Community > Posts By > tiamabreid

 
tiamabreid's photo
Sat 11/08/08 03:04 PM
I definitely agree with the lack of doctors. I did a paper in my 3rd year of Univ. about the general medicine (family doctors) becoming non-existant.

Most medical students are choosing a specialty rather than general medicine. This could be one of the reasons we see so many more people in the Emergency Rooms. Over on this side of the country as well, many doctors are not taking any new patients.

As far as illegal's receiving medical care, that is a completely different topic, but a very good one.

tiamabreid's photo
Sat 11/08/08 12:14 PM
In addition,

Not only was the money accepted, it was heavily sought and asked for.

And again, I am not bashing any candidate that has every run for office. It is just a fact that money is taken (accepted) from the American people. And now, as much as any time in America's past recessions, we need that money in the hands of the American people. To brag about how much money was raised, I think, is a sign of how little one may care about the "little people" who donate verses the power all that money can buy. One who says they care about the "little people" and then takes SO MUCH money (as President-elect Obama said) from the "little people" - during a recession, makes me wonder.

President-elect Obama may do wonders for our country, I am not saying anything different. The fact that we have stepped beyond any bounds that would have never been considered 40 years ago is a huge deal. I dont think that means there is, all the sudden, not going to be any devious political tactics anymore.

tiamabreid's photo
Sat 11/08/08 12:01 PM
In all honesty, a person either accepts or rejects a gift. In this case, as with the case of all Republicans and Democrats, money is ACCEPTED.

I am not saying it is not necessary to run a campaign of this size or calibur. It is not a bash against any candidate, it is a fact. I did not say that the person donating the money HAD to do it, but it was accepted by the receiver.

tiamabreid's photo
Sat 11/08/08 08:32 AM

You believe the president is "just like us?" Have you ever had 600 million dollars to spend on a campaign or owed back as many favors as are required in order to offer to return the favor? I submit that the president is far from "just like us."

The point here is that if someone wants to have hope in politicians it should, at the very least, be on the local level. Why not your state representative or your governor? They actually do more and pass measures that affect your day-to-day life in much more significant ways then the Chief Executive.

A president is one man serving a nation of over 300 million. Odds alone dictate that to him you are little more than a number, a part of a census figure.

But more to the point, what has President-elect Obama done to deserve a "hope" in him. My hope in fellow citizens is developed after having had some experience with them, some reason to be faithful to their cause or business. A man who four days ago was elected is someone I feel I need to give a chance but hope? I think the verdict is very much out on that--at least for now.

I don't understand political idol worship. They were supposed to be the people's servants--answerable to the people and accountable to us. Today they are accountable to the NY Times and the Washington Post but not to the electorate.

I guess to have hope I have to first develop a relationship...and it is tough to do that when only one of 300 million plus.


Drew,

There is a chance for every American to one day become President. The raising of 600 million dollars for a campaign is absolutely rediculous. I do agree with that. Not only is our President taking that money away from his people who definitely could use it right now, he is also campaigning to every city and state with precise emphasis on "the little guys".

Knowing that President-elect Obama has taken so much money from "the little guys", yet every state has an electoral group, and "the little guys" are just tossed into a sea, I definitely would have to agree with you about the money issue.

The favors, however, are going to be there and have been there for quite some time now. I dont believe that we have a true democracy anymore. I dont think democracy really exists anymore in America. There are too many people in power who can appoint people they like to continue their legacy and too many people with money that can flash it around.

Hope in politicians? I think there can ALWAYS be hope. Whether or not the hope is deserving, and whether or not it was a fair battle to earn the trust and hope, we should still always look at the future with hope.

I see hope as waking up in the morning facing the day, facing all the hard times in my life, because someday I might make some things easier for my family.

I do have hope for my local politicians, but that's just the start as far as government is concerned. Where would we be right now without the United States of America and all that our flag, people, and nation stand for? It would be a cold day to wake up and realize that I was under the rule of an islamic country, or some other communist country. Hope?

Yeah, I do have hope, even in our President.

Tina

tiamabreid's photo
Fri 11/07/08 08:25 PM


As for the sense of hope people feel, this is an emotion I simply do not share as it relates to politicians, regardless of party or mission. I have hope in my family, in my faith and in those people for whom I care. I have hope in random acts of kindness, both shown and received and I have hope for our nation, not because of government but in spite of government.

It is simply a reminder that we are the Therefore, I find hope in the people of this nation, the people who on a daily basis commit themselves to bettering your life and mine. No matter the profession they have chosen or the amount of money that they earn, the hope I find is in counting on them, believing in them and trusting my fellow citizen to remember some wise words...

