100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
Topic:
Been a long time!
|
|
welcome back! Ready for more of our insanity?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miss me??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Merry Olde England
|
|
I hope these jerk offs like being animal food!
Andy, I am appalled by your comment. What did animals do to deserve such mistreatment? I know... Some humans are so nasty even Vultures would get sick eating off of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've been saying the same thing all along. Hussein wants the monopoly on mass murder. Why? PS, MOFO! Not you, SS 
I'm just an unedjamacated, redneck, trailer trash nobody and I fckin' get it. The dumbasses wut supports the idiot-in-chief all claim they is educated and well bred. Some mofos be lyin' dey ***** off up in here. 
It is like I have said of snobs looking down on me and claiming to be from "nobility." My response to them is that, "they come from a long line of inbreeders." Why is it to many of the English and Spanish royal heritage have issues like hemophilia? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The more time you give a woman the more of a chance she will change her mind!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Merry Olde England
|
There is no information supporting the hypothesis that any further restrictions on firearms will make the general public any safer, period. This is just an assumption. Department of Justice and FBI records all show that in the U.S. gun control has nothing to do with gun homicides. So one could retaliate with "Your paranoia about my guns doesn't trump the right of the people to expect reasonable provisions to protect them from violence". Few people have given any attention to things that would help to prevent mass shootings from happening again. Ya know, I so concur with what you are saying but something dawned on the pic you quoted to respond to, I am sure you are asking this question along with me... Who are these "Rest of the American People?" I want to know who these people are so when they need me to save them with MY gun I will not waste the effort. Watching a few more stupid idiots die means more elbow room for the rest of us! I hope these jerk offs like being animal food! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Merry Olde England
|
Nice STRAW MAN Argument! Done with Pictures no less! The 55 MPH speed limit was imposed due to the fuel crisis we were dealing with. NOT SAFETY! Safety was the excuse to get that passed. Now as far as criminals are concerned and HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINES... not to expose your argument as invalid but, Criminals wield FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPONS. WE DON'T. It takes a lot more effort to get 30 down range with a Semi Auto than a fully auto. And Fully Automatics are illegal in most citizens' hands! So having a 30 round magazine just levels the play field a bit considering military weapons have magazines that hold 250 or more rounds and are man portable! Also criminals here use hand grenades (something they don't talk much about in the news. They just say "Explosions were heard.") and they have been seen with RPGs. So wake the hell up. Next, where you live CITY BOY? Wanna talk about bad neighborhoods? I grew up in the WOOD my ni@@a. I grew up in two Neighborhoods that both went from nice to crap the moment HUD started to introduce GHETTO TRASH to our homes! I HAD A CRACK HOUSE TWO HOUSES AWAY FROM ME! One of my neighbors actually got into a fight with five stupid ghetto hoods dealing CRACK. And the funny thing is messing with a Kung Fu MASTER is a bad idea especially when he is begging you to leave him be. I had been threatened by them with a gun until another group of friends of mine threatened them with GUNS and lot more... Here in Los Angeles there are neighborhoods you take your life in your hands walking alone unarmed at night especially if you are white. Lets see, S Central LA, there is Grape Street, Hoover Street, and those are just two lovely areas. E Inglewood, that place is still a dump! Long Beach is still trying to deal with a area near the Wilmington harbor called "the Junk Yard." Then there is a nice section of Wilmington near the industrial area. They just found a body recently stuffed in a trunk in Harbor Gateway! And Venice Beach? At night time is when the real flavor comes out to play! Then there is a area near where Compton and Carson boarder each other near the refineries... WAR ZONE! Hell, Harbor City is right in the middle of a gang war right