I am sure no one has ever put this Question Here on Forum . So ,,,,
Although There is no Legal definition of Living Together , It Generally Means to Live together as Couples without being [ Married ], In this Era of Mobiles and Networking many couples Live together and are called "Living Together Concept" Do you think this is Good OR Bad ? What's Your Opinion ???

My opinion is people should do whatever makes them happy as long as it is not hurting someone else in the long run..do what they want too..

It does not really matter if you are married or not.. unless your cheating on the one your married to.. then well karma always seems to make it's rounds~~

It's been put out here before more than once. My opinion is that I'm no judge of good or bad when it comes to how people choose to live.

I genuinely value my solitude far too much.

It's not something I would do!

I rather date! Man has his own home.


Some States have common Law marriage after a number of years. Which means
Your mate can claim half your personal assets legally.

So you mean to say Let's not bother about them. Let Them Live Happily Ever After .... Nice words from your Kindest Heart !

It’s upto each person how they choose to live, as long as they are happy and that situation is not causing other damage then who really cares how they live and why should anyone need to have an opinion on the living situation of jack and Jill down the road and Bob and Sandra in the next street .
Such a bizarrre thing to ask ,

That's the Point I am Looking for , You are Cent Percent Right !

I'm just stating my opinion!

It's not my business what Others choose.

Life is about Choices.

But marriage is hard work!!! Are you genuinely serious Curle? I have married twice and it is not something I want to do again tbh. We would have to never, ever argue, because I despise unnecessary conflict or drama. It is easy to say these things, but when you have experienced marriage, sometimes it is not the fairytale one thinks.

Hello Everyone

There are those that have had a very bad and costly divorce financially, and will not marry again. There are those that only separate and cannot remarry. Living together the second time around is perhaps a halfway house for them, so to speak. A feeling of commitment to each other for both people, without the need to marry.

then why live , you are going to die.....the woman in most cases get the

shaft...bad idea for her, she needs commitment...and to really be

connected...

she misses all the joys preparing for the wedding with friends and

family. the wedding its self, the reception party, and the honey moon....

I am happy enough, sharing the house with my cats :cats:

I agree with you, it would be difficult for a woman to accept it, however, I do sympathise with guys who have had a bad divorce and decide never to remarry. Maybe after living together for awhile the guy may relent and decide to marry if she kept pushing.

I disagree as not all women want to marry, this is the 21st century after all!

You know it swings both ways right? There are women who have had a bad divorce and say they never want to marry again, and there are some men who want to marry and push for it!

Just saying

What's sacred about it?
Marriage the way we know it has been created by church way back when. It was a great means to control people, and also to oppress women in general which was the church's agenda as before they came into power women had equal power to men, and in some areas even more. Those were the areas that women were better at. This was respected, acknowledged, and that way both gender could be and live what they were good at.
It was like that with ALL ancient people.

It all got messed up when church came into power and installed a patriarchal system.
So there's nothing sacred about it. Sorry to burst your bubble.

Before all that crap people were pagans (a church term for heretics, aka non-churchies and thus evil) also had marriage, but entirely different. There was handfasting in certain cultures, and this was valid for a year. If they wished they could extend it, if not, then not. No one would judge.

The judging of such things is a result of the church/religion doctrine.

Then we got people marrying because it was easier if one would pass away. And maybe even cheaper tax-wise.

And now people choose whatever they want.
That freedom of choice is Sacred!

I agree with you, I did keep my first comment addressed to both men and women. We just went on to say women are more likely to want the commitment of marriage, than a man is for the reasons mentioned, but yes it swings both ways.

I think it is good because if things don't work out it doesn't cost you court fees