Topic: Superstar Big Zimbob Signs Autographs at Gunshow | |
---|---|
Edited by
alnewman
on
Sat 03/15/14 07:15 PM
|
|
yes, of course, HARVARD made it up,,,and those not from Harvard are privileged with the truth,,because of what they HAVENT seen,,,lol Only the Odumboite entitlement crowd could believe that, for others the old saying, "put up or shut up" applies and for Odumbo it seems like it's shut up. But I forgot, the entitlement crowd don't need facts or proof, just their sensibilities. Is the term entitlement crowd the same as leeching welfare whores? No much worse, the ho actually performs a needed service on occasion. But then sometimes there are those ho's like the ones Georgie keeps getting mixed up with that call the cops when they don't get what they want. |
|
|
|
is the term weak BEYATCH referring to an ill female dog
a bully white Hispanic who cant get a 150 pound teen off of him or an immature old man who tries to be hip and cool by posting misogynistic and classist insults from the safety and anonymity of their computer ? |
|
|
|
I mean, since we wish to take every topic to this place,,, IM just asking?
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sat 03/15/14 08:07 PM
|
|
is the term weak BEYATCH referring to an ill female dog Like the man says, a whore serves a purpose. a bully white Hispanic who cant get a 150 pound teen off of him or an immature old man who tries to be hip and cool by posting misogynistic and classist insults from the safety and anonymity of their computer ? Speaking of. When you're crowd gonna sue the jury and legally retry Big Z, the Hispanic? I bet, that old man would speak the same, cara a cara. He's no welfare slut. |
|
|
|
im�ma�ture
adjective adjective: immature 1. not fully developed. I would say that applies to the entitlement crowd that can't accept reality. George was illegally tried in the first place because the racist just could understand what a little thug got what he deserved but then was vindicated by a jury of his peers and found "not guilty" by unanimous decision, means all of them for the immature entitlement people that can't understand the language. Of course just being a part of the entitlement crowd would classify as immature, not fully developed, the reason they believe they are entitled in the first place. But for all he has had to endure has made Georgie a hero in my book, hey let's all seem him ammo gift cards. Here is what he can use: Yeah, he still has a lot of work ahead of him. And I understand Georgie wants to do a little gambling. I wonder what states Georgie got a CCI permit from? |
|
|
|
Edited by
isaac_dede
on
Sat 03/15/14 09:39 PM
|
|
what does the "entitlement" crowd have to do with Zimmerman?
I'm not part of the "entitlement" crowd But before you try to use another Ad Hominem argument, and attack me instead of the issue. Let me put this out there. I'm a 32, single white male, grew up on a farm(although a small one), I am a strong believer in our right to own firearms, I am a fan of a smaller government. I also hold 2 Bachelor's degrees, where I graduated with Honors, In addition to my education I served my country for 8 years in the Naval intelligent community, where unfortunately I was honorably discharged for medical reasons. According to the media, I should be backing Zimmerman 100%, well I don't. I am not privy to all the of the FACTS that the jury had before them, but from what I do know, I have some issues with the case. Whether he is guilty or not,(the courts don't always get it right, we've had people let off after 20+ years were stolen from their lives when they got it wrong), showing up to sign weapons, that he used to kill a person is in poor taste, if it wasn't then why don't soldiers go to Iraq, and hold an assault rifle signing? Because of respect, which clearly Zimmerman has NO RESPECT for this HUMAN'S life he took. Vilifying the victim, is the same argument dirty cops make when a prostitute is raped, it's because "she's a 'whore' so she deserved it" what someone does, or how someone is portrayed doesn't make the FACT that he was KILLED any less of a crime than if it were someone else. |
|
|
|
Welfare slutting came into play when Z was accused of not working and living off taxpayers who are forced to support irresponsible ghetto hos and their rats.
