http://www.exposeobama.com/ This is one source. Why isn't MSM announcing and celebrating with him. Heard nothing on any of the news channels. Has Hussein corrupted FOX also?? Some of the party favors they will pass out. ![]() that's not a reputable source, that's a blog. |
|
|
|
Folks are homeless, hungry and jobless in America. What the heII says Hussein, Let's Partay Down!! The Obama White House kicks off a giant holiday social season this week, I’ve learned: 28 parties and open houses planned for December, with more than 50,000 people expected. The mega-entertaining sprint, overseen by First Lady Michelle Obama’s East Wing Social Office, comes in the wake of a security breach at the Obamas’ Nov. 24 state dinner where Tareq and Michaele Salahi, TV reality-show aspirants, whizzed through security checkpoints even though they were not on the 320-person guest list. The Social Office will be more vigilent now, the East Wing said Tuesday. The Salahis told NBC Tuesday they were not party crashers, but they did not explain why they had the impression they were welcome at the dinner. I asked Camille Y. Johnston, communications chief for Michelle Obama, for details about the upcoming party season. "This holiday season, more than 50,000 people will visit the White House’s 17 holiday parties and 11 open houses," she said. from Lynn Sweet, Politics Daily 28 Parties?!?!? I wonder why, that out of the 28 parties mentioned not one is a "Christmas" party? You would think that they could at the very least combine the parties into one large affair to keep costs down. I'm sure American tax dollars are being utilized in some fashion to fund these soiree's! Hussein = Narcissistical, arrogant, pretentious and ostentatious spendthrifts. It is a true disgrace how our tax dollars are being wasted. We are in the worst recession/depression and Hussein wastes our tax dollars partying. Wonder how much we have to shell out on the Bulldogs dresses?? Shame on you, Hussein!! source? If this is true, that's a party almost every night. Gotta love government waste. |
|
|
|
Edited by
AndrewAV
on
Sun 12/06/09 04:05 PM
|
|
no, you proved nothing as usual. you regurgitated information like a good little boy and didn't bother to read the data...again. Look at the column titled "responsiveness." As a whole, that level for the US is #1. That means we have the best designed system implemented for medical response (dignity, autonomy, confidentiality, communication, prompt attention, access to social support networks during care, quality of basic amenities, and choice of provider are the different sections judged). that is more important to me than everyone having healthcare. I'd rather know that when something has to be done that it can be done. So because healthcare is not 100% distributed, we lost points on the test. Try reading what you post sometime and don't just give a list of numbers. If you'd like more info at why our health sucks, read up a few pages to my response to Fanta. Health in america is not a failure of the system, it is a failure in all of us. The trouble with your position is that the entire electorate isn't 26, single with no children on what I'm guessing is a government-sponsored student loan program and no experience what a wrenching experience having to go through a major illness is all about. I'm betting you don't have ANY insurance, either, because then you'd know what COBRA really costs. I could be wrong, but I'm also guessing your whole plan vis-a-vis your own personal healthcare is I'm Not Ever Going To Get Sick. Have you been to an ER lately on a Saturday night? Unless you're brought in by an Advanced Life Support unit, you'll wait what seems like an eternity and have to pay over $1000 for the 'privilege'. Do you know what it's like to be stuck between an insurance company and a provider who double-billed for the same procedure? Have you ever been threatened with a collection agency because your insurance company was a habitual foot-dragger because some MBA figured out they could save millions leaving the billions in premiums simmer a little longer in the investment market while they hang you out to dry? Had the provider miscode your procedures and have your insurance company refuse to pay them, leaving YOU to straighten our the mess while the provider declares your records are private and even YOU can't see them without a court order? See, it's my opinion that you don't know any of this stuff because you just don't believe it can happen to you. I was only a little older than you when I had my first bad episode. My age caused the internist to discount the possibility of what turned out to be the correct diagnosis. Cold hard fact- it CAN happen to you or somebody you love at any time and you'll find out all to quickly how your fellow libertarians will abandon you in your time of need like a leper that's costing them money. -Kerry O. Close... yes, I'm on a student loan program but not in the traditional sense - I have paid cash for every dime of my schooling up to this point because my parents made too much and I still had to claim their income even if I wasn't living with them. The federal gov is having issues with getting IT