100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
|
|
Sin_and_Sorrow said:
I don't believe in Satan so he can suck my ***. That said. You don't want Satan to die laughing, eh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
chocolina
on
Sun 03/11/12 03:46 PM
|
|
chocolina said: If he says 'Jesus is OUR GOD (Meaning MAN)' or 'Jesus is GOD' in both cases that is blaspheme. Sin_and_Sorrow said: Then Jesus was a sinner, deserved to die, and did NOT die for our sins. OK .. let me explain you again by laws of logic : If A = God and B = Jesus If A/God / =1 /The Only One / : 1. If A /is god/ = 1 / the Only One / , then B /Jesus/ is not God 2. If A = B , then A is not = 1 , hence polytheism aka blaspheme 3. If A= B=1 , then non of religion and beliefs but Christianity is the Only Right religion and Torah , Koran and all non Christian / holy /books are false because non of them accept Jesus like their god   
Sin_and_Sorrow said: Not sure who taught you math.. Chocolina said OK .. let me explain you again by laws of logic : erm...did you get it ? Sin_and_Sorrow said: ..just saying. Say but try to read too .. or the devil gonna punch your tongue with a big fork
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chocolina said: If he says 'Jesus is OUR GOD (Meaning MAN)' or 'Jesus is GOD' in both cases that is blaspheme. Sin_and_Sorrow said: Then Jesus was a sinner, deserved to die, and did NOT die for our sins. OK .. let me explain you again by laws of logic : If A = God and B = Jesus If A/God / =1 /The Only One / : 1. If A /is god/ = 1 / the Only One / , then B /Jesus/ is not God 2. If A = B , then A is not = 1 , hence polytheism aka blaspheme 3. If A= B=1 , then non of religion and beliefs but Christianity is the Only Right religion and Torah , Koran and all non Christian / holy /books are false because non of them accept Jesus like their god
Sin_and_Sorrow said: Not sure who taught you math.. Chocolina said OK .. let me explain you again by laws of logic : Sin_and_Sorrow said: ..just saying. Say but try to read too .. or the devil gonna punch your tongue with a big fork
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Spiritual awakening.
Edited by
chocolina
on
Sun 03/11/12 03:29 PM
|
|
Funches
wouldn't True reality only amount to being True illusion is your existence to you yourself.... a Truth?...or a True Reality? If a True reality is a True Illusion then you wouldn't know .. because you're not going to know about your existence . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Spiritual awakening.
|
|
But I can say that this world of duality (good and evil) is mostly an illusion. Buddhists have found out this thousands years ago . 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
chocolina
on
Sun 03/11/12 03:08 PM
|
|
CowboyGH said:
How is the blasheme? We are told Jesus is our God all the way back to Genesis. We ??! 
We = CowboyGH hence not true If St. Athanasius the Great get his resurrection he'd strangled you by his halo , because his entire life has been devoted to protection of false claims like yours aka blasphemy in Christianity. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chocolina said: If he says 'Jesus is OUR GOD (Meaning MAN)' or 'Jesus is GOD' in both cases that is blaspheme. Sin_and_Sorrow said: Then Jesus was a sinner, deserved to die, and did NOT die for our sins. OK .. let me explain you again by laws of logic : If A = God and B = Jesus If A/God / =1 /The Only One / : 1. If A /is god/ = 1 / the Only One / , then B /Jesus/ is not God 2. If A = B , then A is not = 1 , hence polytheism aka blaspheme 3. If A= B=1 , then non of religion and beliefs but Christianity is the Only Right religion and Torah , Koran and all non Christian / holy /books are false because non of them accept Jesus like their god
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sin_and_Sorrow said:
He's not saying Jesus is GOD. He is saying Jesus is OUR GOD (Meaning MAN) I effing E: LORD GOD. Please, get it right already. If he says 'Jesus is OUR GOD (Meaning MAN)' or 'Jesus is GOD' in both cases that is blaspheme. If before that there was a claim ' God is the only one' then non of above is true If second /'God is the only one'/ is not true then no problem to be included as well as Olympus gods , Scandinavian gods etc. and thousands more including Jesus too.. Sin_and_Sorrow said: ANd I'm not Christian so it's okay. 
