Topic: Does anyone know what the definition of a liberal is?
yellowrose10's photo
Thu 10/08/09 12:55 PM








and then again there is a difference between a non Christian (or atheist) and an anti-Christian

a anti-Christian is ALWAYS gonna look for the most negative to deride the religious, in which case there ceases to be any discussion and then just becomes competing rants


Considering that all non Christians are not atheists and all non religious are not atheists.

I am not anti Christian, I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all. Christianity just happens to be the most active in imposition in this country.


including the president and other members of congress right?

Hell yea.


then we must get him out of there right???? I mean he attended a church with an extremist preacher...so he must have those thinkings too right??? not to mention he has a chair in the UN security council.


but who do we replace them with??? atheists???? the supreme court ruled it's a religion and there are extremists there too


They can have whatever religion they want privately. That is not a reason for concern. If they impose those religious beliefs on others that is a concern. Don't make laws based on religion and there will be no problems. Do not have religion in the government and there will be no problem.

Practice the religion at home and keep it out of the government of all.

The only way to be fair here would be to include all religion in the government, every last one, which are thousands if not more or to take the religion out of the government completely. There is no include just one religion in the government and be fair to all.
So keep it out of the government and then we can be fair to all.



since you have complete faith in the president and congress to not impose their beliefs into the government...then that is proof not all Christians are the way that gets by those that hate. that is proof that some Christians CAN separate church and state. so next time we generalize...remember the president you support and members of congress and our founding fathers...Christian


I said as long as they keep it private. They will have problems from me if they impose their beliefs on the people too, just like everyone else.

So as long as they keep it at home and not impose it on all of us I will accept them as right and just.


I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all.

that is what you said that I am referring to. there will always be religion in government but that doesn't mean the laws effecting the people will necessarily be changed

don't you think an atheist politicians uses his or her beliefs to influence how he or she votes at times????? of course...just like other religions...but that doesn't necessarily mean that laws will change that voids the constitution and tramples on others rights

Dragoness's photo
Thu 10/08/09 12:56 PM


pitchfork I'm helping the folks at Conservapedia rewrite the biblepitchfork


use blue crayon....that helps me bigsmile
devil Im pretending to be a christian conservative on there but I am putting secret liberal messages in the new bible we are creatingpitchfork


According to them it is already laden with the liberal evil...lol I never thought I would see the day when a conservative would call the bible evil in it's form....lol
:banana: I know.laugh Thats what I am saying.laugh These people are (at Conservapedia)admitting that the bible in it original form has liberal messages in itlaugh


http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project


I still say, if the bible is too liberal then you are too conservative

and if the bible is too conservative then you are too liberal

you don't change the bible to suit your politics

you change your politics to suit the bible


with the disclaimer that that would only apply to Christians who follow the bible


you and I know that but there are people on both sides that think differently. after this there will probably be a group of liberals that rewrite the Bible to suit them. it doesn't end....I just don't have to read it. BUT under the constitution...whether agree or not...they are within their rights


Sorry but I must disagree with ya. Why are most people against gays in America? Most of the time they are trying to change things whether if it's marriage,the bible or having classes in school or books of my 2 mommies. People don't like change especially when most grew up one way and see that a very small group of people are trying to push their beliefs on them.


personally what people believe (as long as it doesn't interfere with me and mine) I really don't care.

I am not big on change myself...I really don't like it...but others can do as they wish as long as laws aren't broken or interfering with me....as far as I'm concerned


But, that's the problem..."If it doesn't interfer with you directly, you don't care what they do"
Saying that and myself included gives them the opportunity to take advantage and go for those "" small changes. Then before you know it...it does affect us directly.
For Examople: I have no children so gays having or pushing a book like I have 2 Mommies in the schools don't affect me directly but, when I do have them and the book is already in the schools...I'm Screwed bc I didn't care enough to act when it was happening at that very moment ;)


Parnoia will destroy ya...lol

no photo
Thu 10/08/09 12:56 PM






and then again there is a difference between a non Christian (or atheist) and an anti-Christian

a anti-Christian is ALWAYS gonna look for the most negative to deride the religious, in which case there ceases to be any discussion and then just becomes competing rants


Considering that all non Christians are not atheists and all non religious are not atheists.