people that can attain a security clearance. Thus, they pay for school and give a small stipend and living expense check in exchange for a few years service with the government - kind of works like the GI bill. Either way, it does not kick in for another month or so. however, I have zero income right now and am living off of my savings (there's a thought)... christmas shopping and all. I'm still waiting for my unemployment to kick in (because as much as I hate the program, I've paid in for 8 years so i'm not missing the opportunity to get some of that back) so I'll get something for an income. As for my health insurance, if my employer ever offered it, I bought it. If they didn't, I used COBRA or found some provider to give me a higher deductible plan that at least covered emergency care. Even if that meant skipping a few concerts when I was younger or not eating out (or as in the case a few years ago, eating well) I still paid for it. $*it happens and I realize that. I'm still waiting for my COBRA paperwork and when it comes, I'll adjust my budget to allow for that too. I've used it before in that timeframe where I'm not eligible for my new benefits and I'll use it now as long as I can until I finish this next degree. Unless I can find a "major issue" only policy on the cheap. However, I do not see how my position alters anything in the grand scheme of things other than my personal opinion. Even if I had some major life illness, my opinion would not change on the public option or in government regulating healthcare in many of the ways they are discussing. I believe reform needs to happen to stop all the double-billing and procedural issues as well as start with tort reform, but i cannot support a plan that will ultimately lay the groundwork for a single-payer medical plan. It is against every single economic ideal I have. |
|
|
|
except that we are not like any one of those nations. yeah, we're close to canada, but we still live different lifestyles and have far different structure. We develop far more technologies and medications. We perform far more complex procedures and develop far more new procedures. Apples and oranges. Other nations cannot be used to prove it will work or that it won't work. All comparisons must be "all else equal" to be valid... that will never happen in this case. Also, check out who is #1 on the quality of care. us. if you take distribution out, we're the best in the world. That's just fine with me. Also, gallup is still showing 49% against, 44% for. so... how can most want the public option if the majority doesn't even want the bill? Lastly, you flag the government as so great citing the military, social security, and the military... Do you realize that the military goes over budget every year, Social Security has not had any liquiid capital for many years (basically bankrupt with a lot of assets), and the post office hasn't been in the black this century. Sounds like they're great at this whole money thing. Swing and a miss... If you can't comprehend what I posted, it's not my fault. We have the highest level of healthcare in the world. Just because the distribution isn't as good does not mean that I can't receive the highest quality of care here. Social security never turns a profit. What you have is a whole lot of IOUs and no cash. I know you haven't the slightest clue about finance so I'm not going to explain how this works again. no, you proved nothing as usual. you regurgitated information like a good little boy and didn't bother to read the data...again. Look at the column titled "responsiveness." As a whole, that level for the US is #1. That means we have the best designed system implemented for medical response (dignity, autonomy, confidentiality, communication, prompt attention, access to social support networks during care, quality of basic amenities, and choice of provider are the different sections judged). that is more important to me than everyone having healthcare. I'd rather know that when something has to be done that it can be done. So because healthcare is not 100% distributed, we lost points on the test. Try reading what you post sometime and don't just give a list of numbers. If you'd like more info at why our health sucks, read up a few pages to my response to Fanta. Health in america is not a failure of the system, it is a failure in all of us. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Trickle-Up Economics
Edited by
AndrewAV
on
Sun 12/06/09 11:21 AM
|
|
Poppycock! Seriously... The fact he worked for the treasury and refers to that as trickle up economics is scary. I mean, it's an econ 101 term and he screwed it up! Either way it is a totally biased and incomplete argument completely based away from logic. I'm not a huge supporter of any of our recent wars but this "surge" is not going to kill healthcare reform. The bill will hopefully kill itself. Also, goldman was not the reason for the crash, it was that congress empowered them to guarantee all those securities. Congress is the root of the problem there. |
|
|
|
