Topic: Lovers | |
---|---|
You can't turn a ho into a housewife... |
|
|
|
You can't turn a ho into a housewife... it worked for J. Howard Marshall...well, sort of. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Scotti71
on
Tue 08/21/12 10:42 PM
|
|
However many it took for them to get good at it. Having many partners doesn't guarantee anything. Having few partners also doesn't guarantee anything. You're fairly new here, so it will take us a while to be able to tell when you're joking, since many of us don't know you :). |
|
|
|
Eww, I just noticed the new pic. Gross choice Scotti lol.
|
|
|
|
I would love it if they had had none.
However since that is totally unrealistic, it doesnt matter, I am not judging them on their past. As long as there are none added to the list while they are with me. |
|
|
|
I heard people discussing how many lovers is it ok for your partner to have had in the past. The people came up with a median number lol. What would your acceptable number be? I dont think there is an absolute number but, if it averaged to more than 2 per year since becoming sexually active, I probably wouldnt take their advances as more than just an attempt to get laid again just being honest |
|
|
|
Well, for skill acquisition purposes and regular maintenance of physical needs, you'd need to have done it at one time or the other. But for me, what matters most is if you're faithful in the present relationship :-) Though unfortunately numbers don't count much when it comes to actual experience :-)
|
|
|
|
I heard people discussing how many lovers is it ok for your partner to have had in the past. The people came up with a median number lol. What would your acceptable number be? All that matters is how they are once with me. I should be the only one. |
|
|
|
You can't turn a ho into a housewife... Yeah you can, just add a U an S an E a W an I an F and an E. |
|
|
|
i hope i'm the first one
|
|
|
|
You can't turn a ho into a housewife... |
|
|
|
Eww, I just noticed the new pic. Gross choice Scotti lol. |
|
|
|
You can't turn a ho into a housewife... I am about to find out....I'll let ya know. |
|
|
|
I would love it if they had had none. However since that is totally unrealistic, it doesnt matter, I am not judging them on their past. As long as there are none added to the list while they are with me. I'd prefer they've at least had enough to have figured out what they're doing. The last thing I want is a guy who has no clue what to do in bed. |
|
|
|
I thought everyone lied about that number to begin with, so what's the point in asking?
There is even the invention of the "Rule of three." Which simply states: Whatever number a man gives you, divide by three, and that his real number. With women, it's multiply by three. |
|
|
|
numbers dont matter, but sometimes we ask just for fun.. i know someone who have had 92 women in 2years..
|
|
|
|
I thought everyone lied about that number to begin with, so what's the point in asking? There is even the invention of the "Rule of three." Which simply states: Whatever number a man gives you, divide by three, and that his real number. With women, it's multiply by three. lol. So guys lie and say they've been with more and women lie and say they've been for less? Talk about insecure! |
|
|
|
I thought everyone lied about that number to begin with, so what's the point in asking? There is even the invention of the "Rule of three." Which simply states: Whatever number a man gives you, divide by three, and that his real number. With women, it's multiply by three. Nice to see you again RO :-) Out building stats? |
|
|
|
I never knew the lying rule. I Was always able to tell the real number with no need for embellishment or underemphasis.
|
|
|
|
I thought the rule was girls divide by 2 and guys multiply by 2 to brag.
|
|
|