Alright, I'm not a guy into guys, but happy to give it an objective review. It's good. You've done well. Good clear photos and the blurb is clear and not too long. Maybe it's a little vague, and nothing grabs my attention. Just what "simple things?" You filled in most of the information and you seem alright.

Of course, I'm not your target audience, but I wonder if it might be better for you to include a pic or two that shows off your physique. A full-body-length shot, or maybe something waist-up in a tight-fitted shirt. I'd think "guys into guys" would want to see that. Help them out, maybe?

Also, you left the headline as the default (lame) "Hi.." which you could use to say more and stand out better in search results. Just a thought.

Overall, it's a really good profile, as is. I rate it 9/10.

Europe has every right to worry about Putin taking over other sovereign countries, when there's no shortage of Russian government officials calling for Russia to next attack any number of other European countries, including NATO countries. It's better for everyone else if Putin is stopped in Ukraine.

I get it if you're disappointed in Biden breaking his promise not to pardon Hunter, & let the legal system run its course. I'm a little disappointed, too, but given the crimes involved, paying his taxes too late and filling out a federal form incorrectly, and having his personal information and naked photos presented on the House floor, despite being a private citizen, and after Trump literally sold pardons during the closing days of his first term, I'm incapable of caring all that much about this. I don't see how a string of uncommented URLs should make me want to care.

Oh, cool, because I have questions. What makes RFK Jr. qualified to run HHS? His "adult" position on vaccines? Or what made Matt Gaetz qualified to run DOJ? His experience with criminal investigations (as the subject)? I suppose you think that Tulsi Gabbard is qualified to be the Director of National Intelligence, since she's been spouting Russian talking-points for years?

Depending on who you talk to, we may have been in WWIII for a few years, now. European countries have been fretting over Russia's aggression for a long time, and it's in their best interest to tie Russia up in the quagmire in Ukraine. Lots of countries are involved in supplying Russia or Ukraine in the conflict.

That said, I see very little chance of this turning nuclear, as every authority on the matter I've seen all agree that there's no practical use for nuclear weapons beyond deterrence against other countries using nukes. And nobody's using nukes.

I hope it does work, but I don't see anything indicating it will. It's not like Trump is finding top talent for his cabinet. He's appointing washed-up TV hosts for cabinet positions. It's worse than last time.

Again, all this was investigated exhaustively and no such foreign funding was found.

Trump, on the other hand, openly takes $millions directly from foreign governments at his golf clubs and hotels.
/www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/trump-received-78-million-payments-foreign-governments-president-repor-rcna132276

Also apparently $millions in bribes from Egypt, back in 2016.
thehill.com/homenews/house/4860121-trump-egyptian-government-probe/

Biden does not have a 401 in a Swiss bank account. Firstly, that would've been absolutely brought out in the Republican investigation into his and his family's finances--and it was never mentioned. Second, he's been a federal government employee for over fifty years, and the US Government doesn't bank with the Swiss. For government employees, they have completely different retirement accounts, not called a 401, (or a "401(k)") Next, Biden already gets a federal pension for his decades in Congress and being VP, and soon his pension for being President. He'll be pulling down hundreds of $thousands each year for the rest of his life, and never has to deal with the poor optics of having a foreign bank account.

Maybe you can share where you got that silly notion.

That wasn't weaponization of the Justice Department. Those were real crimes, and if anything they slow-walked those indictments against Trump, to the point that he now won't see the courtroom for any of those egregious offenses. Seriously. Boxes of government documents in his f***ing bathroom! Took over a year for the government to get them back--after a search warrant! And the crimes just keep rolling.

But yeah, with Gates running the DOJ, you can bet we'll see weaponization of the DOJ like never before. I can't even imagine the mess Hegseth will make at the DOD or Gabbard as the DNI. I guess Trump wants to "burn it all down."

Good profile. Nicely-lit photos, and the blurb is one of the better ones I've ever read on here. Not sure what's up with the crocodiles (caimans?)--that could be a conversation starter. The headline is a bit long, but that's alright. Lots of people leave the headline as the default "Hi.." which bugs me, so great work!

Anyway, from the photos and information, you seem like a good guy. Reminds me of one of my brothers-in-law. Lots of things to like, and I don't see anything wrong, here. 10/10. Again, great work!

Good luck!

Good profile. Nice photos, and you make it clear what you seek. The text blurb looks a little messy due to the lack of some white space between the sentences, and it's more readable on mobile (that's a known bug with this website), but that also seems to be the style for younger people, today. You also left your headline as the default "Hi.." which could say so much more, but lots of people do that.

It's clear from the photos that you're pretty and young, and will probably be alright. I only see small problems with the grammar, so I rate it 9/10.

Good luck!