The Social Security Program in the US is the only program that consistently shows a profit year after year. It is not protected though and is used as a fund to support many other programs within the National Budget. The idea that it is broke is a con. They just need to pay the money back that they drew out of it. Why can't we compare our Health Care to other Nations? We all have Drs. and patients. The only real difference is they have Socialized Health Care and we have politicians with their hands in the Insurance Companies pockets. The money cannot be paid back so long as we are running a deficit. This is why ss and medicare are essentially bankrupt. There are IOUs and an annual budget, but since we are borrowing hand over fist, "repayment" would just have to be done with borrowed or printed money. That is the problem. As for healthcasr, take this for example: You have high cholesterol and just survived a heart attack. What is the #1 thing the doctor tells you to do? Change your lifestyle. Run, walk, bike, lay off the fast food, be healthy. Sure, meds can help but major lifestyle changes will make the largest difference. Right now, we have the highest obesity rate in the world. We live increasingly sedintary lifestyles full of junk and fast food. There is nowhere in the world that has the access to cars and fast food that we do. I mean, most of europe doesn't even have a car. They walk everywhere and can do so due to the organization and structure of their society. I can understand the comparison you are trying to make, but healthcare is ultimately rooted in the health of the society. If you start high on health, it's not as hard or expensive to maintain that level. When you have higher need, there exists higher demand and higher costs like here in the US. |
|
|
|
except that we are not like any one of those nations. yeah, we're close to canada, but we still live different lifestyles and have far different structure. We develop far more technologies and medications. We perform far more complex procedures and develop far more new procedures. Apples and oranges. Other nations cannot be used to prove it will work or that it won't work. All comparisons must be "all else equal" to be valid... that will never happen in this case. Also, check out who is #1 on the quality of care. us. if you take distribution out, we're the best in the world. That's just fine with me. Also, gallup is still showing 49% against, 44% for. so... how can most want the public option if the majority doesn't even want the bill? Lastly, you flag the government as so great citing the military, social security, and the military... Do you realize that the military goes over budget every year, Social Security has not had any liquiid capital for many years (basically bankrupt with a lot of assets), and the post office hasn't been in the black this century. Sounds like they're great at this whole money thing. Swing and a miss... If you can't comprehend what I posted, it's not my fault. We have the highest level of healthcare in the world. Just because the distribution isn't as good does not mean that I can't receive the highest quality of care here. Social security never turns a profit. What you have is a whole lot of IOUs and no cash. I know you haven't the slightest clue about finance so I'm not going to explain how this works again. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Me, me, me!
|
|
Thanks for posting this. I think there is a little flaw to the arguement. There has always been a sense of entitlement and inflated ego in the upper class. The only reason this is coming into the light is because those that once were upper class are no longer such. But if you talk with the working poor and poor overall you will not get that sense. I don't think there is nothing wrong with confidence, however, eventually those that are overconfident will be knocked down my life... and may learn their lesson. I think it is the other way around. Technology and credit have become so accessible that those things only available to the upper class are now attainable by those in the middle and even lower classes. I don't know how many guys working construction I'd see with their big lifted F-350 on 37" tires towing a huge fifth wheel or loaded toy hauler. The kids learn by example. It is no longer the days of "we can't afford that," it's the days of just putting it all on credit to keep up with the neighbors and the kids get accustomed to the lifestyle. Finding out that lifestyle was a lie is a hard truth to comprehend. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Me, me, me!
|
|
"Listen up, maggots. You are not special. You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake. You're the same decaying organic matter as everything else."
-Tyler Durden I agree though. Didn't even read the article but this generation is all about me. They don't want to work for anything and expect everyone to take care of them. There's a few political things I want to say about this but I'll just shut up now and keep it on topic. |
|
|
|
except that we are not like any one of those nations. yeah, we're close to canada, but we still live different lifestyles and have far different structure. We develop far more technologies and medications. We perform far more complex procedures and develop far more new procedures.
