Topic: Casey Anthony
Lpdon's photo
Sun 07/10/11 01:32 PM



Not lying during court is one thing, clearly she never took the stand, cause she can not speak without perjury....Im talking about the perjury charges she is facing leading to the original arrest in which she led the police and volunteer search groups on a false runaround based on ALL her false statements on some nanny who never existed---and missing child report when she knew KNEW there was a rotting corpse inside her trunk...

DUI___could lead to vehicular manslaughter---they lost their driving rights even when vehicular manslaughter was not present

So Perjury should release her from her right to the right to remain silent in her case where manslaughter WAS present


nothing, and i mean NOTHING EVER requires a person under u.s jursdiction to give up their right to remain silent. she never perjured herself. perjury is a lie told while under oath in court. how can one commit perjury if one does not testify in court? she was convicted on four conts of giving police false statements. that is not perjury.


You're right, My bad on that one. But still think it should have given up her rights to fifth in court, like all 3 strikers---you got to pay sometime...sometimes you lose your right to mingle with society outside the metal bars. some lose their drivers license some should lose their 5th in court...Just my opinion...nothing more.


You might like living in Iran or North Korea if you really think like that.

jrbogie's photo
Mon 07/11/11 06:15 AM



Not lying during court is one thing, clearly she never took the stand, cause she can not speak without perjury....Im talking about the perjury charges she is facing leading to the original arrest in which she led the police and volunteer search groups on a false runaround based on ALL her false statements on some nanny who never existed---and missing child report when she knew KNEW there was a rotting corpse inside her trunk...

DUI___could lead to vehicular manslaughter---they lost their driving rights even when vehicular manslaughter was not present

So Perjury should release her from her right to the right to remain silent in her case where manslaughter WAS present


nothing, and i mean NOTHING EVER requires a person under u.s jursdiction to give up their right to remain silent. she never perjured herself. perjury is a lie told while under oath in court. how can one commit perjury if one does not testify in court? she was convicted on four conts of giving police false statements. that is not perjury.


You're right, My bad on that one. But still think it should have given up her rights to fifth in court, like all 3 strikers---you got to pay sometime...sometimes you lose your right to mingle with society outside the metal bars. some lose their drivers license some should lose their 5th in court...Just my opinion...nothing more.


three stikers do not lose their right to remain silent or to say anything that might incriminate them. where do you get this stuff? have you ever even read the fifth amendment or the maranda decision??? people are removed from society or lose their driver's license only AFTER they've been convicted. anthony was never convicted.

Simonedemidova's photo
Mon 07/11/11 10:07 PM




Not lying during court is one thing, clearly she never took the stand, cause she can not speak without perjury....Im talking about the perjury charges she is facing leading to the original arrest in which she led the police and volunteer search groups on a false runaround based on ALL her false statements on some nanny who never existed---and missing child report when she knew KNEW there was a rotting corpse inside her trunk...

DUI___could lead to vehicular manslaughter---they lost their driving rights even when vehicular manslaughter was not present

So Perjury should release her from her right to the right to remain silent in her case where manslaughter WAS present


nothing, and i mean NOTHING EVER requires a person under u.s jursdiction to give up their right to remain silent. she never perjured herself. perjury is a lie told while under oath in court. how can one commit perjury if one does not testify in court? she was convicted on four conts of giving police false statements. that is not perjury.


You're right, My bad on that one. But still think it should have given up her rights to fifth in court, like all 3 strikers---you got to pay sometime...sometimes you lose your right to mingle with society outside the metal bars. some lose their drivers license some should lose their 5th in court...Just my opinion...nothing more.


three stikers do not lose their right to remain silent or to say anything that might incriminate them. where do you get this stuff? have you ever even read the fifth amendment or the maranda decision??? people are removed from society or lose their driver's license only AFTER they've been convicted. anthony was never convicted.


I never said they lose their right after three strikes, i said they should

Lpdon's photo
Mon 07/11/11 10:55 PM
Edited by Lpdon on Mon 07/11/11 10:55 PM





Not lying during court is one thing, clearly she never took the stand, cause she can not speak without perjury....Im talking about the perjury charges she is facing leading to the original arrest in which she led the police and volunteer search groups on a false runaround based on ALL her false statements on some nanny who never existed---and missing child report when she knew KNEW there was a rotting corpse inside her trunk...

