oh wel, just a hit and run piece by the copy paste queen of the forums.
i tried to make an honest woman outta you but, you just wouldnt have any part of it. |
|
|
|
see how ridiculous it is to just be a story writer with no basis in fact.
all i asked for was some place to sorce your info. since im notprivy to the leftwing talking points memo or the mounds of top secret government papers you seem to have. my TS only gets me in so far. i dont have g level secret squirrel clearance yet. |
|
|
|
bill clinton had a secret meeting with osama bin laden in late 1999 where bin told hoim of a plan to bring down the finances of the US, clinton asked him if he could wait until he was out of office before anything happened. bin said sure no problem friend. then the cigars were brought out and bin gave bill a last momento, the turban still has the stains on it.
bill clinton actually is quoted (and this part is true) that america needed to find away to slow down the economy so that the rest of the world didnt fall into a depression. well, guess they found away after all huh? |
|
|
|
hey propaganga writer,
wheres it at? cant just say something on here and not expect people to want to verify outlandish claims. its very simple, just tell me where you got your info. |
|
|
|
civil discourse.
Dragon just asked for you to prove the remark about being in afghanistan prior to 9 11. any ideas on where to search for this tid bit of hidden news? |
|
|
|
Topic:
VP Selections
|
|
OMG....
Ann Coulter is one of the smartest women writers of our time, but even she cant help hillary. what do you think about condaleeza? |
|
|
|
sorry this is the only timeline and mention of when troops actually went into afganistan, if you know of some other place that it is documented i will be more than willing to concede, other wise you are just making up more crap, but your a writewr right thats what you do, write stuff you make up, doent have to be based on fact. is there a disclaimer, the following is based loosely on a real story?
September 19, 2001 The U.S. sent combat aircraft to Persian Gulf military bases. Saturday, October 6, 2001 President George W. Bush tells Congressional leaders about the upcoming attack. Sunday, October 7, 2001 Osama bin Laden releases a videotaped statement before the attacks begin. 9:30 a.m. EDT (approx): The leader of the Northern Alliance says he believes the U.S.-led attack will begin "very soon". 11:30 a.m. EDT (approx): Israel is informed about the upcoming attack. 12:30 p.m. EDT (9 p.m. local time): the United States, supported by Britain, begins its attack on Afghanistan, launching bombs and cruise missiles against Taliban military and communications facilities and suspected terrorist training camps. Head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers stated later that 15 long-range bombers, 15 aircraft-carrier-based strike aircraft, and approximately 50 Tomahawk missiles from US and British submarines were involved. A Northern Alliance spokesman later tells CNN that attack hit anti-aircraft batteries near Kabul and "at least three terrorist camps" near Jalalabad. Initial reports are that Kabul, Kandahar, and Herat are among the targets. Electricity in Kabul is almost immediately cut off. 1 p.m. EDT: President Bush makes a televised speech announcing the attack and discussing further US's intentions, including humanitarian aid."On my orders, the United States military has begun strikes against al Qaeda training camps and military installations of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan." ... "We are the friends of almost a billion worldwide who practice the Islamic faith. The United States of America is an enemy of those who aid terrorists and of the barbaric criminals who profane a great religion by committing murder in its name." |
|
|
|
They have fought each other this way for hundreds of years. Nothing new. We are just party to it now. We cannot change them. Just like any other person, they have to ASK FOR HELP first before they will be willing to change. FORCED HELP seldom works. We definitely "forced help" on them, we bombed the sh*t out them and now occupy their streets with major artillary, the threat of violence at a whim. How the hell is that helping them??? major artillery? not anymore no, not for awhile now actually. you dont get to hear from the small voices that ask for help, you are ony paying attention to the loudest of the fanatics, who are a small minority, but your the party of the minority so i guess that makes sense to you. they havent had bombs for hundreds of years, sorry to burst your bubble. and the way they used to do it, was nothig like this. they would actually take the best fighter of the group and face off against the fighter from the other group. you really need to brush up on the history, oh sorry rewritting again? |
|
|
|
Edited by
armydoc4u
on
Mon 03/03/08 07:43 AM
|
|
I am too smart to buy that bull. We would not be fighting terrorist here, that is babyshrubs fearmongering propaganda. no i dont think you are smart at all, talk about buying in to some real BS. we wouldnt be fighting terrorist here. your right you guys wouldnt be, i would while you locked yourself in the basement telling yourself it wasnt real!!! i HAD A FOOD LADY LIKE YOU IN SCHOOL, SHE WOULD ALWAYS TALK TO HERSELF AND LOOK OVER YOUR SHOULDER AT THE DOOR IN THE BACK, THEY'RE COMING! Do you have a twitch like her too. oh wait Mrs. B is that you? are you the dragoon lady? i thought you couldnt have communication with the outside world from the hospital. here pass it around |
|
|
|
The sad thing about terrorists is that if you take out one, another is ready to take his/her place. The war will never end, 9/11 was not the first time nor will it be the last time we are attacked by terrorists. Just like the "war on drugs", the war on terrorism will never end. I agree with you totally especially because this "war", is about ideologies...you cant settle that with bombs..religious zealots have no fear of death, they welcome it. and yet, they continue to use suicide bombers to try and settle it. and of course the zealots fear death, that is why they arent the ones in the suicide vest's. the family of a bomber is taken care of, like being given a large life insurance policy. that is one of the main reasons they do it, and then the propaganda machine with videos and the like are wheeled out in the name of martyrdom. yea yea yea another one off'd himself. to bad he took 23 kids with him, but lets not let our heart bleed for them. |
|
|
|
I too live this way But many do not and they are being lead down the yellow brick road of fearmongering and warmongering. We are not making a dent in terrorism in Iraq and the reason we have not had any new attacks has absolutely nothing to do with our military being in Iraq. It is illogical to even think along those lines. Terrorists are worldwide. Iraq is not the homeland of terrorism. Iraq has not perpetrated a terror attack in our soil to this day. 9/11 was perpetrated out of Afghanistan WHILE OUR MILITARY WAS THERE!!!!!! Come on people. It is not as plain as day. first and foremost i would like to commend you for admitting that there are indeed terrorist in the world. there might be hope for you(doubtful as it is) you say that no terror attacks have happened again and it is illogical to say it is because we are in iraq? it is illogical to think it is otherwise. they can not afford the time man power or resources to launch yet another attack on the US while we are depleting their numbers on the battlefields that are iraq and afghanistan. which is to say we are more than making a dent, but you wouldnt know that without having actually seen it with your own eyes. you have however seen that there hasnt been another attack here, so i guess the government wit its resources is doing an at least somewhat fair job on keeping the blood in your body. we are no longer at war with iraq. wtf did he just say? you read it. right now iraq is merely a place where we are fighting terrorist of any nation that sends them there. of course maybe you would rather we let the fight(which is happening one way or another-cause hugs just dont work anymre)come to your neighborhood. we had a large number of forces in afghanistan on 9 11? thats interesting, i mean im in the service and I didnt know about that. |
|
|
|
fearmongering is saying that we are now hated throughout the entire world and that the only way to turn that tide is to elect a democrat who will not even committ to any of the troop withdrawls that you say is required by the world, or that we have been shamed and some day we will wake up and realize that.