Apples and oranges. Other nations cannot be used to prove it will work or that it won't work. All comparisons must be "all else equal" to be valid... that will never happen in this case. Also, check out who is #1 on the quality of care. us. if you take distribution out, we're the best in the world. That's just fine with me. Also, gallup is still showing 49% against, 44% for. so... how can most want the public option if the majority doesn't even want the bill? Lastly, you flag the government as so great citing the military, social security, and the military... Do you realize that the military goes over budget every year, Social Security has not had any liquiid capital for many years (basically bankrupt with a lot of assets), and the post office hasn't been in the black this century. Sounds like they're great at this whole money thing. |
|
|
|
Ant American who thinks the war in Afghanistan is not worth dying for should have their worth as an American checked. Al Qaeda attacked us! and 8 years ago, it made sense to be there because we were after those that attacked us. now, intellgience shows there are less than 100 of them in afghanistan - they're now in pakistan along the border. Afghanistan has not been a righteous war for some time now. so my question for you is should we attack Pakistan too? On your logic, it sounds like we should... And the reason I don't believe in the draft is that while we enjoy certain freedoms, I do not believe dying for someone else's beliefs and desires. If we were geneuinely attacked and our freedoms had to be defended, I would fight; however, right now, there is nothing to do with our freedoms in Afghanistan and we're just looking at Vietnam part II right now. We leave, they come back. Guess we'll have to occupy yet another nation for eternity. And before you jump off saying I won't do anything for my freedoms... in a year and a half, I'll be working for the DOD working on their IT security and surveilence. Yeah, not as glamourous as running around with a gun but it serves the same end purpose. |
|
|
|
Another laughable topic. States have been reporting record cold temps in the winter. Is that why they changed the name from Global Warming to Climate Change? Who, in their right mind is going to tell, Super Power, our banker, Communist China to quit polluting? Sure's heII ain't gonna' be Hussein. Not even droppin' to his knees would convince 'em. ![]() Just across the border in Mexico, smoke billows daily from AAmerican owned factories. Mexico done went and said, the U S can't tell them what to do. I just checked. No one on Manhattan Island is dumping property to avoid water damage. Al Gore must know something we don't. He just moved into a big freakin' office building there. Obviously you don't understand global warming. With Global Warming comes the melting of the world's ice sheets. This causes an influx of ice cold water into the worlds oceans, and thus changes the ocean currents. This in turn causes climate change. It is different in different areas of the world. Areas that were once warm may become cooler while areas that were cool become warmer. except the one place on the planet that doesn't go through this cycle is the area by the ice sheets...ok...yeah... that's convenient. That is not true. There was no ice there at one time. yeah, and they came in by the natural cycle. They'll leave by the natural cycle too and there's not a damn thing we can do about it. |
|
|
|
Another laughable topic. States have been reporting record cold temps in the winter. Is that why they changed the name from Global Warming to Climate Change? Who, in their right mind is going to tell, Super Power, our banker, Communist China to quit polluting? Sure's heII ain't gonna' be Hussein. Not even droppin' to his knees would convince 'em. ![]() Just across the border in Mexico, smoke billows daily from AAmerican owned factories. Mexico done went and said, the U S can't tell them what to do. I just checked. No one on Manhattan Island is dumping property to avoid water damage. Al Gore must know something we don't. He just moved into a big freakin' office building there. Obviously you don't understand global warming. With Global Warming comes the melting of the world's ice sheets. This causes an influx of ice cold water into the worlds oceans, and thus changes the ocean currents. This in turn causes climate change. It is different in different areas of the world. Areas that were once warm may become cooler while areas that were cool become warmer. except the one place on the planet that doesn't go through this cycle is the area by the ice sheets...ok...yeah... that's convenient. |
|
|
|
it's a good thing it's not real then. Otherwise my gf's cousin may not have his apartment in 100 years.
|
|
|
|
The Carolina's textile Ind defies the Union logic though. We've always been a right to work state. Lifting the tariffs and globalization screwed us all by itself. well right-to-work is definitely one thing I support. It's not the unions that I hate, it's that the government has to protect them like here in CA. The unions are the reason why our state is failing. When the prison guard union has a few thousand members making six figures, there's something wrong. When the legislators (democratic this time) are on the cellular with the unions as they are discussing budget cutbacks with republicans, there's something wrong. The only time I am 100% against unions is in the public sector. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Oh sweet irony...
|
|
so what, no defense from all you climate change folks?
|
|
|
|
I think the main problem with a lot of unions ( and the one I belong to is included in that because of things I have seen and heard going on at other places ) is that they just don't have the common sense to realize that if they keep demanding more and more, eventually the company isn't going to be able to survive if things take a turn for the worse. Now, the local I belong to has always had pretty good leadership in that they have known that the entire goal is to keep people working. They know that if people aren't working, there isn't any union. Therefore, they will take slightly less than what a lot of people would want, but we help make sure the place stays up and running. Where the heck have y'all been for the last 25-30 years? The Government has steadily been killing the Unions influence in America. Why? Because it was the largest organized group of "the people" in America, and stood in the way of globalization (outsourcing American jobs for a cheaper labor market). If the Unions had the government in their pocket the trade tariffs would still be around. You should come to california. The unions have our state by the short 'n curlies. |
|
|
|
Topic:
windows xp won't boot, help?