now. Brown and Black are at it again! So lets talk drug infested neighborhoods... Lets talk Dangerous Neighborhood, my geshniggie... Shoooooo, I can speak Ebonically cause I is trapped between cultures and it is a sin to be white in America! This Ni@@a had to adapt to float in some circles becasue of my obvious lack of melanistic distinction offending in some circles. When it becomes clear I grew up among them then I gain some (if just a tiny bit) of cred! And I am 47. Ya know, I bet you ain't got Anything the people in your "tough" neighborhood want. If you had something to take away I bet they would be on you like wolves. Here is a idea. Put a sign in front of your house you are proud to not own any guns and let's see how long it takes before your house is robbed! I lived in Redding for five years. Their gang problem was a joke! I ran into some of them. They could tell QUICK they may have had me then but when I came back I was bringing some friends of mine from down south. All I had to do was represent properly and they recognized! Bunch of stupid Methed out peckerwoods with attitude were not going to be a match for what I had to bring to the table! So come on, I know and have known REAL gangsters. Some of them were indeed friends of mine. How about you? Sorry but your argument is invalid... At least a man with a 30 round magazine has more deterrent than a man with a six gun! But not everyone buys or owns guns. But at least some NON GUN OWNERS have more respect than some of the people on this site expressing their ANTI GUN sentiments seem to portray here. You say it is just 30 round magazines... You want them all banned, ALL guns. Not just parts. Here is a thought that should terrify you to no end, WHAT IF SOMEONE MAKES A RAY GUN THAT FIRES AS LONG AS IT HAS POWER? Let us say a pair of 9 volt batteries can give this gun 100 shots? And it can be made with parts scrounged from modern electronics? Now what if this knowledge became public domain and the DIY how to instructions to make one was released on the internet? HMMMM, MAGNETIC RAIL GUN! Hmmmmmmmmmm. Lazer? HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM. Tesla Death Ray? (Particle gun) HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM! But then again how about this thought, I can take a 18 wheeler and drive through a crowd of people or construction front loader on a rampage driving through houses. How many hundreds of people would die in an attack like that? How about driving a bulldozer through a crowded festival? Se we now have to ban LARGE AND CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES DUE TO THE POSSIBILITY OF WEAPONIZING THEM? And how would you stop an 18 wheeler on a rampage? This is how I would PREFER to do it... 
Because 18 wheelers are BIG GAME! One shot in its engine and its game over. How would you try to handle it? Road blocks, toss him a telephone and try to talk the driver down? Good for you you never owned a weapon. Clearly you don't go into the wilderness at all! I dare you to say you went hiking in Alaska unarmed. 
I dare you! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you smoke some pot with me I will be your best friend!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEll, actually, England has a very low gun ownership and gun homicide rate, but it has a (classist) culture and infrastructure that isnt desirable to me now Wales, on the other hand,, is much more desirable, less technology, less hustle and bustle, less paranoia, more 'calm',,,just my opinion but, I Agree, americans and guns go together like white and rice,,never gonna see them without it (They wrote it into their constitution,,lol) and its silly to think that disarming all americans is possible or probable or will stop ALL Crime in america, it will just lower GUN HOMICIDE,,obviously,,, having a gun is a personal choice, like renting a home or buying one or even (in some cases), just going homeless instead, I prefer renting, I prefer not to own a gun It doesnt bother me if others choose to own guns, my mom has always had one because she is petite and has no interest in fighting people bigger than her my brother owns a couple, but he trained with Navy Seals, so he knows his way around it AND appreciates the value of human life I only 'fear' guns being available to those who arent trained nor have a respect for life,,,,,those jack and jills who have watched too many movies and feel like they can be heros or who have impulse control or anger issues who are likely to see it as a venting tool,,, Wales has an extremely high rate of stabbings and since knives aren't scary looking