100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Why Are Women Afraid to Send the First Letter | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
in the "modern world", anything that can, might, may be an insinuation of un perfectness of another, can, might, may be taken as such.
the art of unaccusatory speak is no doubt going to become more valuable each day. of course, that is for when one does not want to accuse. but hey, cheers to all the love messages! hehehe... smiles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't presume to speak for women & I don't think you can generalise for all, I think if you do then you're going down the slippery slope of sexism. I'm just so greatful & suprised when I get a first message (Ame)
Thank you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Me thinks this thread needs to be stamped like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is the OP: I am not being presumptuous, although wondering why women will search a man's profile, but rearly if ever send the first introductory letter to a man? Not every profile is interesting to a woman understood. Please notice that the author of the OP didn't say "many women" or "most women" or "all women". He simply said "women". Granted, I consider the inquiry to be a bit clumsy if not weird. In English-language writing, if there is no quantifying qualifier in front of a noun, the "all" is presumed and understood. I was cutting the OP slack by allowing the missing quantifier TO be "many" or "most" instead of the understood "all". In any event, not a single single woman has indicated "fear" is the reason. 
Using a qualifier would limit the individuals the topic is addressing. I was not trying to exclude any individual from expressing their experiences. You made presumptions, not me*. I noticed you also missed punctuation yourself. Any complaints about your imperfect gramatical* skills[.*] *I *grammatical (though, it should be grammar) [*] ? I'm sorry...you were in the middle of making a point, and I interrupted you. Oh, and you went off-topic. And, you went off topic simply to attack another poster. Though, I suppose, if you're the OP you're *allowed* to do that. Or, perhaps if you're male, you're *allowed* to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't presume to speak for women & I don't think you can generalise for all, I think if you do then you're going down the slippery slope of sexism. I'm just so greatful & suprised when I get a first message (Ame) Thank you Hi Chris! 
Hoped it was a pleasant surprise though! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't presume to speak for women & I don't think you can generalise for all, I think if you do then you're going down the slippery slope of sexism. I'm just so greatful & suprised when I get a first message (Ame) Thank you Hi Chris!
Hoped it was a pleasant surprise though!
Oh Yes! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am not being presumptuous, although wondering why women will search a man's profile, but rearly if ever send the first introductory letter to a man? Not every profile is interesting to a woman understood. I'm not sure I agree. Don't get me wrong, I'm not inundated with first messages but I do get one here and there. Then again, I don't send many myself, it depends what's in the profile I supose. At least that's what usually appeals to me rather than looks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In my experience most wimmin say Hi, and then ***** if a man say's hi back.. Guy's rarely make long posts until they are gettin some good..JS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that is the major problem why lovers loose their God sent partners because woman always want men to approach them first and some of them don't reply.they look at age!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that is the major problem why lovers loose their God sent partners because woman always want men to approach them first and some of them don't reply.they look at age! 
wait, let me understand what be happenin here... how can somebody "loose" what they never "had"? it's not like a car, where you buy it. or like your car key's that you can "loose"... the notions you speak about are all from a "ownership" perspective... like others are taking what "belongs" to one self... are not relationships based upon "2 peoples mutual consent", for as long as that may exist by 2... are you talking about trying to subvert the free will mutual consent of another by trying to imply "God" sent this partner to one self, so they should NOT LEAVE, or want to be somewhere else, with anyone or someone else... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey wait that nut is Loose Better tighten it or you may lose it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it tis a nut tightening day for a devised post for all the great loose screws on such occasions as this.
a fine toast to the screw nuts chews for the holidays! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm just wondering why there's no popcorn in this ENTIRE thread?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outta popcorn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Okay. *munches on a piece of catbread*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am not being presumptuous, although wondering why women will search a man's profile, but rearly if ever send the first introductory letter to a man? Not every profile is interesting to a woman understood. I m not a gal...so i cannt answer DAT but i assume dat gals always wants boys to take dat first step. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it seams that women think one way and we men think another way.no sence in talking about it.bang your head against the wall and it will allways hert..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
there is one woman here that likes to atack men.no matter what we say we are wrong in her eyes.who cares if we cant spell as long as people understand.im not likeing seeing her make snotty coments.so if you dont like men im sure theres a off switch on your computer.use it....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm an old fashioned woman and a bit shy, so for me, its kinda weird to start send first message to a man.
I always worries about what they will think of me, if Im doing that ??? So I think, I cant do that, because it makes me uncomfort with myself, maybe it's like doing an embarrassing thing. :| |
|
|
|
|
