100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Spike Lee Doesn't Like Whites in His Hood | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 02/28/14 11:24 AM
|
|
lol,, pot calling kettle black syndrome from those who use conspiracist 'talking points' or anti authority 'talking points' or anti government 'talking points' or pro authority 'talking points' or anti liberal 'talking points' lol also known as OPINIONS That are in agreement with previously stated opinions,,, you know,even if you think it is only an Opinion,but there are such things as objective Facts out there,regardless of you calling them Opinions! 
does the presence of these 'objective' facts somehow dispute the reality of opinions? so,anything you post is Fact,what everyone else posts is Opinion then? Glad I have finally figured it out!
Couldn't have lived with myself otherwise! 
Typical "troll" ideology..... Will help you in your future understanding Con 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lol,, pot calling kettle black syndrome from those who use conspiracist 'talking points' or anti authority 'talking points' or anti government 'talking points' or pro authority 'talking points' or anti liberal 'talking points' lol also known as OPINIONS That are in agreement with previously stated opinions,,, you know,even if you think it is only an Opinion,but there are such things as objective Facts out there,regardless of you calling them Opinions!
does the presence of these 'objective' facts somehow dispute the reality of opinions? so,anything you post is Fact,what everyone else posts is Opinion then? Glad I have finally figured it out!
Couldn't have lived with myself otherwise!
no answer to the question huh? what else is new...lol people post fact and opinion, including me, never posted otherwise what I have figured out is that when people disagree with another person on an opinion they attack that person with personal insults or they attack the validity of the opinion by labeling it a 'talking point' never seeing that their opinions could likewise be considered 'talking points' if they appear more than a few times in the blogs, websites, speeches of others,,,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wait, does he DEMAND only African americans or does he REQUEST African americans are sent in order to contribute to their opportunities? I see it as the latter,,, would it be as controversial if a female asked for female reporters to have their interviews or a Christian to ask for Christian reporters to have their interviews? there is a difference in being pro black and being anti white... but i'm not sure you understand this as you don't see a difference when someone is pro white or anti black... that is exactly my point there IS a difference between being supportive of one thing and being against other things I understand it quite well i don't think you do... being pro black means helping blacks in a way that isn't racism... anti white means they are directed in a way to hurt whites, no matter how... spike is the latter, like king shabazz, Louis Farrakhan, and a few others king barry would be pro black, as Jesse Jackson is too, can you see the difference? no, I don't see where Farrakhan has tried to or has the power to hurt whites nor spike I do agree ,though, that shabazz is hateful of and promoting harm to whites,,, spike and LF both have anti white agenda... and i'm not talking about killing white babies, although LF does seem to want to get rid of the jews for some reason... |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Dodo_David
on
Fri 02/28/14 11:37 AM
|
|
dodo descriptions and adjectives imply OPINIONS the QUOTE provided has nothing that I Can see as 'anti white' msharmony, that news report is just that, a news report, not an opinion piece. Now, this is an opinion piece: In the expletive-strewn soliloquy, Lee wraps up all kinds of complaints, personal and aesthetic and political, in an angry bow. "I grew up here in Fort Greene. I grew up here in New York. It's changed." He decries those who complained about neighbors calling the cops on his jazz-playing father. He suggests you can't be the fan of a white Celtic in black Brooklyn: "��How you walking around Brooklyn with a Larry Bird jersey on? You can't do that. Not in Bed Stuy." And so on.
Strip it down, and Lee is plainly attacking what he sees as racial encroachment. That's offensive, because he wouldn't get away with directing a similar jeremiad at Latinos or Chinese-Americans or almost any other type of alleged encroacher... ... "You can't discover this! We've been here. You just can't come and bogart ... You can't just come in the neighborhood and start bogarting and say, like you're motherf---in' Columbus and kill off the Native Americans." That's Lee echoing the standard primal scream: I was in this neighborhood before you, which gives me and others who share my skin color license to call you and those who share your skin color colonizers. (Quote Source) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entitled to opinion,,,,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dodo descriptions and adjectives imply OPINIONS the QUOTE provided has nothing that I Can see as 'anti white' msharmony, that news report is just that, a news report, not an opinion piece. Now, this is an opinion piece: In the expletive-strewn soliloquy, Lee wraps up all kinds of complaints, personal and aesthetic and political, in an angry bow. "I grew up here in Fort Greene. I grew up here in New York. It's changed." He decries those who complained about neighbors calling the cops on his jazz-playing father. He suggests you can't be the fan of a white Celtic in black Brooklyn: "��How you walking around Brooklyn with a Larry Bird jersey on? You can't do that. Not in Bed Stuy." And so on.