you don't hear about it. Ill still take it, more of a fighting chance against a knife than a few bullets,,, You are kidding us, right? I have studied knife fighting with those who took it as a serious art and defense form. Dying by a knife can be a slower death than being shot and actually you can indeed kill someone just as fast with a knife as you can with a gun. Just a good bleeding puncture wound is death unless you can get the bleeding to stop. Personally my two preferred knives to fight with are the Machete or a old school military bayonet with double edges and a blunted point. A stabbing wound with a knife with a blunted point is a bleeder! if I have the wherewithal to do someone with a knife do you think I have any interest in letting them live let alone leave a clean crime scene? More than likely I am going to kill someone and make a total statement about it. at least that is how a lot of criminals think. They do what they do for the power rush, the ego boost, and to them hurting and killing is fun! Bear in mind I am not even talking swords here. I learned to fight with a knife as small as two inches in blade length. A slit throat is a slit throat! A knife as small as an Exacto blade can accomplish that! Holy cow! One thing I know is MOST English think their gun control can end crime when it has only inflamed it. Worst is criminals adapt. Can't get a gun? Easy enough to get a knife! Frankly if I did ever visit England I would have unconventional weapons on me, one of them looks like a funky credit card, and if some of the local flavor decided to strong arm me I would make anyone of them bleed and then I would beat the ever loving crap out of them for drawing steel on me. But your laws would punish me for defending myself and teaching a hooligan a badly needed life lesson! Ya know, the people of England I have respect for. Your nations laws and government? NO RESPECT AT ALL! You reward crime. You are a nation run by criminals! And to think we were once an English penal colony! BTW England, do us a favor, take that crap pie Piers Morgan back! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And people wonder why I keep saying look at Germany in the 1920s and tell me what is coming is going to be good for us! I think the revolution begins when the dollar does collapse and what fills the power void afterwords bothers me more if history plays out like it always does!
It is true, a lot of Americans are lazy idiots! All they want is their comfort in the here and now! Who cares about tomorrow? Who cares about the past? Humans are nothing more than a bunch of Trododon who are too smart and too blind to see their own extinction coming! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a man who invests time and effort to attract a woman is in it for the long haul, because he won't waste time and effort on a woman he won't stay with. if a man is out for the thrill of the chase he is not going to use a lot of time or effort per woman. i guess it could be some sort of ego boost to find woman that are willing to give so much of themselves, but once she gives everything she has to give, the thrill is gone. personally, i have found that sex with any woman is the same, UNLESS emotions are involved. when a man loves a woman, sex becomes intimacy. i guarantee i guarantee that a man who becomes intimate with a woman is not going to hit it and quit it (bulldog double guarantee - patent pending) I would like to add that people (men included) have expectations that if not met also color a man's decision making process. If the sex is all that, well, if you give a mouse a cookie... HE IS GOING TO WANT MORE! If it is not all that he may decide to look for someone more fulfilling to him. Some guys float along on looks and have women throwing themselves at them. He can hit and split as long as his looks carry him! If you keep feeding the fat kid why should he look for work to feed himself? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTW, police have yet to really come across someone really doing bad and really set up to handle them. The tactic the police like to use is really called "immediate and overwhelming subdual." Likewise many PD forces have snipers now. Los Angeles county SWAT has at least one 50BMG sniper rifle in its armory! A 30.06 will shoot through walls. A 50BMG will shoot through buildings!
So what is up with that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://reason.com/blog/2012/06/19/obama-administration-defended-use-of-vio They raided the wrong house! And the gun grabbers wonder why we need semi-autos with more than 10 rounds!  
