Community > Posts By > MikeMontana
Topic:
Satan does not exist!
|
|
Satan is no "arch enemy". He is a powerless being who carries out the
will of God, and reads out the sin's against man upon his final judgment. Read the book of Job. Satan is no red-horned "devil". Thats all pagan mythology my friends. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Montreal Question
|
|
Whats gas going for in Canada (in/around Montreal) these days? I'm
thinking of heading up to Montreal this weekend. Anyone know the exchange rate? Suggestions on what to see/do/avoid are very welcome! -Mike |
|
|
|
Spidey,
You wrote that I was "adding to the scripture", I summarized Genesis Chapter 1, thats true. But, I accurately summarized it as "God made men/women [1:26]" in the plural. Genesis 2 speaks of Adam/Eve only. Cain and God discuss his punishment, speak of multitudes of OTHER ppl existing. Jesus spoke of Adam, in the context as the first Man to know of God. I dont dispute that. |
|
|
|
I met Mother Theresea when I was in grade-school. She made a "support
the Mission in India" tour through the Catholic Schools and popped into our little school. Fast forward 20 years and I find myself reading the newspaper that she's being cannonized into Sainthood while I am sitting in India. Sitting in the same city that she started her India mission (Varanasi) and a few hours later found myself at the bldg she started her mission from. Hows that for strange circumstances? |
|
|
|
Week 4 really, I missed class last week. Tonite was an interesting
night. Good class material, and the group is starting to "gel". We send emails to each other during the week "...hey so/so is putting on a show c'mon out and see them..." - that sort of thing. Some ppl really interact very well, and I find myself a little better than usual - meaning, a little more social than I would normally be. Thats great, its an improvement for sure - just got a ways to go. Towards the end of the class it was my turn to "perform" with a lady in the class. Jen, is shy, but seems very thoughtful, and I've been thinking how pretty and how "different" she seems. So we were told to do a skit "slow dancing" with dialog. Wow, what fantasticaly pretty green eyes she has. I was feeling awkward, I dont touch ppl I dont know very well. As it turned out, neither does she. She was visibly uncomfortable. Teacher interrupted. Told her to relax. After class I asked Jen if I was being particularly lecherous (in a good laugh way), she laughed and shyly admitted that she was just very nervous. *sigh* now I'll be thinking about Jen all week. How cool was that to find yourself dancing with a pretty lady that you had previously only daydreamed about! <GRIN!> |
|
|
|
Hi Spidey,
I take a different approach. There were many ppl living on the Earth long before Cain. If we read Genesis literally - assuming that each verse and chapter is in sequential order, then we read that God made man, and women, (plural) in Chapter 1, verse 26. Later, in Chapter 2, God made Adam personally, from clay. Adam was the first man that God revealed himself to, and so he is "the First Man" in that respect. With that in mind, we read about Adam/Eve/Cain/Able, and Cain's banishment from the Garden. He laments that he will be cast out by EVERYONE ELSE - God marks him so that NO ONE else will kill him. He marries, and builds a CITY for thousands of other people. Clearly Cain and God were very aware that there were multitudes OF OTHER people. Scripturally supported that there were other ppl besides Adam & Eve. Genesis 4 13 And Cain said unto the LORD, My punishment is greater than I can bear. 14 Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that every one that findeth me shall slay me. 15 And the LORD said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the LORD set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him. 16 And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden. 17 And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch. |
|
|
|
The "virginity" aspect of the "Virgin Birth" is due in part to a
mistranslation of "alma" into "virgin" [Isaiah 7:14] in the Septuguant. The 1st century translation of the hebrew bible in to Greek mis-translated the messianic prophecy that the messiah would be born from a "young woman", into the literal "virgin woman". The astute gospel copy-editor connected the "un-wed" Mary story with the mis-quoted prophecy, and the rest is history. |
|
|
|
I been to her house. Literally! Tradition holds that after the
Assumption, she traveled to Ephesus Turkey, where she was taken care of by St. John until her death. Some traditions say she was "taken up" at her death. Other traditions say she returned to Jerusalem and died there. It is interesting that Mary, as the mother of Jesus, is the only woman NAMED in the Quran. Interesting isnt it? |
|
|
|
Topic:
"FIRST DATE IDEALS"
|
|
I disagree.
Take it from a man's perspective. I schmooze my way into asking you for a date while we were standing in line at Starbucks. You are impressed by my confidence, charm and persistance, so you agree. Now what? Am I going to REALLY suggest that our first date be several hours together in the dark (as in a movie, or a dinner/movie thing)? No way. A romantic walk on the beach with a goon you just met at Starbucks - nope. First dates have to be neutral. Comedy show was a great idea! Coffee was another great one. But definately nothing romantic - otherwise you'd come off as a creep. Your thoughts? -Mike |
|
|
|
Topic:
Dabbling with Dowries
|
|
Survey Says.....
Not likely to fly. Thanks for all your input, I teased him tonite throwing in your comments! -Mike |
|
|
|
Topic:
Tell me about your beliefs
|
|
This I beleive...