I am not anti Christian, I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all. Christianity just happens to be the most active in imposition in this country.


including the president and other members of congress right?

Hell yea.


then we must get him out of there right???? I mean he attended a church with an extremist preacher...so he must have those thinkings too right??? not to mention he has a chair in the UN security council.


but who do we replace them with??? atheists???? the supreme court ruled it's a religion and there are extremists there too


They can have whatever religion they want privately. That is not a reason for concern. If they impose those religious beliefs on others that is a concern. Don't make laws based on religion and there will be no problems. Do not have religion in the government and there will be no problem.

Practice the religion at home and keep it out of the government of all.

The only way to be fair here would be to include all religion in the government, every last one, which are thousands if not more or to take the religion out of the government completely. There is no include just one religion in the government and be fair to all.
So keep it out of the government and then we can be fair to all.



Oh boy watch the Right wingers do their last flip if that ever happened. OH wait.. Nah, keep it OUT of government, period.

yellowrose10's photo
Thu 10/08/09 12:57 PM
Edited by yellowrose10 on Thu 10/08/09 12:58 PM








pitchfork I'm helping the folks at Conservapedia rewrite the biblepitchfork


use blue crayon....that helps me bigsmile
devil Im pretending to be a christian conservative on there but I am putting secret liberal messages in the new bible we are creatingpitchfork


According to them it is already laden with the liberal evil...lol I never thought I would see the day when a conservative would call the bible evil in it's form....lol
:banana: I know.laugh Thats what I am saying.laugh These people are (at Conservapedia)admitting that the bible in it original form has liberal messages in itlaugh


http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project


I still say, if the bible is too liberal then you are too conservative

and if the bible is too conservative then you are too liberal

you don't change the bible to suit your politics

you change your politics to suit the bible


with the disclaimer that that would only apply to Christians who follow the bible


you and I know that but there are people on both sides that think differently. after this there will probably be a group of liberals that rewrite the Bible to suit them. it doesn't end....I just don't have to read it. BUT under the constitution...whether agree or not...they are within their rights


'liberals that rewrite the Bible to suit them...'
Now that is funny. rofl

Thou shalt keep your religion to yourself... hey I kinda like it, maybe I'll start the NEW LIBERAL BIBLE... drinks


are you saying there aren't biased liberal sources out there and this couldn't POSSIBLY happen???? well I guess it depends on what definition of liberal you use huh?

and actually....from what I believe religions are...that passage wouldn't be in there....maybe the convenient liberal Bible, maybe?????

Dragoness's photo
Thu 10/08/09 12:57 PM









and then again there is a difference between a non Christian (or atheist) and an anti-Christian

a anti-Christian is ALWAYS gonna look for the most negative to deride the religious, in which case there ceases to be any discussion and then just becomes competing rants


Considering that all non Christians are not atheists and all non religious are not atheists.

I am not anti Christian, I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all. Christianity just happens to be the most active in imposition in this country.


including the president and other members of congress right?

Hell yea.


then we must get him out of there right???? I mean he attended a church with an extremist preacher...so he must have those thinkings too right??? not to mention he has a chair in the UN security council.


but who do we replace them with??? atheists???? the supreme court ruled it's a religion and there are extremists there too


They can have whatever religion they want privately. That is not a reason for concern. If they impose those religious beliefs on others that is a concern. Don't make laws based on religion and there will be no problems. Do not have religion in the government and there will be no problem.

Practice the religion at home and keep it out of the government of all.

The only way to be fair here would be to include all religion in the government, every last one, which are thousands if not more or to take the religion out of the government completely. There is no include just one religion in the government and be fair to all.
So keep it out of the government and then we can be fair to all.



since you have complete faith in the president and congress to not impose their beliefs into the government...then that is proof not all Christians are the way that gets by those that hate. that is proof that some Christians CAN separate church and state. so next time we generalize...remember the president you support and members of congress and our founding fathers...Christian


I said as long as they keep it private. They will have problems from me if they impose their beliefs on the people too, just like everyone else.

So as long as they keep it at home and not impose it on all of us I will accept them as right and just.


