i know your smarter than that... but keep trying, maybe someday you'll learn how to spell GOOGLE...

truthorfiction is one of millions of sites that can be found

ON GOOGLE,,,,

Looks like I just killed a thread.
No liberal wants to admit they messiah is a fraud and hates our country.

willing has already shot that site down... they can put whatever they want on there with no repercussions...

try going to the source, instead of your liberal run lie sites...

How about refraining from ad hominem attacks on fact-checking sites because those sites don't support your beliefs.

I copied that off the sites home page. It's part of their disclaimer.

They can post any type of BS they wish and not have to prove it.
May as well be a liberal blog.

Liberal news source;

he legal license President Obama used to justify U.S. military intervention in Libya expires today, and there's little sign the White House is working quickly to get it renewed.

Exactly two months ago, Obama notified Congress of his unilateral decision to engage in "limited military action" to help defend the Libyan people from attacks by their leader, Moammar Gadhafi.

But under federal law -- the War Powers Resolution of 1973 -- Obama is only allowed to keep U.S. forces engaged in hostilities for 60 days, unless Congress declares war, authorizes funding for the effort or extends the deadline.

Congress has not enacted legislation authorizing military involvement in Libya, and the White House has not made a public effort to comply with the rule.

Experts say this is the first time an American president has defied the War Powers Resolution's deadline for participation in combat operations without any concurrent steps by Congress to fund or otherwise authorize the role.

While every administration since 1973 and some lawmakers have questioned the constitutionality of the resolution's infringement on executive power, it has not been successfully challenged in court and remains the law of the land.

Now some members of Congress from both parties want answers.

how about you look something up for once? it's easy to ACT like you know everything, but it's not so easy to actually know something..

point is, people should learn for themselves... it's easy just to say something is false without actually looking anything up, but if you were to put any effort into learning something first before you say how false something is, we wouldn't be having this discussion...

I remember he sued Az because they were enforcing immigration law.

Not enforcing it is contrary to the oath he took




Obama suspends deportation for thousands of illegals, tells GOP to pass DREAM Act
Published June 15, 2012

President Obama said Friday the United States will stop deporting hundreds of thousands of young illegal immigrants and give them work permits, a move praised fellow Democrats but criticized by Republicans on Capitol Hill who said the administration has side-stepped the country’s legislative process.

served in the military.<<< Cool by me.

Individuals who have been convicted of a felony offense, a significant misdemeanor offense, or three or more other misdemeanor offenses not occurring on the same date and not arising out of the same act, omission, or scheme of misconduct are not eligible to be considered for deferred action under the new process.<<< Protecting Illegals who committed felonies

The change is expected to impact roughly 800,000 illegal immigrants.

The election-year announcement was met with surprise and question by several GOP lawmakers.

“This is another example of executive overreach,” Florida GOP Rep. Allen West.

West said he just learned about the policy change Friday morning and that such a move should have come through legislation on Capitol Hill where it could be debated.

“That’s how we do business in the United States,” said West, R; Fla.

New York GOP Rep. Peter King, chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security, vowed an “immediate review" into the possibility that the Department Of Homeland Security will direct U.S. Border Patrol agents to conduct selective enforcement.

i'm not gunna explain anything to them, they know it's true, mostly...

liberals just want to confuse issues, rather than getting to any truth... which would hurt their cause, because of all the liberal lies...

If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bull$hit!

..... or "Barry" them in or under it

We're all just mushrooms, and Barry, as POTUS, is just another fungi as well to the likes of Soros and the bankers/wall street

If he has a clue, they gave it to him to play with

Yeah, yeah. The fact-checking sites don't support the negative false claims about President Obama, and so those sites must be wrong.

Ever heard of Occam's Razor?

liberals are liberals, they lie... so a liberal run website won't lie?

wake up and smell the coffee...

Every thing here was reported by MSM. I'd wager 99% of the claims started were reported by liberal MSM.

Does LIBERAL MSM hate the oButmeister?

Wow, both an urban legend and ad hominem in one sentence.

Perhaps you should read a little about Rich Buhler, the founder of TruthorFiction.com.

WND: "Dean of Christian talk radio' succumbs to cancer"

EthicsDaily.com: "Separating Truth from Fiction: An Interview with Rich Buhler"

The Florida Times-Union (a.k.a.Jacksonville.com) published an article titled "Fact Check: So who's checking the fact-finders? We are".

The article confirms the objectivity of TruthorFiction.com, Snopes.com, FactCheck.org and PolitiFact.com

blah, blah, blah...

you didn't even read the disclaimer on the site you posted...

Deferred action is a discretionary determination to defer removal action of an individual as an act of prosecutorial discretion.
Deferred action does not provide an individual with lawful status.

http://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/consideration-deferred-action-childhood-arrivals-process


the post above (about 'criminals') is regarding those who ARENT ELIGIBLE For a deferment,,,,,


its kind of like in the criminal system, how we 'cut deals' with some,,,,depending upon how much bigger a fish they can get us

its called prosecutorial discretion,, cant remember a time when it didn't exist ,,,,

Yet, you have not proven that the fact-checking websites are wrong.

huh.. and you haven't proven them right...