Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 … 14 15 Next

Topic: Obama 08
mrtxstar Joined Sun 12/30/07 Posts: 436	Sun 01/06/08 02:21 PM
Conny Rice?

Passiespel Joined Fri 12/07/07 Posts: 1219	Sun 01/06/08 02:21 PM
She's not that stupid to work for Hillary.

mrtxstar Joined Sun 12/30/07 Posts: 436	Sun 01/06/08 02:22 PM
As front runner in GOP?

toastedoranges Joined Thu 01/03/08 Posts: 11042	Sun 01/06/08 02:22 PM
She's not that stupid to work for Hillary. yet she's smart enough to work for bush?

Passiespel Joined Fri 12/07/07 Posts: 1219	Sun 01/06/08 02:31 PM
Point taken en so true!

FreshMountainAir Joined Thu 08/30/07 Posts: 17879	Sun 01/06/08 02:42 PM
I would vote for Condoleezza Rice way before I would vote for Hillary!!

StuffedAnimalOrgy Joined Sun 12/30/07 Posts: 1035	Sun 01/06/08 02:43 PM
In my opinion Ron Paul was the best bet, but the media kept him secret until the end so yeah.

toastedoranges Joined Thu 01/03/08 Posts: 11042	Sun 01/06/08 02:44 PM
I would vote for Condoleezza Rice way before I would vote for Hillary!! i'd rather shoot myself in the foot. have you seen her testify before congress when called to do so? she makes me sick

FreshMountainAir Joined Thu 08/30/07 Posts: 17879	Sun 01/06/08 02:45 PM
I just put her a step above Hillary! I didn't wish she were a candidate...

mrtxstar Joined Sun 12/30/07 Posts: 436	Sun 01/06/08 02:57 PM
In my opinion Ron Paul was the best bet, but the media kept him secret until the end so yeah. Ron Paul would get us all killed.

StuffedAnimalOrgy Joined Sun 12/30/07 Posts: 1035	Sun 01/06/08 02:58 PM
Ron Paul would try and make it fair for all classes of living. And Bush is already trying to get us all killed.

toastedoranges Joined Thu 01/03/08 Posts: 11042	Sun 01/06/08 03:14 PM
ron paul is the best one out there imo

mrtxstar Joined Sun 12/30/07 Posts: 436	Sun 01/06/08 03:43 PM Edited by mrtxstar on Sun 01/06/08 04:26 PM
Ron Paul would try and make it fair for all classes of living. And Bush is already trying to get us all killed. Fair? He is weak on national defence. Enjoy your fairness when he gets us killed.

JaymeStephens84a0lc Joined Mon 04/23/07 Posts: 2704	Sun 01/06/08 04:37 PM
But if Christianity isn't his religion... no he shouldn't have. I would rather someone swear on something they believe in, but thats just me... or is it? I think most people would agree that if you're being sworn into office to do anything to do with our government I want you believing what you are saying. If a Muslim/Islam puts their hand on the bible to swear wouldn't that be like lying b/c they don't believe what it says? I couldn't with a clear conceince swear on a bible b/c I don't believe in it, but I could swear on my Book of Shadows b/c I believe in it whole heartedly. Your post from another thread. PERSONALLY Obama reminds me of OSAMA... He wouldn't put his hand over his heart at some big rally thing they had during the pledge of alligance or the national anthem. Any citizen has the right to refuse to do so, but I feel that if you are running for office then you should be the most patriotic mother f*cker in there. I don't want someone in the white house, representing our flag that doesn't show pride for what it stands for. I'm I the only one here who interprets these two posts as diametrically opposed to one another? Many People do not have an issue of patriotism.. They have an issue with the Christian religion... That is the sole reason they do not hold their hand to their heart during the anthem and pledge. I dont' care what religion Osama is EITHER! LOL, I DO care that he is a terrorist and their NAMES sound alike!

toastedoranges Joined Thu 01/03/08 Posts: 11042	Sun 01/06/08 04:39 PM
....read the stuff i put up from wikipedia

toastedoranges Joined Thu 01/03/08 Posts: 11042	Sun 01/06/08 04:46 PM Edited by toastedoranges on Sun 01/06/08 04:46 PM
since my name is mike, i must be similar to all the marks in the country. no?

Jistme Joined Wed 10/31/07 Posts: 2991	Sun 01/06/08 05:17 PM
I DO care that he is a terrorist and their NAMES sound alike! My mistake.. I'm going to go rethink my voting strategy now..

JaymeStephens84a0lc Joined Mon 04/23/07 Posts: 2704	Sun 01/06/08 11:14 PM
I DO care that he is a terrorist and their NAMES sound alike! My mistake.. I'm going to go rethink my voting strategy now.. Do you not understand sarcasm?

leahmarie Joined Fri 12/28/07 Posts: 1482	Mon 01/07/08 02:48 AM Edited by leahmarie on Mon 01/07/08 02:49 AM
Since Hillary is being thrown into the mix, here is my two cents. The problem with Hillary is that what she says doesn't make sense. She claims that she has been overseas as wife of the President, what is it, 93 times and that she knows foreign policy. Yet when she was First Lady, she was never cleared for top security. Therefore, she never sat in on any of those overseas meetings. So, how can she claim to have foreign affairs' experience when she never participated in meetings with foreign leaders? Additionally, she also claims to have 35 years of experience. Simultaneously, she touts herself as being the candidate of change. Well, what has she been doing in those 35 years? Why hasn't she been able to orchestrate any change in 35 years? Are we supposed to give her another 35 years to get the job done? One of the posters said more women than men are against Hillary and wonders why. It might be that women are more adept than men in determining when another woman is not truthful.

Jistme Joined Wed 10/31/07 Posts: 2991	Mon 01/07/08 02:50 AM
Do you not understand sarcasm? Why no.. I'm thinkin I don't. My response about rethinking my strategy was obviously sarcastic. Judging by it being so unlike, completely outside of what I'd normally write, my character. Your reply was just a shorter version of what you had written earlier, substantiating the earlier statement which was anything but sarcastic. So..please... Explain the nuances and subtlety of sarcasm, for those of us less skilled? I for one, await your comments on comedic prose with bated breath.