I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all.

that is what you said that I am referring to. there will always be religion in government but that doesn't mean the laws effecting the people will necessarily be changed

don't you think an atheist politicians uses his or her beliefs to influence how he or she votes at times????? of course...just like other religions...but that doesn't necessarily mean that laws will change that voids the constitution and tramples on others rights


Except it is in the form of a denial of gay marriage. Religious voting to deny others their civil rights. You can't make it right.


Winx's photo
Thu 10/08/09 12:58 PM
Edited by Winx on Thu 10/08/09 12:59 PM








pitchfork I'm helping the folks at Conservapedia rewrite the biblepitchfork


use blue crayon....that helps me bigsmile
devil Im pretending to be a christian conservative on there but I am putting secret liberal messages in the new bible we are creatingpitchfork


According to them it is already laden with the liberal evil...lol I never thought I would see the day when a conservative would call the bible evil in it's form....lol
:banana: I know.laugh Thats what I am saying.laugh These people are (at Conservapedia)admitting that the bible in it original form has liberal messages in itlaugh


http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project


I still say, if the bible is too liberal then you are too conservative

and if the bible is too conservative then you are too liberal

you don't change the bible to suit your politics

you change your politics to suit the bible


with the disclaimer that that would only apply to Christians who follow the bible


you and I know that but there are people on both sides that think differently. after this there will probably be a group of liberals that rewrite the Bible to suit them. it doesn't end....I just don't have to read it. BUT under the constitution...whether agree or not...they are within their rights


'liberals that rewrite the Bible to suit them...'
Now that is funny. rofl

Thou shalt keep your religion to yourself... hey I kinda like it, maybe I'll start the NEW LIBERAL BIBLE... drinks


I know people that want to change the Bible.frustrated

Remember? My child's religion teacher at school told the class that she didn't believe in dinosaurs and God put them on the earth to confuse us. She said that rocks aren't as old as scientists think because God put them on the earth already looking old. Where is that in the Bible?frustrated


yellowrose10's photo
Thu 10/08/09 12:59 PM










and then again there is a difference between a non Christian (or atheist) and an anti-Christian

a anti-Christian is ALWAYS gonna look for the most negative to deride the religious, in which case there ceases to be any discussion and then just becomes competing rants


Considering that all non Christians are not atheists and all non religious are not atheists.

I am not anti Christian, I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all. Christianity just happens to be the most active in imposition in this country.


including the president and other members of congress right?

Hell yea.


then we must get him out of there right???? I mean he attended a church with an extremist preacher...so he must have those thinkings too right??? not to mention he has a chair in the UN security council.


but who do we replace them with??? atheists???? the supreme court ruled it's a religion and there are extremists there too


They can have whatever religion they want privately. That is not a reason for concern. If they impose those religious beliefs on others that is a concern. Don't make laws based on religion and there will be no problems. Do not have religion in the government and there will be no problem.

Practice the religion at home and keep it out of the government of all.

The only way to be fair here would be to include all religion in the government, every last one, which are thousands if not more or to take the religion out of the government completely. There is no include just one religion in the government and be fair to all.
So keep it out of the government and then we can be fair to all.



since you have complete faith in the president and congress to not impose their beliefs into the government...then that is proof not all Christians are the way that gets by those that hate. that is proof that some Christians CAN separate church and state. so next time we generalize...remember the president you support and members of congress and our founding fathers...Christian


I said as long as they keep it private. They will have problems from me if they impose their beliefs on the people too, just like everyone else.

So as long as they keep it at home and not impose it on all of us I will accept them as right and just.


I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all.

that is what you said that I am referring to. there will always be religion in government but that doesn't mean the laws effecting the people will necessarily be changed

don't you think an atheist politicians uses his or her beliefs to influence how he or she votes at times????? of course...just like other religions...but that doesn't necessarily mean that laws will change that voids the constitution and tramples on others rights


Except it is in the form of a denial of gay marriage. Religious voting to deny others their civil rights. You can't make it right.




didn't we go over this???? I don't have a problem with gay marriages myself and others don't as well. but since you don't know what religion votes what...your post isn't accurate

Dragoness's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:01 PM











and then again there is a difference between a non Christian (or atheist) and an anti-Christian

a anti-Christian is ALWAYS gonna look for the most negative to deride the religious, in which case there ceases to be any discussion and then just becomes competing rants


Considering that all non Christians are not atheists and all non religious are not atheists.