Strip it down, and Lee is plainly attacking what he sees as racial encroachment. That's offensive, because he wouldn't get away with directing a similar jeremiad at Latinos or Chinese-Americans or almost any other type of alleged encroacher... ... "You can't discover this! We've been here. You just can't come and bogart ... You can't just come in the neighborhood and start bogarting and say, like you're motherf---in' Columbus and kill off the Native Americans." That's Lee echoing the standard primal scream: I was in this neighborhood before you, which gives me and others who share my skin color license to call you and those who share your skin color colonizers. (Quote Source) are you honestly of the belief that a 'news report' can contain NO OPINION? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Dodo_David
on
Fri 02/28/14 12:24 PM
|
|
are you honestly of the belief that a 'news report' can contain NO OPINION? Would you care to explain why you doubt the objectivity of the news report? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rant ,harsh words
these are someones PERSPECTIVE of something he doesnt like that whites are trying to impose their ,,no where is he QUOTED as having said that, leading me to conclude this is how the listener/reader/writer of the piece interpreted what he DID say,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dodo descriptions and adjectives imply OPINIONS the QUOTE provided has nothing that I Can see as 'anti white' You very seldom see anything for what it is beyond your little field of segregationist vision but for once you are correct. What an absolute surprise. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm doing what every other person in Hollywood does: they dictate who they want to do interviews with. Tom Cruise, Robert Redford, whoever. People throw their weight around. Well, I get many requests now for interviews, and I would like African-Americans to interview me. What I'm doing is using whatever clout I have to get African-Americans assignments. The real crime is white publications don't have black writers, that's the crime." Now this is a man I have no problem in honoring. Straight up and in your face telling it like it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wait, does he DEMAND only African americans or does he REQUEST African americans are sent in order to contribute to their opportunities? I see it as the latter,,, would it be as controversial if a female asked for female reporters to have their interviews or a Christian to ask for Christian reporters to have their interviews? So what if he did, it would be his right but then you have no concept of rights, just entitlements. So let me put it in terms that a six year old would understand and perhaps your daughter could explain it to you as you have stated. It has to do with property, when it yours, you own it, it's a right. When the property is not yours, others own it, that is an entitlement. And as the time and fame belong to Spike Lee, it is his to determine the terms upon which he will confer an interview. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I'm doing what every other person in Hollywood does: they dictate who they want to do interviews with. Tom Cruise, Robert Redford, whoever. People throw their weight around. Well, I get many requests now for interviews, and I would like African-Americans to interview me. What I'm doing is using whatever clout I have to get African-Americans assignments. The real crime is white publications don't have black writers, that's the crime." Now this is a man I have no problem in honoring. Straight up and in your face telling it like it is. that statement is 100% pro black, not a bad thing... spike has said much worse tho... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is more of what Spike Lee said:
Nah. You can't do that. You can't just come in the neighborhood and start bogarting and say, like you're mother****in' Columbus and kill off the Native Americans. Or what they do in Brazil, what they did to the indigenous people. You have to come with respect. There's a code. There's people.
So, Spike Lee is saying that white people have to act non-white in order to live in his neighborhood. How you walking around Brooklyn with a Larry Bird jersey on? You can't do that. Not in Bed Stuy.
So, according to Spike Lee, if a white person moves into Lee's neighborhood, then the white person can't wear anything that pertains to a white athlete. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How can a politician be but corrupt. To win a political office requires an immense amount of money in comparison to the reward(salary). So who has that kind of money, why those that would benefit from that election many times over. So how can politics be other than corrupt. You realize they make more then just their salary right? Oh please do enlighten us as to how that applies to the conversation at hand. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yea, but he has a history with racist and Anti American remarks. This is just more of it. Really and what justification do you have to support that obviously racial statement on your part? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is more of what Spike Lee said: Nah. You can't do that. You can't just come in the neighborhood and start bogarting and say, like you're mother****in' Columbus and kill off the Native Americans. Or what they do in Brazil, what they did to the indigenous people. You have to come with respect. There's a code. There's people.
So, Spike Lee is saying that white people have to act non-white in order to live in his neighborhood. How you walking around Brooklyn with a Larry Bird jersey on? You can't do that. Not in Bed Stuy.
So, according to Spike Lee, if a white person moves into Lee's neighborhood, then the white person can't wear anything that pertains to a white athlete. there might be a context thing there... he might be saying that for the whites safety... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is more of what Spike Lee said: Nah. You can't do that. You can't just come in the neighborhood and start bogarting and say, like you're mother****in' Columbus and kill off the Native Americans. Or what they do in Brazil, what they did to the indigenous people. You have to come with respect. There's a code. There's people.
So, Spike Lee is saying that white people have to act non-white in order to live in his neighborhood. How you walking around Brooklyn with a Larry Bird jersey on? You can't do that. Not in Bed Stuy.
So, according to Spike Lee, if a white person moves into Lee's neighborhood, then the white person can't wear anything that pertains to a white athlete. there is nothing in the quote that mentions 'white people' the quote seems to be about bogarting and disregarding the history of a place,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that is exactly my point there IS a difference between being supportive of one thing and being against other things I understand it quite well I would suggest otherwise, you really don't understand but have just hit a window of opportunity that makes it seem so. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think I'll have to agree, 100%.  
Typical Liberal, they never think for them selves. They use DNC published talking points. But isn't this just a typical Repugentcon talking point, requires no thinking just labeling. Once you see the truth for what it really is, then you would be thinking. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
feel free to suggest ,,,,,
I have quite a clear grasp of the difference being a female who cares about female safety but doesn't NOT care about male safety or oppose it PRO FEMBALE is not ANTI MALE being a single mom who cares about single parents but doesn't NOT care about married couple parents or oppose them PRO SINGLE MOM IS NOT ANTI MARRIED COUPLE being an African American who cares about African americans, but doesn't NOT care about other races or oppose them PRO AFRICAN AMERICAN IS NOT ANTI <other races of> American etc,,etc,,, |
|
|
|
|