DUI___could lead to vehicular manslaughter---they lost their driving rights even when vehicular manslaughter was not present

So Perjury should release her from her right to the right to remain silent in her case where manslaughter WAS present


nothing, and i mean NOTHING EVER requires a person under u.s jursdiction to give up their right to remain silent. she never perjured herself. perjury is a lie told while under oath in court. how can one commit perjury if one does not testify in court? she was convicted on four conts of giving police false statements. that is not perjury.


You're right, My bad on that one. But still think it should have given up her rights to fifth in court, like all 3 strikers---you got to pay sometime...sometimes you lose your right to mingle with society outside the metal bars. some lose their drivers license some should lose their 5th in court...Just my opinion...nothing more.


three stikers do not lose their right to remain silent or to say anything that might incriminate them. where do you get this stuff? have you ever even read the fifth amendment or the maranda decision??? people are removed from society or lose their driver's license only AFTER they've been convicted. anthony was never convicted.


I never said they lose their right after three strikes, i said they should



There was a man in history who thought like that too, he committed suicide with his woman and dog in a bunker in Germany at the end of World War 2. It partly that logic and the rest of the world wanting him dead for it that put him there.

jrbogie's photo
Tue 07/12/11 04:51 AM





Not lying during court is one thing, clearly she never took the stand, cause she can not speak without perjury....Im talking about the perjury charges she is facing leading to the original arrest in which she led the police and volunteer search groups on a false runaround based on ALL her false statements on some nanny who never existed---and missing child report when she knew KNEW there was a rotting corpse inside her trunk...

DUI___could lead to vehicular manslaughter---they lost their driving rights even when vehicular manslaughter was not present

So Perjury should release her from her right to the right to remain silent in her case where manslaughter WAS present


nothing, and i mean NOTHING EVER requires a person under u.s jursdiction to give up their right to remain silent. she never perjured herself. perjury is a lie told while under oath in court. how can one commit perjury if one does not testify in court? she was convicted on four conts of giving police false statements. that is not perjury.


You're right, My bad on that one. But still think it should have given up her rights to fifth in court, like all 3 strikers---you got to pay sometime...sometimes you lose your right to mingle with society outside the metal bars. some lose their drivers license some should lose their 5th in court...Just my opinion...nothing more.


three stikers do not lose their right to remain silent or to say anything that might incriminate them. where do you get this stuff? have you ever even read the fifth amendment or the maranda decision??? people are removed from society or lose their driver's license only AFTER they've been convicted. anthony was never convicted.


I never said they lose their right after three strikes, i said they should



well, simone, now i think your arguing just to argue. here's what you wrote, 'should have given up her rights to fifth in court, like all 3 strikers.' it looks like a comparison of something that should be and what is. irregardless, when you say 'it should be', i assume you mean it should change from what it is now. i keep asking how you would change things and you keep coming up with statements like this that contain the word 'should.' for anything to change as regards ,tials, juries, testimony, etc., there would have to be an amendment to the constitution. so how would you word such an amendemnt? obviously you'd be aboloshing several current amendments so which would stay and which would go in justice system you'd aprove off? just what rights are YOU willing to give up so that the next casey anderson is sure to be convicted.

TurboRams's photo
Wed 07/20/11 01:25 AM
Don't worry when caylee meets her mother at heavens gates Casey is gonna receive a kick in the mouth and sent to hell by her daughter :)

Simonedemidova's photo
Wed 07/20/11 10:12 AM

Don't worry when caylee meets her mother at heavens gates Casey is gonna receive a kick in the mouth and sent to hell by her daughter :)


I agree, that lil slut can hook up with my ex. They sound like a perfect match...that is if the melting skin off their bones doesnt hurt to bad when they do it...pitchfork

Simonedemidova's photo
Sat 08/20/11 04:56 PM
So i hear that Casey anthony's parents will be on Dr. Phil sometime in September.