I am not anti Christian, I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all. Christianity just happens to be the most active in imposition in this country.


including the president and other members of congress right?

Hell yea.


then we must get him out of there right???? I mean he attended a church with an extremist preacher...so he must have those thinkings too right??? not to mention he has a chair in the UN security council.


but who do we replace them with??? atheists???? the supreme court ruled it's a religion and there are extremists there too


They can have whatever religion they want privately. That is not a reason for concern. If they impose those religious beliefs on others that is a concern. Don't make laws based on religion and there will be no problems. Do not have religion in the government and there will be no problem.

Practice the religion at home and keep it out of the government of all.

The only way to be fair here would be to include all religion in the government, every last one, which are thousands if not more or to take the religion out of the government completely. There is no include just one religion in the government and be fair to all.
So keep it out of the government and then we can be fair to all.



since you have complete faith in the president and congress to not impose their beliefs into the government...then that is proof not all Christians are the way that gets by those that hate. that is proof that some Christians CAN separate church and state. so next time we generalize...remember the president you support and members of congress and our founding fathers...Christian


I said as long as they keep it private. They will have problems from me if they impose their beliefs on the people too, just like everyone else.

So as long as they keep it at home and not impose it on all of us I will accept them as right and just.


I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all.

that is what you said that I am referring to. there will always be religion in government but that doesn't mean the laws effecting the people will necessarily be changed

don't you think an atheist politicians uses his or her beliefs to influence how he or she votes at times????? of course...just like other religions...but that doesn't necessarily mean that laws will change that voids the constitution and tramples on others rights


Except it is in the form of a denial of gay marriage. Religious voting to deny others their civil rights. You can't make it right.




didn't we go over this???? I don't have a problem with gay marriages myself and others don't as well. but since you don't know what religion votes what...your post isn't accurate


It is obvious, sorry.

yellowrose10's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:01 PM
I gotta run some errands

this has been really funny....even made my sister laugh when she read it. now our tummies hurt from laughing

rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl

yellowrose10's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:02 PM












and then again there is a difference between a non Christian (or atheist) and an anti-Christian

a anti-Christian is ALWAYS gonna look for the most negative to deride the religious, in which case there ceases to be any discussion and then just becomes competing rants


Considering that all non Christians are not atheists and all non religious are not atheists.

I am not anti Christian, I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all. Christianity just happens to be the most active in imposition in this country.


including the president and other members of congress right?

Hell yea.


then we must get him out of there right???? I mean he attended a church with an extremist preacher...so he must have those thinkings too right??? not to mention he has a chair in the UN security council.


but who do we replace them with??? atheists???? the supreme court ruled it's a religion and there are extremists there too


They can have whatever religion they want privately. That is not a reason for concern. If they impose those religious beliefs on others that is a concern. Don't make laws based on religion and there will be no problems. Do not have religion in the government and there will be no problem.

Practice the religion at home and keep it out of the government of all.

The only way to be fair here would be to include all religion in the government, every last one, which are thousands if not more or to take the religion out of the government completely. There is no include just one religion in the government and be fair to all.
So keep it out of the government and then we can be fair to all.



since you have complete faith in the president and congress to not impose their beliefs into the government...then that is proof not all Christians are the way that gets by those that hate. that is proof that some Christians CAN separate church and state. so next time we generalize...remember the president you support and members of congress and our founding fathers...Christian


I said as long as they keep it private. They will have problems from me if they impose their beliefs on the people too, just like everyone else.

So as long as they keep it at home and not impose it on all of us I will accept them as right and just.


