1 2 7 8 9 11 13 14 15 22 23
Topic: why would a God have the "need" to create
DHinkle's photo
Mon 11/24/08 04:47 PM




Whether you choose to believe in the Christian male deity or biological evolution, birth still remains the domain of the female. Asexual division only gave rise to more complicated reproductive capabilities of mammals. The cells that result from the reproductive division of one cell during mitosis or meiosis are appropriately referred to as "daughter cells."

So the fact that female animals and humans give birth is "just Pagan dogma" huh


"Krimsa" asexuality gave rise to the female reproductive organs and "asexual cloning" will make them obsolete

the female reproduction organs could have been use to rise women to power but this era will soon pass..religion evolution and technology has always remained in the way



Whatever that means? huh


as you said women were giving birth and therefore had access to the children the majority of the time and could have rose to power through teachings ...but instead of teaching the children how to be "just" ..religion was teaching the children that women are subservant


an dude stop tryin to act deap if u really look back at all ur responses they make no sense AT ALL

Krimsa's photo
Mon 11/24/08 04:50 PM
an dude stop tryin to act deap if u really look back at all ur responses they make no sense AT ALL


Thats our funch. He starts threads and just argues endlessly but his statements are somewhat spatial, nebulous, convoluted and generally off topic.

You must be new. happy

Daybrightener's photo
Mon 11/24/08 04:50 PM
I'm glad that we got in on things from the start.

Personally I believe that each Christian will get to rule his/her own planet or group of planets or solar systems if they so desire.

Why else make so many millions of systems with so many planets. What better way to populate the systems than with ones that make a life choice to believe and not only to believe but also that love God.

DHinkle's photo
Mon 11/24/08 05:07 PM

an dude stop tryin to act deap if u really look back at all ur responses they make no sense AT ALL


Thats our funch. He starts threads and just argues endlessly but his statements are somewhat spatial, nebulous, convoluted and generally off topic.

You must be new. happy


yup new an i dont like to argue or punctuate lol jus like to b heard an i saw this an hey i no the bible i was raised by it so i thought i would try to answer some questions an then got bombarded with critisism lol but hey its all good

Krimsa's photo
Mon 11/24/08 05:10 PM
Its a religion forum. There is some of that. happy

DHinkle's photo
Mon 11/24/08 05:13 PM
haha i see that like i said im not a scholar or anything but you dont have to believe in something to no one h#ll of a lot about it u no

no photo
Mon 11/24/08 06:25 PM

yea wouldnt u b that doesnt make it a need an the point i was getting at was not the needto eat it was the way in which u did it u can stay home an eat wat is already there or u can go buy something for variety


"DHinkle" I wouldn't have the need to dine in or dine out if God didn't have the need to create people with the need to eat ..so the question once again is why did God have the need to do that or the need to create anything


no photo
Mon 11/24/08 06:33 PM
Edited by funches on Mon 11/24/08 06:41 PM

an dude stop tryin to act deap if u really look back at all ur responses they make no sense AT ALL


"DHinkle" the question is am I'm trying to be deep or are you just being dense

no photo
Mon 11/24/08 06:35 PM
Edited by funches on Mon 11/24/08 06:45 PM

an dude stop tryin to act deap if u really look back at all ur responses they make no sense AT ALL


Thats our funch. He starts threads and just argues endlessly but his statements are somewhat spatial, nebulous, convoluted and generally off topic.

You must be new. happy


"Krimsa" in the other post "DHinkle" expressed that you were bit_hing instead of debating ...so ..er. do you also agree with "DHinkle" on that point also

no photo
Mon 11/24/08 06:40 PM

I'm glad that we got in on things from the start.

Personally I believe that each Christian will get to rule his/her own planet or group of planets or solar systems if they so desire.

Why else make so many millions of systems with so many planets. What better way to populate the systems than with ones that make a life choice to believe and not only to believe but also that love God.