No one has to back anyone. Jury found Big Z innocent. Whiners will whine. Dead thug got justice. He assaulted and Z defended himself. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sun 03/16/14 06:47 AM
|
|
what does the "entitlement" crowd have to do with Zimmerman? I'm not part of the "entitlement" crowd But before you try to use another Ad Hominem argument, and attack me instead of the issue. Let me put this out there. I'm a 32, single white male, grew up on a farm(although a small one), I am a strong believer in our right to own firearms, I am a fan of a smaller government. I also hold 2 Bachelor's degrees, where I graduated with Honors, In addition to my education I served my country for 8 years in the Naval intelligent community, where unfortunately I was honorably discharged for medical reasons. According to the media, I should be backing Zimmerman 100%, well I don't. I am not privy to all the of the FACTS that the jury had before them, but from what I do know, I have some issues with the case. Whether he is guilty or not,(the courts don't always get it right, we've had people let off after 20+ years were stolen from their lives when they got it wrong), showing up to sign weapons, that he used to kill a person is in poor taste, if it wasn't then why don't soldiers go to Iraq, and hold an assault rifle signing? Because of respect, which clearly Zimmerman has NO RESPECT for this HUMAN'S life he took. Vilifying the victim, is the same argument dirty cops make when a prostitute is raped, it's because "she's a 'whore' so she deserved it" what someone does, or how someone is portrayed doesn't make the FACT that he was KILLED any less of a crime than if it were someone else. Gee, it's not every day I get to meet someone who doesn't care about the rule of law, rights or justice.... until THEY need it |
|
|
|
Isn't it amazing at how the government run indoctrination system has worked so well. Allows the people to mistaken indoctrination for education, the difference being the capability of critical thinking.
With this understood, it is easy to see why many would be so confused as to not be able to make a decision on their own, without being told what should be thought by the bank owned mass media. For the law has been so distorted in the indoctrinated mind, they little understand the concept of law as was know by this countries founders. The law so well understood in the framing of the world's most unique government for the freedom of the government. This segment of America is even worse than the entitlement crowd that just follows their emotions as stirred up by the media. There is never any doubt as to the entitlement crowds take on any matter, it's whatever the current idol is propagating. But the indoctrinated crowd has been trained to just follow their government and never question what they say is right. And those states that are the worse arbitrators of removal of freedoms, California, New York, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, seem to be full of whiners that just accept what ever is thrown at them. But I do have to give credit to the gun owners of Connecticut, a small minority I might ***, for standing up for their rights and taking on the government. I hope they will stand together as they will fail if they don't. The revolution is upon us, it is high time the people stand up for their rights and contain the entitlement crowd and the idiots. For now there is still a chance to have a peaceful revolution through the courts but that may not be true for long. |
|
|
|
is the term weak BEYATCH referring to an ill female dog a bully white Hispanic who cant get a 150 pound teen off of him or an immature old man who tries to be hip and cool by posting misogynistic and classist insults from the safety and anonymity of their computer ? |
|
|
|
Edited by
alnewman
on
Sun 03/16/14 05:26 PM
|
|
is the term weak BEYATCH referring to an ill female dog a bully white Hispanic who cant get a 150 pound teen off of him or an immature old man who tries to be hip and cool by posting misogynistic and classist insults from the safety and anonymity of their computer ? In all likelihood to a female dog not of the four legged persuasion or maybe it does have four legs instead of a brain. Whichever, it definitely believes it is a member of the entitlement crowd. But definitely not the disparaging about Georgie, he is a "dude" not afraid to pop a cap at some violence bent little thug, a real hero, "dude". And the last remark, just whom was immature and blew their cool, none of the old men here. But this old man sure does enjoy himself all the same and has fear of no one but loves classy, non-entitlement women. So anyway, let me get back to ordering another ammo gift certificate for Georgie's 10mm. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Love that sign!!! |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 03/16/14 08:31 PM
|
|
is the term weak BEYATCH referring to an ill female dog a bully white Hispanic who cant get a 150 pound teen off of him or an immature old man who tries to be hip and cool by posting misogynistic and classist insults from the safety and anonymity of their computer ? In all likelihood to a female dog not of the four legged persuasion or maybe it does have four legs instead of a brain. Whichever, it definitely believes it is a member of the entitlement crowd. But definitely not the disparaging about Georgie, he is a "dude" not afraid to pop a cap at some violence bent little thug, a real hero, "dude". And the last remark, just whom was immature and blew their cool, none of the old men here. But this old man sure does enjoy himself all the same and has fear of no one but loves classy, non-entitlement women. So anyway, let me get back to ordering another ammo gift