Interesting. Are they even still together. Do you think they will now help Casey after she threw them all under the buss or do you thin they will abandon her?

I know she is in hiding but i think she aught to go to Aruba to hide. They have no problem taken out a woman and skating around the system. Then again...thats just her style...

Ladylid2012's photo
Sat 08/20/11 05:27 PM

Don't worry when caylee meets her mother at heavens gates Casey is gonna receive a kick in the mouth and sent to hell by her daughter :)


really?? you sure about that??

i think the perspective of one
on the other side of the veil is
one of love, not hate and revenge

but hey, none of us really know now do we

Ladylid2012's photo
Sat 08/20/11 05:31 PM

So i hear that Casey anthony's parents will be on Dr. Phil sometime in September.

Interesting. Are they even still together. Do you think they will now help Casey after she threw them all under the buss or do you thin they will abandon her?

I know she is in hiding but i think she aught to go to Aruba to hide. They have no problem taken out a woman and skating around the system. Then again...thats just her style...


I feel sorry for her parents
what an awful thing to have to go through

I would think they will forgive and help their daughter, maybe not.

If my child was facing death and me being thrown under a bus would
save their life, i hope they would throw me....i would ask them to.

msharmony's photo
Sat 08/20/11 06:43 PM
Love is mutual, I would hope someone who did something terrible and loved me would not lie about me and throw me under the bus to save their own tale,,,

I would have a hard time taking the HIGHER road with someone that showed me such 'love' and taking their consequences for them....

Ladylid2012's photo
Sat 08/20/11 06:57 PM

Love is mutual, I would hope someone who did something terrible and loved me would not lie about me and throw me under the bus to save their own tale,,,

I would have a hard time taking the HIGHER road with someone that showed me such 'love' and taking their consequences for them....


Love between parents and children is not always equal.
Besides, none of us know what happened behind closed
doors with this family, we only get to see what the media showed us.

Never is easy taking the 'higher' road.
I can't say how I would act, or what I would do if it were my
child's life at stake. Safe to say I wouldn't be rational.

Simonedemidova's photo
Sat 08/20/11 08:11 PM

Love is mutual, I would hope someone who did something terrible and loved me would not lie about me and throw me under the bus to save their own tale,,,

I would have a hard time taking the HIGHER road with someone that showed me such 'love' and taking their consequences for them....


I agree. they stuck their necks out on the line the entire time for her before her trial and when caylee was just a "missing" person. They bent over backwards to help her adn stick by her when the world said she was guilty before any arrests her parent and brother were there by her side...

The second she got into trial...she blamed her parents and her brother..if that was my child and I believed she was guilty of the crime...i would would have to abandon her..

If i believed her innocence i would support her, but if she lies in court about me and I knew she was lying to save herself...how could i trust her on whether or not she murdered my grandchild...if she cant be honest i'm not sure i can stand by her..i mean some dishonesty for other reasons that would not include taking a human life in our own family or any one elses for that matter...i could be more supportive, my own grandchild though. . .no.

She clearly has no respect for her own child, let alone her own parents or brother. Why should they risk their own lives for her now?

msharmony's photo
Sat 08/20/11 11:19 PM


Love is mutual, I would hope someone who did something terrible and loved me would not lie about me and throw me under the bus to save their own tale,,,

I would have a hard time taking the HIGHER road with someone that showed me such 'love' and taking their consequences for them....


I agree. they stuck their necks out on the line the entire time for her before her trial and when caylee was just a "missing" person. They bent over backwards to help her adn stick by her when the world said she was guilty before any arrests her parent and brother were there by her side...

The second she got into trial...she blamed her parents and her brother..if that was my child and I believed she was guilty of the crime...i would would have to abandon her..

If i believed her innocence i would support her, but if she lies in court about me and I knew she was lying to save herself...how could i trust her on whether or not she murdered my grandchild...if she cant be honest i'm not sure i can stand by her..i mean some dishonesty for other reasons that would not include taking a human life in our own family or any one elses for that matter...i could be more supportive, my own grandchild though. . .no.