My views are whacked. I beleive in the literal interpretation of the Bible. I beleive that its content is reasonably accurate. Thats right, I beleive in a "young earth", but literalism runs both ways. I beleive Adam wasnt the 1st man. I beleive The Law applied to Jews only, and for a limited time - until the time of the Messiah. That messiah is Jesus. I beleive Jesus was man, not divine. I beleive he died, and did resurrect. I reject the idea of a 'hell'. I reject the idea of a 'heaven' [at least in the way most ppl beleive it]. I reject the idea that "innocent non-christians" rot in 'hell'. My mission in life is to make people's lives around me better. Make them better by my actions, not necessarily my words. In doing this, I am making "heaven on earth" a literal reality. Feel free to email me if you violently disagree, or would like o know how-on-earth did I come to these conclusions. -Mike |
|
|
|
Topic:
I will rot in Hell
|
|
Well, if a pastor was able to clearly see that you'll be rotting in hell
for THAT, then I'll surely be in hell for several eternities for my misdeeds! Damn good thing that pastor wasnt elected Supreme Being of the Universe. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Evolution - not so stupid
|
|
Not sure what SpiderCmb's true intent was on the original thread, but,
here's my thoughts which should be contradictory to my usual content & themes. Evolution is a demonstrable, and predictable reality. You can see the adaptation of species to a changing environment directly. Its a useful and workable theory that can be employed (like selective breeding). Now, I will throw in that the concept of dinosaurs "evolving" through millions of years into apes...into humans is only a theory. There is no measurable, demonstrable history of observation to this. There cant be - no objective evidence can exist for "pre-human" times - nobody was there to record it. So we theorize on the Origin of Species, and we can reverse apply Evolution, as a theory, to make sense of the fossil record. Its the 'reverse application of evolution' that is the 'theory' aspect. It's a useful manner of explaining some data, but, its not absolute. It will always remain "theoretical" in the same bucket of "wishful science" like Black-Hole-Time-Travel. If you are the type of person who takes offense at the idea that humans are descended from Apes, take heart, the "Theory of Evolution" doesnt 'prove' anything. It takes just as much faith to accept a religious decree of humanitie's origins as it does to accept a new-age theory of millions of years of biolgical filtering. Still, the 'theory of evolution' is very real, and it has real application in our daily lives. -Mike |
|
|
|
Thanks for all the thoughts being posted. I was most impressed with
Adventure's statement about being helped by the Mormons without being coerced into joining the church. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Dabbling with Dowries
|
|
The guy I share an apt with has recently divorced. He's bitter, and even
though he's a young guy (mid 20s, very fit) he's taken up a very hard edge about romance. We were talking the other day, and he said that he was demanding a 'dowry' of any serious potential "next-wife". I thought he was just being foul, but, he was serious. Worse, he's getting traction with his idea. The idea goes like this: He states the obvious: women have a strong financial incentive to work, marry/divorce, collect alimony/child-support, re-marry and repeat. He's not saying that they purposefully do this, but, it clearly works to their benefit. So, Jim feels that to counter that incentive, he wants a dowry to be paid (approx $25k to $10k), and a pre-nup agreement drawn up to help shelter his liability. I laughed and called him a misogynist nut, "C'mon Jim no woman is going to even consider that" "You're right Mike. No woman that I want to deal with. Now, I've been dating several women already, and they're completely aware of my feelings on this. A couple dissapeared expectedly. Now, the ones who are foreigners are considering this as a business arrangement." I was really surprised. He's dating several lovely ladies, all VERY VERY educated foreign women, who are aware of his "Dowry" plans. They seem perfectly OK with the idea of marrying for citizen-ship, and enjoying his company in the mean time. ...whataya all think? |
|
|
|
Helping a man when he's down. Can't argue against that one. Pretty good
fundamental position to start from. |
|
|
|
OOOh +1 for the Adventure Man, caught the "Hadith" slipping in under the
radar! Good catch. |
|
|
|
Topic:
economy
|
|
The economy is pretty good for those in a position to take YOUR money.
ha ha. I hate to say it, but, some of the "wishful thinking" scenarios of economic cluster-fukcs outlined in the "Communist Manifesto" really do seem to be coming into focus. |
|
|
|
Topic:
How much is your gas?
|
|
$2.80 Edison,NJ
There is no "limits" to the amount of fossil fuel, at least not in the "we're gonna run out in our lifetime" sense. Two generations ago used coal, and there was the same 'coal is a finite resource - woe unto us'. Two generations prior to that was using hardwood. Point being, we'll exit the "Fossil Fuel" age, into something else, before we ever really run dry. The price is what the market will bear. Thats all there is to it. Sure, short-term fluctuations are attributed to seasons, wars, greed, and typo's. Fact is, we probably could afford $4.00 a gallon. Its only after $6/gallon that we'd do anything about it. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Where were you & what
|
|
1988 Pink Floyd at the Meadowlands
I'd been to concerts before, I'd been to sporting events too. But, this was the only time I ever felt that the *stadium* was dwarfed by the performance. The music, the effects, the props... just incredible. |
|
|