oh, more of the poor persecuted privileged double standards

1.He doesn't need to be judged guilty of anything additional here, his maker is taking care of that



NO, PEOPLE DONT HAVE TO BE 'FOUND GUILTY' TO PAY A PRICE< DO THEY? GLAD WE AGREE

and


YEP, AS GEORGES 'MAKER' WILL BE TAKING CARE OF ANYTHING 'ADDITIONAL' FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE



2. On earth he was adjudicated a problem,

FUNNY, SO WAS GEROGE, THATS WHY HE HAS AN ARREST RECORD AND HAD TO ATTEND AN ALCOHOL PROGRAM IN ADULTHOOD

3.And George is guilty of nothing but from the entitlement crowd that believes that have the entitlement to pass their judgement on others.

ENTITLEMENT BLAH BLAH BLAH,,,,,,

SO FUNNY< I GUESS THAT MAKES EVERYONE CALLING THE TEEN A THUG PART OF THAT CROWD TOO,,,lol

4. You want to be entitled, then entitle yourself to be responsible for yourself and learn that violating anothers rights will result in your being a thug and joining the other little thug.


GREAT ADVICE,,, YOU SHOULD SHARE IT WITH YOUR DOMESTIC ABUSING< GUN TOTING< STALKING HERO ZIMMERMAN

Im sure the superior minds can make out incomplete sentences as long as they are within the context of the rest of the conversation, and SPELLED out in ENGLISH,,,lol

awww

no one here hates that little coward of a man,,, but I will admit to having distaste for adults who so comfortably attack children

and the 'current' photo, btw, is not a photo of Treyvon,,,but, what does research matter when slinging around information that reinforces our personal agenda?

psssst.....they don't convict dead people because they are never tried in a court of law, it doesn't mean they are INNOCENT.......Martin was indirectly found guilty of causing his own death by Zimmerman's acquittal.

Martin had called himself a "Gangsta", and without splitting hairs it's AKA a thug.

Does this "persecuted privileged" ridiculous rhetoric of yours include those of us who happen to be white middle income tax payer who fund the entitlement crowd? If so it's like biting the hand that has fed you.

no no, cant change the rules now,, we cant ADD on

Treyvon was not found GUILTY of anything, Zimmerman was merely not found GUILTY of second degree murder

being found 'not guilty' only means jurors convince each other that SPECIFIC statutes don't apply to the evidence, it doesn't mean 'innoocent' of the action, only not PROVEN guilty

MArtin didn't call himself 'a gangsta ' either

and the persecuted privileged has nothing to do with taxpayer status , so , no,, it isn't at all synonymous with white taxpayers

most everyone in my family are likewise taxpayers but don't GRIPE about some of those taxes helping to feed and shelter children , elderly, and disabled, and don't look down their nose on them or make and spread their NASTY ASSumptions about their character,.,,

and I buy my own food with money I 'earned', so I am personally not worried about biting the hand that feeds me

So. According to you, Biz Z CHASED Dead Thug down, spun him around, shot him in the heart, then, pulled the Dead Gangsta on top of him while beating his own face and banging his own head on the pavement?

Makes sense, in a stupid liberal kinda way?

Perhaps, stupid liberals can demand a retrial and hand pick they own jury.

BTW. The testimony Precious read was put together with the help of the prosecution. From hearing her speak, I doubt she could string a full testimony. Her verbal incontinence kept spewing her real intelligence.

its clear what I, as someone who has been there, believes

'Big Z' 200 some odd pounds at the time thought the teen was 'up to no good' ( don't just 'believe' that, its on the emergency call)


'Big Z' followed the teen in his car (also admitted to in the Zs recorded reenactment with the police)


...at this same time the teen is telling his friend on the phone that the '*****' is staring him down

'Big Z' then sees the teen turn back and come towards him (again, heard on the emergency call)



'Big Z' , after the kid has passed behind him, becomes irritated that he might 'get away' gets out his car and chases after him (also heard on the emergency call)


.. at the same time the teen is telling his friend that he is being followed and is advised to run from what might be a 'pedophile'

