Community > Posts By > Kings_Knight

 
no photo
Sun 08/29/10 08:56 AM
Edited by Kings_Knight on Sun 08/29/10 08:58 AM

Believing Faux News Channel with pickle your brain.

It is very bad for people, they should look away.


Yeah. That Keith Olbermann guy is SO much more knowledgeable and smarter 'n stuff. Then there's that really unbiased Chris Matthews and the 'thrill' he gets up his leg when 'The UN' speaks ... can't ask for more 'objectivity' than that, huh ... ? We should all get our 'news' from DailyKOS and 'Democratic Underground' and then we'd be SO much more 'informed' ... we'd have SO much Kool-Aid® we'd NEVER get thirsty for unbiased reporting ...

Sad, really ... leading the horse to water and waiting 'til it wants to drink is all y' can do sometimes ...

no photo
Sun 08/29/10 08:05 AM
Lesbian sex and hot oil wrestling ... YAY ... !

no photo
Sun 08/29/10 07:53 AM
Me .. ! Me ... ! Pick me first ... !

no photo
Sun 08/29/10 07:24 AM
Edited by Kings_Knight on Sun 08/29/10 07:31 AM
Thanks ... this will definitely be the next dish I prepare ...

Question: In order to keep measurements correct, the 'T' is referring to 'Tablespoon' and the 't' is referring to 'teaspoon', right ... ?

Just want to make sure before I start my prep ...

no photo
Sun 08/29/10 07:14 AM
Just proves y' can lead a horse to water, but y' can't make him think ... some people will believe anything - just look who's sittin' in the White House if y' want proof of that ...

no photo
Sun 08/29/10 07:08 AM
I'm a lesbian too - i'm just trapped in a male body ...

no photo
Sun 08/29/10 06:56 AM
No, but if y' got some s'mores or lots of chocolate stuff, that'd be cool ...

no photo
Sun 08/29/10 06:44 AM
There was a winner ...

no photo
Sun 08/29/10 06:43 AM
Is! Is NOT! Is! Is NOT! IS! Is NOT! ...

Where's the s'mores ... ?

no photo
Sun 08/29/10 06:25 AM
Counting nose hairs is good for when you're bored ...

no photo
Sat 08/28/10 09:51 PM
Edited by Kings_Knight on Sat 08/28/10 09:52 PM
The only valid schema for things 'pyschological' (a pseudoscience of the first degree) is the O-S-R schema ( Organism - Stimulus - Response ). All the rest is subject to change without notice - that's why it's called a 'soft science' - it has no 'hard' rules - you know, like Chemistry or Engineering ...

no photo
Sat 08/28/10 09:34 PM
And how high IS a mouse when it does ... ?

no photo
Sat 08/28/10 09:33 PM
Paterson. Bloomberg. Tag team idiots.

no photo
Sat 08/28/10 09:23 PM



" ... how be you start with all the people who think this is a good idea...you can even post a notice over the gate..."hard work will set you free"... "


How 'bout a little historical context for accuracy with this quote: "Arbeit Macht Frei" was the German phrase placed in the iron gates controlling entry to Auschwitz (Auswiechem) in Poland. It translates to "Work Makes You Free". The context is that of the concentration camps - oder 'Konzentrationslager'.

With that in place, what comparison, exactly, is being made?



Really King?? Ive always taken you for such an intelligent poster...It means taking the "undesirables" Blame a failing economy on them...and herd them into unfit prison (camps) If mankind doesnt learn from history we are doomed to repeat our mistakes.


At the risk of belaboring the obvious, the Nazis didn't put 'welfare recipients' into the gas chambers and the ovens. They put Jews and what they deemed 'üntermenschen' into them ... the flawed historical analogy is, at best, less than tenuous ...

no photo
Sat 08/28/10 09:09 PM

" ... how be you start with all the people who think this is a good idea...you can even post a notice over the gate..."hard work will set you free"... "


How 'bout a little historical context for accuracy with this quote: "Arbeit Macht Frei" was the German phrase placed in the iron gates controlling entry to Auschwitz (Auswiechem) in Poland. It translates to "Work Makes You Free". The context is that of the concentration camps - oder 'Konzentrationslager'.

