Topic: Trump ends Obama seperation policy! | |
---|---|
Well his DAD 'probably' was ... so guilt by association maybe? So you attack Trump but fail to mention prominent Democrats who were high up in the Klan like the person who was fourth in line to the Presidency when Obama was President, Robert Byrd the original Klansman and a truly evil SOB. well attacks were a pretty good tactic of success in the last election ... but I also think they are tacky and a sign of decreasing intellect and increasing narcissism |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 06/24/18 07:55 AM
|
|
Well his DAD 'probably' was ... so guilt by association maybe? So you attack Trump but fail to mention prominent Democrats who were high up in the Klan like the person who was fourth in line to the Presidency when Obama was President, Robert Byrd the original Klansman and a truly evil SOB. well attacks were a pretty good tactic of success in the last election ... but I also think they are tacky and a sign of decreasing intellect and increasing narcissism wait, so has the argument switched from 'well, obama did it' to "well, obama SHOULD have done it"? |
|
|
|
Well his DAD 'probably' was ... so guilt by association maybe? So you attack Trump but fail to mention prominent Democrats who were high up in the Klan like the person who was fourth in line to the Presidency when Obama was President, Robert Byrd the original Klansman and a truly evil SOB. well attacks were a pretty good tactic of success in the last election ... but I also think they are tacky and a sign of decreasing intellect and increasing narcissism wait, so has the argument switched from 'well, obama did it' to "well, obama SHOULD have done it"? |
|
|
|
Well his DAD 'probably' was ... so guilt by association maybe? So you attack Trump but fail to mention prominent Democrats who were high up in the Klan like the person who was fourth in line to the Presidency when Obama was President, Robert Byrd the original Klansman and a truly evil SOB. well attacks were a pretty good tactic of success in the last election ... but I also think they are tacky and a sign of decreasing intellect and increasing narcissism wait, so has the argument switched from 'well, obama did it' to "well, obama SHOULD have done it"? The SAME law was not in effect. there was room for discretion, like in any system of law in the US. This law was ZERO TOLERANCE (no discretion) ... and I am not 'you democrats' just one person with one point of view on a public forum for opinions ... |
|
|
|
Too many people repeat the same egregious error: thinking that pointing out the failures of the OTHER GUYS, makes the failure of YOUR guys, okay, or even laudable. No matter how many democrats you can list who committed this or that crime or bad behavior, it will never change the fact that when a Republican does the same thing, that it's entirely despicable, AND it's entirely the responsibility of that Republican. And vice versa, of course. Personally, I want leaders who BEHAVE THEMSELVES, and who do the jobs they were elected to do. And I will vote to throw them out, when they screw it up, no matter how many people they point to who are just as bad. That's a game that parents wont tolerate in a FOUR year old wayward child, no reason to tolerate it in a grownup in a position of power. while that is nice and makes for a great sound bite, here is the reality Identity politics has always existed, the difference is today with the social media and 500 channel you cannot get away from it, identity politics only came up once every four years and after the election everyone went back to their normal lives. Each party has been promising to do things to improve, change America and most have not kept their promises all one has to do is look at their party's political platform to see, Ive posted a link to the 1968 Democratic and Republican party platform to illustrate my point And after read it I bet you will be saying Holy beep that sounds like the problems of today and if you're really ambitious read all of the party's platform from 1972 and on and you will get a much better idea on how both parties are full of shite Each administrations has made mistakes and the incoming administration tries to clean up the mistake of the previous administration or worse they are handcuffed because of the previous administration, assigning blame is what uneducated people do. below is the 1968 political party platform http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=25841 Republican ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=29604 Democrats^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ As in for leaders behaving themselves? please. Both parties have had men who have not behaved themselves or even showed they have morals From Presidents to Vice presidents, to Congress, State Legislators you name it both parties have had unscrupulous individuals because man is fallible If American history had to erase all the men that didn't behave themselves you would have to rename a lot of buildings, cities, streets, high schools etc. |