It's hard to say who's right in that heavily slanted article. One might think from reading that garbage that President Obama personally directed the raid. These wrong-address raids happen from time to time. It's horrible, and I'm sure the agencies involved review their processes in order to prevent that mistake in the future, but they're also dealing with some really slimy people to get the information they use. Hard to imaging they'd get it right every time, that way. I don't have a problem with the DOJ backing up law enforcement organizations, too. I'm sure that family got an apology and even cash to cover damage to their home, however, I doubt the police will quit considering 11-year-old girls as potential threats. Do you think a girl that age couldn't use a weapon, nor feel compelled to use it in defense of her parents? No. Everybody has to be cuffed until they can sort it out. Lastly, you seriously want to use the idea of shooting at police for a reason for bigger magazines? It's those crazy, powerful guns that make the police go to these no-knock raids at all. Actually if I may put a lean on this. First of all what right has a bunch of GOONS have when they raid ANYONE'S house to treat young children the way they did? Adrenalin? the rush? their training? First of all if I was the commander in charge of that operation in the course of dealing with the PR headaches this created I would have the officers who put a gun to a CHILD'S HEAD put on administrative leave and put through a psychological evaluation before allowing him back on duty at all! Likewise the officers who rousted the sleeping girl would be on two weeks disciplinary leave and FORCED to apologize to the girl and her parents PERSONALLY as well as the tactical officer who was in charge of moving in on the house!! HIS TEAM SCREWED UP! I would be VERY public about their punishment. BUT THAT IS HOW I WOULD HANDLE IT! I WOULD DEMAND DECORUM THESE MEN WILL NOT OPERATE BY! You are right, the wrong houses get raided here and there. But first of all they need to handle people differently, especially children. Yes these men have all the right in the world to be nervous as a caged cat surrounded by starving pit bulls. But these men are supposed to be trained professionals, not High School Football stars! If they were busting up terrorists I would be all for them applying liberal doses of the boot! But to put the boot to children? We don't live in Africa! On top of that what right has the law to utilize military assets on Civilians? the local PD is not allowed full autos or high power for law enforcement. What makes the Fed so special? And then to boot the after math... Those girls are SO traumatized now! And for what? A small cadre of men with guns can feel big and important and special? A little boost to the ego and testosterone? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No one can dispute the fact that if guns were really a deterrent the US would have the smallest crime rate in the world. No criminal here knows whether there is a gun or not when they commit their crimes. So they obviously do it without knowing if there is a gun or not. So guns are no deterrent to crime. It appears those who fear guns the most are the ones who have them because they see the false power of having them? I wonder how many other differences other countries, such as those in Europe have from the U.S... To assume that base on this one difference would be a fallacy as Mexico doesn't allow civilians to have guns yet they have a higher homicide rate, and Switzerland requires (or strongly encourages) military issued assault rifles be kept in the closet of every household (this is linked to military service). The Swiss have a much lower homicide rates than most countries. Now that we are on the subject... In the U.S. Clinton banned assault rifles, yet, Columbine occurred smack dab in the middle of this ban. And furthermore gun violence, overall, continued to decline after the ban was lifted... This can't help but make you wonder... As with Washington D.C. who lifted its strict gun laws without a climb in gun violence. Another example would be Chicago, Illinois. They have the strictest gun laws in the country, yet the highest crime rate. Given this information how can one conclude that restricting firearms would have any impact on the U.S. and its crime rates? In fact, gun laws seem to have virtually no impact on crime, which is unfortunate for both sides of the debate. (Although making them illegal does help cartels make a few extra bucks.) So why are we not pursuing mental healthcare as a better alternative method of preventing tragedies? This would do nothing but benefit everyone, would it not? That being said... I understand your frustration with those who believe they are untouchable because they have a firearm. However, people do fear losing them as it does put them at a disadvantage to anyone still wielding the said firearm (which is anyone with the political pull to still own one or career criminal who purchases one on the black market). Power is so subjective in this argument as, in a way, it would give a 90 lb woman more "power" to defend herself against a 250 lb man under certain circumstances. Again, i point out, UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, as nothing is, or ever will be, fool proof. Which leads me to question... You say the government has no fear of guns because they have bigger and more powerful ones. But if guns don't make you more powerful then how did they achieve this status? Oh what a relief your posts are. 
Mental Health is a big issue and for some reason an impossible issue to get them to pay any attention to. I have fought for more mental health screenings and care since the 90s when I became aware of the massive lack in this country. So we are in perfect agreement there and maybe we can get the gun advocates to work for it too and then maybe it will get done. Gun ownership should have extensive mental health checks regularly, it would help with the murder suicides and stuff of that nature. Ok, the issue with the weapon is that holstered with the safety on it is almost no protection unless someone announces they are about to attack you and gives you time to unholster it and unsafety it, right? In order for a gun to be the "protection" the NRA and gun fanatics claim it to be, it would have to be in your hand, with the safety off and finger on the trigger when the threat happens, like in your scenerio with the 90 pound women. I have had the joy of being attacked in domestic violence situations and in stranger situations, a gun would not have made it better for me as it was too fast and too close for the gun to have been effective. My mind and body prevented my death possibly on a few occasions. The gun would have been stolen from me and used probably to commit some terrible crime elsewhere if not on me. Which I am not afraid of death so to me the worst would be someone else being killed by my weapon which I was stupid enough to let get stolen..... 