That explains all .. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
chocolina
on
Wed 03/07/12 02:40 PM
|
|
CowboyGH still waiting for your answer here : AdventureBeggins said: If a man break into my house with intent to murder my child or woman... I will kill him if I must to stop him. There is most definately a different meaning in the words murder and kill. Or would you consider what I did 'murder' and so punish me? CoyboyGH said: Would be murder. CowboyGH said : No, a judgement is not murder. If a judgement was murder, there would be no such thing as the death penalty. For if a judge sentenced someone to death, the judge and the executioner(s) would then also have to be sentenced with murder. Then the father killing his child by his judgement will be innocent , based on your claim ??? CowboyGH said: Well you just said "father" killing his "child" as a judgement. So I assumed you were referring to Jesus and his father. Nope .. try 3rd time ...lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CowboyGH still waiting for your answer here : If a man break into my house with intent to murder my child or woman... I will kill him if I must to stop him. There is most definately a different meaning in the words murder and kill. Or would you consider what I did 'murder' and so punish me? CoyboyGH said: Would be murder. Chocolina said: In this way how you gonna name that act when God has drown all ppl including babies in that ? CowboyGH said : No, a judgement is not murder. If a judgement was murder, there would be no such thing as the death penalty. For if a judge sentenced someone to death, the judge and the executioner(s) would then also have to be sentenced with murder. That is why we are not to murder, for Jesus is the judge, not us. Then the father killing his child by his judgement will be innocent , based on your claim ??? ??? Not sure exactly what you're talking about here, but I'm pretty sure you're speaking of the crucifixion. CowboyGH , you make me laugh now ... I'm patient .. read it .. don't behave like Smeck's offspring now
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
chocolina
on
Mon 03/05/12 02:03 PM
|
|
CowboyGH Every time someone "kills" another is murder Thanks you needed long time to get it that finally
But it is only murder because it is unlawful/illegal. If there was no law against the taking of another's life, neither in God's nor man's law there would be no such thing as "murder". Now you start to produce hypothesis on theme " murder' Sounds like : if your grandma was a man she'd have balls ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
chocolina
on
Mon 03/05/12 01:50 PM
|
|
CowboyGH Every time someone "kills" another is murder Thanks you needed long time to get it that finally
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
msharmony said: relevance? explain how someone can steal without taking but taking is not a crime and STEALING is If I take the camera out of my desk, that is not illegal if I take YOUR camera, without your permission, that is illegal and called 'stealing' Chocolina said: Till here you didn't explain " how someone can steal without taking" You explain the difference between 'take' and 'steal' Now pls one more try ... How someone can steal without to take it ? msharmony said: you can kill without murdering,, just as you can take without stealing Here I'm lost in your logic twist Msharmony  
Cowboy said: It is true, you can "kill" without murdering. But you can only take without stealing if what you're taking is your own. Reason you can kill without murdering is because you can kill a cow for dinner. Reason you can kill without murdering is because you can kill a cow for dinner CowboyGH The miracle of twisting logic continue ... because to eat the cow for dinner you first have to murder it the reason-intention / cow for dinner/ consists itself murdering , and the process completes by killing the cow because to eat the cow for dinner you first have to murder it the reason-intention / cow for dinner/ consists itself murdering , and the process completes by killing the cow You can not "murder" a cow. Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. It is not unlawful to kill a cow, neither in man's law or God's law. So again, one could not "murder" a cow. Then why you gave so foolish example abt 'murder' and 'killing' using a cow if you can't 'murder' it ? Give me now the same example abt for humans What are you talking about? That's why the cow was used as an example. You can not murder a cow, but you can kill both a person and a cow. woow woow CowboyGH... who told you that ??? Try to kill cow in India and you gonna find soon the difference between 'to be killed ' or 'murdered '
Ho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
msharmony said: not true, I can also take something down that isnt mine if its on my property I can also take something from someone if they have given me permission neither is the same as stealing But why you twist till now the idea abt stealing-take ? Here there is logic .. You can't steal without to take ... hence give me a sample how you can steal without to take it ?? Why you explain the meaning of 'to take' .. no one discuss abt it but 'can't steal without to take' |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