certificate for Georgie's 10mm. so BEYATCHES have something to do with entitlement,, ? I just thought they had to do with arrogance that cant be backed up with action,, learn something new every day and Georgie, not afraid to pop a cap, not something to brag about, a monkey can shoot a gun too Georgie is not too afraid to follow and intimidate a teen , but is afraid of getting beat by a 150 pound teen though,, sounds like the above mentioned definition of BEYATCH to me seems like the immature one is the one constantly referencing ghetto slang like 'hos' and those who can cosign for him but then feign ignorance when the topic they began (definition of insulting slang) is returned,,,, lol yeah, Im into classy men too,,, but the tacky ones can stand to be corrected so they may be able to improve their faulty logic and hypocritical inconsistencies,,, AS FAR AS ZIMMERMAN,,,,he can use all the help he can get,, just be sure he doesn't kill HIMSELF With all that ammo and weapons intended to be gifted to him |
|
|
|
Edited by
isaac_dede
on
Sun 03/16/14 08:53 PM
|
|
....Gee, it's not every day I get to meet someone who doesn't care about the rule of law, rights or justice.... until THEY need it.... Yet another Ad Hominem argument, and one based on complete assumptions at that. But I'll play, Don't care about he law? That's funny, for 2 years I was attached to the Federal Police in D.C. working patrols in neighborhoods where often I was one the only white guy around, I worked primarily in Barry Farms. Many people saw EVERYONE who lived in Barry Farms as 'thugs' or 'crackheads' and a lot of them were but not all. Because of my race, they tried to partner me with an African-American, in which they succeeded. I was in a position of authority doing police patrols, and authorized not only to carry a firearm, but also to use deadly force if necessary. There were many times when our patrol car was hit with rocks that people threw at us, could we have stopped, got out of our car, and waited for a rock to hit us, then claim self-defense and shoot the people throwing rocks? probably, and we would have probably been justified legally in doing so. However, that is not how a PROFESSIONAL acts, instead we kept on our merry way, we didn't stop to pick a fight, especially with someone who very easily may have been under the influence of drugs. Now you may say that we didn't do our job, blah blah blah, and that we failed in our mission. But that's not the case, the job of a police officer is to protect and serve, and do all things necessary to preserve the peace even at the expense of their own feelings. Were we angry that we had rocks thrown at us...certainly, however, which course of action preserved the peace better? ignoring our own feelings, and keep on going? or jumping out of the car, getting hit, and then returning fire and possibly start street-wide gun fight?....We chose the former, because we understood, that our life was not in immediate danger, and that keeping our cool was the best course of action. Zimmerman, chose to act on his feeling and GOT OUT of his car, if we had a trainee jump out of the car because he got flustered, he would have been let go, or reassigned. There is no place for hot-heads in Law Enforcement, just as there is no place for people who place one life above another's because of job, class, social status, or any other myriad of possible categories that would make one life seem more valuable than another, No where in any oath I ever took, either in the military, or elsewhere do I remember the words "I will serve and protect, Those with job, those who are "this", or those who are "that" I've also noticed that everyone in favor of Zimmerman in this thread, has been referring to him by name, or at least by the last letter of his name, while at the same time, never mentioning Trayvon Martin by name but instead referring to him as a "thug" and stating things such as "got what he deserved", Showing that they clearly place value of one individual higher than another. Regardless of what Trayvon Martin may, or may not have been, it was a POOR DECISION on Zimmerman's part to get out of his car in the first place, he was frustrated that "these guys always get away" obviously he was acting on his FEELINGS and not in the Capacity of a Professional, Did Trayvon drag Zimmerman from his Car?.....Nope. What happened after he got out, yes legally he may have been justified for shooting and killing a teenage boy, and Trayvon may have attacked first, but only AFTER Zimmerman got out of his car, which was a poor a decision in my opinion, and unfortunately it resulted in kid losing their life. Showing up at a gun-show acting like some wanna-be superstar and signing guns, is as i've maintained in very poor taste. And I would venture a guess that the only reason he would do such a thing is to create more controversy and extend his 15-minutes of fame, showing once again the only person he respects is himself, and a complete disrespect for a family whose kid he killed. It is in poor-taste. |
|
|
|
Love that sign!!! like signs that draw attention to individuals,? might love this one, though its twitter, still fits the requirement,, |
|
|
|
Love that sign!!! like signs that draw attention to individuals,? might love this one, though its twitter, still fits the requirement,, Yeah, the old couple that lived at that address were terrorized, vandalized and persecuted for the irresponsible actions of an idiot would didn't bother to confirm the address before posting it! Smart move! |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Mon 03/17/14 07:23 AM
|
|