|
|
The only issue with #2 is if there have been major updates. I'm assuming that once a service pack is released, the algorithms are changed because my XP home code (I upgraded to xp pro) did not work with the SP2 (I think) xp home software my brother has... he lost his code. Andrew, It will still work, but you would need to call Microsoft on its failure and tell them that it wont work.. Just state you reformatted the machine to clean up viruses, and they will give you another code... Or what you can do is run a program called Magic Jelly bean, and it will tell you all of your Serial key number/registration codes, then just write them down, you would need to do this prior to reformat.. They also fixed it with vista and windows 7, but with Xp you had a multi-processor key, the key could work on 2 processors.. well the only issue with that back when xp came out,(which is why Quad cores don't show up that way in XP) is that their was only hyper-threading which didn't show as 2 processors, as a dual core will.. So as their license was written, if you have a P3 or P4 processor, single core, you could legally install the OS on two machines using a single key. They later rewrote this and now it is different in licensing and being legal... "technical Loophole" good to know... i'll have to try that next time. |
|
|
|
Topic:
new laptop
|
|
I just hit up pricewatch and worked out a couple Athlon II setups for under $500 with 2TB storage. The secondary reason I want to upgrade my old server (now running ubuntu server 8.something) is that i get the MS stuff for free (student programs for IT rock!) but I need an x64 architecture. More importantly, I need space. I do photography and those RAW files fill up drives fast. $500 is about what I was looking to go for because I needed a new laptop. however, my scholarship is buying me a 15" Macbook pro when the new ones come out in a month or two. That means I can afford to upgrade my editing desktop (for photoshop - i7, 1.8GB geforce, and 16 GB ram here I come) and still get a server or get the badass server. i'm going option #1. happy times for me ![]() Andrew, You may want to dual boot it, or setup VM on it.. only reason why is LARGE files on Windows has a tendency of slowing things down greatly.. Indexing etc.. Check out ESX-I from VM-Ware you have to setup a profile on their site but ESX-I is free... Also look at SUN microsystems VirtualBox which is a VMWare freebe that runs on Ubuntu, and you can Run Windows 2k8 server and exchange virtually... Might be easier.. Im all for microsoft.. Im MCSE, MCITP and working to MCM.. but Linux still is a much better file server... and Apache is also Killer compared to IIS.. Damn DCOM issues... HA! I just realized that ubuntu now has an x64 version and it's 9.1 now. I may just have to dual-boot. The MS stuff is really just for learning the programs for when I get this other degree i'm at least familiar with them. i really love the LAMP style with ubuntu though. a basic install and it's all set - slow as all hell computer (10 years old now) and it still runs like a champ. |
|
|
|
yeah, windows 7 as of last week. I'm thinking about going back to XP though because it is a bit slower on my netbook. I'm still a bit weary to go up to 7 on my desktop because all I use it for is photo work. As well laid-out and streamlined as windows 7 is, i have not found one thing that I cannot live without; however the lumping all my files into a pane in the explorer and 'open' boxes is far more efficient. it isn't the viewing that has any errors - i've had to do a few coding tweaks because microsoft still will not go to the mozilla standard, but only when I upload it from expression to the web. maybe i'll try it on my xp box and see... Andrew, Let me know if XP works.. Id be interested in seeing what the issue is, if it is with 7... I am getting ready for a project, which is gonna suck.. I got myself into a migration of 600+ desktops from XP to 7.. Only issue is their is no direct path.. SO im trying to automate it from 2k8 server... Funny that Beta 2k8 R2 has the process, but 2k8 R1 does not have the migration process built in.. No plans on it either according to microsoft... Further, they are running hardware which i think is gonna be crushed, but hey its their money.. "what do i know im just IT" LOL.. Ouch... good luck with that one lol. I'll definitely let you know. I was loving 7 until this morning when i tried to run illustrator for some web graphics and i ran as badly as my storage server now would run it (666mhz P2, 512mb SDRAM ouch!). i realize it's a netbook, but a 1.6 with hyperthreading (i think... i don't believe x86 atom processors are dual-core) should do better. Maybe it's because 7 uses half the 1GB of ram on its own lol. |
|
|