"Daybrightener" yes God created the Solar System so vast so that every Christian can have their very own planet in which they can follow the teachings of God and torture little lifeforms less powerful than themselves

tribo's photo
Mon 11/24/08 06:48 PM
Edited by tribo on Mon 11/24/08 06:50 PM

no photo
Mon 11/24/08 06:57 PM




"Tribo" usually women gives me that compliment ....sort of strange coming from a guy ...

Krimsa's photo
Mon 11/24/08 10:38 PM
"Krimsa" in the other post "DHinkle" expressed that you were bit_hing instead of debating ...so ..er. do you also agree with "DHinkle" on that point also


I guess that would depend on what the definition is of "bit_hing." I wasn't even aware that the English language contained terms with underscores. Im at a loss. huh

no photo
Tue 11/25/08 04:54 AM

"Krimsa" in the other post "DHinkle" expressed that you were bit_hing instead of debating ...so ..er. do you also agree with "DHinkle" on that point also


I guess that would depend on what the definition is of "bit_hing." I wasn't even aware that the English language contained terms with underscores. Im at a loss. huh


"Krimsa" apparently you also wasn't aware that if a word is deemed offensive that either the site or the moderators will automatically change some of the letters in the word which explains why the word is underscored

also the question wasn't about English 101 it was about do you also agree with "DHinkle" and possibly others that you bit_h instead of debate

but anyway logic will dictate that you won't agree but the moral of the story is ...to think twice before you join forces to launch a witch hunt because you may find youself on the stake being burned

Krimsa's photo
Tue 11/25/08 05:04 AM
Edited by Krimsa on Tue 11/25/08 05:07 AM


"Krimsa" in the other post "DHinkle" expressed that you were bit_hing instead of debating ...so ..er. do you also agree with "DHinkle" on that point also


I guess that would depend on what the definition is of "bit_hing." I wasn't even aware that the English language contained terms with underscores. Im at a loss. huh


"Krimsa" apparently you also wasn't aware that if a word is deemed offensive that either the site or the moderators will automatically change some of the letters in the word which explains why the word is underscored

also the question wasn't about English 101 it was about do you also agree with "DHinkle" and possibly others that you bit_h instead of debate

but anyway logic will dictate that you won't agree but the moral of the story is ...to think twice before you join forces to launch a witch hunt because you may find youself on the stake being burned


I dont understand. I think he was actually accusing you of being an idiot but maybe Im wrong. bigsmile

DHinkle said:
an dude stop tryin to act deap if u really look back at all ur responses they make no sense AT ALL

no photo
Tue 11/25/08 05:14 AM

I dont understand. I think he was actually accusing you of being an idiot but maybe Im wrong. bigsmile


"Krimsa" what you don't understand is that on the previous page he accuse you of bit_hing ...so maybe it's you that is the idiot ....

your Wiccan witch hunts always seem to land you in trouble ..as I told you when you first came to this site to think before you post or atleast take the time to read the previous posts

Krimsa's photo
Tue 11/25/08 05:22 AM
Well seeing as I just quoted him...

Krimsa's photo
Tue 11/25/08 05:22 AM
Edited by Krimsa on Tue 11/25/08 05:22 AM
double post

no photo
Tue 11/25/08 05:34 AM

Well seeing as I just quoted him...


"Krimsa" ..yes it's refreshing seeing you hiding behind a guy's quote as you sprew feminism ...

first you were complaining about that you couldn't understand what the guy was typing and now when he disagree with me he's suddenly Einstein

an clear example of what I meant about women not being in power but only being empowered ...


no photo
Tue 11/25/08 05:38 AM
Well personally, I don't see anytyhing wrong with Funches asking questions and wanting to know.flowerforyou

We all have questions here...
wanting to know.

Nothing wrong with sharing what we do know....
and
speculating away at what we don't know.....


But let's not forget ,
that
while we are "at it"....

to crack open "The Book"
too,

and take a look inside...and read.....

cause when we do....

we
just
might
be surprised to find ....

that

the answers we are looking for....
are
right there
inside the pages of that book......

practically
jumping
right off the pages at us.

flowerforyou:heart:flowerforyou

1 2 7 8 9 11 13 14 15 22 23