Senator Bob Menendez shows that Democrats aren't above the law.

https://apnews.com/article/menendez-federal-bribery-indictment-2f4a8945ea113debe54b062dc59d2c88

The DOJ investigated Biden extensively during the Trump Administration. Hillary too, and they couldn't come up with charges.

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/01/hillary-clinton-justice-department-investigation-results

Trump was charged because he's so shockingly criminal that they had no choice but to indict and charge. This is not weaponization of the DOJ. It's just the DOJ doing their job.

The evidence against Hilary and Biden of illegal acts that compare or worse than any illegal acts that Trump was charged with are there but ignored because of the weaponization of the DOJ.. . Every legal scholar agrees Hilary destroyed government evidence and Biden had documents he shouldn’t have and lots of them in several different unsecured places. If you can’t see the unfairness in the way the feds handled the Trump case compaired to those other two cases , Means your Trump deraingement guides your decisions.

There are no legal scholars who can show that Hillary illegally destroyed evidence and the crime is not merely keeping classified documents, but knowingly keeping them. Prosecutors would have to show intent, and simply having documents in the boxes out in the garage is not enough. Hillary's email servers getting wiped after she left office is not destroying evidence, but just a good idea for old computer hardware.

And still, where's the weaponization? Where has Biden directed the DOJ to do anything? Sure, Trump will say so, but that's just because it's how Trump ran his DOJ. A.G. Sessions ran the DOJ and didn't run it exactly how Trump wanted, so he installed Barr, and all along, both told Trump they found nothing on Biden and Clinton, making Trump look like an idiot after he promised to jail Hillary. That would be weaponization. By all accounts, Biden has kept out of the Trump investigation.

Your insistence that Trump is innocent--despite literal piles of evidence, and that Biden "is the most corrupt president ever" is the real Trump derangement syndrome.

Baaaaah, baaaah, you are the most gullible person I have ever seen. Are you on the mailing list for the democrats weekly talking points . It’s hard to take someone seriously that refuses to see the obvious. The obvious being that joe Biden has divided this country’s citizens against each other more than anybody since Abe Lincoln. Joe is poison for this country. Hilary’s is about as innocent as the democrats that stole the 2020 election. Guilty? Hell yes, but swept under the rug like most crimes committed by democrats…

Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden are so guilty that nobody can find the evidence? So guilty that years after finding the classified docs in Biden's home and office, or Hillary's email server, They can't even identify the laws broken, or find witnesses to the "crimes." Maybe I'm the sheep, but I can point to articles and government reports that support what I'm saying, and the silly Republicans just say "it's obvious." Is it possible that they think "obvious" means "I can't say how, but I feel it's true."

Yes, it took years to put together indictments for Trump, but at least we can now read about which laws he's charged with breaking, and even see and listen to some of the evidence collected. In court, they're lining up witnesses--some of them were even in on the crimes, pleading out and agreeing to testify. The other side: "Biden is so guilty! The most corrupt president ever. The worst president ever. And so guilty." (with the lowest unemployment, the highest stock market, zero indictments, zero family members appointed to government positions & no foreign payments taken)

Who's the gullible one?

You!!! You are the one that refuses to admit the people that investigated the destruction of evidence against Hilary said their was illegal activity destroying government property, but they refused to bring charges because it was a Clinton . Same with Biden , the evidence of illegality was their but they refused to bring charges because it was a Biden. Those are the facts . Because you democrats believe in and want a two tiered justice system doesn’t negate the facts that Joe and Hilary got special treatment from Biden’s D.O.J. I’m sure the trial of Gold Bar Bob will be a farce , and he will pay no penalty. That way of life ( thieving and lying) is par for the corse for most of these democrat politicians.

That's funny, because Hillary's email server was not a government asset. It was a private server she kept in her home, so even if she had taken an axe to the server, there would've been no destruction of government property. I suspect you got your information from some unhinged radical bloggers. And as for Clinton & Biden not getting charged because their position, I'd refer you to the fact that they were investigated by House Republicans and Trump's DOJ. No friends there. What's your excuse for that?

Lastly, I haven't seen anything to indicate that Senator Menendez or Rep Cuellar will get extra help from Democrats on their legal problems.

