Topic: Bizzarro World/Liberals want recount? | |
---|---|
Weirdly, two days ago this news item appeared. It has been buried by the avalanche of news of the death of Fidel Castro:
SNOWDEN: “RUSSIA SUCCESSFULLY RIGGED US ELECTIONS IN FAVOR OF TRUMP” http://universepolitics.com/2016/11/25/snowden-russia-successfully-rigged-us-elections-in-favor-of-trump/ Snowden is quoted: “What is most surprising about this election, according to my information, is that the electronic voting machines were clearly rigged in Hillary Clinton’s favor, but Russian hackers cunningly used this to their advantage and inverted the process towards Donald Trump in the last moments leading to his election." |
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Sun 11/27/16 08:16 AM
|
|
well,HoodahThunkit?
http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/clinton-team-to-take-part-in-u-s--state-vote-recount--trump-blasts-effort-/42709448 Clinton team to take part in U.S. state vote recount, Trump blasts effort By Ian Simpson and Roberta Rampton WASHINGTON/WEST PAlM BEACH, Fla. (Reuters) - Democrat Hillary Clinton's campaign will take part in a recount of Wisconsin votes in the U.S. presidential race, an effort Republican winner Donald Trump called "ridiculous" on Saturday. Wisconsin's election board on Friday approved the recount requested by Green Party candidate Jill Stein. She has said she wants to guarantee the integrity of the U.S. voting system since computer hacking had marked the Nov. 8 election. Marc Elias, the Clinton campaign counsel, said the campaign would take part in the recount in Wisconsin as well as in the other battleground states of Pennsylvania and Michigan if recounts were mounted there. Elias said in a statement on the Medium website that the Clinton campaign had not planned to seek a recount since its own investigation had failed to turn up any sign of hacking of voting systems. "But now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides," Elias said. Clinton's campaign should be legally represented in Wisconsin to be able to monitor the recount, he said. In a statement, Trump said the three states had been won by wide margins, including by more than 70,000 votes in Pennsylvania. The recount is a "scam by the Green Party for an election that has already been conceded," he said. The $7 million (6 million pound) Stein has sought to raise for the recounts is a way "to fill her coffers with money, most of which she will never even spend on this ridiculous recount," he said. Although Trump won the Electoral College tally, Clinton will have won the national popular vote by more than 2 million ballots when the final results are in. Stein has raised $5.8 million of the $7 million needed to cover fees and legal costs for the three recounts, according to her campaign website. The deadline for filing a recount bid in Pennsylvania is Monday. The voting margins make it highly unlikely any recounts would end up giving Clinton a win in all three states, which would be needed for the overall election result to change. Trump beat Clinton in Pennsylvania by 70,010 votes, in Michigan by 10,704 votes and in Wisconsin by 27,257 votes. Experts urged extra scrutiny of the three states, Stein told CNN on Friday, because their voting systems were seen as vulnerable. (Editing by Jonathan Oatis) Watch the "Franken-ing" of a General Election by the Clintons! Jill Stein concerned about Irregularities,my Butt! Was always an effort by Clinton-Camp and its Backers,inside and outside of the US! Just observe how the recount-Funds rolled in! US-Senate-Election of Al Franken all over again! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well, we may see a Special Prosecutor after all. |
|
|
|
"'Hour of Populists': MSM demonizes right-wing politicians, labels their success as dangerous trend"
http://youtu.be/k1XyDq_J61w/ 3:48 Nov 29, 2016 Donald Trump will be the next US president, while former UK Independence party leader Nigel Farage played a major role in Brexit. Marine Le Pen is running in the FRENCH Presidential election in 2017, while Frauke Peatry, with her Alternative for GERMANY party, is also gaining supporters. And, Norbert Hofer from AUSTRIA's Freedom Party has a good chance of winning a re-run of the Presidential election in the country next month. RT's Miguel Francis-Santiago takes a look at the trend. ------------- That's 5 countries and counting. Saddle up! |
|
|
|
well,HoodahThunkit? http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/clinton-team-to-take-part-in-u-s--state-vote-recount--trump-blasts-effort-/42709448 Clinton team to take part in U.S. state vote recount, Trump blasts effort By Ian Simpson and Roberta Rampton WASHINGTON/WEST PAlM BEACH, Fla. (Reuters) - Democrat Hillary Clinton's campaign will take part in a recount of Wisconsin votes in the U.S. presidential race, an effort Republican winner Donald Trump called "ridiculous" on Saturday. Wisconsin's election board on Friday approved the recount requested by Green Party candidate Jill Stein. She has said she wants to guarantee the integrity of the U.S. voting system since computer hacking had marked the Nov. 8 election. Marc Elias, the Clinton campaign counsel, said the campaign would take part in the recount in Wisconsin as well as in the other battleground states of Pennsylvania and Michigan if recounts were mounted there. Elias said in a statement on the Medium website that the Clinton campaign had not planned to seek a recount since its own investigation had failed to turn up any sign of hacking of voting systems. "But now that a recount has been initiated in Wisconsin, we intend to participate in order to ensure the process proceeds in a manner that is fair to all sides," Elias said. Clinton's campaign should be legally represented in Wisconsin to be able to monitor the recount, he said. In a statement, Trump said the three states had been won by wide margins, including by more than 70,000 votes in Pennsylvania. The recount is a "scam by the Green Party for an election that has already been conceded," he said. The $7 million (6 million pound) Stein has sought to raise for the recounts is a way "to fill her coffers with money, most of which she will never even spend on this ridiculous recount," he said. Although Trump won the Electoral College tally, Clinton will have won the national popular vote by more than 2 million ballots when the final results are in. Stein