Community > Posts By > BlakeIAM

 
BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 03:31 PM
Liberalism destroys a country from within.

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 03:24 PM
Who's gonna fill their shoes?/ George Jones

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 03:05 PM
Edited by BlakeIAM on Sat 07/14/18 03:06 PM

I'm thinking it was a really nice visit with my sons and daughter-in-law... wish they could have stayed longer.


I am glad it was a nice visit.
I know you were looking forward to this day.
It shall go down as a sweet memory.
How did the horseback rides go?

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 02:41 PM
Nothing has ever existed .
Nothing will never exist.
God is self-existing.
God has always existed .
There will never be any point where God doesn't exist.
Us mere human finite creatures have a beginning and therefore an end in this present physical state.
One day our flesh and bones will go back to the ground, but our souls will exist in one dynamic fashion or another.
Therefore I believe in forever on that scale.


BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 10:31 AM

Sex.
If the sex was good he’ll come back. I’ll take care of him and he’ll come back for more. I don’t mind being a side-chick. Finding respectful men is an uthopia anyway so might as well go for those who will give me a good time.
My celebrity crush is Eden Hazard.



If you were with someone you really cared about and loved, would you have a problem if they had a "side -chick" as you so eloquently put it?

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 09:30 AM

A sign of some kind of victory?

That's weird too, just sayin smokin


Not weird at all. You just didn't get what I meant that's all.

All the liberal tears and attacks on Trump is just a sign that he is doing things right .
If they were to like Trump I would be concerned.

So the Trump balloon is just another sign of victory and another sign of how lame liberals are.

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 08:26 AM
Emmylou Harris/ Tulsa Queen

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 08:22 AM
The Trump balloon is just another sign of victory.

Thanks!

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 07:50 AM
Edge :wink:

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 07:31 AM

So far I've been having trouble with online dating but I'm willing to bet money on its just because I'm new at this and just can be obscenely awkward


Has nothing to do with you being "new" at it.

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 07:26 AM


Very childish and unproductive.
Liberals are a sad bunch of crybabies.

wow you're such a snowflake


Far from it flock of seagulls.
Now move along .

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 07:19 AM
That's my kinda of night/ Luke Bryan

BlakeIAM's photo
Sat 07/14/18 06:32 AM
Did you know that there is a word in the English language with only one vowel , which occurs six times : indivisibility.

BlakeIAM's photo
Fri 07/13/18 08:01 PM
Stop crying like a liberal baby.
It will get you know where, just like Hillary.

:wink:

BlakeIAM's photo
Fri 07/13/18 07:26 PM

gotta get lunch as Im wicked hungry.
breakfast was plain yogurt, natural peanut butter and almonds for crunch.



Wicked!
:wink:

BlakeIAM's photo
Fri 07/13/18 06:54 PM

Putin will have to give them up for a trail , if there is one!

I don't think Putin will have a choice in that matter. Imo


He doesn't have to give them up , but he may give up a "fallguy" to find out how they "discovered" Russian involvement through the legality of "discover" in court.


BlakeIAM's photo
Fri 07/13/18 05:34 PM

If you met a person in the neighbourhood where you live ( or somewhere else ) , both of you are into each other but one of the two is attached to someone else, would it be right to proceed or should you hold the boat off?
This is a hypothetical discussion / hypothetical question.


I think the 'hypothetical " answer should be clearly obvious for so many obvious reasons that there is no need for a hypothetical discussion about this scenario.
But, that is just me.

However, I do remember you stating you had the hots for some dude in your neighborhood, but that he was attached.
You also stated that his girlfriend doesn't treat him right, (not sure how you know all those details).

So , it seems this whole "hypothetical " scenario isn't really so "hypothetical " after all.

Hmmm... carry on.

BlakeIAM's photo
Fri 07/13/18 05:12 PM
Edited by BlakeIAM on Fri 07/13/18 05:13 PM


Trey Gowdy made Strzok look like the little lying , pathetic fool that he is.




really??

i guess that you didnt get a chance to watch the part where Strzok had his chance to answer back without pooor little trey gowdy interupting him,cuz he handed poor little trey gowdy his @$$ in a hat while he sat there taking it,and looking VERY ashamed of himself!

NOT TO MENTION the part where he shut him up when he asked him to provide ANY evidence,or proof that his opinion in any way affected the investigation and he just had to sit there looking stupid,cuz he couldnt.

it was ALMOST as funny as when louie gohmert tried to bring his affair with the FBI lawyer into it,and the whole senate jumped on him,including another senator publically telling him that he needed to "go get his medication"!!

cuz STRZOK wasnt the one who looked like a fool!!!


i guess you must have switched channels to go watch FAUX&friends,or something while THAT was happening,huh?

laugh




Lies.
He didn't hand ANYONE their a**.
He couldn't handle Trey in any way whatsoever.

Strzok is a lying fool , and a pathetic person in general.

Please refrain from presuming what I do or don't watch.

Also you can go easy on the exclamation points unless you are a really, really, excited 12 year old girl who just started to learn how to text.

Everything doesn't warrant!!!!!!

Actually quite annoying, but then again liberals...

They wouldn't know facts if they were tattooed on their torso.

Pretty sad really.


BlakeIAM's photo
Fri 07/13/18 04:07 PM
The right to free speech wasn't being questioned.

BlakeIAM's photo
Fri 07/13/18 04:05 PM
Trey Gowdy made Strzok look like the little lying , pathetic fool that he is.