....Gee, it's not every day I get to meet someone who doesn't care about the rule of law, rights or justice.... until THEY need it.... Yet another Ad Hominem argument, and one based on complete assumptions at that. But I'll play, Don't care about he law? That's funny, for 2 years I was attached to the Federal Police in D.C. working patrols in neighborhoods where often I was one the only white guy around, I worked primarily in Barry Farms. Many people saw EVERYONE who lived in Barry Farms as 'thugs' or 'crackheads' and a lot of them were but not all. Because of my race, they tried to partner me with an African-American, in which they succeeded. I was in a position of authority doing police patrols, and authorized not only to carry a firearm, but also to use deadly force if necessary. There were many times when our patrol car was hit with rocks that people threw at us, could we have stopped, got out of our car, and waited for a rock to hit us, then claim self-defense and shoot the people throwing rocks? probably, and we would have probably been justified legally in doing so. However, that is not how a PROFESSIONAL acts, instead we kept on our merry way, we didn't stop to pick a fight, especially with someone who very easily may have been under the influence of drugs. Now you may say that we didn't do our job, blah blah blah, and that we failed in our mission. But that's not the case, the job of a police officer is to protect and serve, and do all things necessary to preserve the peace even at the expense of their own feelings. Were we angry that we had rocks thrown at us...certainly, however, which course of action preserved the peace better? ignoring our own feelings, and keep on going? or jumping out of the car, getting hit, and then returning fire and possibly start street-wide gun fight?....We chose the former, because we understood, that our life was not in immediate danger, and that keeping our cool was the best course of action. Zimmerman, chose to act on his feeling and GOT OUT of his car, if we had a trainee jump out of the car because he got flustered, he would have been let go, or reassigned. There is no place for hot-heads in Law Enforcement, just as there is no place for people who place one life above another's because of job, class, social status, or any other myriad of possible categories that would make one life seem more valuable than another, No where in any oath I ever took, either in the military, or elsewhere do I remember the words "I will serve and protect, Those with job, those who are "this", or those who are "that" I've also noticed that everyone in favor of Zimmerman in this thread, has been referring to him by name, or at least by the last letter of his name, while at the same time, never mentioning Trayvon Martin by name but instead referring to him as a "thug" and stating things such as "got what he deserved", Showing that they clearly place value of one individual higher than another. Regardless of what Trayvon Martin may, or may not have been, it was a POOR DECISION on Zimmerman's part to get out of his car in the first place, he was frustrated that "these guys always get away" obviously he was acting on his FEELINGS and not in the Capacity of a Professional, Did Trayvon drag Zimmerman from his Car?.....Nope. What happened after he got out, yes legally he may have been justified for shooting and killing a teenage boy, and Trayvon may have attacked first, but only AFTER Zimmerman got out of his car, which was a poor a decision in my opinion, and unfortunately it resulted in kid losing their life. Showing up at a gun-show acting like some wanna-be superstar and signing guns, is as i've maintained in very poor taste. And I would venture a guess that the only reason he would do such a thing is to create more controversy and extend his 15-minutes of fame, showing once again the only person he respects is himself, and a complete disrespect for a family whose kid he killed. It is in poor-taste. The 3rd sentence of the second paragraph explains your ignorance..... |
|
|
|
Edited by
isaac_dede
on
Mon 03/17/14 08:14 AM
|
|
The 3rd sentence of the second paragraph explains your ignorance..... Care to elaborate? So you can actually add something to the topic? Or would you rather just call me ignorant because you are unable to refute my argument in an articulate manner? I don't have a problem with Zimmerman going free honestly. I have a problem with his profiting of the life of a young teenage boy. I have a problem with his lack of respect for that teenagers life, and for in my opinion stepping over the boundaries of his job, he was not a police officer, and in fact the professionals advised him against following Trayvon Martin, to which he said "ok" then obviously chose to ignore the professionals anyway. I also don't think he should be targeted and killed by those who think he is nothing more than a racist murderer. He may have been attacked when he got out of his car, and he may have been legally justified to defend himself, however, my problem is the fact that he got out of the car after PROFESSIONALS advised him against even FOLLOWING Trayvon Martin. But this isn't a topic on whether or not he is guilty, this is a topic on the his showing up at a gun-show to sign autographs, proving that once again he think's he is more important than he is, an insurance-writer doing patrols aka wanna-be police officer. Now really a nobody who had his 15-minutes of fame, and the fact it is fading now he is a wanna-be super star, and it is disgusting to profit of a life he took whether it was self-defense or not. |
|
|
|
Is it the death of Martin he is profiting from or the attention he got in the media, from "civil right profiteers", politicians and even the president?
I would suggest he is profiting from the latter, without the attention he got nationally he would be an unknown and therefore not valuable in attracting people to attend any type of event. |
|
|