Sorry for the book--I wish everyone a great weekend.

-Drew






OK, so, here you are saying that you do not share the emotion of "hope" in the politicians. Then go on to say, the fellow citizens, whatever profession they have chosen, you have hope in them. You believe in them and would want to "hope" you could count on them.

Well, isn't our president one of us? Isn't he, too, a citizen, just like we are?

Thomas Jefferson-
“I hope our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach us that the less we use our power the greater it will be.”

We need to see our president as a human, not a manufacturing machine. Though we may expect much more from him than our fellow workers we see on a daily basis, so much more is riding on their job and efforts. There can be no human in office that will ever be perfect.

The "hope" you are referring to should be held in our president, just the same as in a marriage. As I was talking with someone just tonight about this same thing, we elect who we marry amongst many other candidates. You said that you have hope in your family and in your nation. Your hope should hold the same value for your president. This IS your future. This could, eventually, hold the outcome of how your life changes over his term in office.

The definition of "hope" is: to cherish a desire with anticipation

I would "hope" this is the case with everyone.

Tony Blair-
"At the heart of my politics has always been the value of community, the belief that we are not merely individuals struggling in isolation from each other, but members of a community who depend on each other, who benefit from each other's help, who owe obligations to each other. From that everything stems: solidarity, social justice, equality, freedom."

All said in a lump sum. We live in a community and survive off of community effort (yes, even when it comes to elections). You said you have "hope" in our nation (community effort), so it would be an oxymoron for you to say that you have "hope" in our nation without "hope" in our president.

Tina

tiamabreid's photo
Fri 11/07/08 07:18 PM



I did not say that "the present" (Here Now) "guaranteed" that you or anything will exist "beyond any given point in time" --- did I?


yes you did "JennieBean"


JennieBean said
I know I exist and I know I am infinite because existence is infinite.


you are trying to be sneaky and slip in your pantheists beliefs by placing it in a parable ...but you clearly claim that you are infinite which mean you will exist pass any given point in time










I'm still trying to get the flippin' hang of this.

The point of infinite is not our bodies, or the flesh on our bones. For instance, there are infinite amount of numbers.

Our presence here on earth is finite, while our soul, many seem to think is our conscience, will live on (that is if you believe in a higher power, such as God).

As far as the vastness of space you were talking about earlier, like I was saying, numbers are infinite because we will never reach an ending point. The same with space. If we will never come to the ending point, it is safe to say that space is infinite.

Pantheist is suggesting that the vast space IS God. There is a huge difference between having infinite but separate components and having everything lumped together as one. That's just my opinion anyway, buy hey, I am VERY new here.


tiamabreid's photo
Fri 11/07/08 07:03 PM


I did not say that "the present" (Here Now) "guaranteed" that you or anything will exist "beyond any given point in time" --- did I?


yes you did "JennieBean"


JennieBean said
I know I exist and I know I am infinite because existence is infinite.


you are trying to be sneaky and slip in your pantheists beliefs by placing it in a parable ...but you clearly claim that you are infinite which mean you will exist pass any given point in time








tiamabreid's photo
Thu 11/06/08 09:46 PM
EXACTLY!!!

I said this exact same thing about the bible being twisted and turned in every which way to appease whomever was reading it in another post (different topic).

tiamabreid's photo
Thu 11/06/08 09:09 PM
"When people put their faith in the Bible they aren't putting their faith in God. They are putting their faith in an ancient mythology that came from the Mediterranean region, and clearly has many parallels with thing like Greek Mythology as well as all the other myths from that part of the world, including the idea that the gods required blood sacrifices to be appeased."

Actually, one of the said reason for Moses to have brought down the 10 commandments was because of a worshiping of false idols.

I agree with what you are saying here. I do believe, though, that we can learn from mistakes. The bible has been distorted from it's original version to cater to what the reader's needs are. There's the student bible, the man's bible, NIV, KJV, the woman on the rag's bible (exaggerating there). Anyway, spirituality and faith in what YOU believe to be right should the only way to have any sort of faith at all.

The bible should be some sort of reference, if anything. Many times I hear so many people speaking of rediculous ideas such as, "give it all to God, he'll take care of it". HOW!

If you believe there is a God, which I do, he gave all of us a brain. If we were to give all of our problems to God, why the hell are we here in the first place. There would be no reason at all as far as Christianity is concerned.

That's an entirely different topic for discussion anyway, and oh, dont get me started on prayer and how people blow that out of proportion as well.

1 2 3 5 Next