It was a hammer, not a ax… and the governmental property was the e-mails not the machine… The fact that Menendez is still holding a seat after a previous incident. That’s the support, when a republican rep. just a few months ago was forced out by other republicans for similar unethical behavior. Why isn’t other democrats asking for his ouster That’s the differance. .. Also…Clinton’s and Biden’s position had nothing to do with their crimes being swept under the rug, it was Who they are not what they were or still are. A Trump appointee isn’t bound by Trump. Unlike Obamas “ right hand man”..

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGeCfDPvC/

This is good advice for Biden. Save Netanyahu or yourself from Trump taking over in the elections this year

Not bound by Trump? Maybe try to tell that to all the attorney generals Trump fired.

Clinton's emails are not government property. She was only Secretary of State and not President, so when she wrote, sent, received or deleted emails, it's not subject to the Presidential Records Act, and until subpoenaed, there was no legal requirement to even keep them. She got the idea of a personal email server from Colin Powell, who advised her it would be easier to use than the government system, and as a veteran, myself, I can confirm that the government email system totally, royally sucked in those years. But if you can point to a law on the books that said otherwise, at that time, then I would be happy to be proven wrong, especially since nobody can even correctly point to a law that Hillary broke with regard to her emails.

Good luck.

Jim comeys investigation found that Hilary had about 100+ emails containing classified info. on several different unsecured servers. She treated those emails like a grocery list. She was supposed to treat them for what they are . Top secret, classified info. But Comey even said although others could and would be charged after such wrecklessness he thinks there should be no charges brought against mrs. clinton. So your theory is that kind of two tiered justice is fine.

Biden might have sold out to the oil companies but he’s still a far better choice than trump
Frankly I wish that the governor of California had run for the White House
He would have done more than Biden for the environment
The problems of global warming are incredibly much more serious than inflation or any of the other problems most people worry about.
There’s no inflation on a dead planet

A terrible economy is real and now, the damaging effects of global warming is speculative fear mongering in most peoples minds. If we can’t pay our bills is what folks worry about first.

You can read Comey's report on Hillary's email investigation. A couple pages long and easy to read.

https://www.fbi.gov/news/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

There were no charges for Hillary or anybody else because the facts didn't support charges. And Comey never said that others could and would be charged. He left it to DOJ to make those decisions and they declined, too. Not two-tiered justice. At worst Comey said that things were discussed that should've been known to be inappropriate to discuss in an unsecured system. He didn't even say whether Clinton wrote the classified information, so she could have simply been replying to someone else's message that also included some classified topic. Either way, the relevant laws require intention or gross negligence resulting in exposing classified information. Didn't happen.

If the economy is so terrible, then why is Trump trying to take credit for it?

https://thehill.com/homenews/4435862-trump-claims-credit-record-stock-market-biden/

But of course, you're going to get it wrong if you listen to what Trump says.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/14/politics/fact-check-trump-claims-about-biden-economy/index.html

It has more merit than Biden saying that inflation was at 9% when he came into office…and he keeps repeating that lie.. Trump is claiming credit for the stock market, a lot different than the economy and the inflation…

To Bart…
What makes you say this:
the damaging effects of global warming is speculative fear
I don’t understand
Please explain how the effects of global warming is merely speculative fear

I’m talking about the damage the climatologists claim that we have just a few years till ??? I’ve heard everything from life will cease to exist to the seas will rise and flood the entire earth.. we see no real signs of a continual warming , the earth has had warm spells and cooling spells over many eons. I won’t argue that the earth isn’t being affected by human technology. but I don’t think we should panic over it and start turning green before we are ready physically and intellectually about how and what exactly should be done. . I don’t think Biden’s idea of deploying a solar shade in space to shade the earth from the sun is the answer…

I did read it and it clearly said there were top secret classified info about 110 items with those markings and even the ones not marked , on 32 different unsecured servers . she should have known better and had responsibility securing that info. And Comey did say, … Don’t mistake that others couldn’t and wouldn’t because he could recommend charges being brought but he wouldn’t in this case. Intent doesn’t have to be there to be charged. Incompetence could be enough though..

Maybe you missed it, but Comey's report didn't say 110 emails had classification markings. Only that 110 emails were found to have classified information. Probably mentioned sensitive information. Also, the US government has a completely separate system for sending classified information, not even connected to the Internet, so it's weird that any emails would have a classification mark, unless someone decided to type "SECRET" or whatever into the email, which isn't how document classification works. Maybe that's another reasons why Comey didn't recommend charges.