As to the power of the gun. The folly is the "gun balls", gun craziness..... There are gun owners out there and I hope they are the majority because I am not anti gun, I am anti gun crazy, who have the weapon for an extreme situation that they know will never happen and they pay that weapon no mind other than to keep it safe and make sure no one steals it or no kids get it. They realize it will not help them in the case of a house break in most likely because it is locked away safely for the kids sake. These gun owners take all non gun precautions to make sure they are safe and their families are safe. They live as if they don't even have a gun and don't need for anyone to know they have a gun except the proper authorities. I support these gun owners and that is why I am not anti gun. Because I believe these are the closest to sanity you get with a gun. The government has gone beyond the firepower of a gun, wouldn't you say? Just their intelligence, surveillance, covert possibility, etc... alone make a mere gun useless against it, right? But in the scenario of "my gun is bigger than your gun", they win. So that makes them more powerful. Smarter can out beat a gun every time. Even when faced with our government. Look at the successful attacks on us. It wasn't a gun that did it. Hey, its like I say, if you don't like us owning guns here move to a country that does not allow gun ownership. Quit whining bout how bad guns are when it is bad people with guns is the problem. NOT THE GUNS THEMSELVES! I doubt you last a year in Mexico! And the further south you go the less time I would bet you have. Whine about guns to a criminal some time. All I see here is a verbose justification of how GUNS are bad and not the people carrying them. So with that I will let this hot air pass much like a wet chili fart!!! Allow me to revisit this... like I need permission. First of all the screenings you mention are hollow. And making doctors ask you if you own a gun in the course of your treatment is UNCONSTITUTIONAL! they already have to report gunshot wounds as well as other wounds suspected as a result of criminal activity. A knife in the side of your chest is not a construction accident! now with that said... Criminals don't wait or ask permission for anything. it can be argued they are mentally ill but in all fairness let us not involve this argument with CAREER criminals for a moment, let us focus on the criminally insane. The recent New York fire fighter shooting for instance, how does a convicted murderer get his hands on such massive fire power? CONNECTIONS! HE HAD CONNECTIONS! He had to. Notice how quiet the news has been on this one vs. the Connecticut shooting? Because we can ask hard questions of one issue but when children are involved suddenly people like yourself go ballistic! "Oh how sad two fire fighters died but in Connecticut 20 children (and six adults COUGH COUGH) died and we need more gun control!" So let us look at the shooter. Was he on Prescription meds? As far as I know by what news has been released YES HE HAS! Did he have easy access to the weapons? It appears he murdered his mother to get to the guns! So his access was denied until he went completely over the edge. Then he KILLED TO GET THE TOOLS HE NEEDED. So there could very well be more to this than just meds and mental instability. There is no mention if he was abusing illegal drugs like METH. There is a good chance this loser was messing with BOTH. Mix meds and wonderful things happen! There are a lot of facts we are being denied and a lot of facts you choose to overlook. The Connecticut Shooter was armed with just PISTOLS! He had no long arms! So we ban assault guns when a pistol was the predominate weapon of choice for killings... WHAT THE HELL IS THE LOGIC BEHIND THAT? Now back to mental health issues... Now we got to disarm people with PTSD becasue they MIGHT flip out? How about Bi-Polar people? How about anyone listed with clinical depression? What qualifications are you looking at? What criteria are you using to back this idealism of yours? A person with Schizophrenia is just as dangerous as a person with Delusional Paranoia. But typically people with these conditions should not be wandering around on the streets yet here we are in America and we have these people tossed out like trash wandering around in their own little bubble world and when that world clashes with reality we have tragedies happening all the time. Job security for some industries in this nation... What constitutes a gun crazy? Now as for the idea if someone is going to shoot you in the back and you are carrying a gun on your hip. You don't carry a gun on your hip unless you have backup somewhere near by! That way if some dick with a gun or knife decides to jump you from behind your backup spots them out and does them in theory. This is how police operate by Practice! You watch my back as I watch yours! You seem to act like all Americans think only for themselves and about only themselves! You think far too little of the