9/11 NBC News broadcast
[wma download]

"Shortly after 9 o'clock ... [Albert Turi the Chief of Safety for the New York Fire Department] received word of the possibility of a secondary device, that is another bomb going off. He tried to get his men out as quickly as he could, but he said there was another explosion which took place, and then an hour after the first hit - the first crash that took place - he said there was another explosion that took place in one of the towers here, so obviously according to his theory he thinks that there were actually devices that were planted in the building.


Two WTC impacts. Three explosions reported.

One of the secondary devices he thinks that took place after the initial impact he thinks may have been on the plane that crashed into one of the towers. The second device - he thinks, he speculates - was probably planted in the building. ... But the bottom line is that he, Albert Turi, said that he probably lost a great many men in those secondary explosions, and he said that there were literally hundreds, if not thousands, of people in those towers when the explosions took place."

Firefighter Schroeder recollects in great detail how he was one of the first firefighters to rush to the complex. ... As they were making there way up the floors, Firefighter Schroeder heard a huge explosion. “The elevators just blew right out. We couldn’t believe it. The plane hits 80 floors up but the elevators explode at least five minutes later? It was unreal.”

Firefighter Schroeder made it all the way up to the 23rd floor before barely hearing on the failing radios that another plane was coming in. That plane would hit the South Tower though for some reason “We were tossed like a rag doll by another explosion in our building. People were making there way down the stairwells burnt like you couldn’t believe. We were all shocked because it seemed as if there was fire everywhere, on so many floors. It just didn’t make sense”. [Prison Planet]

Lou Cacchioli, Firefighter in WTC 1: At that point, Cacchioli found one of the only functioning elevators, one only going as high as the 24th floor ... "Tommy Hetzel was with me and everybody else also gets out of the elevator when it stops on the 24th floor," said Cacchioli, "There was a huge amount of smoke. Tommy and I had to go back down the elevator for tools and no sooner did the elevators close behind us, we heard this huge explosion that sounded like a bomb. It was such a loud noise, it knocked off the lights and stalled the elevator.

"Luckily, we weren't caught between floors and were able to pry open the doors. People were going crazy, yelling and screaming. And all the time, I am crawling low and making my way in the dark with a flashlight to the staircase and thinking Tommy is right behind me. "I somehow got into the stairwell and there were more people there. When I began to try and direct down, another huge explosion like the first one hits. This one hits about two minutes later, although it's hard to tell, but I'm thinking, 'Oh. My God, these bastards put bombs in here like they did in 1993!' [Arctic Beacon]
"...then somebody said that they saw an airliner go into one of those towers. Then, an hour later than that we had that big explosion from much, much lower down and I don't know what caused that."

WMV video download (268kB)
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/911_firefighters.html

allow me!





Perfect timing of the Planes and those non-existent Explosives,not to mention the Explosive-friendly Fires!

I know your not an American Mr conrad but your mocking tone at these brave fireman's testimony is childish

what makes you think I am mocking them?
I am mocking those who ought to know better,yet spread the same Fertilizer again and again!
If you really read those Testimonies,they say that it Looked Like,then you CTs come and claim they said there was!
Now Who is mocking them?

Double post. Broadband connection problems.

35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC

1) heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome)
2) inability to quench ground zero heat with water
3) red hot/molten steel at ground zero
4) missing core columns from ground zero (vaporized during destruction)
5) spreading of sand at ground zero consistent with attempts to limit radiation
6) washing of steel recovered from pile consistent with radiation decontamination
7) extreme security for ground zero steel shipments consistent with limiting access to radioactive steel
8) extreme security at ground zero, limiting exposure, view of devastation
9) extreme pulverization of WTC concrete into very fine particles
10) disappearance of over one thousand human bodies from WTC debris
11) disappearance of furniture, phones, filing cabinets and computers from WTC debris
12) disappearance of elevator doors, office doors, office cubicle walls, toilets and sinks from WTC debris
13) several floor fragments fused together in “meteorite” object
14) bone fragments sprayed into Bankers Trust upper floor during destruction
15) multiple blast waves during destruction of tower
16) large fireballs during initiation of WTC1 destruction
17) small backpack-sized fission nukes exist
18) fission-nuke technology well-established
19) low efficiency of fission nukes ensures leftover radioactive fragments and China syndrome
20) EMP formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning)
21) Description of heat in WTC blast cloud
22) Extensive cover-up of ground zero air by EPA
23) High rate of cancers, including thyroid cancer typically associated with radiation exposure, in ground zero responders
24) Melted, hanging skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire
25) Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC basement reported by Pecoraro
26) Steel beam bent in U, without cracking, evidence of extreme high temps
27) Steel beam bent in U has layer of molten metal on surface
28) Extreme overall devastation of two massive towers and blasted out Ground Zero aftermath
29) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical DEW theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (EMP, extreme pulverization of tower into dust) but denies nukes at all costs
30) Appearance of fantastical, nonsensical thermite (super nano-thermite) theory by likely govt agents-- uses evidence of nukes (molten steel, china syndrome) but denies nukes at all costs
31) Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes
32) Pyroclastic debris cloud during WTC destruction
33) Upwards jutting debris trails reminiscent of debris trails formed during underground nuke test
34) Small bright flashes during destruction of both towers
35) Extremely compacted ground zero debris

Oh, a nice appeal to emotion there. So, you've found the minority of kooks that created Fire-fighters for 9/11 truth? Congratulations. How about you go direct to the source (it'll save you a lot of time):

http://firefightersfor911truth.org/

Have you read any of the wealth of material I posted for you yet? You'll find plenty to debunk some of this stuff in there.