|
|
|
Well his DAD 'probably' was ... so guilt by association maybe? So you attack Trump but fail to mention prominent Democrats who were high up in the Klan like the person who was fourth in line to the Presidency when Obama was President, Robert Byrd the original Klansman and a truly evil SOB. It's pretty sad. The Democrats made him 3rd in line to the presidency when he was a high ranking member of the KKK and a liar. He stated he was no part of the Klan and had no contact with Klansmen after 1943 but there are letters dated in the late 1940's and early 1950's to leaders of the KKK praising them and the Klan by Byrd. Then, if they really thought he changed why would he vote against the amendment for African Americans to vote and also did a 14 hour filibuster supporting Segregation. Byrd was an evil man and a racist his whole life who constantly fought to keep African Americans away from Caucasians and out of elected office and out of the US military. The same Democrats that supported an actual true vile racist are the same ones calling President Trump a racist because he is enforcing the law of the country (that the Democrats in fact put on place)…. Liberal logic for you. |
|
|
|
Well his DAD 'probably' was ... so guilt by association maybe? So you attack Trump but fail to mention prominent Democrats who were high up in the Klan like the person who was fourth in line to the Presidency when Obama was President, Robert Byrd the original Klansman and a truly evil SOB. It's pretty sad. The Democrats made him 3rd in line to the presidency when he was a high ranking member of the KKK and a liar. He stated he was no part of the Klan and had no contact with Klansmen after 1943 but there are letters dated in the late 1940's and early 1950's to leaders of the KKK praising them and the Klan by Byrd. Then, if they really thought he changed why would he vote against the amendment for African Americans to vote and also did a 14 hour filibuster supporting Segregation. Byrd was an evil man and a racist his whole life who constantly fought to keep African Americans away from Caucasians and out of elected office and out of the US military. The same Democrats that supported an actual true vile racist are the same ones calling President Trump a racist because he is enforcing the law of the country (that the Democrats in fact put on place)…. Liberal logic for you. Well, that racist never tried to deny his history. and I doubt the SAME democrats who 'supported' that one are the ones not supporting Trump TODAY. |
|
|
|
Well his DAD 'probably' was ... so guilt by association maybe? So you attack Trump but fail to mention prominent Democrats who were high up in the Klan like the person who was fourth in line to the Presidency when Obama was President, Robert Byrd the original Klansman and a truly evil SOB. It's pretty sad. The Democrats made him 3rd in line to the presidency when he was a high ranking member of the KKK and a liar. He stated he was no part of the Klan and had no contact with Klansmen after 1943 but there are letters dated in the late 1940's and early 1950's to leaders of the KKK praising them and the Klan by Byrd. Then, if they really thought he changed why would he vote against the amendment for African Americans to vote and also did a 14 hour filibuster supporting Segregation. Byrd was an evil man and a racist his whole life who constantly fought to keep African Americans away from Caucasians and out of elected office and out of the US military. The same Democrats that supported an actual true vile racist are the same ones calling President Trump a racist because he is enforcing the law of the country (that the Democrats in fact put on place)…. Liberal logic for you. Well, that racist never tried to deny his history. and I doubt the SAME democrats who 'supported' that one are the ones not supporting Trump TODAY. Actually he did. He lied and claimed he had nothing to do with the Klan after 1943 and claimed he was only in the Klan for a few months all lies. That is a lie and trying to hide his affiliation and his history. |
|
|
|
But at the same time the Democratic party is the party of Segregation, Jim Crow and racism so it's not surprising. Lyndon Johnson's exact words "We will have those Ni***r's voting Democrat for the next 100 years."
