Community > Posts By > Peccy

 
Peccy's photo
Thu 10/25/12 06:34 PM

I must have reverse amnesia

because I could have sworn I heard about nothing but the attack for at least a month afterwards

its now october 25 and the attack was 09/11
And that excuses it how? Is there some timeline on this? Oh, I forgot, the election. That takes priority over a few people that were murdered. Silly me.

Peccy's photo
Thu 10/25/12 02:48 PM
I don't watch FOX

Peccy's photo
Thu 10/25/12 12:02 PM
I wonder how his supporters will spin this?

Peccy's photo
Thu 10/25/12 11:47 AM
Notice how quiet it has been in the news about the 4 Americans who lost their lives in Benghazi.

Where are the Memorials?

The prime time news shows?

The slideshows of pictures of their lives and their dedications to this country?

Nothing. Nervous silence.

Ask yourself why?

Peccy's photo
Thu 10/25/12 10:14 AM
It's God's will for people to starve to death daily too? God's will to have people murdered? God's will does not exist, c'mon people, it's the 21st century! Stop hiding behind this smokescreen!


Peccy's photo
Wed 10/24/12 10:43 AM
True, nothing else I can say, but if Americans don't open their eyes soon, there will be no America.

Peccy's photo
Wed 10/24/12 10:30 AM
Edited by Peccy on Wed 10/24/12 10:36 AM
Pretty lackluster announcement. The Obama lovers will be with Obama no matter what he decides. But if he has nothing to hide, why not give them up for 5 million to a charity?

Actually it doesn't really matter, if they found Osama Bin Laden hiding in his closet, some people would make up some kind of excuse as to how he got there and why.

Peccy's photo
Tue 10/23/12 03:08 PM
ROFLMAO!

Peccy's photo
Tue 10/23/12 11:46 AM
Edited by Peccy on Tue 10/23/12 11:48 AM
Not taking sides (I don't like either one) but according to Gallup no one leading by over 50% this late in October has ever lost. But anything can happen. Take what you want from this.


GALLUP DAILY
Oct 20-22, 2012 – Updates daily at 1 p.m. ET; reflects one-day change

Obama Approval
51%
+2
Obama Disapproval
45%
-1
Registered Voters

Romney
48%
-
Obama
47%
-
7-day rolling average
Likely Voters

Romney
51%
-
Obama
46%
+1
7-day rolling average

Payroll to Population
45.2%
+0.1
Underemployed
16.5%
-
Unemployed
7.5%
+0.1
Job Creation Index
19
-
Economic Confidence
-18
-2

Peccy's photo
Tue 10/23/12 09:21 AM
I doubt you'll have to worry, the unintelligent responses will soon pour in.

Peccy's photo
Mon 10/22/12 09:00 PM

i really didn't see a clear winner, but obama did seem to be jabbing more

did anyone else notice the tie selection? subliminal suggestion towards bipartisan for romney?


Yeah I noticed, but I think Romney was trying to appeal to the masses by portraying the good-guy image. Obama came in attack mode but it never worked. Although I think that the candidates pretty much tied tonight, Obama will never get over that first debate thrashing he received. And all you Obama supporters can disagree, but every major news outlet agrees that he got toasted.

Peccy's photo
Mon 10/22/12 12:41 PM
No source?

Peccy's photo
Mon 10/22/12 07:35 AM


LOL.............for one I didn't interject the word "lazy" into this piece, the original, or one who is passing themselves off as original is. Read the EndNote.


Um, aren't you the original poster? Who put the word "lazy" in the title?

I don't get what the fun is in slapping people down and then pretending you didn't do it.
I didn't "pretend", if you knew me you'd know that I don't pretend anything......especially on a public forum where opinions are as common as leaves in Vermont.............lol

Peccy's photo
Sat 10/20/12 07:05 PM

Americancrossroads is a joke organization. It is a bunch of garbage that is put out by them.
The same can be said about any media source in the US.

Peccy's photo
Sat 10/20/12 10:24 AM
Edited by Peccy on Sat 10/20/12 10:25 AM
LOL.............for one I didn't interject the word "lazy" into this piece, the original, or one who is passing themselves off as original is. Read the EndNote.

