Topic: Iran vs Israel: | |
---|---|
[You read Al Jazeera if you like, I'll pass.....
Your free to research independantly and find the same items on other sites and your also free to be willfully misinformed but please let us have a conversation based on facts and reality and not propaganda. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Leigh2154
on
Tue 05/22/12 04:36 PM
|
|
Refusing to read news from all over the world and from different sources makes you very one-sided. Especially if the only news you read is 75% propaganda and owned and controlled by the corporation. Jeannie, that is only an opinion...I just don't agree with the majority of your posts on the subject...And there is no proof that Israel stole 200-600 pounds of uranium from US... |
|
|
|
Edited by
Leigh2154
on
Tue 05/22/12 04:35 PM
|
|
[
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Optomistic69
on
Tue 05/22/12 04:38 PM
|
|
Just in
Good News The head of the UN nuclear watchdog has said it is close to signing an accord with Iran after his talks in Tehran. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief said the deal could increase Tehran's co-operation with IAEA investigations into its atomic activity. Yukiya Amano said he expected a deal with Iran to be signed "quite soon" |
|
|
|
[You read Al Jazeera if you like, I'll pass..... I couldn't agree more....means you too, right Best? |
|
|
|
Just in Good News The head of the UN nuclear watchdog has said it is close to signing an accord with Iran after his talks in Tehran. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief said the deal could increase Tehran's co-operation with IAEA investigations into its atomic activity. Yukiya Amano said he expected a deal with Iran to be signed "quite soon" Wonder if this has anything to do with the European Oil Embargo which is set for July 1st? |
|
|
|
News of the potential agreement comes ahead of a meeting between Iranian negotiators and representatives from six world powers - the US, Russia, China, the UK, France and Germany - in the Iraqi capital, Baghdad, for negotiations on Wednesday.
The six-power coalition will be led by European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton. |
|
|
|
Refusing to read news from all over the world and from different sources makes you very one-sided. Especially if the only news you read is 75% propaganda and owned and controlled by the corporation. Jeannie, that is only an opinion...I just don't agree with the majority of your posts on the subject...And there is no proof that Israel stole 200-600 pounds of uranium from US... Of course its my opinion. Not sure what subject you are referring to. |
|
|
|
Now if we apply the same pressures to Israel we can get them to sign the Non Proliferation treaty.
All we would realy have to do is withold american aid for a few months...........No need to bluster and threaten as in Iran......... |
|
|
|
[You read Al Jazeera if you like, I'll pass..... I couldn't agree more....means you too, right Best? I allways do and form my opinions on the best information I can get. |
|
|
|
Now if we apply the same pressures to Israel we can get them to sign the Non Proliferation treaty. All we would realy have to do is withold american aid for a few months...........No need to bluster and threaten as in Iran......... Tiocfaidh ár lá our day will come |
|
|
|
Edited by
Bestinshow
on
Tue 05/22/12 05:14 PM
|
|
Now if we apply the same pressures to Israel we can get them to sign the Non Proliferation treaty. All we would realy have to do is withold american aid for a few months...........No need to bluster and threaten as in Iran......... Tiocfaidh ár lá our day will come The situation we have now is totaly absurd, threaten and bluster and economicly boycot one country for what you suspect it may have or could one day have and support economicly and politicly another country that allready has the bomb and refuses to sign the non proliferation treaty. Is it just me that feels it is a moronoic position? |
|
|
|
Did the Republic of Iran state that Israel "Must be wiped off the map." or were they talking about the Zionist Regime? **** Here is one of your favorite sources, Wikipedia: Translation controversy Many news sources repeated the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting statement by Ahmadinejad that "Israel must be wiped off the map",[5][6] an English idiom which means to "cause a place to stop existing",[7] or to "obliterate totally",[8] or "destroy completely".[9] The Iranian presidential website stated that "the Zionist Regime of Israel faces a deadend and will under God's grace be wiped off the map," and "the Zionist Regime that is a usurper and illegitimate regime and a cancerous tumor should be wiped off the map."[10] Ahmadinejad's phrase was "بايد از صفحه روزگار محو شود" according to the text published on the President's Office's website.[11] The translation presented by the official Islamic Republic News Agency has been challenged by Arash Norouzi, who says the statement "wiped off the map" was never made and that Ahmadinejad did not refer to the nation or land mass of Israel, but to the "regime occupying Jerusalem". Norouzi translated the original Persian to English, with the result, "the Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time."[12] Juan Cole, a University of Michigan Professor of Modern Middle East and South Asian History, agrees that Ahmadinejad's statement should be translated as, "the Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e eshghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad)."[13] According to Cole, "Ahmadinejad did not say he was going to 'wipe Israel off the map' because no such idiom exists in Persian." Instead, "he did say he hoped its regime, i.e., a Jewish-Zionist state occupying Jerusalem, would collapse."[14] The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) translated the phrase similarly, as "this regime" must be "eliminated from the pages of history."