How many American citizens does he have to murder before it becomes a "problem" for you? 10?... 100?... 1000?... 6,000,000?... 300,000,000?

"The death of one is a tragedy...The death of millions is a statistic." -- Joseph Stalin



You haven't declared war on Canada either...When can I expect to be killed by a drone?

probably the minute a terrorist is hiding out there and your government doesnt agree to help capture him

and then, only if you happen to be in the immediate vicinity of the place such a terrorist decides to hide,,,,,which is usually not very close to 'civilization',,,,,,

Wowzer! Golly Gee!!

The Source is here among us!!

MSMBS must only share certain details about drone attacks and how they are carried out.

I was thinking.

With all the thugs killed, why hasn't there been the same call to disarm citizens?

Don't Hood Rats count as a value to society and need saving from citizens with guns?

no clue the argument being made here

Im not calling to end drones OR disarm citizens,,,whether they are defending themself against 'hood rats' or 'mentally ill' suburbanites,,,,

I'm saying two things.

If Barry is going to call for bans on citizens having weapons, he should look in the mirror. He's had killed a whole bunch of baby Pakis.

Hood Rats = Kids of gang-bangers. Guess they would be the same value as Pakistani kids. They'll only grow up to be like their parents.

Or, is there only a fuss when criminals waste middle to upper class, predominantly white kids in low crime ares?

so,be specific!
What do You want?

TRAINED and RATIONAL citizens should have access to DEFENSE that is likewise RATIONAL

If 'barry' designs a drone that isnt able to take out a SPECIFIC target area because it is operated by UNTRAINED personnell or designed to not be SPECIFIC in its delivery of death,,than he should back off of regulating citizens weapons in a likewise manner

details make a difference, regulation considers DETAILS,,,


all kids have value,,,,

and yes, generally, american culture makes the most fuss once something begins to affect 'middle to upper class)

What? We haven't declared war on Canada? What the hell is going on?
Stand by, we have drones in your area.

Stay tuned for the usual false equivalences, Red Herrings and Strawman arguments.

REGULATION and PRECAUTION

just like I dont want visually impaired or minors driving vehicles, or vehicles available which go above 200 mph,,,

yet, I dont want citizens to not have any access to any vehicles

similarly, I want common sense precautionary regulation to keep tools of death out of the hands of people without the capacity to be responsible and safe with them

and I want those tools of death to have some COMMON Sense design that can be for 'self defense' and not mass anihilation,,,

From your response, I take it that you approve of your president's MURDER of people HE considers (in his own questionable judgment) to be "terrorists", along with any perfectly innocent people that may be around them (considered as "collateral damage" by your president and his criminally murderous administration) ANYWHERE, including SOVEREIGN COUNTRIES, without so much as a "How do you do" such as a lawful arrest and possible extradition for trial in a court of competent jurisdiction?

Notwithstanding what you said, I still find it hard to believe that like your President, you have absolutely NO RESPECT or consideration for the rule of law and human life. Please tell me it ain't so.

I understand that throughout history,, accidents have happened
and that everyone dies at some point

'approval' has nothing to do with it

I understand that whether it is a drone or a 'war', sometimes innocents will be caught in the crossfire (in fact, its inevitable except where those who are wanted decide to hide in complete isolation)

I also trust that other measures are considered before 'war', or drones are deployed

would absolute absence of death be wonderful? yes

is such an assurance possible every time? no


would we rather every murderer that can manage to remain amongst 'innocents' be off limits and there by safe from capture so that noone innocent ever dies,,,,I guess I wouldnt

Murder by drone is NO ACCIDENT!



So you believe that the innocent must be made to suffer for the crimes of the guilty? Again you admit that you have NO RESPECT for the rule of law or human life itself!



Are you faithfully "trusting" the word of a mass murderer who won't acknowledge the rule of law, that he's doing the right thing? Now THAT'S faith…too bad its also equivalent to faith in Satan's goodness.



YES…Anyone who believes in the rule of law would have to agree that we would rather do that. Anyone who thinks we shouldn't, is an outlaw who convicts him/herself at the very least of not giving a damn about other human lives and quite possibly of aiding and abetting the unjust slaughter of innocents.

Unfortunatley, you have made it abundently clear that you really don't care about the murdered kids in Newtown, only about the political advantage your evil president might gain from it in furthering his tyrannical, unlawful and tresonous agenda.

If the American people are stupid or apathetic enough to allow him to have his way, I predict that Americans will be the "German Jews" of the 21st century! This time it will be a lot more than six milion…Probably about 60 million Americans will die at the hands of your new Fuhrer, thus making it perhaps the greatest holocaust in all human history.

give it a rest,, seriously

I care about human life, while realizing that some crap is unavoidable, including THE END OF HUMAN LIFE

I would not want twelve murderous individuals walking the streets with guns shooting willy nilly, because noone wanted to risk innocent people being killed in taking those murderers out

we let 12 kill 10 each, to avoid hitting one or two ourself in taking those twelve out? now THAT makes no sense

many decisions have to be made with logic and not mere emotion,,,

the deaths are sometimes unavoidable, the best that can be done is minimize the numbers,,,,

I wish you would.



Please specify which human lives you care about, because outside of yous and your family's, I don't see any real caring about human life except in whatever way it might serve your personal interests.



So if you or your children are physically close to a fleeing killer, you won't mind if a cop doesn't worry that you or they might be in the way if he shoots at him, right? If you or your kids get killed in the process, well that's just the way the cookie crumbles, right?

Why do I find that hard to believe?



So you approve of a drone taking out you and your family as collateral damage if you happen to (unknowingly) live next door to "terrorist" (currently defined as anyone your president doesn't like)?



Most importantly, decisions should NOT be made based on psychopathic selfish interest.



…but with respect to your unlawful and murderous administration, most of the time they are completely avoidable.

So if you or your children are physically close to a fleeing killer, you won't mind if a cop doesn't worry that you or they might be in the way if he shoots at him, right? If you or your kids get killed in the process, well that's just the way the cookie crumbles, right?



what LEAPS people make in these threads

my example said TWELVE murderers shooting indiscriminately,, in other words, in the CASE Where deaths are unavoidable and the concern becomes LESSENING The number of deaths

I dont believe these decisions are as simplistic as people try to make them, and I would never want to be in the position to have to make those choices,, but that is the job some have,,,,


do you think of a bomber got out to a public area and blew up a thousand people, those families would feel it was ok that noone stopped him before he got there because he was hiding in a place where one or two unconnected lives may have been lost?

do you t hink americans, or most others, would have such an easy time justifying allowing a thousand to die to save two?

somehow,, I dont think they would,,,or else noone should or would ever be killed anywhere except by homicidal maniacs

So President killed all these kids in Pakistan!!!! Hmmmmm

Obama seems to be the cause of Most things for those who do not like him.

It was under his watch and yes, he ordered the slaughter of innocents.

so did every president who authorized military actions in our history,


sometimes the few die in order to save the many,,,

May I ask?

What authority do you have to demand people who see death of children by Barry's Drones, as murder, to 'GIVE IT A REST'?

Seriously?? WOW, just WOW!