'Big Z' continues to follow the kid , after being advised not to(evidenced by where the altercation took place)


..after this time, the teen expresses to his friend that he thinks he lost the stranger but then expresses disgust at the fact that the man has appeared 'right behind' him again,,,


a WITNESS Hears voices speaking loudly (same time friend on phone says teen stated he wasn't gonna keep running and teen asks stranger why he is following him)

Stranger (one of the voices the witness HEARD before the altercation) responded aggressively , according to friend on phone with 'what are you doing around here'

now here, based upon 'Big Zs' previous Proactive aggression that night and BEFORE that nigh with others,, is where I believe it MOST LIKELY That he decided to try to Detain the teen so he wouldn't 'get away'


at which point, after already not knowing why this stranger had followed him in his car and then got out on foot to trail him, the teen FOUGHT with him


'Big Z', realizing he bit off more than he could chew, panicked, realized his own gun posed a threat that the boy may get his hands on, and used it instead to shoot the boy

now, I cant prove it happened that way, nor could the prosecutor, nor did the defense prove it DIDNT happen that way


its not a stupid 'liberal' idea either, its a idea from someone who has BEEN THERE in Treyvons shoes,, only my attacker was a rapist perv without a gun who decided to RUN when I fought back loudly, probably scared of drawing attention to him,,,,, which it did, which got him pretty quickly apprehended,,,

I didn't change any rules, I merely gave MY OPINION, which you don't like, of how the verdict can be interpreted. OH wait.....I'm not a dogmatic liberal so I'm not ENTITLED to an opinion!!!!!!

I said Martin was INDIRECTLY found guilty, not that he was found guily.....and Martin did refer to himself as a "gangsta" in a text message to one of his friends that was made public.....and I'm not going to find proof for you....don't believe me then YOU can PROVE me wrong.

So any tax payer who complains and doesn't like that THEIR TAX DOLLARS are being spent to support people who use the publically funded welfare system as an OPTION because working is INCONVENIENT is your idea the "persecuted privileged"???? Those middle class tax payers aren't privileged and don't consider themselves persecuted, unlike the lazy parasites who want someone else to PAY FOR THEIR CHOICES. Feeling it's unfair that their tax dollars are being spent on lazy people who "game" the system doesn't equate to feeling persecuted.......you need a dictionary.

Most of those people who complain don't have a problem helping those in NEED like children, the elderly and the HELPLESS either.....they do have a problem with LAZY PARASITES WHO USE THE SYSTEM AS AN OPTION RATHER THAN WORKING TO SUPPORTING THEMSELVES. DO YOU GET THAT?????? Or can't you accept that is what they object to because it hits too close to home for your liking?

YES! we are all sharing our 'opinions' regarding Zimmerman who is the topic of the thread


Agreements are so much more pleasant and straight forward,,

and no, taxes aren't meant to be spent on frauds , and taxpayers have a right to gripe about frauds although there are already laws in place that back them up in that point of view and judicial processes in place to try to diminish those instances

but those instances ARE the exception rather than the rule and the precious 'taxpayers' who constantly complain about the safety net system because of those exceptions and who constantly stereotype the whole system and all on it with degrading character assassinations are the 'persecuted privileged' I refer to,,,

Pure rubbish, for the umpteenth time.

More pure rubbish, for the umpteenth time.

uh oh! new phrase of the day for the PPP

from entitlement crowd,,,,blah blah blah

to 'pure rubbish for the umpteenth time'


,,,creative and colorful , part distraction, part avoidance

,, nice job

More rubbish, for the umpteenth time, for the entitlement crowd. Doesn't change matters, still just rubbish.

make sure to follow those around all day who don't agree with ya and post

'more rubbish',,, it helps to practice our typing in this internet age,,,,

Msharmony i'd give it up,

Arguing with someone who chooses to have a fictitious "civil" flag as their profile pic already shows you that they are going to follow their beliefs regardless if it is based in fiction or not.

http://www.loeser.us/flags/american_note_2.html

No matter how many times you say the facts in the case, they will still refuse to believe it, because frankly they don't want to.