Here's a terrific NY Times article as found in the IHT. The writer does a great job of debunking controlled demolition:


"The demolition theory has managed to endure what would seem to be enormous obstacles to its practicality. Controlled demolition is done from the bottom of buildings, not the top, to take advantage of gravity, and there is little dispute that the collapse of the two towers began high in the towers, in the areas where the airplanes struck.

Moreover, a demolition project would have required the walls of the towers to be opened on dozens of floors, followed by the insertion of thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms, all sneaked past the security stations, inside hundreds of feet of walls on all four faces of both buildings. Then the walls presumably would have been closed up.

All this would have had to take place without attracting the notice of any of the thousands of tenants and workers in either building; no witness has ever reported such activity. Then on the morning of Sept. 11, the demolition explosives would have had to withstand the impacts of the airplanes, since the collapse did not begin for 57 minutes in one tower, and 102 minutes in the other."

Reposted from JREF

After the NIST was dragged into a muddy lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, it reluctantly parted with the video of firemen talking about huge explosions causing the twin towers to collapse on the day of the 9/11 tragedy. The video is clear proof of the damning knowledge that huge explosions were what caused the towers to collapse and that there was a fully fledged master game behind the execution of the tragedy on American soil.

Although there is evidence to suggest that the impact of a plane to the building could have caused the collapse, the firemen in the video clearly claim that they heard secondary explosions that led the towers to fall down, as the firemen were present in the lobby of one of the towers. According to another firefighter, there were at least three huge explosions that led the lobby to collapse on their heads. The video surely has added another perspective to the whole 9/11 tragedy.

Watch the firemen covered in the dust of 911 give live testimony to news cameras. yet they were ignored. Go figure.

watch it here.

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6951395-firemen-give-huge-explosions-testimony-in-911-fiasco-video

Pathetic that you call them kooks or whatever.

If a Building is falling in on top of you,there will be definitely some explosive noises!
But the Explosives solely exist in the minds of the CTs!

and the firemen on the scene stay out of american politics Mr Conrad clearly you are out of your element.

you post doesn't make sense!
The discussion is simply of an engineering nature,and the Red Herrings are all yours!

Yeah,now the newest Rage is,that you take a Building down with one huge explosion!
Something on the magnitude of about 600'000 pounds of Explosives!

The CT-argument becomes more and more ridiculous by the day!

None of this post makes any sense. "Although there is evidence to suggest that the impact of a plane to the building could have caused the collapse, the firemen in the video clearly claim that they heard secondary explosions that led the towers to fall down, as the firemen were present in the lobby of one of the towers."

In addition my father is a highly decorated fire-fighter and he calls them kooks, for everything you've brought up he's seen before and thinks nothing of it. But then, he served for over 40 years, so he saw it all.

By the way, have you read any of that material yet? I don't really expect you to, but it would make a nice change.

You guys with this 911 crap are soooooooooo borrrrring. thought I'd start my own that has as much credibility and you all can be here with me on the ground floor. here's how it goes;



Obama was behind this all and did it in order to stop the use of fossil fuels.

First they attacked the WTC in order to get Bush to blow up the ME oil supplies and put him into power after Bush leveled the place just so he could finalize his plans.

Once in power, he carried on with his mission by blowing up the Deep Water Horizon to stop our use of deep water oil. Then big coal with the mining disaster with those miners that are still trapped underground.

Now they have went after big natural gas, with the explosion of the pipeline.

And nobody is investigating this because they are all shills of Obama! 911 is nothing compared to this conspiracy as it has Saudis, Democrats, green people, big oil, the airlines, and of course ..............

ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He's doing it for that sole purpose. In order to prove all this I have a friend who makes vids in his mother's basement. Once made we have the proof to get this off the ground. A blog referring to the vid will cement it in as 'indisputable proof' and, will then take thousands of links and facts to prove it is not fact as well as cause confusion at press conferences as government officials get asked what they are doing about this investigation and then, when they say what investigation? We've got proof there's a cover up!!!!

Add in a few Jewish names and the 'Joo Connection' is born. **** this has legs like you won't believe!!!! It'll occupy the mindless void in truthers heads for decades.

Oh, and did you know, a third plane crashed in the WTC on 911. Strange how there is no film or evidence huh? You'd think somebody (not naming names) but somebody has something to hide. After all, the state controlled media didn't report it, how come?





There you go!!! Now go forth and have a Cup of Chamomile Tea!

yours truly,

Hilarius Schartenmeyer

You did not even watch the testimony. Goodbye Mr conrad.

It does, doesn't it? But then the truthers have been clutching at straws for some time now. Most of what was presented in this thread is quite old and long disproved, but they still hang on to it. I love how that site he quoted from earlier misused the firemen's quotes. Some of these site administrators are so dishonest at times. Lawyers for 9/11 truth list people on the petition that didn't even know they had 'signed'. Another site has been sprung for listing dead people as supporters, with one even dying in WTC1. It makes me laugh how anyone who disagrees is a 'disinfo' agent when they are so adept at it themselves.

I'll wager none of them ever read the wealth of material I've supplied in this thread.

No one really cares what an australian has to say on americas issues. well at least I do not.

Well, your bigotry has been noted.

Stop the personal attacks toward members.

Kim

Conrad, I wouldn't bother. It's just more out of context quotes desperately trying to support the CD theory.