"2" women does not equate to several . And both women claimed they did not believe his advances were sexual in nature . As reported on CNN
Joe Biden is a good man that has done tremendous things on behalf of all woman
Unlike trumps statement of being able to grab women by their private parts and getting away with it because hes rich . As reported on "Entertainment Tonight" with audio

Ms.H when one of those cops shoots an innocent victim they or the department gets sued..not to mention what is going on in Venezuela is more than a good enough reason to vet these people that come in and not catch and release them..and when you look at the fact that those who reinstated the catch and release law is a traitor..and just because we may be litigious is by no means a reason to allow those into the country when you have no idea who they are..

Do you think that China and Russia are the only ones in Venezuela you also have terrorists groups there like Hezbollah and Hamas..how do you know they aren't coming through the border..we don't..it's just a matter of time..just like I said we would see a spread of diseases which is happening as well..Like I've said many times before an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure..

Do you just release products on the market that aren't checked out..do you just give someone a gun and make them a cop before doing a background check..these people aren't being vetted some are sneaking in..how many are sneaking in to being a cop..that's what background checks are for..I was right about the spreading of diseases I hate to say what I think is coming next..

Ms.H when one of those cops shoots an innocent victim they or the department gets sued..not to mention what is going on in Venezuela is more than a good enough reason to vet these people that come in and not catch and release them..and when you look at the fact that those who reinstated the catch and release law is a traitor..and just because we may be litigious is by no means a reason to allow those into the country when you have no idea who they are..

Do you think that China and Russia are the only ones in Venezuela you also have terrorists groups there like Hezbollah and Hamas..how do you know they aren't coming through the border..we don't..it's just a matter of time..just like I said we would see a spread of diseases which is happening as well..Like I've said many times before an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure..

Do you just release products on the market that aren't checked out..do you just give someone a gun and make them a cop before doing a background check..these people aren't being vetted some are sneaking in..how many are sneaking in to being a cop..that's what background checks are for..I was right about the spreading of diseases I hate to say what I think is coming next..

UNFOUNDED CLAIMS
The claim of terrorist groups coming through southern border -UNFOUNDED
Claim migrants are bringing in disease and sickness - UNFOUNDED
Claim trump isnt guiltyof obstruction - UNFOUNDED
Claims President Obama and secretary Clinton are traitors - UNFOUNDED

Claim, terrorist groups coming through the southern border

"AP FACT CHECK: Trump’s mythical terrorist tide from Mexico "

http://www.apnews.com/4a7792c523ab4b5984893b38c988d70b


Claim, Migrants are bringing in disease and sickness

"Migrants don't bring disease. In fact, they help fight it, a report says "

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/immigration-border-crisis/migrants-don-t-bring-disease-fact-they-help-fight-it-n944146

Claim, Trump isn't guilty of obstruction

Why Trump isn’t being charged with obstruction — even though Mueller didn’t exonerate him


http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/3/24/18279851/mueller-trump-obstruction-justice-exoneration

The above is the truth whether some want to face it or not. Anyone willing to do some research can sit down and in a few min know that all those false claims were started on social media by Russian Trolls. All of it is easily proven a lie.


(Claims President Obama and Secretary Clinton are traitors.)

Every time I see this claim I can't help it. I laugh. I've tried to look this claim up and see if I can find real info on this claim. About all I find is a story that leads to an even more outlandish claim called "PizzaGate" Which is another hoot. (Pizzagate conspiracy theory, which alleged that Clinton was part of a child-sex ring based in part at a Washington, DC, pizza restaurant.)

It's hard for me to believe that anyone could believe such a story. Since there is no real evidence of this, I really can't post a link to anything. About all, I can do with this one, leave it up to the common sense of the reader.

Thanks for displaying the links Charles

Hmmm, I wouldnt think being a goofball, OR arrogance OR interference were really a concern for Trump supporters,

Mr. "I know more than military generals or our intelligence community"
Mr. "I have a genius IQ but don't want you to see my grades.
Mr. "Players who kneel during the anthem should be fired"

as far as the economy. Facts are facts. It totally depends upon which facts people focus on. But considering what economy WAS when he came in. I find it hard to not laugh at the idea that he was 'damaging' what he came into.

