I think also Rhode Island, but the point is it is legally confined within certain areas in the US, that is not the same as illegal.

Back to the topic..
Here is a make believe scenario:
What do you call it when a man tells a woman to go and bring home money when he barely works part time and makes.. let's say ...
only $300 per month, and this man says he is too old fashioned to help around the house, help with his child? Would this man be a modern man expecting his wife to work, or would this man be nothing more than a traditional pimp? Is this not what a prostitution-pimp arrangement is all about? There could be many variations such as the man never works at all, but the question is, when a healthy man does not provide the basics, will not help around the home/childcare, and yet expects his wife to do all of this while he hangs out or sits around the house...what does this man resemble the most? I have seen this scenario many times, men exploiting a woman's right to work. Is this not being a pimp?

In many cultures women are valued for being housewives and mothers, and it would be up to her if she wanted to squeeze in some part time work for the benefit of her family in mind. But, it would be a man's honor to provide what's needed for his wife and child at home. This seems to have been replaced with something vulgar in modern society, where the women are now valued for bringing home a paycheck..is this not the prostitution of women?

Or here's another " make believe" scenario:
what would you call a woman who chose a man who made $300.00 per month ( $10.00 per day) to be her mate.. the one to support her?

I would call her... stupid

But... but... isn't it the personality and character that counts? *snickers*

I assure you these women are not stupid, they take care of more than their fair share, these women are far more intelligent and competent than most. The men who do this think they are right since women are 'expected to work now days'. It seems that the right for women to work has been turned into something vulgar by misogynist men and there are no laws to protect women from this form of exploitation. Often the man will stay home and 'babysit', while in reality he is only playing video games and ignoring the child.

I would totally be an escort but it usually has unsavory expectations and associations. If I could be an escort without any expectations of intimacy, I would.

300 a month?

That's some serious third world chit goin' on there.


Estelle, again I ask...
Are you equating women who have jobs to whores?

To IamwhoIam-- Why? Do you prefer attention of many to intimacy with one?

No.

Escorts get paid well. It's not about the attention. It's about escorting someone to a high profile event and making them look good, in theory. But in reality, they expect more, as in prostitutes.

Thanks.
That's the clarification I've been waiting for.

It does not matter where it is? Although, I have only seen this in the US.

I've found that no matter what men always expect more. It seems it would be easier to provide that 'more' while being someone who can be up front and say 'ok this much more... will get you this much more'. Any regular woman would have a hard time saying that to her boyfriend/husband due to the expectations, so it is easier for an escort to decline sex.

I've found that no matter what, some women are going to pretend to know what all men are like.

When members insist on making it personal,
the thread gets closed.

soufie
Site Moderator