Okay MM so you've researched all the articles that support your viewpoint. You have dismissed all the articles that refute your viewpoint. You have not verified any truths. There is no cover up, no government involvment in 911. A group of religious extremist hijacked 4 airplanes and guided three of them into the twin towers and the pentagon. END OF STORY!!!

what does anyone have to gain by any of this? does the professor at MIT gain prestige to take on the physics of the collapse? do the fireman on the scene who insist they heard explosions gain anything? No one has anything to gain. being that 90% of the alleged hijackers were from saidi arbia what are we doing in Iraq? http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248

What are we doing in Iraq?

Two words: neocons and oil.

check this out Mnhiker........ http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248

Sigh.

'I wanted to get out
and they pulled me back in!'

Check out Shaolin's post of May 5, 2006 12:49 AM

http://forum.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=messageboard.viewThread&entryID=16568494&adTopicID=23&categoryID=0&IsSticky=1&groupID=100333015&Mytoken=037A00E1-7721-4063-AC9E41C6D877F47F298776765

Synopsis: Jeff King is NOT a structural engineer by training,
which DOESN'T make him an expert on the subject.

You don't need experts in anything

All you need to do is figure how many people it would take to pull off this very elaborate schema. (Im saying more then alot)


Then take it to account every time a sex tape is released in the public there are only two people that know about it at the time of filming.


The posibility of anyone keeping there mouth shut let alone everyone. Big Fat Impossible.

ok however the man who designed the trade towers did say that it should have withstood the impact. Its realy not cool to attack the messenger being JEff KIng I find his credentials sound enough and his logic is perfect, watch the video and decide http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1822764959599063248

two examples of your impossible logic Manhatten project and the stealth bombers, how about the gulf of tonkin tossed in for the fun of it

I don't care if it's cool or not.

If he's not an expert on the subject
he's talking about, then he has
little credibility in my book.

Get the opinion of an expert
structural engineer and a
demolitions expert and
maybe that would be more
credible.

I cant cut and paste all of these http://patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html

The so called experts couldn't figure out how to get a truck from being stuck under an overpass until a 6 year old kid said why don't you try letting the air out of the tires.

They noted discrepancies. So what?
It just means that the official
government explanation of events
was probably flawed.

As it states in your article:
'Several even allege government complicity
in the terrible acts of 9/11.'

Why only several?

If the evidence was so clear-cut
and indisputable, shouldn't it
be almost unanimous?

Witness the doubt in their explanations:

"almost certainly brought down by controlled demolitions", "possible use of explosives".

They are making educated guesses,
not conclusive ones.

and that exacly has what to do with this conversation?

There is absolutely
no conclusive proof
of a government conspiracy,
only conjecture.

If it looks like a duck walks like a duck and quakes like a duck it isnt a chicken

Experts are sometimes wrong.


Yeah, Go with the duck formula. FUNNY FUNNY

I think its funny you cannot defend your position at all its all your opinion at least I get the opinion of experts to back me up. its a great topic to discuss

Its the same arguments that were around after we landed on the moon!!!!!No validity at all.

Did we really land on the moon?

Remember Capricorn One?