100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Community > Posts By > 1956deluxe
|
|
|
You know what? If the President was not using drone stikes to kill the terrorists you would be biitching. If the President does use drone strikes to kill terrorists you would be biitching. Doesn't seem to matter what he does, you biitch about it. Bunch of whiners. So, how do you feel about him killing SUSPECTED, not proven beyond a doubt, SUSPECTED terrorists and thousands of kids and other innocents? Are you sad for their families of do your undies get all sticky? Sure, kill the SUSPECTED terrorists. Fine with me. You want them proved beyond a reasonable doubt? Like in an American Court?? HA! Last time he suggested that, the REPS got their panties all in a bunch! Make up you mind. You want the basterds dead or tried in courts in NY?? So. Are you saying the dead kids are basterd terrorists??? Kinda' bigoted to say that the only good Muslim is a dead one, no? You are playing games. Let me know when you are ready to have serious conversation about this topic. All you do is attack the President, no matter what he does. I would suggest that there are multiple levels of military approval required to launch a drone strike. Sure there is! The Liar in Chief says "KILL" and the order goes downhill thru all of them The fact of the matter is there are "standing orders" and some cabinet of CIA people takes out the competition. If it's clean, the POTUS takes credit, if not, he throws a general under the bus (for something unrelated of course....can't have drones as a topic of conversation). When you refer to the President of the United states of America in a derogatory manner, the conversation is over. You show your true colors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know what? If the President was not using drone stikes to kill the terrorists you would be biitching. If the President does use drone strikes to kill terrorists you would be biitching. Doesn't seem to matter what he does, you biitch about it. Bunch of whiners. So, how do you feel about him killing SUSPECTED, not proven beyond a doubt, SUSPECTED terrorists and thousands of kids and other innocents? Are you sad for their families of do your undies get all sticky? Sure, kill the SUSPECTED terrorists. Fine with me. You want them proved beyond a reasonable doubt? Like in an American Court?? HA! Last time he suggested that, the REPS got their panties all in a bunch! Make up you mind. You want the basterds dead or tried in courts in NY?? So. Are you saying the dead kids are basterd terrorists??? Kinda' bigoted to say that the only good Muslim is a dead one, no? You are playing games. Let me know when you are ready to have serious conversation about this topic. All you do is attack the President, no matter what he does. I would suggest that there are multiple levels of military approval required to launch a drone strike. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a brit this whole thing makes me laugh. it seems the us has a problem with mental cases getting a gun and killing innocent groups of unsuspecting people. none of you want to relinquish your guns because its your god given right to have protection against these mental murderers who pose a threat because they have guns. so the argument against removeing guns from the us is that you need them to protect yourselves, against people who have guns! obviously you cant irradicate the threat by "removing" the mental cases, as its very hard to know who is a mental gun slinging muderer and who is just from the south. maybe you should give guns to kids so they can also protect themselves. and the anti gun crowd making themselves look stupid by using the wrong names for guns?. yep, dem da stoopid ones. guns dont kill people, people who want to kill people... kill people. you cant remove the insane and angry. but you could make weapons harder to get hold of.  