I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all.

that is what you said that I am referring to. there will always be religion in government but that doesn't mean the laws effecting the people will necessarily be changed

don't you think an atheist politicians uses his or her beliefs to influence how he or she votes at times????? of course...just like other religions...but that doesn't necessarily mean that laws will change that voids the constitution and tramples on others rights


Except it is in the form of a denial of gay marriage. Religious voting to deny others their civil rights. You can't make it right.




didn't we go over this???? I don't have a problem with gay marriages myself and others don't as well. but since you don't know what religion votes what...your post isn't accurate


It is obvious, sorry.


again...obvious to YOU...not me

Dragoness's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:02 PM









pitchfork I'm helping the folks at Conservapedia rewrite the biblepitchfork


use blue crayon....that helps me bigsmile
devil Im pretending to be a christian conservative on there but I am putting secret liberal messages in the new bible we are creatingpitchfork


According to them it is already laden with the liberal evil...lol I never thought I would see the day when a conservative would call the bible evil in it's form....lol
:banana: I know.laugh Thats what I am saying.laugh These people are (at Conservapedia)admitting that the bible in it original form has liberal messages in itlaugh


http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project


I still say, if the bible is too liberal then you are too conservative

and if the bible is too conservative then you are too liberal

you don't change the bible to suit your politics

you change your politics to suit the bible


with the disclaimer that that would only apply to Christians who follow the bible


you and I know that but there are people on both sides that think differently. after this there will probably be a group of liberals that rewrite the Bible to suit them. it doesn't end....I just don't have to read it. BUT under the constitution...whether agree or not...they are within their rights


'liberals that rewrite the Bible to suit them...'
Now that is funny. rofl

Thou shalt keep your religion to yourself... hey I kinda like it, maybe I'll start the NEW LIBERAL BIBLE... drinks


I know people that want to change the Bible.frustrated

Remember? My child's religion teacher at school told the class that she didn't believe in dinosaurs and God put them on the earth to confuse us. She said that rocks aren't as old as scientists think because God put them on the earth already looking old. Where is that in the Bible?frustrated




It is funny huh?

Dragoness's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:03 PM
Edited by Dragoness on Thu 10/08/09 01:04 PM













and then again there is a difference between a non Christian (or atheist) and an anti-Christian

a anti-Christian is ALWAYS gonna look for the most negative to deride the religious, in which case there ceases to be any discussion and then just becomes competing rants


Considering that all non Christians are not atheists and all non religious are not atheists.

I am not anti Christian, I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all. Christianity just happens to be the most active in imposition in this country.


including the president and other members of congress right?

Hell yea.


then we must get him out of there right???? I mean he attended a church with an extremist preacher...so he must have those thinkings too right??? not to mention he has a chair in the UN security council.


but who do we replace them with??? atheists???? the supreme court ruled it's a religion and there are extremists there too


They can have whatever religion they want privately. That is not a reason for concern. If they impose those religious beliefs on others that is a concern. Don't make laws based on religion and there will be no problems. Do not have religion in the government and there will be no problem.

Practice the religion at home and keep it out of the government of all.

The only way to be fair here would be to include all religion in the government, every last one, which are thousands if not more or to take the religion out of the government completely. There is no include just one religion in the government and be fair to all.
So keep it out of the government and then we can be fair to all.



since you have complete faith in the president and congress to not impose their beliefs into the government...then that is proof not all Christians are the way that gets by those that hate. that is proof that some Christians CAN separate church and state. so next time we generalize...remember the president you support and members of congress and our founding fathers...Christian


I said as long as they keep it private. They will have problems from me if they impose their beliefs on the people too, just like everyone else.

So as long as they keep it at home and not impose it on all of us I will accept them as right and just.


I am anti any religion in government, making laws of any kind to govern us all.

that is what you said that I am referring to. there will always be religion in government but that doesn't mean the laws effecting the people will necessarily be changed

don't you think an atheist politicians uses his or her beliefs to influence how he or she votes at times????? of course...just like other religions...but that doesn't necessarily mean that laws will change that voids the constitution and tramples on others rights


Except it is in the form of a denial of gay marriage. Religious voting to deny others their civil rights. You can't make it right.




didn't we go over this???? I don't have a problem with gay marriages myself and others don't as well. but since you don't know what religion votes what...your post isn't accurate


It is obvious, sorry.


again...obvious to YOU...not me


It seems to be obvious to others too so you might be the minority on this one too.