Peccy's photo
Sat 10/20/12 10:18 AM
Edited by Peccy on Sat 10/20/12 10:30 AM


yep,if it weren't for those pesky Constitutional Restrictions,he would have created a veritable Paradise!spock


He barely used executive privilege at all. Bush used it 1000 times in his presidency.
True about Obama, he just invoked it for fast and furious. However; George H.W. Bush only invoked it once in 1991. He allowed Cheney, not to turn over documents subpoenaed during a congressional investigation into a Navy aircraft program. Clinton did it 14. Ole' GW did it 6 times. Only 994 off.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/government-elections-politics/when-presidents-invoke-executive-privilege/

Peccy's photo
Sat 10/20/12 03:35 AM



into equality by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work without receiving.

When half of the people realize that they do not have to work because the other half will take care of them, the other half will soon realize that it does no good to work because someone else will be enjoying the fruits of their labor.

That my friend, is the end of any nation.

It's a simple equation, you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

*Portions of this were taken from a poster, I simply added sentences and embellished it.


slaphead This statement comes from an "undercover" lazy person who feels they might be missing out on some laziness that they falsely imagine others might be getting.surprised shades

It is a projection of a personal wish.

Half of the nation is not lazy.slaphead



IM wondering when the notion that needing assistance and being 'lazy' are the same thing became such a trend,,,


when we count social security which people paid into for their old age as laziness, or food stamps that people, many of them working, need just to feed their kids, or tanf which often has a work requirement attached just for an extra couple hundred bucks a month as laziness

while continuing to assume those with wealth are therefore, less lazy,,

we are guilty of drinking the kool aid and playing their game for them,,,,
LOL........leave it to you guys to read too much into this and start tearing it down word for word. I posted it, and what I meant when I did was in response to the inane notion that the wealth in the USA needs to be redistributed and the wealthy need to pay more simply because they are wealthy.

Willow - assume much?
Harmony - No where did I state anything that you're referring to.
Don - I have served in the government from my home state
Maryland, You live in Nevada, but know much more than me
about how DC works, I forgot.

Peccy's photo
Fri 10/19/12 08:34 PM




into equality by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work without receiving.

When half of the people realize that they do not have to work because the other half will take care of them, the other half will soon realize that it does no good to work because someone else will be enjoying the fruits of their labor.

That my friend, is the end of any nation.

It's a simple equation, you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

*Portions of this were taken from a poster, I simply added sentences and embellished it.


What you are describing is socialism, and what caused the demise of the USSR. It is the opposite of everything America was founded on and why so many of us refer to Obama as Unamerican.
Exactly; however, Obama is just a figurehead. He gets his orders from higher up.


Socialism is still socialism, regardless of the source. Working for free is still slavery even if you call it "taxing the rich". Slavery is the opposite of freedom no matter how you slice it.

Obama is all about class warfare.
I'm not disagreeing with you...hell I posted it.........lol I just think that Obama is simply following orders. Kennedy tried to go his own way and remember how well that panned out in'63.

Peccy's photo
Fri 10/19/12 08:18 PM


into equality by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work without receiving.

When half of the people realize that they do not have to work because the other half will take care of them, the other half will soon realize that it does no good to work because someone else will be enjoying the fruits of their labor.

That my friend, is the end of any nation.

It's a simple equation, you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

*Portions of this were taken from a poster, I simply added sentences and embellished it.


What you are describing is socialism, and what caused the demise of the USSR. It is the opposite of everything America was founded on and why so many of us refer to Obama as Unamerican.
Exactly; however, Obama is just a figurehead. He gets his orders from higher up.

Peccy's photo
Fri 10/19/12 08:00 PM
into equality by legislating the wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working for, another person must work without receiving.

When half of the people realize that they do not have to work because the other half will take care of them, the other half will soon realize that it does no good to work because someone else will be enjoying the fruits of their labor.

That my friend, is the end of any nation.

It's a simple equation, you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.

*Portions of this were taken from a poster, I simply added sentences and embellished it.

1 2 12 13 14 16 18 19 20 24 25