With that in place, what comparison, exactly, is being made?

no photo
Sat 08/28/10 07:10 PM
One more 'blame-America-first' response ...

Surprised? Why, no ...

no photo
Sat 08/28/10 02:56 PM
Edited by Kings_Knight on Sat 08/28/10 02:56 PM

Trivia: Canadians fought in Nam by volonteering for US military. They were buried as "proud Americans" ...... their families feel different.


WHAT does fighting in 'Nam have to do with an islamist military attack on the World Trade Center ... ? There's no equivalence between the two. This is just a pointless anti-American rant.

no photo
Sat 08/28/10 12:17 PM
And then there's this ...

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/25/cbsnews_investigates/main4296175.shtml

How Independent Are Vaccine Defenders?

Sharyl Attkisson Investigates Vaccine Advocates Taking Funding From The Companies Whose Vaccines They Endorse

By Sharyl Attkisson

They're some of the most trusted voices in the defense of vaccine safety: the American Academy of Pediatrics, Every Child By Two, and pediatrician Dr. Paul Offit.

But CBS News has found these three have something more in common - strong financial ties to the industry whose products they promote and defend.

The vaccine industry gives millions to the Academy of Pediatrics for conferences, grants, medical education classes and even helped build their headquarters. The totals are kept secret, but public documents reveal bits and pieces.

A $342,000 payment from Wyeth, maker of the pneumococcal vaccine - which makes $2 billion a year in sales.


A $433,000 contribution from Merck, the same year the academy endorsed Merck's HPV vaccine - which made $1.5 billion a year in sales.


Another top donor: Sanofi Aventis, maker of 17 vaccines and a new five-in-one combo shot just added to the childhood vaccine schedule last month.



Every Child By Two, a group that promotes early immunization for all children, admits the group takes money from the vaccine industry, too - but wouldn't tell us how much. 



A spokesman told CBS News: "There are simply no conflicts to be unearthed." But guess who's listed as the group's treasurers? Officials from Wyeth and a paid advisor to big pharmaceutical clients. 



Then there's Paul Offit, perhaps the most widely-quoted defender of vaccine safety. 



He's gone so far as to say babies can tolerate "10,000 vaccines at once." 



This is how Offit described himself in a previous interview: "I'm the chief of infectious disease at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and a professor of pediatrics at Penn's medical school," he said.



Offit was not willing to be interviewed on this subject but like others in this CBS News investigation, he has strong industry ties. In fact, he's a vaccine industry insider.



Offit holds in a $1.5 million dollar research chair at Children's Hospital, funded by Merck. He holds the patent on an anti-diarrhea vaccine he developed with Merck, Rotateq, which has prevented thousands of hospitalizations.



And future royalties for the vaccine were just sold for $182 million cash. Dr. Offit's share of vaccine profits? Unknown.

no photo
Sat 08/28/10 11:23 AM
The post cuts off at the right edge and is almost impossible to read in its entirety.

no photo
Sat 08/28/10 11:19 AM
Edited by Kings_Knight on Sat 08/28/10 11:22 AM
'Vaccination' ... sounds so innocuous, doesn't it ... ? I'll never take another vaccination, and I see NO reason why kids need to have 'em either. My grandsons were FORCED by the educational bureaucracy to take a Hepatitis C shot before they were allowed to enroll in their school. How efffing smart is that? Inject a sexually-transmitted disease into a young HEALTHY body to satisfy some effing bureaucrat? Vaccines now - as evidenced by the 'H1N1 / Avian / Bird-Pig-Human Flu' fraud - are a greater threat than the disease. The 'H1N1' 'pandemic' was NEVER a 'pandemic' when applying the WHO's own numbers to the deaths caused by the virus. It was all about profit for the vaccine's manufacturer and the lie told by the chief 'scientist' who testified to the 'lethality' of the 'virus'.

As to the question posed in the OP, the 'legal principles' may remain the same, but that doesn't mean they're justified. It only means the state and its agencies retain a monopoly on the use of force and coercive power.

1 2 12 13 14 16 18 19 20 24 25