Community > Posts By > Peccy

 
Peccy's photo
Fri 05/18/12 08:26 PM
Do I get a Klondike Bar as well?

Peccy's photo
Fri 05/18/12 08:21 PM
reincarnation? Do you think it's possible? If so how do you think it works? There are a lot of documented cases on it so can you easily refute it? Just looking for opinions here.

Peccy's photo
Fri 05/18/12 08:12 PM
That's a fantastic pick up line, why hasn't anyone ever thought of that?

Peccy's photo
Fri 05/18/12 08:09 PM
Edited by Peccy on Fri 05/18/12 08:10 PM

do you feel a forger would have been that spot on as to have the high resolution fit perfectly on top of the forgery,, but careless enough to leave evidence of all the 'layers'?





One way a forgery could be accomplished requires that the high-res version be the same as the obviously doctored version.

Step 1. Remove background and clean up all stray pixels on an original.
Step 2. Clean up text by coloring characters with pure black.
Step 3. Scan other documents to obtain characters needed to re-spell whatever you want. (including signatures)
Step 4. Clean up individual pieces.
Step 5. Rework a new document to appear as close to an original as possible.
Step 6. Overlay doctored copy over background of choice.


I've recreated numerous certificates for various businesses over the years. Regardless of what that guys says, it wouldn't takes weeks to accomplish the cleaning up of that document. 24 hours tops...

JPG's do not support transparency. That means that there has to be yet another image that was used to create that JPG (maybe from the PDF?) as a JPG image placed in the PDF would have entirely covered the background.

Look at the PDF. Pay close attention to that slit down the left side.

Do you still think that PDF is an accurate copy?

Deception breeds doubt and that doc is a breeding ground...

I have a degree in graphic design. While I haven't seen the image, I can assure you everything Peter says holds true. JPG's do not support transparency, so it could have been a GIF (only supports 256 colors so it is doubtful) Probably a PNG which supports millions. But I am slightly buzzed, so if someone could provide a link I might be able to tell you better.

Peccy's photo
Fri 05/18/12 04:27 PM


We don't need more laws, particularly laws that govern the Internet.

Is everyone so frightened that they want laws to protect them from everything? If so, this fear is what will lead us into a perfect police a state.




no, because even if their were laws, I doubt they would be enforced correctly or fairly. So , I will just be a banana.
so in actuality I have been in a relationship with a banana named Chiquita for over four four years? The things you find out on the net!

Peccy's photo
Fri 05/18/12 03:58 PM

Most banks have a way of avoiding fees. By getting a certain balance, having direct deposit, etc
no fees here.....no minimum balance, no checking, card fees, nothing. I would switch banks if it started.

Peccy's photo
Fri 05/18/12 03:17 PM
When did this start angel?................lol

Peccy's photo
Fri 05/18/12 03:13 PM
Edited by Peccy on Fri 05/18/12 03:15 PM
Ok, I see your point...I really have no problems with a pic because I'm a guy; however, females have big problems with all the married/attached male perverts lurking in the corners of the web. (That was in response to the girl sitting 10 feet away from me...lilangel)

Peccy's photo
Fri 05/18/12 11:00 AM
LOL...not "sad to say that Spider is right". More like the situation Spider described is correct unfortunately.

Peccy's photo
Fri 05/18/12 08:47 AM

It will come to nothing, unfortunately.
Sad to say, but Spider is most likely right

Peccy's photo
Thu 05/17/12 06:23 PM


I am more than skeptical, go to snopes you can find tons of these kinds of stories were it ends up being someone looking for a payout planting it and then acting shocked.

I sure wouldn't go as far as intentionally pouring scalding coffee on my crotch for any amount of money!scared

My boa is much more valuable than mere money.smokin
agreed!!!!!

Peccy's photo
Thu 05/17/12 06:08 PM



having something on your mind doesnt mean you act upon it

I have lazing about on my mind all the time, wish I could just lounge around,,,,


but I know I cant so I dont....





I think there is proof that laziness might be a wee bit easier to control than sexual deviance. But, I don't even know why I responded to this...



there is proof of it , really?

actual studies?,,, Im doubtful,,,,


people have been duped into thinking they arent in control

but people can do whatever they want to or not , whatever they are 'thinking' about

the 'proof' I would think is in the fact that recidivism drops significantly with treatment,,,,

showing that even a 'sexual deviance' is within our control when it comes to our actions,,,

If only life were as simple as you try to make it out to be. Every criminal could be rehabilitated and we could live in a safe crime free world!

Treatment obliviously doesn't work in all cases. So you are saying we as a society should keep paying for a criminals treatments even when that person has showed it obviously is not working? Why doesn't this surprise me?