She clearly has no respect for her own child, let alone her own parents or brother. Why should they risk their own lives for her now?



that is the other issue, if we dont allow our children(even grown) to experience the consequence of their action or if we take the consequence for them, how will we ever expect them to grow and learn oor to appreciate how wrong what they did was in the first place?

Simonedemidova's photo
Sun 08/21/11 11:20 AM



Love is mutual, I would hope someone who did something terrible and loved me would not lie about me and throw me under the bus to save their own tale,,,

I would have a hard time taking the HIGHER road with someone that showed me such 'love' and taking their consequences for them....


I agree. they stuck their necks out on the line the entire time for her before her trial and when caylee was just a "missing" person. They bent over backwards to help her adn stick by her when the world said she was guilty before any arrests her parent and brother were there by her side...

The second she got into trial...she blamed her parents and her brother..if that was my child and I believed she was guilty of the crime...i would would have to abandon her..

If i believed her innocence i would support her, but if she lies in court about me and I knew she was lying to save herself...how could i trust her on whether or not she murdered my grandchild...if she cant be honest i'm not sure i can stand by her..i mean some dishonesty for other reasons that would not include taking a human life in our own family or any one elses for that matter...i could be more supportive, my own grandchild though. . .no.

She clearly has no respect for her own child, let alone her own parents or brother. Why should they risk their own lives for her now?



that is the other issue, if we dont allow our children(even grown) to experience the consequence of their action or if we take the consequence for them, how will we ever expect them to grow and learn oor to appreciate how wrong what they did was in the first place?


Well yes, I have a feeling that all her partying and selfish behavior, calling all the shots stems from the lack of parenting in the first place..

Seakolony's photo
Sun 08/21/11 12:06 PM
Casey Anthony left Florida after the trial for a resort spa, then was ordered back to Florida to serve out her probation for the conviction of stealing and writing bad checks. She did not receive support from her family. Beaz is fighting her judication and stay in Florida probation court as she would not be able to work, facts that her life has been threatened. Saying it is unfair to make her serve her probation out as it ma6 endanger her life. Now do I feel Casey Anthony had had something to do woith her daughters death, yes. Do I think her father may have had something to do with Caylees death, yes. Is it a fact that in the judicial and police world the famlial abuse is found in some of its highest numbers statistically yes. Do I agree that Casey Anthony should be able to serve her probabtion somewhere she can get a fresh start as double jeopardy is against the law, yes. Could I have convicted her with the evidence presented, no.

Seakolony's photo
Fri 08/26/11 02:52 PM
The apellant court upheld the judges decision for Casey Anthony to finish her porbation before being allowed to leave the state of Florida.

Simonedemidova's photo
Sat 08/27/11 07:55 AM

Casey Anthony left Florida after the trial for a resort spa, then was ordered back to Florida to serve out her probation for the conviction of stealing and writing bad checks. She did not receive support from her family. Beaz is fighting her judication and stay in Florida probation court as she would not be able to work, facts that her life has been threatened. Saying it is unfair to make her serve her probation out as it ma6 endanger her life. Now do I feel Casey Anthony had had something to do woith her daughters death, yes. Do I think her father may have had something to do with Caylees death, yes. Is it a fact that in the judicial and police world the famlial abuse is found in some of its highest numbers statistically yes. Do I agree that Casey Anthony should be able to serve her probabtion somewhere she can get a fresh start as double jeopardy is against the law, yes. Could I have convicted her with the evidence presented, no.


I would have convicted her for sure. Without the evidence, she is a compulsive liar from the get go...Why would an innocent man/woman lie for no reason or benefit other than to throw people off their trail. It may not be physical evidence but the tangled storylines tell more than we read.

Glad her family woke up and dont support her. They probably fear for their own safety, as they should. She murdered her daughter, whos to say she wont murder her own father now...to make her child abuse charges seem more realistic..

I really dont care where she serves her probation. No matter where she goes she is a famous criminal now and people will know who she is, wether she is california, montana or nebraska. I am pretty sure we all know her by now. So that seems petty to me whether she comes home or not...

