Robert Johnson BET founder told CNBC, Trump economy brings black workers back into the Labor force.

6-04-2018

www.cnbc.com

to a degree,the government has a small right to censor SOME things,but we are ALL constitutionally protected under the first amendment,which protects free speech,and THE GOVERNMENT is NOT ALLOWED to censor our speech,unless it violates the law,so the worry of government censorship is basically nothing more than paranoid fear mongering,and is pretty absurd.

BUT,some things,which are illegal,dangerously antisocial,or harmful to the greater good of the public,like child pornography, DESERVES,and NEEDS to be censored!!

does anybody disagree with that?

OF COURSE they want access to that information!!!
they want acces to ALL the information the can get on EVERYBODY!!!

that's because there isn't enough regulation to protect people's privacy,and their personal information on these websites!

if the government gets involved in these sites,then the personal information that they are allowed to collect,and use,and what they are allowed to use it for will ALSO be heavily regulated,for the good of the people,unlike NOW,where the sites all hide their agendas in tiny fine print that nobody reads,and pretty much do what they please,so,government regulation on these sites will also ensure that people's privacy,and personal rights are protected,which would also be ANOTHER 'plus' for government control over these sites.

if the government gets involved in this,then these companies will have to fall under the rule of the Federal Communication Comission (FCC),which was started to regulate medias that the masses use to communicate with each,such as TV,and radio.

social media sites are really no different than those are,and should DEFINITELY be regulated in the same way,since they have the ability to cause great harm to the country,and its citizens if they are used incorrectly...

all you have to do is look at the way that facebook was misused during the last election cycle to realize that,since it almost brought our election system to its knees since there was no regulation to keep it from being hijacked by foreign countries to manipulate our elections,and all of the REAL 'fake news' that it gives to people who just assume that the 'news' stories they are reading are genuine,since they are so used to the FCC having oversight over all media to prevent the spread of false stories from happening on a large scale.

so,YES,due to the fact that there are now sites that have even more reach than TV,and radio does,i believe that LARGE social media sites like FB MUST be regulated,for the common good of the country,for which there is already a great precedent in existence,even if you DO happen to think of it as 'censorship',instead of 'public safety'.

It was on a tv program yesterday discussing FB. And. They can give your personal information to Banks and other corporations for advertising purposes on FB.

Not sure if this is correct, but if so, it is not good.

opposition research is fine if its not DIRECTLY from a foreign national as opposed to a RESEARCH agency based in the USA.


A foreign national shall not, directly or indirectly, make a contribution or a donation of money or other thing of value, or expressly or impliedly promise to make a contribution or a donation, in connection with any Federal, State, or local election.

The statute in question is 52 USC 30121, 36 USC 510

I don't consider the internet freedom of speech...way to many idiots saying way to many stupid things...

My mind. i lost it a while ago.

so what? he was the mastermind behind it, he orchestrated the murders and sent his followers out to murder people, the feds called them "Mission killers" and he is responsible.

Its like when the Feds convicted John Gotti on murder charges along with other RICO statutes, he orchestrated the murders and in the eyes of American justice he is just as guilty.

the Fact that he never physically committed the crimes is irrelevant

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/crime-courts/suspect-maryland-newspaper-shooting-had-sued-capital-gazette-defamation-n887626


The Maryland man accused of blasting his way into a newspaper office and killing five staff members with a shotgun appeared to have a longstanding grudge over a 2011 column that reported his guilty plea to criminal harassment, court records show.

"This was a targeted attack on the Capital Gazette," Deputy Anne Arundel Police Chief Bill Krampf said Thursday. "He entered the building with a shotgun, and he looked for his victims as he walked through the lower level."

Jarrod Ramos, 38, was charged Friday with five counts of first-degree murder after the Thursday afternoon shooting at the Capital Gazette newspaper in Maryland's capital of Annapolis. Ramos was not cooperating with law enforcement.

******************************

All started over a piece that was published about him and his record...He wanted it removed from the site ect Even sued the paper and lost over it.. Due to the Judge said he did not prove what was said was a lie... Again when you plaster all over about someone that already has a criminal record you take the chance of them flipping due to all the back lash they will receive.. Sad for sure...

Kuddos to the Police Officers that took down the situation...