AVERAGE gun owner! You have to take this to extremes! The idea is we all watch out for each other. What if a concerned citizen had seen the DC Sniper in action and took them out with a shot to the back? Well, here is some more messed up reality cake for you! We punish good Samaritans here in America. Have you forgotten that? If I had witnessed a Police officer getting shot and another about to get shot and I managed to put a bullet in the back of the killer's head before he killed anyone else I would be arrested for murder as they try to figure out it the news is going to really screw with them and wait to see if popular opinion is on my side before trying to crucify me. We are being made to turn against each other and here you are pointing your finger yelling "NAZI SPY" at everyone like that kid from The Locust People (and yes I did cheer when that man went crazy and killed that fat little bastard)! Crazy is people who fear a tool instead of what people can do with it. Crazy is people who think taking no action is helping a bad situation. Crazy is writing more laws and creating more restrictions that will not work and have been proven to NOT work! Crazy is trying to cure a symptom, not the disease! Crazy is when someone has to take everything to an extreme. Crazy is also thinking everyone is irresponsible. I know people who own a lot of guns. It is their passion and hobby. To them their firearms are their art! Are they crazy? I also know people who are professional target shooters. It is their sport. It is what they are good at. Like an exhibition shooter, are they crazy? Again, blame a tool or the wielder? Just becasue I want to own a plasma beam gun capable of boring a hole ten feet deep in solid stone with every shot does not mean I am going to take it out on a rampage some day!I want one in case ET decides to show up and try to pull an Independence Day 4 on us! The fact something like that would scare the military is a good thing becasue then their assault weapons and assault teams suddenly have their complacency taken away! Face a weapon that can cut through steel like it were toilet paper to a fire hose. I sure would not want to. Its bad enough someone can sneak on to a military base and steal a main battle tank! Nobody could out think THAT! And imagine if the guy would have loaded the magazine for that cannon and its machine guns. Gee, a lunatic with a 150mm cannon capable of targeting and shooting down aircraft! That would have been real fun! The only reason he was stopped was the idiot forgot to lock the turret hatch when he got stuck trying to cross a retaining wall and the police were able to shoot him in the driver seat! Had that hatch been locked it would have been a whole different fight. He almost got the tank free. Even a regular Bulldozer would wreak havoc in the wrong hands. Guns are just an easier and accessible way to kill people but the fact is if you want someone dead a shovel will work! So will a car, a screwdriver, electricity, poison... pick your method. It all takes effort! I cannot support your ideals at all becasue of the slippery slope they support! If you give a mouse a cookie it will want a glass of milk. If you give it a glass of milk it will want another... One Civil Right goes what next? Suddenly you realize you were duped when they tell you "Free Speech," Like hell, shut up or go to a FEMA camp for reeducation! And then what? Your Grand Children have that safe life you always wanted as SLAVES to a higher will? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You tear along here and the bag rips completely open instead dumping the entire contents of said bag into your lap! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No one can dispute the fact that if guns were really a deterrent the US would have the smallest crime rate in the world. No criminal here knows whether there is a gun or not when they commit their crimes. So they obviously do it without knowing if there is a gun or not. So guns are no deterrent to crime. It appears those who fear guns the most are the ones who have them because they see the false power of having them? I wonder how many other differences other countries, such as those in Europe have from the U.S... To assume that base on this one difference would be a fallacy as Mexico doesn't allow civilians to have guns yet they have a higher homicide rate, and Switzerland requires (or strongly encourages) military issued assault rifles be kept in the closet of every household (this is linked to military service). The Swiss have a much lower homicide rates than most countries. Now that we are on the subject... In the U.S. Clinton banned assault rifles, yet, Columbine occurred smack dab in the middle of this ban. And furthermore gun violence, overall, continued to decline after the ban was lifted... This can't help but make you wonder... As with Washington D.C. who lifted its strict gun laws without a climb in gun violence. Another example would be Chicago, Illinois. They have the strictest gun laws in