Community > Posts By > arkdanimal
I'm not sure what to think, I'll have to think about it!
|
|
|
|
OK
|
|
|
|
Ok
|
|
|
|
no bite
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Naked Mass?
|
|
Again, there is nothing wrong with nudity!
|
|
|
|
better to do nothing in the face of denial
|
|
|
|
never mind
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is God a collective?
|
|
God points! I also have a hard time believing that God will send people to hell! or at least very many. I just started studying this one area specifically a few years ago. So far I have found that there is probably some sort of hades or hell or something but that it is reserved for evil itself, or Satan if you will. Other wise how do we explain "father forgive them for they know not what they do"
|
|
|
|
My sentiments exactly, unfortunate that so many will lose there nerve over this. But I for one am tired of working my self to death so others can live off of my labor!
|
|
|
|
I want a beer, now if I can only find that church key! lol
|
|
|
|
yep
|
|
|
|
i agree sharp, i thinks its a spiritual seal like that given gods chosen which is said to be on the forehead, to undestand it any other way is foolish, just as lindsey's or other futurist writers on the subject try to interject what has happened 2000 yrs ago is meant for today, instead of happening in AD 70. People tend to go with whats popular rather than whats really stated - its much easier to read a supposed theologians take on things than study the book to see what it really says. You posted this after I asked you to explain your position on the Muslims and you STILL have not given me a succinct response to this question. Damage control and afterthoughts do not equate to explanation. |
|
|
|
i agree sharp, i thinks its a spiritual seal like that given gods chosen which is said to be on the forehead, to undestand it any other way is foolish, just as lindsey's or other futurist writers on the subject try to interject what has happened 2000 yrs ago is meant for today, instead of happening in AD 70. People tend to go with whats popular rather than whats really stated - its much easier to read a supposed theologians take on things than study the book to see what it really says. |
|
|
|
well krimsa, either you believe in God or you don't, you believe in the bible or you don't, either way it is ones own personal choice, there is no middle ground really. The bible contains a lot of figures of speech, metaphors and parables, every single word is not always a literal meaning. It basically says not to eat scavenger animals, that's about it. but since you don't believe any of it, I can't see that it really matters. Well what I believe in doesn't really matter now does it? If I believed in the validity of the bible as being the word of god in written format then wouldn't I have even more interest in determining why these erroneous statements were made? As it stands now they are just being pointed out as clearly ludicrous assertions. I dont think you can just say "well it was those crazy old school Jews" and wash your hands of it. The OT was clearly included in the bible for a reason, namely that these authors were felt to be "divinely inspired". Oh you mean my "Yes" or "No" reply to your other thread didnt cover it? |
|
|
|
Oh well, I tried!
|
|
|
|
actually I don't think the muslims read the bible, but the Koran (not sure of spelling) so some may misinterpret that as some christians and others misinterpret the bible. |
|
|
|
well krimsa, either you believe in God or you don't, you believe in the bible or you don't, either way it is ones own personal choice, there is no middle ground really. The bible contains a lot of figures of speech, metaphors and parables, every single word is not always a literal meaning. It basically says not to eat scavenger animals, that's about it. but since you don't believe any of it, I can't see that it really matters. Well what I believe in doesn't really matter now does it? If I believed in the validity of the bible as being the word of god in written format then wouldn't I have even more interest in determining why these erroneous statements were made? As it stands now they are just being pointed out as clearly ludicrous assertions. I dont think you can just say "well it was those crazy old school Jews" and wash your hands of it. The OT was clearly included in the bible for a reason, namely that these authors were felt to be "divinely inspired". |
|
|
|
Whats the matter? Cat got your tongue? If you want to say these things, go ahead. I am asking you to explain what has caused you to reach this conclusion. I am merely questioning your position. Understand what? I was addressing your assertion that "Muslim extremists" have misinterpreted the bible in some respect and have therefore wrongly focused their hateful agenda on Christians. Are you capable of explaining this position or no? |
|
|
|
I think, Oh ya that's it, I think, Oh ya that's, I think, Oh ya that's it,...............
|
|
|
|
well krimsa, either you believe in God or you don't, you believe in the bible or you don't, either way it is ones own personal choice, there is no middle ground really. The bible contains a lot of figures of speech, metaphors and parables, every single word is not always a literal meaning. It basically says not to eat scavenger animals, that's about it. but since you don't believe any of it, I can't see that it really matters. Well what I believe in doesn't really matter now does it? If I believed in the validity of the bible as being the word of god in written format then wouldn't I have even more interest in determining why these erroneous statements were made? As it stands now they are just being pointed out as clearly ludicrous assertions. I dont think you can just say "well it was those crazy old school Jews" and wash your hands of it. The OT was clearly included in the bible for a reason, namely that these authors were felt to be "divinely inspired". |
|
|