[15] None of these translations, however, are entirely accurate. First, they downplay the significance of the introductory, main sentence, to which the controversial statement "eliminated from the pages of history" is subordinate. In his speech, Ahmadinejad introduced the theme of Israel's elimination by saying 'Imam-e aziz-e-ma farmoudand ke...', which means, 'Our dear Imam commanded that...' In other words, he introduced the exhortation to eliminate Israel by referring to the religious authority of Ayatollah Khomeini as well as the many statements, speeches and comments Khomeini made over the years about Israel. Secondly, the phrase 'bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad' means more than the passive, and slightly ambiguous 'must be eliminated from the pages of history.' It more literally translates into: 'it is necessary (or 'it is imperative') that it be eliminated from the pages of history.' Once one puts the entire sentence together, it thus reads: 'Our dear Imam commanded that it is necessary that the regime of occupation of Jerusalem be eliminated from the pages of history.' The use of a passive verb is akin to the famous passive form used by Cato the Elder, to call for the destruction of Rome's archenemy, Carthage: Delenda Cartago. The latin passive was nevertheless clear in its meaning - Cato wished to exhort the citizens and leaders of Republican Rome to destroy Carthage - which they eventually did [16]. Iranian government sources denied that Ahmadinejad issued any sort of threat. On 20 February 2006, Iran's foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki told a news conference: "How is it possible to remove a country from the map? He is talking about the regime. We do not recognize legally this regime."[17][18][19] "Arash Norouzi, who says the statement "wiped off the map" was never made and that Ahmadinejad did not refer to the nation or land mass of Israel, but to the "regime occupying Jerusalem" No one said they were going to blow up the LAND... Iran says (and Norouzzi agrees) he meant blow up the PEOPLE The PEOPLE of the regime of the land of Israel are the JEWS who live there. Ahmadinejad said he wants to wipe JEWS off the face of the map. They can dance around the head of a pin all they want. It is what they believe. They have threatened it often and they have to be taken seriously even if they are nutballs. Crazed religious fundamentalists who seek end of days apocalypse and threaten to commit genocide must never be permitted to have nuclear weapons. See the documentary Iranium for example... http://youtu.be/mXRXnmsvwRQ Unless you can prove to me that all Jews are Zionists and that all Jews are involved in the Zionists regime then you are wrong. If you can get every Jew or every person who claims to be a Jew to say that they support Zionism and are part of the Zionist regime, then you are blowing smoke. Is that what you are claiming? That all Jews are Zionists? Prove it. whats that got to do with killing all the jews in Israel? Nobody threatened to kill all the Jews in Israel. your the one who posted that Iran said it... No, that was slowhand. I posted stuff from wikipedia about how that claim was wrong, and just mistranslated. Iran said they want to put an end to the Zionist regime. You really need to read the posts more carefully. The translation presented by the official Islamic Republic News Agency has been challenged by Arash Norouzi, who says the statement "wiped off the map" was never made and that Ahmadinejad did not refer to the nation or land mass of Israel, but to the "regime occupying Jerusalem".
YOU just said it AGAIN! Arash Norouzi is quoted as saying that the correct interpretation is that Iran wants the regime occupying Jerusalem wiped off the map he is talking about the Jews in Israel! That goes right to my point. No matter how you interpret it, it is a threat of genocide. And of course there are many other incidents of the leaders of Iran and their proxies Hezbollah and Hamas exhorting crowds for "Death to America. Death to Israel." At least they are consistent however you translate "wiping Israel off the face of the map"... Hooo Boy! That is where your thinking is messed up. Just because the "Zionist regime" happen to be people who claim to be "Jews" does not mean that they are hated because they are Jews. It is the regime they hate. It is the REGIME, THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL THEY WANT DESTROYED. You are mistaking a regime FOR an ethnic group. (JEWS) Unless of course you are trying to claim that every Jew is a Zionist and that every Zionist is a Jew. If so, then PROVE IT. Then you probably think that everyone in Israel is Jewish too. Zionism is to Israel as Americanism is to America. Zion is a synonym for Israel. Patriotic Israelis are pro-Zionism just as patriotic Americans are pro-Americanism. Most Israelis - about 75% are Jewish. This is what is hateful to the Iranians. They would have no complaints if Israel was being run by Muslims. You don't know what a Jew is. Jewish means identifying with the Jewish religion in it's various forms - both very strict - like orthodox or very lax like secular Jews. Just like Christians include all those who identify with Christianity whether they never go to church or they go religiously every Sunday. Iran wants "Death to Israel" and this means death to those who live in Israel and since this is basically Jews and the Jews are the main group they want to kill (they say they don't want to kill Muslims or Christians for example) then Iran is simply threatening another Holocaust of killing Jews. Again. Now all your questions are answered. Who is a Jew, Who is a Zionist, and why Iran calling for wiping Israel off the face of the map means exhortation to genocide. Simple as 2+2=4 any elementary school child can understand it. The only ones who can't figure it out are the chronically prejudiced and/or the antisemites. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on
Tue 05/22/12 08:05 PM
|
|
There is no reason for anyone to hate a person because of their religion or ethnic background. That is illogical.