thats fearmongering too, dont be a hypocrit. I never really understood violent "peace protestors" oxymoronical. |
|
|
|
another bleeding heart post... do you mean as opposed to another war mongering, demonizing, corporate supporting, post ? are you really scared to leave your house? to go to the store, to drive in downtown traffic by another large sky scraper? do you worry like the parents who's 256 kids were held at school by the islamic terrorist only to by killed later that same day. its not the government thats the bad guys, its the BAD GUYS who are the bad guys! she said wake up people, I say please the two of you, go back to bed. |
|
|
|
"The culture of fear is like a genie that has been let out of its bottle. It acquires a life of its own - and can become demoralizing. America today is not the self-confident and determined nation that responded to Pearl Harbor; nor is it the America that heard from its leader, at another moment of crisis, the powerful words "the only thing we have to fear is fear itself"; nor is it the calm America that waged the Cold War with quiet persistence despite the knowledge that a real war could be initiated abruptly within minutes and prompt the death of 100 million Americans within just a few hours. We are now divided, uncertain and potentially very susceptible to panic in the event of another terrorist act in the United States itself."
really, we're scared? Opposition pieces are a funny thing, you can make them convey whatever you what without having to justify or be factual, just throw in some outlandish claims and demand they be taken as gospel. That America has become insecure and more paranoid is hardly debatable. A recent study reported that in 2003, Congress identified 160 sites as potentially important national targets for would-be terrorists. With lobbyists weighing in, by the end of that year the list had grown to 1,849; by the end of 2004, to 28,360; by 2005, to 77,769. The national database of possible targets now has some 300,000 items in it, including the Sears Tower in Chicago and an Illinois Apple and Pork Festival to not be viligant and practice 'safe sex' in regard to our safety is irresponsible and dangerous. Oh course nothing looks dangerous when you have you head burried in the sand. as more and more potentially inviting targets are address they need to be investigated, or would you prefer they didnt possibly allowing you to walk into the next terror attack. or are the terror attacks just a myth in the first place, with the world not being a dangerous place at all. all the news media who report terror activities are just pawns telling lies, when in fact you are safer abroad than you are in the states, is that what you believe? |
|
|
|
The atmosphere generated by the "war on terror" has encouraged legal and political harassment of Arab Americans (generally loyal Americans) for conduct that has not been unique to them. A case in point is the reported harassment of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) for its attempts to emulate, not very successfully, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). Some House Republicans recently described CAIR members as "terrorist apologists" who should not be allowed to use a Capitol meeting room for a panel discussion. http://www.anti-cair-net.org/ quoted members of the democrat party on this site include schumer, boxer, and durbin. These people were not harrassed because they are arab, they were harrassed because of the links and ties they have to terrorist groups. founded by members of hamas and supported by them. you want to lay in bed with these people you need to dust off your burka baby. |
|
|
|
Topic:
WE WERE RIGHT THEY LIED
|
|
aww, but then the land of entitlement will cease to exist. How ever will people survive with out their hand outs and get rich scemes?
you are absolutely right in my humbled opinion, I could not agree with you more if I had said it first. personal action, personal responsibility for those actions. time to bring common sense back into the courtrooms. lawyers are the devil(hahahaha j/k) |
|
|
|
Edited by
armydoc4u
on
Mon 03/03/08 06:23 AM
|
|
seeing how close the action is getting to us and the fact that Canada sort of forgot about the military when the Liberals were in power I traded in my vehicle for something more appropriate but I have to admit it's not that good on fuel.... thats some fuuuunny stuff. can I get the name of the dealer, dont think my jeep is going to cut it. oooh, and sorry for the cut and paste jobby but it didnt think i could convey the tory appropriately so early in the morning. |
|
|
|
Topic:
VP Selections
|
|
well one things for sure, its going to be funny to watch all the posturing
|
|
|
|
I am certain that the liberals would say it was all about venzuela's oil, by proxy through the columbians.... like using the money from cocaine sales to fight for more oil? hahaha |
|
|
|
Topic:
Why
|
|
redundancy department of redundancy
|
|
|