But I inherited a mess, I inherited a mess in so many ways. I inherited a mess in the Middle East, and a mess with North Korea, I inherited a mess with jobs, despite the statistics, you know, my statistics are even better, but they are not the real statistics because you have millions of people that can’t get a job, ok. And I inherited a mess on trade. I mean we have many, you can go up and down the ladder. But that’s the story. Hey look, in the mean time, I guess, I can’t be doing so badly, because I’m president, and you’re not. You know. Say hello to everybody OK?

It’s not every day that a U.S. president calls journalists “among the most dishonest human beings on earth” or that his chief strategist dubs the media “the opposition party.” It’s hardly surprising that the air is thick with questions and theories about how to cover the new administration.

So what is the Reuters answer? To oppose the administration? To appease it? To boycott its briefings? To use our platform to rally support for the media? All these ideas are out there, and they may be right for some news operations, but they don’t make sense for Reuters. We already know what to do because we do it every day, and we do it all over the world.

To state the obvious, Reuters is a global news organization that reports independently and fairly in more than 100 countries, including many in which the media is unwelcome and frequently under attack. I am perpetually proud of our work in places such as Turkey, the Philippines, Egypt, Iraq, Yemen, Thailand, China, Zimbabwe, and Russia, nations in which we sometimes encounter some combination of censorship, legal prosecution, visa denials, and even physical threats to our journalists. We respond to all of these by doing our best to protect our journalists, by recommitting ourselves to reporting fairly and honestly, by doggedly gathering hard-to-get information – and by remaining impartial. We write very rarely about ourselves and our troubles and very often about the issues that will make a difference in the businesses and lives of our readers and viewers.

We don’t know yet how sharp the Trump administration’s attacks will be over time or to what extent those attacks will be accompanied by legal restrictions on our newsgathering. But we do know that we must follow the same rules that govern our work anywhere, namely:

Do’s:

Cover what matters in people’s lives and provide them the facts they need to make better decisions.
Become ever-more resourceful: If one door to information closes, open another one.
Give up on hand-outs and worry less about official access. They were never all that valuable anyway. Our coverage of Iran has been outstanding, and we have virtually no official access. What we have are sources.
Get out into the country and learn more about how people live, what they think, what helps and hurts them, and how the government and its actions appear to them, not to us.
Keep the Thomson Reuters Trust Principles close at hand, remembering that “the integrity, independence and freedom from bias of Reuters shall at all times be fully preserved.”
Dont's:

Never be intimidated, but:
Don’t pick unnecessary fights or make the story about us. We may care about the inside baseball but the public generally doesn’t and might not be on our side even if it did.
Don’t vent publicly about what might be understandable day-to-day frustration. In countless other countries, we keep our own counsel so we can do our reporting without being suspected of personal animus. We need to do that in the U.S., too.
Don’t take too dark a view of the reporting environment: It’s an opportunity for us to practice the skills we’ve learned in much tougher places around the world and to lead by example – and therefore to provide the freshest, most useful, and most illuminating information and insight of any news organization anywhere.
This is our mission, in the U.S. and everywhere. We make a difference in the world because we practice professional journalism that is both intrepid and unbiased. When we make mistakes, which we do, we correct them quickly and fully. When we don’t know something, we say so. When we hear rumors, we track them down and report them only when we are confident that they are factual. We value speed but not haste: When something needs more checking, we take the time to check it. We try to avoid “permanent exclusives” – first but wrong. We operate with calm integrity not just because it’s in our rulebook but because – over 165 years – it has enabled us to do the best work and the most good.

Advice to journalists from Steve Adler, Editor-in-Chief at Reuters:



In my humble opinion, this is most likely the most reliable source of information about life in Trumpland.

I still dont know where the chart with Obamas photo on came from. People keep reposting it, but I can neither agree nor disagree unless I know where it comes from. Can admin or the OP or someone tell me where you found that? I have searched back statements and cannot find the original. So therefore, it means nothing. I am sincere in wanting to know where does that comparison come from. If we are to let everyone know where we get our info, then all the repostings should also be easy to look up.