Seakolony's photo
Sat 08/27/11 08:05 AM


Casey Anthony left Florida after the trial for a resort spa, then was ordered back to Florida to serve out her probation for the conviction of stealing and writing bad checks. She did not receive support from her family. Beaz is fighting her judication and stay in Florida probation court as she would not be able to work, facts that her life has been threatened. Saying it is unfair to make her serve her probation out as it ma6 endanger her life. Now do I feel Casey Anthony had had something to do woith her daughters death, yes. Do I think her father may have had something to do with Caylees death, yes. Is it a fact that in the judicial and police world the famlial abuse is found in some of its highest numbers statistically yes. Do I agree that Casey Anthony should be able to serve her probabtion somewhere she can get a fresh start as double jeopardy is against the law, yes. Could I have convicted her with the evidence presented, no.


I would have convicted her for sure. Without the evidence, she is a compulsive liar from the get go...Why would an innocent man/woman lie for no reason or benefit other than to throw people off their trail. It may not be physical evidence but the tangled storylines tell more than we read.

Glad her family woke up and dont support her. They probably fear for their own safety, as they should. She murdered her daughter, whos to say she wont murder her own father now...to make her child abuse charges seem more realistic..

I really dont care where she serves her probation. No matter where she goes she is a famous criminal now and people will know who she is, wether she is california, montana or nebraska. I am pretty sure we all know her by now. So that seems petty to me whether she comes home or not...



Neither you nor I would have been allowed to sit as jurors on that trial...predisposed to opinion....and there is another reason she was protecting her family until her family hung her out5 to dry for something they did. None of us were there......partying after the fact could be to drown the pain and hide from what happened.....people do many strange things when traumatized and in pain......there was too much uncertainty.....and to be honest I blame law enforcement and the DA office for rushing the evidence into trial without a complete investigation......and too many people that cast doubt on her parents actions themselves........the fault5 definitely rests with the Anthony family but who is the most guilty....the whole family was proven to be liars.......was she on trial for being a liar....no.....but5 I guess the apple doesn't fall far from the tree either.......at least if it was a mistrial there would have been a chance for the DA to get there crap together and not blow it

msharmony's photo
Sat 08/27/11 11:36 AM
what lies did the family tell? I missed that.

I agree that her EXCESSIVE lying would make it hard to believe her father did anything to her. Along with those videos of her interaction with both her parents at jail, seemed clear to me they were scared of her, not the other way around.

I was a victim myself as a child and I still wouldnt find a reason in the world to not call 911 if I saw my child lifeless , in the abusers hands or not. I also wouldnt find a reason to get a tattoo saying 'beautiful life' after witnessing such a thing.

That followed by the fact there was NO corroborating testimony(That I know of) backing up the claim of a sexually abusive father and plenty of witness testimony to the lying nature of this girl.

IT also made no sense to me that a seasoned cop would take a girl that had drowned and THEN duct tape her and try to make it look like an abduction,, that was the biggest stretch of the case. Children accidentally fall in pools all the time, this cops testimony that thats what happened would have had them all in the clear and the case would have been over. It made no sense that he would have reason to cover up such an 'accident' or that he even could judging by how much he seemed to love the little girl.


I understand that the evidence didnt meet the standard, but I would have had alot more questions had I Been on the jury. Like wth happened between the time she supposedly saw her dad carrying the body and the time they found the girl with the duct tape on her?

Thats a pretty big blank to go unexplained.

Another question would be,, of all the times she went into a rage at her parents while incarcerated,, where is the footage of her making these accusations THEN(when her emotions would have been the most frazzled)?


I didnt believe a word of what she said, merely because she seems such a pathological liar,, but I also didnt see the EVIDENCE of her involvement with the daughter dying (Besides looking up information on the internet prior)


,,,my theory, she was a spoiled brat, her parents mostly took care of her child and wanted her to take more responsibility, they left her alone to go on a 'trip' and she felt resentful that she would be obstructed from partying so she went somewhere , ducttaping the child and leaving her somewhere(possibly in the trunk)

the child was dead when she came out and she covered it up as long as she could leading police on a goose chase, ditching the car, and continuing to party,,,


.. but I would have not had evidence to prove it anymore than she had evidence to prove she had been molested by her father,,,