It's an OK profile. The photos are weirdly-lit, the blurb is a mess, and you left the headline as the default "Hi.." It could use a little more work.

The main photo is dim and blurry, but still does an OK job of showing your face. The 3 pics showing you with a phone in front of your face are redundant. I guess you're trying to show off your muscle definition, but you could also do that while showing your face, too. At least lose the two darker ones, since they don't add anything to it. The blue pic of your face is nicely framed, but the blue tint makes it look like you're getting a medical treatment for a skin condition. Or, maybe you're trying hard to look artistic. I don't know.

Then the blurb and headline. Unless you're looking for the kind of woman who doesn't care about intelligence or conversation, you could correct the mess of a paragraph you've got. I mean, It's spelled correctly, but the lack of punctuation is disappointing. Or maybe it's just "hipster." Whatever. Bugs me. Maybe it'll work on the ladies you seek. The headline is where you could craft a few words--just a few, to make you stand out in search results.

Anyway, from the main pic, and the details you included, you seem alright, and many women don't even read the text, so you'll probably do alright. But for the sloppy text and photos that could be a lot better, I'd only rate it 6/10.

Good luck!

Hi Rare Breed. Thanks for the reply. It's gratifying to see that you took my critique the way you did. Many don't.

I'm also sorry that just guys responded, but that happens a lot, and it's why I comment, because it's a shame when nobody comments on a profile when solicited. For some reason, ladies often withhold their opinions on profiles, but when they do respond, I usually stay out of those threads.

Also, it's probably best to not mind "Mr Good Guy." He rarely takes any hint of homoeroticism kindly. He's commented to me "Get a room you two" after I posted that guys seemed like good-looking guys. I'm just trying to be objective & supportive. I guess he just has delicate sensibilities.

Lastly, make your profile how you want! You seem on top of what you're doing, so take what you want from our advice, and good luck!

Helping with the transition is what presidents and presidential administrations have traditionally done. They're just trying to carry on the traditions and norms with decency. What's wrong with that?
presidentialtransition.org/reports-publications/2020-21-lessons-learned/

Both Harris and Trump had way fewer votes this time, so it's also the voters who didn't vote made the difference.

Good point. Billionaires like Musk and Thiel threw hundreds of $millions at the Trump campaign, and Trump's campaign, by itself, was a mess. The doddering old fool kept blabbering in his "speeches" and bitched and moaned about his gripes, but never really had a plan beyond tax cuts and eliminating government regulations. So we can expect that their businesses will be left unregulated while the national debt balloons like never before.

Thanks. Not gonna lie. I'm in a dark mood. I have little respect for Trump after all his criminality and He hasn't shown any signs that he's changed his ways.

The only bright spot of this is that I know a lot of Republicans and most of them are happy that Trump won, so I'm happy for them, and most of them haven't been gloating about this. I do hope that Trump isn't as bad as I fear. In the meantime, I guess it's just back to work and family and whatever else. I'll get through it; It's not that bad.

Creating a new thread to cover this, since nobody else did, and it's a pet peeve of mine when people change the subject of threads to talk about something new:

Donald Trump wins 2nd term in historic return to White House
abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trump-wins-2nd-term-historic-return-white/story?id=115358710

The biggest thing I see in the election results is that the Democrat got about 14 million fewer votes than the last candidate. Too many Democrats staying home, having forgotten what a disaster Trump was last time.

What do you think?

By "straighten up" I mean refrain from bombing neighborhoods with 1-ton free-fall bombs & let the people of Gaza have food and water, and medical care. Starving and bombing a whole population doesn't look like the answer to me. But, yeah, if you want to slaughter a whole population, then Trump's your guy. And you're right that world peace isn't a thing, anymore. We haven't had it in my lifetime. It wasn't peaceful under Trump, even if he didn't start new hot wars, he still ordered military strikes. He wanted to nuke a hurricane--shows how nutty he is. Now he's only talking about letting Russia and Israel do "whatever the hell they like" and let RFK Jr. run things, after Donald pardons himself and takes off to play golf, apparently.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/rfk-jr-trump-promised-control-public-health-agencies/story?id=115303649

World peace is different now, under Biden than it was under Trump, but Biden is handling it better. He's not picking fights with Iraq, and he did pull US troops out of Afghanistan, despite Pompeo's disastrous negotiations with the Taliban. Sure, things look bad between Israel and Iran, but that's because of Netanyahu's incompetence and belligerence meeting Palestinian violence. I agree that the US isn't doing everything right, and should cut off arms shipments to Israel until they straighten up regarding their war crimes.

And while the US traded Viktor Bout ("The Bill Gates of Arms Trafficking") for Brittney Griner, Bout was never a top general. He's barely a terrorist--just sold weapons to terrorist organizations. Business. Since he's been released, he's become a Russian politician.