Not even close. Self-defense is only a small part of the usefulness of the right to own arms. The real purpose of this right is to give regular people the means to keep government in check and repel foreign invasions. (the imperial Japanese never invaded the mainland US because they knew there was a "rifle behind every blade of grass") The musket was the assault rifle of the 18th century. Even a simple farmer armed with one or more could protect himself from harassment or assault at the hands of the regime. Say you did take everyone's guns. Now they're sitting ducks for criminals. (real criminals don't care about the law and will get guns if they want them) Since you're a Brit, you ought to familiarize yourself with your countryman George Orwell. Especially 1984. Britain and the US resemble the world of 1984 more and more by the day. One of my favorite Orwell quotes-"if you want a vision of the future, imagine a jackboot stamping on a human face-forever". Maybe you enjoy your police/nanny state, but I don't care for it. You live in the past. Japan did not have nukes. A couple nuke EMP's in our upper atmosphere over the US would throw us back to the stone age. Won't take much to take us down....look at what a few idiots flying jets did to our economy.....what did that cost us in blood and treasure. Wake up. Where were nukes mentioned? Besides, an "assault" rifle with a 30 round mag is far from having nukes. Not to mention only responsible for a very small amount of gun related deaths, and many of them were accomplished with black-market purchases. So why ban them? You're right nukes were not mentioned. But, he did state that the reason Japan did not invade us was because of our small arms possession. Does this still hold true today? Do you seriously think that the right to bear arms would keep some idiot maniac leader in North Korea from attacking us with a nuke? Or China? Or Russia? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know what? If the President was not using drone stikes to kill the terrorists you would be biitching. If the President does use drone strikes to kill terrorists you would be biitching. Doesn't seem to matter what he does, you biitch about it. Bunch of whiners. So, how do you feel about him killing SUSPECTED, not proven beyond a doubt, SUSPECTED terrorists and thousands of kids and other innocents? Are you sad for their families of do your undies get all sticky? Sure, kill the SUSPECTED terrorists. Fine with me. You want them proved beyond a reasonable doubt? Like in an American Court?? HA! Last time he suggested that, the REPS got their panties all in a bunch! Make up you mind. You want the basterds dead or tried in courts in NY?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a brit this whole thing makes me laugh. it seems the us has a problem with mental cases getting a gun and killing innocent groups of unsuspecting people. none of you want to relinquish your guns because its your god given right to have protection against these mental murderers who pose a threat because they have guns. so the argument against removeing guns from the us is that you need them to protect yourselves, against people who have guns! obviously you cant irradicate the threat by "removing" the mental cases, as its very hard to know who is a mental gun slinging muderer and who is just from the south. maybe you should give guns to kids so they can also protect themselves. and the anti gun crowd making themselves look stupid by using the wrong names for guns?. yep, dem da stoopid ones. guns dont kill people, people who want to kill people... kill people. you cant remove the insane and angry. but you could make weapons harder to get hold of.
Not even close. Self-defense is only a small part of the usefulness of the right to own arms. The real purpose of this right is to give regular people the means to keep government in check and repel foreign invasions. (the imperial Japanese never invaded the mainland US because they knew there was a "rifle behind every blade of grass") The musket was the assault rifle of the 18th century. Even a simple farmer armed with one or more could protect himself from harassment or assault at the hands of the regime. Say you did take everyone's guns. Now they're sitting ducks for criminals. (real criminals don't care about the law and will get guns if they want them) Since you're a Brit, you ought to familiarize yourself with your countryman George Orwell. Especially 1984. Britain and the US resemble the world of 1984 more and more by the day. One of my favorite Orwell quotes-"if you want a vision of the future, imagine a jackboot stamping on a human face-forever". Maybe you enjoy your police/nanny state, but I don't care for it. You live in the past. Japan did not have nukes. A couple nuke EMP's in our upper atmosphere over the US would throw us back to the stone age. Won't take much to take us down....look at what a few idiots flying jets did to our economy.....what did that cost us in blood and treasure. Wake up. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know what?
If the President was not using drone stikes to kill the terrorists you would be biitching. If the President does use drone strikes to kill terrorists you would be biitching. Doesn't seem to matter what he does, you biitch about it. Bunch of whiners. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
HISTORY LESSON
|
|
Can anyone, or everyone tell us about what happens next historicaly after a country is disarmed? ....Like to protect the Children for example? Try reading Mein Kampf or however they spell it. Guy by the name of Adolf Hitler wrote it. Okay all you history experts......the other thing HITLER did was to abolish TRADE UNIONS. When Hitler came to power in January 1933, he saw trade unions as exercising more power over the workers than he could. Trade unions were seen as a challenge to be dispensed with. Hitler knew that he needed the workers to be on his side but he could not allow trade unions to exert the potential power they had. Therefore, trade unions were banned in Nazi Germany and the state took over the role of looking after the working class. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't wait to see what happens when they invent "Laser Guns" like in the Sci Fi movies.
Just think how many people a shooter could take out with one of those babies! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plastic bags kill approximately 100,000 sea turtles and other marine animals each year. Sea turtles often mistake floating plastic bags for their favorite food, jellyfish, and the consequences of ingesting plastic can be fatal.
Source: www.seaturtles.org |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
1956deluxe
on
Sun 01/06/13 09:44 PM
|
|
Nobody is going to register their guns.
Alex Jones makes his living being a "Fear Monger". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plastic bags should be banned everywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Carrington Effect is real. It happened in 1859 and if it were to happen today, it would be a much more devastating.
