact same thing he does???

Hypocrisy runs rampant in these threads and here you are supporting it.




no photo
Fri 06/24/11 05:30 PM


God would never want that. We are all guilty and destined to hell. Jesus has offered to take our punishment, but only if you are willing to do His work in this world. Why do so many non-Christians have a hard time imagining Heaven without unrepentant child molesters, murderers, rapists, thieves, etc?


You may believe you are "destined" to hell and you may believe you are guilty but as Kleisto said, Speak only for yourself.

Jesus has not approached me to do any work for him in exchange to take away "my punishment" for anything. Even if he did, I would tell him, no thanks. I will be responsible for my own crimes thank you anyway.

Now if you want me to believe any of that, feel free to present indisputable proof that Jesus ever existed and that Abraham ever existed.

Otherwise, your statements are not credible.







Wait just a minute here...

Kleisto has and most likely will continue to state what Christians believe.
When I asked for proof of his statements he runs and hides but he can chastise others for doing the exact same thing he does???

Hypocrisy runs rampant in these threads and here you are supporting it.






I am not Kleisto.

I don't state what others believe, and I don't care what others believe.

What I want is proof about what you claim is true.


no photo
Fri 06/24/11 05:33 PM
Edited by Peter_Pan69 on Fri 06/24/11 05:33 PM



God would never want that. We are all guilty and destined to hell. Jesus has offered to take our punishment, but only if you are willing to do His work in this world. Why do so many non-Christians have a hard time imagining Heaven without unrepentant child molesters, murderers, rapists, thieves, etc?


You may believe you are "destined" to hell and you may believe you are guilty but as Kleisto said, Speak only for yourself.

Jesus has not approached me to do any work for him in exchange to take away "my punishment" for anything. Even if he did, I would tell him, no thanks. I will be responsible for my own crimes thank you anyway.

Now if you want me to believe any of that, feel free to present indisputable proof that Jesus ever existed and that Abraham ever existed.

Otherwise, your statements are not credible.







Wait just a minute here...

Kleisto has and most likely will continue to state what Christians believe.
When I asked for proof of his statements he runs and hides but he can chastise others for doing the exact same thing he does???

Hypocrisy runs rampant in these threads and here you are supporting it.






I am not Kleisto.

I don't state what others believe, and I don't care what others believe.

What I want is proof about what you claim is true.





And what do you think I claimed as true???



no photo
Fri 06/24/11 05:37 PM
By "you" I am speaking of anyone who makes any claims about the Bible being true. Do you?




Kleisto's photo
Fri 06/24/11 05:43 PM


God would never want that. We are all guilty and destined to hell. Jesus has offered to take our punishment, but only if you are willing to do His work in this world. Why do so many non-Christians have a hard time imagining Heaven without unrepentant child molesters, murderers, rapists, thieves, etc?


You may believe you are "destined" to hell and you may believe you are guilty but as Kleisto said, Speak only for yourself.

Jesus has not approached me to do any work for him in exchange to take away "my punishment" for anything. Even if he did, I would tell him, no thanks. I will be responsible for my own crimes thank you anyway.

Now if you want me to believe any of that, feel free to present indisputable proof that Jesus ever existed and that Abraham ever existed.

Otherwise, your statements are not credible.







Wait just a minute here...

Kleisto has and most likely will continue to state what Christians believe.
When I asked for proof of his statements he runs and hides but he can chastise others for doing the exact same thing he does???


I will respond to this, by simply saying one thing. In general to be considered a true Christian, you must believe certain things. If you don't, you are not really a true Christian according to the belief systems. They are absolutes.

no photo
Fri 06/24/11 05:45 PM

Number one, speak for your damn self. If you wanna believe this about yourself fine, but I don't. I am not guilty of what someone did 2,000 years ago or better, I reject that idea wholeheartedly. This is EXACTLY why people have such problems with you types, because you push your ideas of God onto those like me and Jeannie. You wanna talk persecution? That's a damn good example of it.

Second, how do you know, all things good and bad isn't a part of doing God's work? How do you know, that the entire experience isn't how God intended it, and that we all have a purpose and role in it even those that do bad? If you say I can't know God's ways, what makes you so sure you can? That statement works both ways you know.


1) I did speak for myself. I stated my belief about humanity. I didn't say that you believe it. So this is what you call a Strawman Fallacy.

2) Because God isn't evil, that's how I know.

no photo
Fri 06/24/11 05:46 PM

By "you" I am speaking of anyone who makes any claims about the Bible being true. Do you?







Do I what? Make claims about the Bible being true?


I thought you didn't care what others believed...



KerryO's photo
Fri 06/24/11 05:47 PM


BTW, Spiderman-- your logic is faulty. It's a classic expression of Proof by Ignorance and it's self-serving hogwash.


LOL! Thanks man.


No problem. Someone has to keep an eye on you wetware programmer types, lest you think infinite loops could be run faster if only the hardware guys could give you faster cycle times.


-Kerry O.

no photo
Fri 06/24/11 05:47 PM

You may believe you are "destined" to hell and you may believe you are guilty but as Kleisto said, Speak only for yourself.


Did I say you believed that? No, it's my belief. Stop the straw man fallacies, okay? They are conducive to a conversation.


Otherwise, your statements are not credible.


This from a 9/11 truther who thinks Jews are space lizards. ohwell

1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 11 12 17 18