Well if you had bothered to actually read this thread instead of simply picking out one comment, you will notice that the point that has been made repeatedly and with mounting historical evidence is that this country was in fact NOT founded on any Christian principles. We sought to eliminate the "Divine Authoritarian Rule" of a King.

Treaty with Tripoli 1796

Article 11

As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

Done it. Wasn't surprised.

What is Absolute Honesty?

You mean to say the bible nor its parables cant be interpreted as even slightly confusing?

I am not asking that you reproduce EVERY bit of information you have ever studied on the subject but anything outside of the bible. You make the claim that there was a "Theory of Creationism" that some nameless scientists seem to feel is more plausible than their current workable theories?. That is conjecture on your part unless you can substantiate this with the title of a book or a source for the information. You should at the very least be able to describe the theory if you have read and studied it I would hope. How does it differ exactly from the two contradictory accounts of Genesis found in the bible?

How would statistical information "point out the improbability of human anthropogenesis"? So you are saying that you dont understand the concept of "transitional fossils" . According to modern evolutionary theory, all populations of organisms are in transition. Therefore, a "transitional form" is a human construct of a selected form that vividly represents a particular evolutionary stage, as recognized in hindsight. Can you point out (give names) for the evolutionary scientists that do not have a handle on this concept? I would be curious. Creationism is an illogical conclusion to draw based on all available physical evidence to the contrary. I have never heard of a "creationist scientist." Where do they go to school? What are their credentials? As it stands now The Theory of Evolution is indeed considered to be a "Theory" It is taught in that context in public schools. If you are having a difficult time understanding why, I urge you to look up the "Scopes Trial" of 1925 online. It is often dubbed euphemistically "The Monkey Trial."

I see many on here that make statements of who and or what they believe in,such as confucius being their god etc..

It makes no diff. to me what one believes in but i wonder if anyone conciders the >>>foundation<<< of their beliefs - takes into concideration "WHY" they beleive what they believe about who or what they think is worthy to be a "god"/Goddess/etc., in thier views?

After all - you need some type of reason and some type of faith to believe in anything you aspouse to be worthy of being held up as some entity that you concider worth worship or reverence.

Soooo - what is your foundation for believing the way that you do? - Or, if you don't have one, explain this also to me if you would so i can understand [using reason and logic] how you can justify your beliefs that for instance Micky Mouse is god.

Why is his word so silly, contentious, unreasonable and contradictory then? I feel a circular argument coming on.

old enough to bleed,
old enough to breed





i figured this would confuse some people.
what i'm saying is (technicly) the way God made it, is that if a girl is old enough for menstral cycle, she's old enough for sex.
But society has changed since creation, and this is frownd apon.
I don't shag young girls.
I was just giving a literal answer to the question.

My dry humor goes missunderstood sometimes.


So lock up your daughter
lock up your wives
lock up your houses
and run for your lives

I tried to send you a personal message but you are limiting your communications with women under the age of 55. I guess you don't want to talk to old broads like me.

JB

Your faith is totally irrelevant to these questions. I am asking you to explain your basis for bigotry and hate.

As long as you are still learning new things and not limiting yourself to one mind set I think that is good.

As for the subject of "faith" I learned it by my own experiences of what is possible. I did not learn it from a teacher.

jb

was itnot also written "i will have mercy upon whom i have mercy".......

that dosen't sound like anything mortal has BIGGER WILL than the will of "god".........

but your god is small, for he is your brain alone, as all other brains are as pathetic, as they "sadden" great wisdom when they speak, and each and every last one spoke a truth........

for if one think of evil being outside alone, then the mind is decieved by it's own grandeaur......

ROFL STOMP, so.....asking why is linked to satan?? How to be afraid of people thinking for themselves.

now that is just plain wrong...and stay away from my daughter...

Please explain your position on Muslim Extremists and why you feel

A. That they are misinterpreting the bible (even though they read the Koran)

B. Why "Muslim Extremists" are more dangerous than Christian fundamentalists?

C. Whether or not you feel that the attacks perpetrated on domestic soil on 9-11 were in any way connected with US foreign policy in the Middle East.

None of these questions have been addressed by you. I will continue to pose them when you make your grand sweeping generalizations about "love" and "hate" and "tolerance."