We rely too much on technology. Best bet is to live in a small rural town, store lots of food and water and have plenty of ammo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Texas Secession
|
|
Here we go again.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't tell the difference between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Religious Right in America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I Love these bible thumping business owners who choose certain portions of the bible to make an issue of.
How about some of these bible laws: Exodus chapter 35 2 You have six days in which to do your work, but the seventh day is to be sacred, a solemn day of rest dedicated to me, the Lord. Anyone who does any work on that day is to be put to death. Leviticus chapter 20 8 "Obey my laws, because I am the Lord and I make you holy." 9 The Lord gave the following regulations. Any of you that curse your father or mother shall be put to death; you Leviticus chapter 20 27 "Any man or woman who consults the spirits of the dead shall be stoned to death; Exodus Chapter 22 (TEV) 21 "Do not oppress foreigners in any way. Remember, you yourselves were once foreigners in the land of Egypt. Deuteronomy chapter 22 22 If a man is found sleeping with another man's wife, both the man who slept with her and the woman must die. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not only did he NOT mention God, he also didn't say anything about trains, drinkin', pickup trucks, momma or prison.
He sure don't know nothin' about country western songs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marine Corps spokesman Captain Kendra Motz:
While the Marine Corps did not "issue a statement," we did respond to queries with the following information: . . . Regarding no Marines at the embassy/consulate in Libya: Embassy security in Tripoli and the consulate in Benghazi fall under the Regional Security Officer with the State Department. The U.S. maintains over 285 diplomatic facilities worldwide. MCESG provides 152 security detachments provide internal security at designated U.S. diplomatic and consular facilities in order to prevent the compromise of classified material vital to the national security of the United States. Perimeter security is the responsibility of the host nation police/security forces. The embassy in Tripoli and the consulate in Benghazi do not have a MCESG detachment. Typically, when a new embassy is established, it takes time to grow a new MCESG detachment. In coordination with the State Department, there was discussion about establishing a detachment in Tripoli sometime in the next five years. Overall, the plan is to grow the number of MCESG detachments worldwide to 173. A FAST platoon deployed to Libya yesterday (12 Sep 12) to provide security for the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli. Established in 1987, FAST platoons provide a limited-duration, expeditionary security force to protect vital naval and national assets. FAST companies maintain forward-deployed platoons at various naval commands around the globe and possess U.S.-based alert forces capable of rapidly responding to unforeseen contingencies worldwide. FAST is not designed to provide a permanent security force for installations. FAST platoons are primarily designed to conduct defensive combat operations, military security operations, and rear area security operations in response to approved requests in support of geographic combatant and fleet commanders. When deployed to reinforce embassies with existing MCESG detachments, FAST platoons will customarily provide an outer cordon of security inside the embassy compound, while MCESG Marines maintain security of the chancery proper, and host nation police/security forces provide an outer cordon of security beyond embassy grounds. Regarding ROE [Rules of Engagement]: The Marine Corps does not establish ROE for MCESG detachments or other embassy security forces; that is the responsibility of the State Department and/or operational commanders depending on the command relationship. Regardless, ROE are classified and release of that information would jeopardize the Marines and U.S. interests. Any further inquiry should be directed to the State Department, since Marine security guards report to the ambassador not to a military commander. Captain Kendra N. Motz Media Officer Division of Public Affairs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How'd that work out for them the last time they tried to leave the Union??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
the real picture
|
|
So are you saying intellectual, well read city dwellers voted blue, and redneck, toothless rural folks voted red? So true!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adultery is illegal in the military. Yes and the usual punishment is a written reprimand. Just a warning. Barry doesn't want him testifying. That's why they scheduled the acting director to testify. If, they call Patraeus, he can, as a citizen, plead the 5th. What do you expect him to testify about? That the US Consulate in Benghazi was a front for CIA Operations? You want him to tell ya'll about how many CIA operatives they had in that area and what their mission was? Do you want to hear all about how their counter terrorism mission was discovered and their base of operations attacked? There were a lot of heavy weapons in the Khadafi regime that I am sure the CIA was trying to secure....and I am sure there were terrorist/al queda operatives trying to get the same weapons. Hell, maybe we can get a Navy Seal Team to make a video training game on this subject since ya'll want to have everything broadcast over the news. Wake up. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