has raised $5.8 million of the $7 million needed to cover fees and legal costs for the three recounts, according to her campaign website. The deadline for filing a recount bid in Pennsylvania is Monday. The voting margins make it highly unlikely any recounts would end up giving Clinton a win in all three states, which would be needed for the overall election result to change. Trump beat Clinton in Pennsylvania by 70,010 votes, in Michigan by 10,704 votes and in Wisconsin by 27,257 votes. Experts urged extra scrutiny of the three states, Stein told CNN on Friday, because their voting systems were seen as vulnerable. (Editing by Jonathan Oatis) Watch the "Franken-ing" of a General Election by the Clintons! Jill Stein concerned about Irregularities,my Butt! Was always an effort by Clinton-Camp and its Backers,inside and outside of the US! Just observe how the recount-Funds rolled in! US-Senate-Election of Al Franken all over again! to me looks like a way to get everyone to know who you are. Who knew this persons name before? So if their is more money than needed where does it go? Follow the money. |
|
|
|
The election is over. Let's move forward.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
yellowrose10
on
Tue 11/29/16 07:26 PM
|
|
Wisconsin's judge just ruled a hand count of ballots isn't needed
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin's judge just ruled a hand count of ballots isn't needed Jill&Hill will be apoplectic! |
|
|
|
"SR 1370 – Green Party Denounces Jill Stein for Helping Clinton"
http://youtu.be/RDdphNQ5AQI/ 2:29 Transcript: Green Party Denounces Jill Stein for Helping Clinton It looks like the jig is really, really up for Jill Stein. It appears that the Green Party in general has not been thrilled with their Presidential candidate, taking money from George Soros to help Hillary Clinton continuing to try to somehow still edge out Donald Trump. Stein’s latest two attempts have been debacles – namely filing lawsuits in both Wisconsin and Pennsylvania to try to cause drawn-out recounts in an attempt to have their votes voided at the Electoral College, which meets 20 days from now. Someone named Martha Beale has commented that: “In a letter penned by Green Party Senate Candidate Margaret Flowers, and signed by dozens of prominent GPUS members, the Greens have rebelled against the farcical ‘recount effort’ conducted by Jill Stein saying ‘while we support electoral reforms, including how the vote is counted, we do not support the current recount being undertaken by Jill Stein.’ “ “The reason for this is that as the author notes, ‘as a candidate, Dr. Stein has the right to call for a recount. However, we urge the GPUS to distance itself from any appearance of support for either Democrats or Republicans. We are well aware of the undemocratic actions taken during the primaries by the DNC and the Clinton campaign. Greens cannot be perceived to be allied with such a party.” Technically, it is probably true that Stein could only be ejected from the party at a meeting of perhaps the Executive Committee of the party, however this is a very strong denunciation of the party leader by significant power blocks just under her. It’s also interesting that the Greens - in general now - want to run from Crooked Hillary as far and as fast as they can. |
|
|
|
how about, Hillary dancing with the Stars.
|
|
|
|
how about, Hillary dancing with the Stars. Only if NASA sends her to the stars. |
|
|
|
how about, Hillary dancing with the Stars. Only if NASA sends her to the stars. on Elon Musk's SpaceX's first trip to Mars! |
|
|
|
|
|
@Wikileaks Strikes Again, This Time Is Even Worse Then Ever!
http://youtu.be/1hhY-0RvBxo/ 6:56 RT America --------- "DOD directs employees to not look at Wikileaks" http://youtu.be/htxv7YoSzwg/ 2:35 RT America Dec 1, 2016 Wikileaks has been releasing tons of documents lately, thousands and thousands of them that reveal lots of stuff that was supposed to remain hidden. A lot of people would say that they even influenced the 2016 election, that’s how important Wikileaks leaks have become at this point in time. Which is why The Resident thought it might be great to remind everyone that under President Obama, the Department of Defense actually instructed their employees to not look at any of Wikileaks’ documents at all. Follow The Resident at http://www.twitter.com/TheResident --------- Over 30 days #ProofOfLife #ShowUsJullian |
|
|
|
@Wikileaks Strikes Again, This Time Is Even Worse Then Ever! http://youtu.be/1hhY-0RvBxo/ 6:56 RT America --------- "DOD directs employees to not look at Wikileaks" http://youtu.be/htxv7YoSzwg/ 2:35 RT America Dec 1, 2016 Wikileaks has been releasing tons of documents lately, thousands and thousands of them that reveal lots of stuff that was supposed to remain hidden. A lot of people would say that they even influenced the 2016 election, that’s how important Wikileaks leaks have become at this point in time. Which is why The Resident thought it might be great to remind everyone that under President Obama, the Department of Defense actually instructed their employees to not look at any of Wikileaks’ documents at all. Follow The Resident at http://www.twitter.com/TheResident --------- Over 30 days #ProofOfLife #ShowUsJullian |
|
|
|
According to some Democrats there were a few precincts in Wisconsin that use paper ballots. A majority of those ballots went for Hillary 7 to 1 but a majority of the precincts that use electronic voting machines went for Trump. Because the paper ballots went 7 to 1 for Hillary the Democrats think the electronic machine votes were tampered with, so they want a recount.It seems to me that since most precinct volunteers and election personal are probably Democrats and would not rig the results for Trump. and also it seems the paper ballots would be much easier to manipulate then the electronic votes,I would think if there was any tampering it was for Hillary.BTW if there was going to be a recount it should be because of all the votes cast by dead people and illegal aliens. I really hope there is no reversal of the outcome because the "protesting" you see now is nothing compared to what might happen if this basic right of every citizen 18 and up is trampled on and taken away after a fair and free election. They can recount all they want, it won't change anything. And they know it, so this " threat of a recount will go absolutly.. nowhere. |
|
|