Peccy's photo
Thu 05/17/12 12:20 PM


an assumption is never fair. if you think i am giving him a benefit of doubt on what he has done, then let me say that i am not. i simply am not dwelling on his (or anyone's) past. the past is unchangeable. if his house was raided and pictures were found, than i could see how he was up to his same old tricks. he failed to report. that doesn't mean he had pictures, was using pictures, or had thoughts about pictures, it means he failed to report. why he didn't comply, only he knows. when he has his day in court we might get to find out, or he may plea bargain and get lost in the system again

society looks down on convicted felons who are trying to get their lives in order. twenty, thirty, even forty year old convictions haunt these men and women all their lives. even if they do their time and "pay their debt to society" it never ends for them. has former president bush lived down his dui conviction? will he ever? for some, once a felon always a felon


Let's see...

* Convicted twice for aggravated sexual assault of a minor.
* Convicted once for having tens of thousands of child pornography pictures.
* Gets out of prison and immediately starts creating a series of false identities and social media profiles.

On what grounds should we give him the benefit of the doubt?

As for paying his debt to society, that's just not possible. His evil will linger as long as those girls he molested (including any he might have molested without being caught) are in this world. Possibly longer, as the neuroses they developed as a result of their victimization might be passed down to their children in one way or another. Pedophilia is also a crime that reproduces sexually, the act itself can produce more pedophiles. The victim can become the victimizer. If "Lex" produced more child predators, how can his debt to society ever be paid? It's simply not possible by any stretch of the imagination.
:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Peccy's photo
Wed 05/16/12 09:00 PM

one can only hope he gets raped and tortured in prison .!!! jmo
.....repeatedly by lots of hairy men! Hey if I offend some people who think we should feel something for this lowlife, well, you'll get over it or you won't. These were defenseless children!!! What part of your brain is not getting this? Can you even imagine what was going through their minds while this was happening to them?

I don't care what statistics say. . . most victims of a sick twisted mind like that usually end up a statistic. . . or wish they were later on in life.

What gives a person the right to take that away? "But rehabilitation can help!" It hasn't helped this one since 1990, how many more children have to suffer because people think they deserve another chance?

In my opinion, the first was too many.

Peccy's photo
Wed 05/16/12 08:10 PM
Edited by Peccy on Wed 05/16/12 08:12 PM




Look around at the other ones that have been posting on here for years with little or NO clear pics. Start checking some profiles and then decide if they are really WHO they claim to be. I don't need these kind of people as frinds. I have plenty of REAL friends. I don't care who I offend. Dating sites should make people put up clear PICS of who they are! This will weed out the married ones too! Who are welcome to be here, but don't need to be DATING here!



how would a clear pic change anything, people can post pics of anyone,,,,

and this site doesnt require one even use a pic of themself, as its for mingling and anything beyond that is up to our own risk,, just like real life,,,
UMMM...........you could post multiple clear pics? Different shots........you know, or is this a problem for some people?


For some odd reason, this does seem to be a problem for some people. I don't understand it. It is extremely easy to get clear pictures to put online, yet some people say they're unable to do so. It's just an excuse.
Heck, if you have a cell then more than likely you have a camera! All laptops have them built in for Skype, I guess. There was no skype when I video chatted.

Peccy's photo
Wed 05/16/12 07:31 PM


Look around at the other ones that have been posting on here for years with little or NO clear pics. Start checking some profiles and then decide if they are really WHO they claim to be. I don't need these kind of people as frinds. I have plenty of REAL friends. I don't care who I offend. Dating sites should make people put up clear PICS of who they are! This will weed out the married ones too! Who are welcome to be here, but don't need to be DATING here!



how would a clear pic change anything, people can post pics of anyone,,,,

and this site doesnt require one even use a pic of themself, as its for mingling and anything beyond that is up to our own risk,, just like real life,,,
UMMM...........you could post multiple clear pics? Different shots........you know, or is this a problem for some people?

Peccy's photo
Wed 05/16/12 11:24 AM
LOL....don't worry there will be A LOT to show you about him in the coming months!

Peccy's photo
Tue 05/15/12 08:55 PM





America desperately needs a viable third party. They don't have one now. If Paul runs as an independent, he will just draw votes from Romney and may cost him the election.


GOOD!




Because she doesn't have enough faith in Obama to win on his own.
LOL...........have you seen his numbers? Hideous! And Paul is the only one who can beat Obama! Mitt doesn't stand a chance, they have mountains of dirt on him!


That's why Romney is now 3-5 points over Obama? slaphead
You must have gotten you info from FOX....because they're not biased or untrustworthy!

Peccy's photo
Tue 05/15/12 08:30 PM
Whatever makes you sleep better at night, you better hope Romney doesn't win, being a loss prevention (whatever you are) is going to be hard to do when stores start going under. Because Romney is just another Obama only a few shades lighter.

Peccy's photo
Tue 05/15/12 06:18 PM

Right here in black and white..1989 conviction him and his gf..rape of three girls:(

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-09-26/news/0209260197_1_child-pornography-images-and-videos-abuse