Winx's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:04 PM
Edited by Winx on Thu 10/08/09 01:05 PM
Dragoness,

It would be funny if my child wouldn't have to hear it. I can't imagine all of those kids going to college thinking that.:angry:


no photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:05 PM





pitchfork I'm helping the folks at Conservapedia rewrite the biblepitchfork


use blue crayon....that helps me bigsmile


See Yellow my definition of Liberal was 100% correct. Liberals believe in attacking by numbers and as I have been reading through your earlier post I noticed that you were being attacked by the herd of crazy liberal conspiracy theory thinking group of atheist. And yes, your friend is right by the way...gays should not marry and your not born gay...it's a choice. I can personal care less if your gay or not but they shouldn't :)



Considering this whole post in inaccurate, I don't where to start here.

Yellow hasn't been attacked not once.


Being gay is not a choice. You either are gay or bi or you are not. It is not a choice at all.

How do I know I am not gay? I see a naked woman and have no desire for her. So I am not bi or gay. I was born ungay.




Yes, being gay is a choice. And one day you wake up and say "Hmmm, you know what dating the same sex isn't doing it for me so let me try the same instead"
That's choice. Also, yes she has bc she mentioned a belief of hers and then the Libs come out (as usual) and want a clear definition or response for what she meant. She gives you one and (of course) it's not to your group's liking so you want another. Read back on the post and you'll see...
But, hey I'm just talking out loud :)


When did you choose to be straight, smart guy?

MirrorMirror's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:05 PM

I gotta run some errands

this has been really funny....even made my sister laugh when she read it. now our tummies hurt from laughing

rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
waving

Dragoness's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:07 PM

Dragoness,

It would be funny if my child wouldn't have to hear it. I can't imagine all of those kids going to college thinking that.:angry:




Well at least you are there to show the kids a different view so they can decide for themselves when they are older.

MirrorMirror's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:08 PM

Dragoness,

It would be funny if my child wouldn't have to hear it. I can't imagine all of those kids going to college thinking that.:angry:


:tongue: Hell look at me!laugh I went to a church academy and I believe that dinosaurs evolved into draconians and live underground:tongue:

Winx's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:08 PM


Dragoness,

It would be funny if my child wouldn't have to hear it. I can't imagine all of those kids going to college thinking that.:angry:


Well at least you are there to show the kids a different view so they can decide for themselves when they are older.


I'm lucky that my child asks me about these things. My child knows that I will tell truth.


Winx's photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:09 PM


Dragoness,

It would be funny if my child wouldn't have to hear it. I can't imagine all of those kids going to college thinking that.:angry:


:tongue: Hell look at me!laugh I went to a church academy and I believe that dinosaurs evolved into draconians and live underground:tongue:


laugh flowerforyou

no photo
Thu 10/08/09 01:09 PM









pitchfork I'm helping the folks at Conservapedia rewrite the biblepitchfork


use blue crayon....that helps me bigsmile
devil Im pretending to be a christian conservative on there but I am putting secret liberal messages in the new bible we are creatingpitchfork


According to them it is already laden with the liberal evil...lol I never thought I would see the day when a conservative would call the bible evil in it's form....lol
:banana: I know.laugh Thats what I am saying.laugh These people are (at Conservapedia)admitting that the bible in it original form has liberal messages in itlaugh


http://www.conservapedia.com/Conservative_Bible_Project


I still say, if the bible is too liberal then you are too conservative

and if the bible is too conservative then you are too liberal

you don't change the bible to suit your politics

you change your politics to suit the bible


with the disclaimer that that would only apply to Christians who follow the bible


you and I know that but there are people on both sides that think differently. after this there will probably be a group of liberals that rewrite the Bible to suit them. it doesn't end....I just don't have to read it. BUT under the constitution...whether agree or not...they are within their rights


'liberals that rewrite the Bible to suit them...'
Now that is funny. rofl

Thou shalt keep your religion to yourself... hey I kinda like it, maybe I'll start the NEW LIBERAL BIBLE... drinks


are you saying there aren't biased liberal sources out there and this couldn't POSSIBLY happen???? well I guess it depends on what definition of liberal you use huh?

and actually....from what I believe religions are...that passage wouldn't be in there....maybe the convenient liberal Bible, maybe?????


Hmmm how about using convenient conservative, break up the monotony or repetition.

I was just laughing at the notion that liberal would care to waste time editing or redoing a book that has already caused wars and all manner of hatred of others. Life's too short.