msharmony said: relevance? explain how someone can steal without taking but taking is not a crime and STEALING is If I take the camera out of my desk, that is not illegal if I take YOUR camera, without your permission, that is illegal and called 'stealing' Chocolina said: Till here you didn't explain " how someone can steal without taking" You explain the difference between 'take' and 'steal' Now pls one more try ... How someone can steal without to take it ? msharmony said: you can kill without murdering,, just as you can take without stealing Here I'm lost in your logic twist Msharmony
Cowboy said: It is true, you can "kill" without murdering. But you can only take without stealing if what you're taking is your own. Reason you can kill without murdering is because you can kill a cow for dinner. Reason you can kill without murdering is because you can kill a cow for dinner CowboyGH The miracle of twisting logic continue ... because to eat the cow for dinner you first have to murder it the reason-intention / cow for dinner/ consists itself murdering , and the process completes by killing the cow because to eat the cow for dinner you first have to murder it the reason-intention / cow for dinner/ consists itself murdering , and the process completes by killing the cow You can not "murder" a cow. Murder - The unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. It is not unlawful to kill a cow, neither in man's law or God's law. So again, one could not "murder" a cow. Then why you gave so foolish example abt 'murder' and 'killing' using a cow if you can't 'murder' it ? Give me now the same example abt for humans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CowboyGH still waiting for your answer here :
If a man break into my house with intent to murder my child or woman... I will kill him if I must to stop him. There is most definately a different meaning in the words murder and kill. Or would you consider what I did 'murder' and so punish me? CoyboyGH said: Would be murder. Chocolina said: In this way how you gonna name that act when God has drown all ppl including babies in that ? CowboyGH said : No, a judgement is not murder. If a judgement was murder, there would be no such thing as the death penalty. For if a judge sentenced someone to death, the judge and the executioner(s) would then also have to be sentenced with murder. That is why we are not to murder, for Jesus is the judge, not us. Then the father killing his child by his judgement will be innocent , based on your claim ??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
msharmony said: relevance? explain how someone can steal without taking but taking is not a crime and STEALING is If I take the camera out of my desk, that is not illegal if I take YOUR camera, without your permission, that is illegal and called 'stealing' Chocolina said: Till here you didn't explain " how someone can steal without taking" You explain the difference between 'take' and 'steal' Now pls one more try ... How someone can steal without to take it ? msharmony said: you can kill without murdering,, just as you can take without stealing Here I'm lost in your logic twist Msharmony
Cowboy said: It is true, you can "kill" without murdering. But you can only take without stealing if what you're taking is your own. Reason you can kill without murdering is because you can kill a cow for dinner. Reason you can kill without murdering is because you can kill a cow for dinner CowboyGH The miracle of twisting logic continue ... because to eat the cow for dinner you first have to murder it the reason-intention / cow for dinner/ consists itself murdering , and the process completes by killing the cow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
msharmony said: relevance? explain how someone can steal without taking but taking is not a crime and STEALING is If I take the camera out of my desk, that is not illegal if I take YOUR camera, without your permission, that is illegal and called 'stealing' Chocolina said: Till here you didn't explain " how someone can steal without taking" You explain the difference between 'take' and 'steal' Now pls one more try ... How someone can steal without to take it ? msharmony said: you can kill without murdering,, just as you can take without stealing Here I'm lost in your logic twist Msharmony
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter_Pan said: NO, you asked: "explain how someone can murder without killing " Answer: funches murders logic, yet logic still lives... Where is the corpse then ?  
As I know murder and killing always left a dead body 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
msharmony said:
relevance? explain how someone can steal without taking but taking is not a crime and STEALING is If I take the camera out of my desk, that is not illegal if I take YOUR camera, without your permission, that is illegal and called 'stealing' Till here you didn't explain " how someone can steal without taking" You explain the difference between 'take' and 'steal' Now pls one more try ... How someone can steal without to take it ? |
|
|
|
|
Previous
