Of course I pluralized "men". OP's OP presented itself as if it is a common plight of all/most/some men as he specifically used the pluralized words "women" and "men" IN it.

And, I quote and bold for your ease-of-reference, since you missed it the first time in your zest and zeal to take special exception to my post in response to OP's OP on this open-to-all discussion board:

As was I!


I was also not speaking to you, but to the OP, as evidenced by the fact that I didn't quote you, like you quoted me when speaking at me.



This time I AM speaking to you, as evidenced by the fact that I DID quote you.

I never had a daughter to pass down my womanly skills and abilities to, so I forced them upon my son.


Even without possessing a womb, he is able to grocery shop, cook his own meals, wash his own dishes, do his own laundry, clean/dust/vacuum his own home and still he's able to mow his own lawn, change his own car's oil, fix a flat, do minor household repairs AND find time for internet/Facebook play, while holding down a rather prestigious and demanding job.

I have more faith in men's ability to successfully multitask, just like women can and do, than all y'all have in yourselves.


Buck up, Charlie...I'll bet after the third time you've had to wear a pink shirt to work because you once again forgot to separate your darks from your whites,


you'll master those household chores...though you might break a nail or two, in the process.

And, we're working on perfecting that whole "YOU go ahead and get pregnant and carry it around for 9 months before popping it out"-thingy,


so WE can bitchandmoan at YOU about YOUR stretch marks and the extra baby weight you're still carrying, 4 months later!


WOO-HOO!!!

You enjoy a little late night Martha Stewart porn, do ya, no1?

Ahhh, well, then. No mystery there, for all eternity (or until the internet is replaced by The Next Great Thing).

No mystery as to why the adage is "Nice guys finish last", either. If it was anything else, he wouldn't be a called a "Nice Guy"...


...he'd be labeled a "Selfish Lover".

I'd suggest you set your main pic to #4; it seems to have more of the vibe you're going for, than the *typical* single-guy-in-a-bar-posing-for-the-camera thingy in the one you're currently using. #4 feels like it has more personality, as you're outside, in your riding gear, with your bike.



I would have said #2, but it's too blurry.

Other than that, it seems short, sweet, and to the point.




Best of luck on here, your second - and hopefully last - go-round!

Oh, c'mon now...you truly believe ALL women require/desire the same treatment from each and every man, each and every time.

AND, you truly believe I'm going to put out on the internet, for all eternity, "First, I want you to ______, then __________, and finish it off with a _________ and a tongue-swirl to the left"?!?

~Pfffffttttt~ Mystery, my dear. And, that's part OF the getting to know each other part. AND, it changes with each man.





Oh, and YES...a little "oral pre warm up" DOES work for me. "Oral" as in not talking *like* an arsehole all the while simultaneously not acting *like* one, too.



Thanks for asking!!!

Nahhhh, I was more alluding to men who spend the day barking out orders to their little women, criticize what she's wearing, b*tch about her 3 grey hairs/5 extra pounds/2 laugh lines around her eyes, sit on their arses while she cleans the house top-to-bottom, does the laundry and mows the lawn

and then suddenly realize they're horny and wanna get some, so they start laying it on thick as the lights start getting turned off for bedtime.


Rumor has it there's one or two of THOSE kind in this world.

I don't believe in using sex as a weapon.


Having said that, I DO believe foreplay begins the moment our eyes open and we say "Good Morning" to each other...and continues throughout the day; it is NOT an act that begins 5 minutes before the Main Event.

What did you remove from your profile (BEFORE I just went and viewed it) that was there when you made this post?


Whatever you removed seems to have done the trick, because there is nothing there now to indicate that your intelligence level is above, below, or on-par with other women's...or men's, for that matter. You appear to be a college girl who's at the beginning of her academic career.


As to which pic to use, the one you've currently selected looks the most "approachable"; #5 is the "most alluring". #6 and #7 appear to be "artsy-fartsy". Pick the pic that is what you're MOST 'going for' and hoping to attract.


Best of luck to you!!!

Sorry, I agree more with soufie and less with the others who've posted.

You live in Alabama; you say you met him at your "summer" job. This leaves the impression he's been doing these nice things for/with you for what...at least 3 months, now?

He started to tell you he was going out with friends and then admitted he's breaking up with his girlfriend of two years.

They're not married; they apparently are not living together. They've been dating and perhaps even exclusively...that's all.

Reads to me like he's been dating her (and not moving forward) for two years. It also reads to me like he's recently realized WHY their relationship hasn't moved forward AND that he's discovered what's been missing which has been making it remain 'stalled' AT that certain point.

Reads to me like he'd like to be able to freely date you, withOUT 'cheating on' or deceiving either of you.



If I liked him, I'd 'go for it'.




Best of luck to you.

<--- Free to date


Butttttttt, NOT for you.

You're geographically undesirable, as you live too far away. Though I have nothing against Christians, I am NOT one (by Christians' own rules), so THAT would obviously cause a problem for 'us'. Because I have a tendency to wear above-the-knee skirts and CFM pumps [A LOT], taking your (raised, no doubt) truck rather than my car will be a problem for 'us', too.



Oh, and while I AM white...

...THAT, sir, is NO "lady".



Best of luck to you in finding The One (white) lady for you, though!!!

I have not found the men on this site to be put off by it, unless they've been instructed by others that they should be.

In real life, yes, I have had men tell me, point-blank, that they are not interested in pursuing/continuing a relationship with me because (they feel) (rightfully so) that I can spot their B.S. within nanoseconds of them beginning to spew it.

Ironically, the four men with whom I HAVE had serious, long-term relationships have admired that same quality; they felt challenged to NOT put on the B.S. act and to BE more real.


Personally, I can't ever imagine a time or circumstance in my life where I'll deliberately "dumb-it-down" simply so someone else can [momentarily] feel better.

Yeah, ya did:




Unless, where you're from, sommeliers EAT the wine bottles???



In any event, it was a charming simile. Ranks right up there with being compared to cars that need to be test-driven and cows that freely dispense milk


for making women's hearts go a-flutter and get all twitterpated.

Personally, I have never found "dust and cobwebs" in my "wine" to be blown out, no matter what the age of its packaging.

That way jumps both ways and a flailing monkey gambles with lives, happiness, and even destiny itself!

When sixty-four asked you a question, you discovered stew and rum is not all that great.

Tranquility is interdependant on the relatedness of motivation, subcultures, and management. But, a stumbling first step tests the thesis that your theorem would unleash.


That is all.

Done...just sent one off to you, OP!!!









Best of luck and enjoy your Mingling!

This. ^^^


I'd also add that - as leigh suggested - when one simply relies on the filmed versions of books, one is simply digesting someone else's/elses' vision(s) (typically the director's and/or producer's and/or actor's/actors') version(s) of the story.

Reading - rather than viewing - the story allows the individual to form their own perceptions as to the 'moral of the story'. So, yeah...you may be cheating yourself of an opportunity for growth and enlightenment.

The "List of Justifiable reasons to shoot" varies from state-to-state, depending on their laws specific to private citizens and police force.

No, really...it DOES - "whether [you] like it or not"...factually-speaking, of course.


Complete with hotlinks to each of the State's laws regarding self-defense:

http://legalinsurrection.com/2013/07/self-defense-immunity-laws-which-states-protect-you-best/


(With VERY limited exceptions,) Supreme Court upholds States' rights to determine what constitutes allowable "reasonable and/or deadly force" for police while in line of duty:

Tennessee v. Garner



You're welcome.