Israel is hated by their neighbors for other reasons. Find out why and you will solve a lot of mysteries and answer a lot of questions. |
|
|
|
Did the Republic of Iran state that Israel "Must be wiped off the map." or were they talking about the Zionist Regime? **** Here is one of your favorite sources, Wikipedia: Translation controversy Many news sources repeated the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting statement by Ahmadinejad that "Israel must be wiped off the map",[5][6] an English idiom which means to "cause a place to stop existing",[7] or to "obliterate totally",[8] or "destroy completely".[9] The Iranian presidential website stated that "the Zionist Regime of Israel faces a deadend and will under God's grace be wiped off the map," and "the Zionist Regime that is a usurper and illegitimate regime and a cancerous tumor should be wiped off the map."[10] Ahmadinejad's phrase was "بايد از صفحه روزگار محو شود" according to the text published on the President's Office's website.[11] The translation presented by the official Islamic Republic News Agency has been challenged by Arash Norouzi, who says the statement "wiped off the map" was never made and that Ahmadinejad did not refer to the nation or land mass of Israel, but to the "regime occupying Jerusalem". Norouzi translated the original Persian to English, with the result, "the Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time."[12] Juan Cole, a University of Michigan Professor of Modern Middle East and South Asian History, agrees that Ahmadinejad's statement should be translated as, "the Imam said that this regime occupying Jerusalem (een rezhim-e eshghalgar-e qods) must [vanish from] the page of time (bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad)."[13] According to Cole, "Ahmadinejad did not say he was going to 'wipe Israel off the map' because no such idiom exists in Persian." Instead, "he did say he hoped its regime, i.e., a Jewish-Zionist state occupying Jerusalem, would collapse."[14] The Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) translated the phrase similarly, as "this regime" must be "eliminated from the pages of history."[15] None of these translations, however, are entirely accurate. First, they downplay the significance of the introductory, main sentence, to which the controversial statement "eliminated from the pages of history" is subordinate. In his speech, Ahmadinejad introduced the theme of Israel's elimination by saying 'Imam-e aziz-e-ma farmoudand ke...', which means, 'Our dear Imam commanded that...' In other words, he introduced the exhortation to eliminate Israel by referring to the religious authority of Ayatollah Khomeini as well as the many statements, speeches and comments Khomeini made over the years about Israel. Secondly, the phrase 'bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad' means more than the passive, and slightly ambiguous 'must be eliminated from the pages of history.' It more literally translates into: 'it is necessary (or 'it is imperative') that it be eliminated from the pages of history.' Once one puts the entire sentence together, it thus reads: 'Our dear Imam commanded that it is necessary that the regime of occupation of Jerusalem be eliminated from the pages of history.' The use of a passive verb is akin to the famous passive form used by Cato the Elder, to call for the destruction of Rome's archenemy, Carthage: Delenda Cartago. The latin passive was nevertheless clear in its meaning - Cato wished to exhort the citizens and leaders of Republican Rome to destroy Carthage - which they eventually did [16]. Iranian government sources denied that Ahmadinejad issued any sort of threat. On 20 February 2006, Iran's foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki told a news conference: "How is it possible to remove a country from the map? He is talking about the regime. We do not recognize legally this regime."[17][18][19] "Arash Norouzi, who says the statement "wiped off the map" was never made and that Ahmadinejad did not refer to the nation or land mass of Israel, but to the "regime occupying Jerusalem" No one said they were going to blow up the LAND... Iran says (and Norouzzi agrees) he meant blow up the PEOPLE The PEOPLE of the regime of the land of Israel are the JEWS who live there. Ahmadinejad said he wants to wipe JEWS off the face of the map. They can dance around the head of a pin all they want. It is what they believe. They have threatened it often and they have to be taken seriously even if they are nutballs. Crazed religious fundamentalists who seek end of days apocalypse and threaten to commit genocide must never be permitted to have nuclear weapons. See the documentary Iranium for example... http://youtu.be/mXRXnmsvwRQ Unless you can prove to me that all Jews are Zionists and that all Jews are involved in the Zionists regime then you are wrong. If you can get every Jew or every person who claims to be a Jew to say that they support Zionism and are part of the Zionist regime, then you are blowing smoke. Is that what you are claiming? That all Jews are Zionists? Prove it. whats that got to do with killing all the jews in Israel? Nobody threatened to kill all the Jews in Israel. your the one who posted that Iran said it... No, that was slowhand. I posted stuff from wikipedia about how that claim was wrong, and just mistranslated. Iran said they want to put an end to the Zionist regime. You really need to read the posts more carefully. The translation presented by the official Islamic Republic News Agency has been challenged by Arash Norouzi, who says the statement "wiped off the map" was never made and that Ahmadinejad did not refer to the nation or land mass of Israel, but to the "regime occupying Jerusalem".