the country, yet the highest crime rate. Given this information how can one conclude that restricting firearms would have any impact on the U.S. and its crime rates? In fact, gun laws seem to have virtually no impact on crime, which is unfortunate for both sides of the debate. (Although making them illegal does help cartels make a few extra bucks.) So why are we not pursuing mental healthcare as a better alternative method of preventing tragedies? This would do nothing but benefit everyone, would it not? That being said... I understand your frustration with those who believe they are untouchable because they have a firearm. However, people do fear losing them as it does put them at a disadvantage to anyone still wielding the said firearm (which is anyone with the political pull to still own one or career criminal who purchases one on the black market). Power is so subjective in this argument as, in a way, it would give a 90 lb woman more "power" to defend herself against a 250 lb man under certain circumstances. Again, i point out, UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, as nothing is, or ever will be, fool proof. Which leads me to question... You say the government has no fear of guns because they have bigger and more powerful ones. But if guns don't make you more powerful then how did they achieve this status? Oh what a relief your posts are.
Mental Health is a big issue and for some reason an impossible issue to get them to pay any attention to. I have fought for more mental health screenings and care since the 90s when I became aware of the massive lack in this country. So we are in perfect agreement there and maybe we can get the gun advocates to work for it too and then maybe it will get done. Gun ownership should have extensive mental health checks regularly, it would help with the murder suicides and stuff of that nature. Ok, the issue with the weapon is that holstered with the safety on it is almost no protection unless someone announces they are about to attack you and gives you time to unholster it and unsafety it, right? In order for a gun to be the "protection" the NRA and gun fanatics claim it to be, it would have to be in your hand, with the safety off and finger on the trigger when the threat happens, like in your scenerio with the 90 pound women. I have had the joy of being attacked in domestic violence situations and in stranger situations, a gun would not have made it better for me as it was too fast and too close for the gun to have been effective. My mind and body prevented my death possibly on a few occasions. The gun would have been stolen from me and used probably to commit some terrible crime elsewhere if not on me. Which I am not afraid of death so to me the worst would be someone else being killed by my weapon which I was stupid enough to let get stolen.....
As to the power of the gun. The folly is the "gun balls", gun craziness..... There are gun owners out there and I hope they are the majority because I am not anti gun, I am anti gun crazy, who have the weapon for an extreme situation that they know will never happen and they pay that weapon no mind other than to keep it safe and make sure no one steals it or no kids get it. They realize it will not help them in the case of a house break in most likely because it is locked away safely for the kids sake. These gun owners take all non gun precautions to make sure they are safe and their families are safe. They live as if they don't even have a gun and don't need for anyone to know they have a gun except the proper authorities. I support these gun owners and that is why I am not anti gun. Because I believe these are the closest to sanity you get with a gun. The government has gone beyond the firepower of a gun, wouldn't you say? Just their intelligence, surveillance, covert possibility, etc... alone make a mere gun useless against it, right? But in the scenario of "my gun is bigger than your gun", they win. So that makes them more powerful. Smarter can out beat a gun every time. Even when faced with our government. Look at the successful attacks on us. It wasn't a gun that did it. Hey, its like I say, if you don't like us owning guns here move to a country that does not allow gun ownership. Quit whining bout how bad guns are when it is bad people with guns is the problem. NOT THE GUNS THEMSELVES! I doubt you last a year in Mexico! And the further south you go the less time I would bet you have. Whine about guns to a criminal some time. All I see here is a verbose justification of how GUNS are bad and not the people carrying them. So with that I will let this hot air pass much like a wet chili fart!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep voting the same cocksuckers back to office and none of this will ever change. I keep trying but some other dumbazz keeps voting them back in! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-gun Canadians live in cities where bears don't break into your house! pro-gun Canadians DO live where bears will eat you!
