Topic: TODAY IN TRUMP LAND | |
---|---|
He is president, rich, beautiful wife and you think he is stupid. Yes, simply because those things are not what makes a man. Beautiful wife? Maybe you should ask Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal about that. That, within and of its self, makes the man stupid. His actions speak volumes about what the man really is. http://www.vox.com/2018/8/21/17765348/michael-cohen-guilty-plea-stormy-daniels-hush-money Any man that can do this to his wife isn't much of a man. http://www.newsweek.com/president-donald-trump-stormy-daniels-affair-melania-trump-783790 dont forget Charles: as it pertains to intelligence stupid: having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense. just noting it doesn't mention income level, career choice, or spousal attractiveness.... popularity is not an indication of intelligence although I am grateful he has not yet done too much damage to the trends the previous administration set in motion after reversing the damage done under Bush Jr. His own words and actions lead me to believe intelligence is not his strength ... unless you count being able to exploit bigotry and fear ... in which case he is brilliant, but not in an IQ test kind of way. I suppose thats why all the 'popular' high school clicks have so many nerds and future scientists. different skillsets, having nothing to do with the common idea of 'intelligence'. |
|
|
|
It's Not Just the President* Who Ought to Be Sweating Today.
In part, "Before the Paul Manafort's Destiny Party really gets rolling—Vodka and ostrich meat for everyone!—let's pause for a moment and consider Vice President Mike Pence. The Choirboy (pace Doghouse Riley) was going nowhere in the winter of 2016. He had screwed up eight ways from Sunday as governor of Indiana, and it was better than even money that he wouldn't be re-elected. His career had kicked the ye oaken bucket. From here, http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a23133924/paul-manafort-cooperating-robert-mueller-mike-pence/ |
|
|
|
Take my Trump Tower apartment instead of my money, Manafort tells Mueller.
The swamp is really starting to stink. "Former Trump campaign chief Paul Manafort told prosecutors he preferred that they seize his apartment in Trump Tower than give up one of the four bank accounts special counsel Robert Mueller's team was eyeing, court papers showed Friday. Manafort is surrendering an estimated $46 million worth of cash and real estate as part of his plea deal. The longtime Republican operative also agreed to cooperate with Mueller's investigations into possible collusion by President Donald Trump's campaign with Russians who interfered in the 2016 election". http://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/14/manafort-told-mueller-to-take-his-trump-tower-apartment-instead-money.html |
|
|
|
Manafort agrees to up to 10 years in prison and forfeiture of real estate and cash. Doesn't sound like anything an innocent victim of a witch hunt would endure.
|
|
|
|
What does manaforts personal tax issues have to do with trump? Oh they are trying to get him to say incriminating things about Trump by using something that has nothing to do with Trump.
|
|
|
|
What does manaforts personal tax issues have to do with trump? Oh they are trying to get him to say incriminating things about Trump by using something that has nothing to do with Trump. That's what I am wondering about.but I suppose in TDS anything is possible,even booting Trump and appointing Hillary! |
|
|
|
now,how about giving the Podesta-Boys the same deal?
Equal Treatment under the Law and all,since they have violated the same Codes,and Manafort was working for them! |
|
|
|
It's Not Just the President* Who Ought to Be Sweating Today. In part, "Before the Paul Manafort's Destiny Party really gets rolling—Vodka and ostrich meat for everyone!—let's pause for a moment and consider Vice President Mike Pence. The Choirboy (pace Doghouse Riley) was going nowhere in the winter of 2016. He had screwed up eight ways from Sunday as governor of Indiana, and it was better than even money that he wouldn't be re-elected. His career had kicked the ye oaken bucket. From here, http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a23133924/paul-manafort-cooperating-robert-mueller-mike-pence/ Hey junior- you know ZERO about Indiana. We are currently in the BLACK. To the tune of 1.78 Billion dollars. https://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/indiana-tallies-million-budget-surplus-reserve-balance-of-billion/article_0d9c36077c71-5bb3-9a5d-a441f2c1c1bc.html It came from the work of Mitch Daniels, and Mike Pence. We're number one in Steel production. The state is below the national average in unemployment. Want a good, high paying job? Come to Indiana. Our HIP Indiana plan was pretty good, until obama came along and screwed it up. Which is why we sued the fed for our money back. For someone who wants links, you must have not gone very far in your research. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Toodygirl5
on
Sun 09/16/18 04:58 PM
|
|
What does manaforts personal tax issues have to do with trump? Oh they are trying to get him to say incriminating things about Trump by using something that has nothing to do with Trump. That's what I am wondering about.but I suppose in TDS anything is possible,even booting Trump and appointing Hillary! That will never happen , Hillary is a crook.Nothing good would come out of her being in control of US. Look at Benghazi. !!! : |
|
|
|
Edited by
Charles1962150
on
Sun 09/16/18 05:52 PM
|
|
How the Mueller Investigation Could Play Out for Trump
"Of all the questions hanging over the special counsel investigation, one stands out: How will President Trump fare in the end?" http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/05/23/us/politics/trump-mueller-russia.html "House Benghazi Report Finds No New Evidence of Wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton". House Benghazi Report Finds No New Evidence of Wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton "Ending one of the longest, costliest and most bitterly partisan congressional investigations in history, the House Select Committee on Benghazi issued its final report on Tuesday, finding no new evidence of culpability or wrongdoing by Hillary Clinton in the 2012 attacks in Libya that left four Americans dead". http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi.html |
|
|
|
Say goodbye to that extra money you're making. I knew this was just a matter of time.