Minorities in the Democratic party have been played by their own party for years. This is what happens when you don't know your own history. |
|
|
|
But at the same time the Democratic party is the party of Segregation, Jim Crow and racism so it's not surprising. Lyndon Johnson's exact words "We will have those Ni***r's voting Democrat for the next 100 years." Minorities in the Democratic party have been played by their own party for years. This is what happens when you don't know your own history. no, that is what happens when history is misrepresented as has been noted many time the democratic party of segregation was largely the SOUTHERN democratic party the larger SOUTHERN party now is the Republican base .. |
|
|
|
But at the same time the Democratic party is the party of Segregation, Jim Crow and racism so it's not surprising. Lyndon Johnson's exact words "We will have those Ni***r's voting Democrat for the next 100 years." Minorities in the Democratic party have been played by their own party for years. This is what happens when you don't know your own history. no, that is what happens when history is misrepresented as has been noted many time the democratic party of segregation was largely the SOUTHERN democratic party the larger SOUTHERN party now is the Republican base .. It was still the Democratic party and has nothing to do with the Republican party. The Democrat party as a whole supported those issues or they never would have held up for as long as they did. They also supported the racists candidates and elected officials like Byrd, Barrett, President Wilson "Played the pro KKK film Birth of a Nation at the White House and praised the film", Senator Black who FDR appointed to the Supreme Court, Bibb Graves (who the Klan helped get elected Governor), Clifford Walker, George Gordon, John Morgan, Edmund Pettus, John Gordon, Ben Stapleton, Harry Truman and De La Beckwith who was repeatedly the Democratic Nominee for political office after he killed Medgar Evers.... That's just a few. I can keep listing them all day. The Republican party fought Segregation and Jim Crow and even ok'd the National Guard to escort African Americans into a school. |
|
|
|
no, that is what happens when history is misrepresented as has been noted many time the democratic party of segregation was largely the SOUTHERN democratic party the larger SOUTHERN party now is the Republican base .. I'm surprised your buddy Igor hasn't jumped in , miss harmony do you know the history behind Jim crow laws? |
|
|
|
no, that is what happens when history is misrepresented as has been noted many time the democratic party of segregation was largely the SOUTHERN democratic party the larger SOUTHERN party now is the Republican base .. I'm surprised your buddy Igor hasn't jumped in , miss harmony do you know the history behind Jim crow laws? IM sure you can school us ... |
|
|
|
IM sure you can school us ... its not my job to school you, My jobs is to present facts backing up my opinions and views. so I take it you dont know the history behind Jim Crow laws? |
|
|
|
But at the same time the Democratic party is the party of Segregation, Jim Crow and racism so it's not surprising. Lyndon Johnson's exact words "We will have those Ni***r's voting Democrat for the next 100 years." Minorities in the Democratic party have been played by their own party for years. This is what happens when you don't know your own history. no, that is what happens when history is misrepresented as has been noted many time the democratic party of segregation was largely the SOUTHERN democratic party the larger SOUTHERN party now is the Republican base .. It was still the Democratic party and has nothing to do with the Republican party. The Democrat party as a whole supported those issues or they never would have held up for as long as they did. They also supported the racists candidates and elected officials like Byrd, Barrett, President Wilson "Played the pro KKK film Birth of a Nation at the White House and praised the film", Senator Black who FDR appointed to the Supreme Court, Bibb Graves (who the Klan helped get elected Governor), Clifford Walker, George Gordon, John Morgan, Edmund Pettus, John Gordon, Ben Stapleton, Harry Truman and De La Beckwith who was repeatedly the Democratic Nominee for political office after he killed Medgar Evers.... That's just a few. I can keep listing them all day. The Republican party fought Segregation and Jim Crow and even ok'd the National Guard to escort African Americans into a school. northerners fought segregation, southerners did not. |
|
|
|
IM sure you can school us ... its not my job to school you, My jobs is to present facts backing up my opinions and views. so I take it you dont know the history behind Jim Crow laws? present the facts or make the point, Im happy with either one. I am aware the history of America's Jim Crow laws, yes now, is there a point coming? |
|
|
|
IM sure you can school us ... its not my job to school you, My jobs is to present facts backing up my opinions and views. so I take it you dont know the history behind Jim Crow laws? present the facts or make the point, Im happy with either one. I am aware the history of America's Jim Crow laws, yes now, is there a point coming? |
|
|
|
present the facts or make the point, Im happy with either one. I am aware the history of America's Jim Crow laws, yes now, is there a point coming? Im glad your happy with either one,but your happiness isn't my concern you said northerners fought segregation, southerners did not while that is true, the Republicans handed the Democrats the south in exchange for key swing votes for Rutherford Hayes and he won the election , and the south punished blacks with Jim Crow laws. so my point is The republicans and Democrats are responsible for jim crow laws in the south and the end of the military occupation of the south. so to blame southern democrats is intellectually dishonest, when it was government policies of both parties that contributed. |
|
|
|
present the facts or make the point, Im happy with either one. I am aware the history of America's Jim Crow laws, yes now, is there a point coming? Im glad your happy with either one,but your happiness isn't my concern you said northerners fought segregation, southerners did not while that is true, the Republicans handed the Democrats the south in exchange for key swing votes for Rutherford Hayes and he won the election , and the south punished blacks with Jim Crow laws. so my point is The republicans and Democrats are responsible for jim crow laws in the south and the end of the military occupation of the south. so to blame southern democrats is intellectually dishonest, when it was government policies of both parties that contributed. and likewise to blame Democrats ... point taken |
|
|
|
even though the Democrats instituted Jim Crows laws with the blessing of the Republicans .
|
|
|