BTW, I am aware of Whales and Scotland likewise being held in the English "trust" (cough wheeze!). Sadly these areas have to fly the English Union Jack! But us silly yanks always put it up upside down! But hey, isn't it nice that you Canadians got America between you and Mexico. Imagine the problems you would have to deal with otherwise... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So how much trouble vs. sup[port would I get in the long run if I caught Piers Morgan on the street, beat his azz SOLIDLY bare knuckle while his body guard had at least six armed men wearing body armor in some cases staring his body guard down. Likewise this would have to be filmed. Then duct tape him to a chair and take him straight to LAX where we purchase a plane ticket right back to England via the quickest path completely out of America and does not offer him a return trip to America. Which laws would be broken? on my end; Conspiracy, I need muscle to make this happen and some money. Plane tickets to England are more than I can afford! Likewise TSA is going to have to get a dose of SHUT THE FUCQ UP while we load him on his flight and duct tape him to his seat. Kidnapping. I don't have legal extradition or ejection papers and he would be grabbed and loaded on to a plane. Premeditated Assault. I want to kick his azz so badly! Assault with a deadly weapon. Even though I am unarmed my goon squad would be. As long as no one has to pull a gun we are able to bend this one good. I am sure there would be hate crime laws invoked as well. BUT what laws has Piers broken? SEDITION! A FOREIGN AGENT LOBBYING OUR GOVERNMENT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES! Not to mention ESPIONAGE CHARGES APPLY TO THIS PRICK! The first amendment has limitations to FOREIGNERS BEING HERE! But what does Congress care. They seem to be too enamored by gun control to actually balance a budget! You might save yourself a lot of trouble if you could convince the CIA that he's a foreign terrorist. They might snatch him and stuff him on a rendition flight to parts unknown for torture and a confession before a show trial in a few years...One can only hope...The CIA has to be good for something! The Brits posted an article in response to the request to have him deported back to Btitain...."WE DON'T WANT HIM BACK!" (google it) Even tho by being here he is avoiding/running from a summons to appear in the phone hacking scandal (for giving false information to investigators and lying under oath) in the "News of the World" case against Murdock and company, they would rather be rid of him than have him back to face charges! 
All the more reason we need to toss him out. They need to wash their own smelly **** out for a change! I am sick of the snail trail he leaves behind himself everywhere he goes! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So how much trouble vs. sup[port would I get in the long run if I caught Piers Morgan on the street, beat his azz SOLIDLY bare knuckle while his body guard had at least six armed men wearing body armor in some cases staring his body guard down. Likewise this would have to be filmed. Then duct tape him to a chair and take him straight to LAX where we purchase a plane ticket right back to England via the quickest path completely out of America and does not offer him a return trip to America.
Which laws would be broken? on my end; Conspiracy, I need muscle to make this happen and some money. Plane tickets to England are more than I can afford! Likewise TSA is going to have to get a dose of SHUT THE FUCQ UP while we load him on his flight and duct tape him to his seat. Kidnapping. I don't have legal extradition or ejection papers and he would be grabbed and loaded on to a plane. Premeditated Assault. I want to kick his azz so badly! Assault with a deadly weapon. Even though I am unarmed my goon squad would be. As long as no one has to pull a gun we are able to bend this one good. I am sure there would be hate crime laws invoked as well. BUT what laws has Piers broken? SEDITION! A FOREIGN AGENT LOBBYING OUR GOVERNMENT FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES! Not to mention ESPIONAGE CHARGES APPLY TO THIS PRICK! The first amendment has limitations to FOREIGNERS BEING HERE! But what does Congress care. They seem to be too enamored by gun control to actually balance a budget! |
|
|
|
|
Previous