YOU just said it AGAIN! Arash Norouzi is quoted as saying that the correct interpretation is that Iran wants the regime occupying Jerusalem wiped off the map he is talking about the Jews in Israel! That goes right to my point. No matter how you interpret it, it is a threat of genocide. And of course there are many other incidents of the leaders of Iran and their proxies Hezbollah and Hamas exhorting crowds for "Death to America. Death to Israel." At least they are consistent however you translate "wiping Israel off the face of the map"... Hooo Boy! That is where your thinking is messed up. Just because the "Zionist regime" happen to be people who claim to be "Jews" does not mean that they are hated because they are Jews. It is the regime they hate. It is the REGIME, THE GOVERNMENT OF ISRAEL THEY WANT DESTROYED. You are mistaking a regime FOR an ethnic group. (JEWS) Unless of course you are trying to claim that every Jew is a Zionist and that every Zionist is a Jew. If so, then PROVE IT. Then you probably think that everyone in Israel is Jewish too. Zionism is to Israel as Americanism is to America. Zion is a synonym for Israel. Patriotic Israelis are pro-Zionism just as patriotic Americans are pro-Americanism. Most Israelis - about 75% are Jewish. This is what is hateful to the Iranians. They would have no complaints if Israel was being run by Muslims. You don't know what a Jew is. Jewish means identifying with the Jewish religion in it's various forms - both very strict - like orthodox or very lax like secular Jews. Just like Christians include all those who identify with Christianity whether they never go to church or they go religiously every Sunday. Iran wants "Death to Israel" and this means death to those who live in Israel and since this is basically Jews and the Jews are the main group they want to kill (they say they don't want to kill Muslims or Christians for example) then Iran is simply threatening another Holocaust of killing Jews. Again. Now all your questions are answered. Who is a Jew, Who is a Zionist, and why Iran calling for wiping Israel off the face of the map means exhortation to genocide. Simple as 2+2=4 any elementary school child can understand it. The only ones who can't figure it out are the chronically prejudiced and/or the antisemites. I came in late and it's a long thread. Is anyone saying that Iran's goal is NOT the destruction of Israel? The Arab countries have already tried. |
|
|
|
My understanding is that Iran does not like the political regime known as Zionism. Since the whole idea of Zionism is to establish the state of Israel as a safe haven for Jews I'm sure they are closely linked.
If Israel would just be a normal country and not be so ethnically driven and so determined to collect as many Jews (for their state) as possible, I don't think there would be any problems in the middle east. Jews claim that everyone hates them and that everyone wants to annihilate them and they they need a safe haven. They use this to justify their aggressive regime and call it "self defense." But to hate anyone because of their religion or their ethnicity is illogical. People hate other people because they fear them. Why do people fear Jews? Answer that question. |
|
|
|
Now if we apply the same pressures to Israel we can get them to sign the Non Proliferation treaty. All we would realy have to do is withold american aid for a few months...........No need to bluster and threaten as in Iran......... Tiocfaidh ár lá our day will come Absotively and Posilutely will! |
|
|
|
My understanding is that Iran does not like the political regime known as Zionism. Since the whole idea of Zionism is to establish the state of Israel as a safe haven for Jews I'm sure they are closely linked. If Israel would just be a normal country and not be so ethnically driven and so determined to collect as many Jews (for their state) as possible, I don't think there would be any problems in the middle east. Jews claim that everyone hates them and that everyone wants to annihilate them and they they need a safe haven. They use this to justify their aggressive regime and call it "self defense." But to hate anyone because of their religion or their ethnicity is illogical. People hate other people because they fear them. Why do people fear Jews? Answer that question. define normal... is Iran normal? why is Israel not normal? |
|
|
|
But to hate anyone because of their religion or their ethnicity is illogical. People hate other people because they fear them.
Illogical, yes, but history is replete with irrational prejudices. Why do people fear Jews? Answer that question.
Ever read Mein Kampf? |
|
|
|
Why do people fear Jews? Answer that question.
Ever read Mein Kampf? Not really. But Jews have been hated and feared (and apparently oppressed) long before Hitler was even in the picture. |
|
|