100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Religion is Child Abuse? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
O' Sitting Thinker... Both! Is the only answer which actually fits your question. If both is not acceptable as an answer to your question than the only answer I can give other than 'both' is... It matters not if I know or believe... I am... Is this not so? AdventureBegins...it's a simply question that ask one to choose from one of two options that represents their existence it's not a question to trick you....just to enlighten you.... My enlightenment comes not from you. In truth. the options given do not even come close to representing my existance (i.e. your question is invalid to the fact of my existance as I am beyond the ability of a binary logic to measure). Knowing or believing mean nothing when reduced to its lowest common denominator. Iam. 
Peace be with you brother but you do not set the parameters by which my life is questioned. (by me) AdventureBegins....I simply offered a challenge with simple rules, it was expected that those that took on the challenge would play by the rules ....but it's clear now that your belief do not permit you to do as such Sure it does, because believing something is the exact same thing as knowing something. Either answer of knowing or believing would end with the same results. It matters none which one of the two one chooses, it's the same exact thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any limit placed upon someone regarding how they perceive their own existence, is equally 'abusive' and with that you just explained why your religious belief is abusive because it forbids you to pick only one of the options .... clear case of limiting thought Asking a binary question limits thought when one asks a full spectrum entity to limit its response to a flat topology. Adventureegins now you are double talking like MsHamony and Cowboy...all you had to do was pick the one option that was presented in the question which most closely represented your existence it's amazing how you guys are incapable of doing such a simple task ...it's as if you have no "Free Will" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any limit placed upon someone regarding how they perceive their own existence, is equally 'abusive' and with that you just explained why your religious belief is abusive because it forbids you to pick only one of the options .... clear case of limiting thought Asking a binary question limits thought when one asks a full spectrum entity to limit its response to a flat topology. Adventureegins now you are double talking like MsHamony and Cowboy...all you had to do was pick the one option that was presented in the question which most closely represented your existence it's amazing how you guys are incapable of doing such a simple task ...it's as if you have no "Free Will" Either answer of knowing or believing would end with the same results. It matters none which one of the two one chooses, it's the same exact thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funches, Why do you argue here to just get under people's skin? You don't come to have a "discussion", you clearly just wish to irritate the one you're "discussing" with. The following two quotes are reasons I'm saying this. The original quote in this post is in response the the following two. Cowboy...need I remind you that you once claim that no children drown in the great flood because God placed them all on Noah's Ark when you make such remarks which you clearly known was untrue...was it to get under people skin? ....or are you simply a pathological liar and are addicted to telling lies so Dr. Cowboy..... please heal thyself first |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funches, Why do you argue here to just get under people's skin? You don't come to have a "discussion", you clearly just wish to irritate the one you're "discussing" with. The following two quotes are reasons I'm saying this. The original quote in this post is in response the the following two. Cowboy...need I remind you that you once claim that no children drown in the great flood because God placed them all on Noah's Ark when you make such remarks which you clearly known was untrue...was it to get under people skin? ....or are you simply a pathological liar and are addicted to telling lies so Dr. Cowboy..... please heal thyself first No I was just not thinking. This what is mentioned was years ago. And must I remind you of what I was recoverying from and still am recoverying from to this day? That mistake has been done fixed again years ago. Why do you hold one mistake over someone's head like it happens everyday? Even after it's been fixed? Again, another example of you just trying to get under people's skin whom you're "discussing" with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funches, Why do you argue here to just get under people's skin? You don't come to have a "discussion", you clearly just wish to irritate the one you're "discussing" with. The following two quotes are reasons I'm saying this. The original quote in this post is in response the the following two. Cowboy...need I remind you that you once claim that no children drown in the great flood because God placed them all on Noah's Ark when you make such remarks which you clearly known was untrue...was it to get under people skin? ....or are you simply a pathological liar and are addicted to telling lies so Dr. Cowboy..... please heal thyself first No I was just not thinking. This what is mentioned was years ago. And must I remind you of what I was recoverying from and still am recoverying from to this day? That mistake has been done fixed again years ago. Why do you hold one mistake over someone's head like it happens everyday? Even after it's been fixed? Again, another example of you just trying to get under people's skin whom you're "discussing" with. At that time in question, again without truly thinking about it, I spoke. At that moment I was thinking everyone was on that ark, did not put into consideration what exactly the scriptures said. How does one expect to get to tomarrow if they are living in yesterday? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have absolutely no fear of being tossed anywhere. I obey God cause I love God, not to save my own rear end. Again, I wish to repeat, I obey out of love, not fear. a clear case of "Battered Wife Syndrome"......or perhaps in your case "Battered Ex-Christian Syndrome" Cowboy...who do you run to when God threatens you...the police?... the Pope? now that I think about it...this would make a pretty cool sci-fi movie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have absolutely no fear of being tossed anywhere. I obey God cause I love God, not to save my own rear end. Again, I wish to repeat, I obey out of love, not fear. a clear case of "Battered Wife Syndrome"......or perhaps in your case "Battered Ex-Christian Syndrome" Cowboy...who do you run to when God threatens you...the police?... the Pope? now that I think about it...this would make a pretty cool sci-fi movie God threatens no one. Enlightenment on possible outcomes is not threatening, it's enlightening of what might happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'abuse' is a highly overused and oversimplified term in the forums, thats why I always almost put it in quotes,,,, MsHarmony...you "always almost"? .....can we say contradiction? you clearly been hanging around "Cowboy 2" way to much but it is somewhat poetic how you always attempt to cover your butt in legalese How is the a contradiction? What she said there is the same as saying "I Usually...". no Cowboy....it means that Msharmony didn't want to take the chance that I could pull up posts in which she didn't place it in quotes in Poker...it would mean that she was bluffing and had a bad hand MsHarmony talk in "legalese parables" and only use laymen contradictory terms such as "always almost" when she is uncertain about something and want to cover her tracks learn your opponent Luke my young jedi padawan....use the Force |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
'abuse' is a highly overused and oversimplified term in the forums, thats why I always almost put it in quotes,,,, MsHarmony...you "always almost"? .....can we say contradiction? you clearly been hanging around "Cowboy 2" way to much but it is somewhat poetic how you always attempt to cover your butt in legalese How is the a contradiction? What she said there is the same as saying "I Usually...". no Cowboy....it means that Msharmony didn't want to take the chance that I could pull up posts in which she didn't place it in quotes in Poker...it would mean that she was bluffing and had a bad hand MsHarmony talk in "legalese parables" and only use laymen contradictory terms such as "always almost" when she is uncertain about something and want to cover her tracks learn your opponent Luke my young jedi padawan....use the Force Learn my opponent? What opponent? Again, there is no "debating" going on at any time in this forum. We are here to share OUR beliefs. How can one debate another over what they believe? They can't, they believe it, bottom line. You act as if someone's trying to prove anything in this forum. I already know you're here to try to disprove something, but that is your own agenda. The rest of us are just here sharing our beliefs and thoughts on the subject at hand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learn my opponent? What opponent? Again, there is no "debating" going on at any time in this forum. Dude it was a joke from Star Wars...why are you so on edge today... you been eating sugar products again? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learn my opponent? What opponent? Again, there is no "debating" going on at any time in this forum. Dude it was a joke from Star Wars...why are you so on edge today... you been eating sugar products again? Not on the edge bro lol. Just when things are posted, they have meaning behind them. If it was a joke, either a lol would have been before the statement or after to signify it a joke. With all the belittling you do in here, it's hard to desipher between it being a joke or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have absolutely no fear of being tossed anywhere. I obey God cause I love God, not to save my own rear end. Again, I wish to repeat, I obey out of love, not fear. a clear case of "Battered Wife Syndrome"......or perhaps in your case "Battered Ex-Christian Syndrome" Cowboy...who do you run to when God threatens you...the police?... the Pope? now that I think about it...this would make a pretty cool sci-fi movie God threatens no one. Enlightenment on possible outcomes is not threatening, it's enlightening of what might happen. right...The Lake of Fire is not a threat...it's a resort and spa....there people received spa treatment that makes them feel so good that they all start wailing and gnashing their teeth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have absolutely no fear of being tossed anywhere. I obey God cause I love God, not to save my own rear end. Again, I wish to repeat, I obey out of love, not fear. a clear case of "Battered Wife Syndrome"......or perhaps in your case "Battered Ex-Christian Syndrome" Cowboy...who do you run to when God threatens you...the police?... the Pope? now that I think about it...this would make a pretty cool sci-fi movie God threatens no one. Enlightenment on possible outcomes is not threatening, it's enlightening of what might happen. right...The Lake of Fire is not a threat...it's a resort and spa....there people received spa treatment that makes them feel so good that they all start wailing and gnashing their teeth It's englithenment of where one might end up. There is no "torture" in the lake of fire. It is know as the second death. The wailing and gnashing of teeth was not in referrence to the lake of fire, please stay on topic. And it doesn't say the gnashing and wailing of THEIR teeth, it is just what could be heard. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learn my opponent? What opponent? Again, there is no "debating" going on at any time in this forum. Dude it was a joke from Star Wars...why are you so on edge today... you been eating sugar products again? Not on the edge bro lol. Just when things are posted, they have meaning behind them. If it was a joke, either a lol would have been before the statement or after to signify it a joke. With all the belittling you do in here, it's hard to desipher between it being a joke or not. is your name "Luke" ...if it is not...then wouldn't that be a clue that it's a joke ....see how you belittle yourself by not paying attention to the obvious you will need much training Cowboy....oops...I meant Luke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learn my opponent? What opponent? Again, there is no "debating" going on at any time in this forum. Dude it was a joke from Star Wars...why are you so on edge today... you been eating sugar products again? Not on the edge bro lol. Just when things are posted, they have meaning behind them. If it was a joke, either a lol would have been before the statement or after to signify it a joke. With all the belittling you do in here, it's hard to desipher between it being a joke or not. is your name "Luke" ...if it is not...then wouldn't that be a clue that it's a joke ....see how you belittle yourself by not paying attention to the obvious you will need much training Cowboy....oops...I meant Luke The mentioning of Luke was part of the belittling. You were simulating the two. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have absolutely no fear of being tossed anywhere. I obey God cause I love God, not to save my own rear end. Again, I wish to repeat, I obey out of love, not fear. a clear case of "Battered Wife Syndrome"......or perhaps in your case "Battered Ex-Christian Syndrome" Cowboy...who do you run to when God threatens you...the police?... the Pope? now that I think about it...this would make a pretty cool sci-fi movie God threatens no one. Enlightenment on possible outcomes is not threatening, it's enlightening of what might happen. right...The Lake of Fire is not a threat...it's a resort and spa....there people received spa treatment that makes them feel so good that they all start wailing and gnashing their teeth It's englithenment of where one might end up. There is no "torture" in the lake of fire. It is know as the second death. The wailing and gnashing of teeth was not in referrence to the lake of fire, please stay on topic. And it doesn't say the gnashing and wailing of THEIR teeth, it is just what could be heard. "Wailing and Gnashing of Teeth" is in reference to the Lake of Fire or what do you think the the firey furnace is an "Easy Bake Oven"?.... it's obvious that you never read the bible and post as if you have and yet so willing to cry that others are belittling you about your knowledge...or the lack of it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Learn my opponent? What opponent? Again, there is no "debating" going on at any time in this forum. Dude it was a joke from Star Wars...why are you so on edge today... you been eating sugar products again? Not on the edge bro lol. Just when things are posted, they have meaning behind them. If it was a joke, either a lol would have been before the statement or after to signify it a joke. With all the belittling you do in here, it's hard to desipher between it being a joke or not. is your name "Luke" ...if it is not...then wouldn't that be a clue that it's a joke ....see how you belittle yourself by not paying attention to the obvious you will need much training Cowboy....oops...I meant Luke The mentioning of Luke was part of the belittling. You were simulating the two. don't you belittle yourself for Jesus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O' Sitting Thinker... Both! Is the only answer which actually fits your question. If both is not acceptable as an answer to your question than the only answer I can give other than 'both' is... It matters not if I know or believe... I am... Is this not so? AdventureBegins...it's a simply question that ask one to choose from one of two options that represents their existence it's not a question to trick you....just to enlighten you.... My enlightenment comes not from you. In truth. the options given do not even come close to representing my existance (i.e. your question is invalid to the fact of my existance as I am beyond the ability of a binary logic to measure). Knowing or believing mean nothing when reduced to its lowest common denominator. Iam.
Peace be with you brother but you do not set the parameters by which my life is questioned. (by me) AdventureBegins....I simply offered a challenge with simple rules, it was expected that those that took on the challenge would play by the rules ....but it's clear now that your belief do not permit you to do as such Sure it does, because believing something is the exact same thing as knowing something. Cowboy...once again you are arguing with yourself...because didn't you follow the rules and picked one option "believe"...so if you can follow the rules...explain why MsHarmony and AdventureBegin are incapable of doing so.... are you more open-minded than them? |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
AdventureBegins
on
Thu 04/19/12 10:36 AM
|
|
O' Sitting Thinker... Both! Is the only answer which actually fits your question. If both is not acceptable as an answer to your question than the only answer I can give other than 'both' is... It matters not if I know or believe... I am... Is this not so? AdventureBegins...it's a simply question that ask one to choose from one of two options that represents their existence it's not a question to trick you....just to enlighten you.... My enlightenment comes not from you. In truth. the options given do not even come close to representing my existance (i.e. your question is invalid to the fact of my existance as I am beyond the ability of a binary logic to measure). Knowing or believing mean nothing when reduced to its lowest common denominator. Iam.
Peace be with you brother but you do not set the parameters by which my life is questioned. (by me) AdventureBegins....I simply offered a challenge with simple rules, it was expected that those that took on the challenge would play by the rules ....but it's clear now that your belief do not permit you to do as such Sure it does, because believing something is the exact same thing as knowing something. Cowboy...once again you are arguing with yourself...because didn't you follow the rules and picked one option "believe"...so if you can follow the rules...explain why MsHarmony and AdventureBegin are incapable of doing so.... are you more open-minded than them? O' Sitting Thinker why must you assume that others have a need to follow your rules? Explain then to Cowboy why you limited the answers. (I need no explanation as the answer is obvious). Indeed perhaps you are not as large as you believe. What makes you as you are... Knowing or believing? If it is knowing then perhaps you should examine your belief. If it is believing perhaps it be necessary for you to seek further knowledge. |
|
|
|
|