Just like i'm a form supporter of the Constitution but now somehow because I think George Zimmeran acted inappropriately, I now apparently have no faith in it, I am also some how lumped into someones version of the "entitlement crowd" oh and my understanding of a what a 'right' is, is apparently flawed.

The other side of the argument will always be "thug got what he deserved" my problem is we aren't a vigilante nation, and George Zimmerman stepped outside of his duties, if he was a cop, i'd probably be on his side, my problem is he isn't a cop, and him trying to act like one got someone killed.

Someone who took a 3-hour gun course that fulfilled the requirements for a Concealed Carry Permit, doesn't, and shouldn't have the same authority as someone who spent 12-30 weeks in a police academy.

George Zimmerman's own words "These azzholes they always get away" it wasn't his job to make sure they didn't get away, that is a job for the police, and again he isn't the police.

But his supporters will continue to uphold him as some sort of hero/celebrity...

When in reality he is nothing but a wanna-be police officer, who pretended to have more authority than he did, got in an altercation(after he was advised by professionals to not even follow), and then he took someone's life.

Not someone I would want anyone looking up to, but some will, some won't and even others will realize that in the grand scheme of things he's really a nobody pretending to be a somebody and as long as we are talking about him, we are helping him in that endeavor. So with that, I am done with this topic, Zimmerman doesn't deserve the attention, so I'm starting with myself and refusing to give him any more of it.

well put, I recently took that approach with a certain female entertainer , its proven harder to take that approach on this subject because I have been in that situation and I have an only son who could find himself in that situation,,,

it literally turns my stomach listening and reading the praises for this person,,,and simultaneous and hypocritical condemnation of the teen who lost his life

but maybe that is even more reason to avoid the topic,,

I do appreciate your rational contribution, something to consider very seriously

His ho mama named him Dead Thug. Hate to call her a ho, cuz another fellow impressioned on me that a ho serves a purpose.

She tryin ta get green, now she lost a meal ticket.

I can here on the skreet corner now. "I luvs mah boi. Buy a teeshirt and bumpa stickah, missah, pleeese."

Perhaps a job would be in order.

That is my flag and has meaning to me and I could care less what you think of it. It is just another piece of BS that demonstrates a distinct lack of understanding of rights.



A distinct contradiction in beliefs which can't happen. If something is white it denies the existence of black and vice versa, it can't be both. As stated before your either understand the constitution or you don't, don't in your case. So of course you would have no faith in it, that is part of what the entitlement crowd is all about. Perhaps if the indoctrinated were to pay some attention to detail some basic concepts may have been learned.



So now cops can shoot anyone they want without question, hang the law. And another idiot steps up and second guesses a jury which even the supreme court is forbidden to do except in a "nis pris" court. Sir I do wish I had legal issue with you and could take you into my court, that horse would be served for dinner and the rest sent to the glue factory as I would have no desire to feed or house it.



And what part of the second amendment do you not understand, don't need no carry permit, it is my right, period. And what part of servant do you not understand. A policeman is but a servant and has no privileges except those extended to them by the masters, the people. When in uniform, a police officer is a second class citizen, a public servant, period. They have but one function, keep the peace, period.



And Georgie would be correct, they do always get away because most of our peace officers are too busy being police officers, the revenue collectors. But hey, one overstepped his bounds and caught paid for it, thanks Georgie, one didn't get away.



Oh and this is really rich, what an idiotic statement. Now just what part of public servant denotes authority? And would this authority be based on unlimited police powers? And just where would that be in the constitution. Let me give you a hint, it isn't. And another hint, using authority that isn't there is a breach of contract, you know the one with the oath of office. That leads to the status of an imposter in the office and nullifies any perceived immunity. Oh and carrying a gun in the commission of any unlawful act amplifies the act to "armed". I love those that try to imply authority and steps on my rights, having horse for dinner.

And by the way, a 911 operator is just that an operator and is not a sworn officer, no authority but to answer phone, render assistance and dispatch emergency services.



So just more BS with no clue to what is actually being said. Another entitlement group trait.