The Trump tax hikes are coming. "President Trump’s biggest political win, so far, is the tax-cut legislation he signed into law late last year. But Trump is now taking action that is essentially a tax hike on American consumers and will offset a portion of the tax cuts he has been crowing about for nine months. And in typical renegade fashion, Trump is dismissing political orthodoxy by daring to hit voters with new taxes just weeks before a crucial election. http://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trump-tax-hikes-coming-194457071.html When tax cuts are disguised future tax increases http://www.usatoday.com/opinion/ "The late Milton Friedman, a free-market economist and Nobel laureate, liked to say that to spend is to tax. Today's tax cuts, if they lead to deficits, are really just disguised future tax increases. The same is true of today's deficit-building spending increases. They, too, are poorly disguised future tax increases". People who lived through the Reagan years and are willing, to tell the truth, we saw this coming. |
|
|
|
OMG,the world's coming to an end,YAHOO and USA Today are channeling Friedman.
The Keynesians are channeling Friedman! What a hoot! |
|
|
|
Say goodbye to that extra money you're making. I knew this was just a matter of time. The Trump tax hikes are coming. "President Trump’s biggest political win, so far, is the tax-cut legislation he signed into law late last year. But Trump is now taking action that is essentially a tax hike on American consumers and will offset a portion of the tax cuts he has been crowing about for nine months. And in typical renegade fashion, Trump is dismissing political orthodoxy by daring to hit voters with new taxes just weeks before a crucial election. http://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trump-tax-hikes-coming-194457071.html When tax cuts are disguised future tax increases http://www.usatoday.com/opinion/ "The late Milton Friedman, a free-market economist and Nobel laureate, liked to say that to spend is to tax. Today's tax cuts, if they lead to deficits, are really just disguised future tax increases. The same is true of today's deficit-building spending increases. They, too, are poorly disguised future tax increases". People who lived through the Reagan years and are willing, to tell the truth, we saw this coming. If you had spent several years getting by on rental income because your work went to another country, you might understand. My son got a tax cut and I got a job out of it. I'm making up the difference in his tax cut plus about 3 times more. My company is adding machines which adds more jobs, plus jobs for the guys installing the machines. The more you spend, the more taxes you pay. The more money you make, the more you spend. It's a great economy. The libs should enjoy it a bit instead of complaining. |
|
|
|
The flaw I see is this. I dont see companies spending money so they can spend MORE money on 'more jobs' for people. If anything, the investment is to CUT expenses (including jobs that they have to pay someone for)
I do agree that the more you make the more you spend, which is why 'conservatives' should maybe get behind higher wages. |
|
|
|
I work in office supplies. As people expand we get orders. I only worked 42 hours last week but my son worked 56. I spend my money for home projects. Lowes got a chunk. That's more jobs for their suppliers.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 09/18/18 09:58 AM
|
|
The walls are slowly starting to crumble down. Trump ex-campaign head Manafort to cooperate with Russia probe "(Reuters) - Donald Trump's former campaign chairman Paul Manafort will cooperate with the federal investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, prosecutors said on Friday, a dramatic turnaround that deals the U.S. president a political setback". http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-manafort/trump-ex-campaign-head-manafort-to-cooperate-with-russia-probe-idUSKCN1LU1WD "I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters." and he was right. And with that type of blind loyalty from so many in his base, I doubt Trump feels 'sweat' about anything. I would guess his father and his money always made a way to fix his messes and keep him out of trouble, and living that life, I doubt #45 has ever or will every 'sweat' over little things like repercussions or accountability. just my opinion though |
|
|
|
Obama was condoning violence back when blacks were looting, setting businesses on fire, vandalizing police cars, and shooting cops.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 09/18/18 11:18 AM
|
|
again with 'blacks'... really? |
|
|
|
Did you keep supporting Obama after policeman were shot and he condoned all the violence the blacks were doing in Missouri? Our country was on the verge of another civil war because our presidents condoned violence from a bunch of thugs. They were burning businesses owned by blacks. It was pure trash.
|
|
|
|
again with 'blacks'... really? With declassification, Trump preps latest Russia probe punch "President Donald Trump has opened a new front in his efforts to discredit the origins of the Justice Department’s Russia probe, with the White House saying he will declassify a trove of documents and publicly release text messages of former FBI officials after calls from a small group of his Republican allies in Congress to do so". http://apnews.com/cf210322a5554685a36cb2f56e1d15bf Sounds like a little bit more obstruction to me. GOP is going to release the way they did for the first one given to Nunes. It will contain half-truth without all of what they redacted not being given. Just enough for Nunes to write non-creditable evidence. Similar to Kavanaugh documents, they would never let the people see all. GOP doesn't even care about the security to the country just to please Trump. Releasing some of the documents is actually opposite of what is called transparency. If they release only the material which suits their narrative, that is the very definition of non-transparency. |
|
|