lmao

God writes not with pen and paper, press and ink.

Please forgive me Whitney.

She is an example of how God writes upon history.

When my grand child has children.

All they will know of Whitney is the Light.

the Voice outways the stumbles.

in the reach of history.

..what in the name of...

..what are you going on about?

Totally lost me we this one..

Who's Whitney? o.o

I will put it another way then.

God breaths more than once.

Inherrant Word. i.e words that can not be changed.

Any one with a pen can change the Word of God (as promulgated by man).

Gods word is a living breathing thing.

It comes from people like you that hold true to your beliefs...

and people like me that fall and find a gem or two in the sands we fall upon when we stumble.

..oh...kay.

Haven't seen Cowboy on lately.

Anyone hear from him?

Although I don't agree with his posting, I'm praying he is ok.

since Adam and Eve were of the same blood that means that Cain was a product of inbreeding

for those that believe that Adam and Eve were the only two people that were created or formed on Earth at that time, then Cain's Wife had to be either his Mother, his sister, or his neice or an angel, but whomever his wife were they would still have to inbreed with their brothers and sisters or first cousins

for those that believe that God create people at the same time he created Adam and Eve...the facts are that God still commanded Adam and Eve to inbreed

but for those that try to dismiss the story of Adam and Eve then you still have Noah's Ark which according to the bible contained the last 8 people left on Earth and to repopulate the Earth they had to inbreed among theirselves

it's simply no way getting around this inbreeding issue which God later deem as being sin

and this is why Jesus couldn't have die for anyone sins for the fact that mankind would still be tainted with the original sins of Adam Eve and Noah's inbreeding ...Mankind would have to be exterminated in its entirely ...even their souls would be tainted...even their spirits

the bible provides a legitimate excuse for God to destroy mankind...and it's all due to the command to inbreed which he himself first thrust upon Man

knowing AdventureBegins..it's someone between Eli Whitney and Whitney Houston

I differ sir.

Adam and Eve (as I see that tale) would have been complete polar opposites by the very method of Eves creation.

What better way to start humans than to make sure the founding pair is as far apart on the spectrum as possible.

.......................................................... May You All Have A Blessed Valentine's Day !!!.............................................................

perhaps.....but then again it was you that first claimed that God pull Adam's Womb out of him and created Eve...one would think that a womb would be the same blood type as the person the womb was pull out of ..even so the womb would still have the same genetic makeup pertaining to family traits minus one being programed to grow breast and a forbidden fruit ....but they would still be of the same blood

you also claimed that Eve was a clone of Adam...and a clone would clearly have the same genetic makeup as the original donor even more than that of a twin..and they would still be of the same blood

but the bottom line is that it is the bible that claims that Eve was formed from a body part of Adam ...and that makes them of the same blood and any sexual activities pertainig to Adam's tallywhacker and Eve's forbidden fruit would be inbreeding

How so?

I did not say that Eve was a clone of Adam.

I said that Eve would have been a Y clone of Adam.

Y points three ways.

if Eve was an "Y" clone of Adam she would have been a mutant with non-working ovaries ...especially since Women have a pair of "XX" chromosomes and the Male has a pair "XY"

but perhaps you weren't referring to Chromosomes, so for the sake of argument let's go with your theory that Eve was only a "Y" clone of Adam....

being a "Y" clone Eve would still be of the same blood and have all the other same genetic traits of Adam minus the "Y" ...which means that their mating would still constitute as being inbreeding

..but that small portion of Adam would be so minuscule.

That, if you truly believed this to be utterly disturbing, gross, and 'not your thing'. You, yourself, would still be a virgin.

Because that minuscule of a comparison would be the same traces of similarities we'd all hare today.

Therefore, that girl behind the counter (or guy which may fit you idk) is your distant cousin. Maybe, really distant, but regardless.

However, you also stated earlier, that incest/inbreeding was relations. Mother, father, sister, brother; etc.

One 'rib', imo, wouldn't make Adam the father of Eve, because, that's not how the whole 'birth' process works. I'm sure, the Omni-God he is, if he had intended for Adam to be the 'father' of Eve, he would have made Eve a toddler; not a full grown hottie.

But Mr. I'm-arguing-the-context-of-the-Bible-despite-adding-my-own-terms-and-clauses-to-it if you truly are against this; then please admit your virginity. If not, you are being a full-blown hypocrite and shouldn't post on this topic anymore.

In truth.

It does not matter.

We are here.

are we not.

7 billion.

With a common ancestor and an uncommon future.

And a guide that continues with us as we grow.

Yet one can find echos of our times in its pages.

and many books.

That's my point.

Some famous dude once said..

"Even if there wasn't God, man would have needed to create him."

Or something along that lines.

The Bible does not make a Christian.

..in fact, imo, you can be truly religious and never even picked up the Bible.

..but people want to use the Bible as the 'sole' reason there is no God. Because a man-made written book.

Truth is, Adam, Eve, their kids, and their kids kids..
..'language' outside of speaking it, but writing it; wasn't true to its form yet.

Thus there stories would have all been hand-me down, bed time stories for centuries.

To expect the Bible to contain 100% truth is ludicrous and to expect a perfect translation and explanation of the universe, is also ludicrous.

Life, like love, wine, dating, science, truth and fiction, are all simply what you make them to be.

Its not your place to judge another for their choice to believe in God, Allah, or the Boogeyman.

To ridicule someone else because of what they want/choose to believe in; makes you lower of a person, than the one choosing to believe in 'magic'.

Just saying, imo.

There is no common ancestor.

nope...sorry.

God created man in His own image.

In the bible, it states that God had already created ALLL

the animals already , BEFORE God created man....

Man alone was created in God's own image..not some common

ancestor.....but ONLY man.

And btw.....every single answer to every single

question that scientists are searching for...

can ALL be found in that book called the Holy Bible.

And many are already finding this to be true.


TRUE science and the bible will always AGREE.....

..'no common ancestor'..?

That's impossible in itself.

Either descendants of Adam and Eve.
Or.
Noah and his flock.

Either group, we would have had to descend from.
Via, common ancestors.

God didn't create 'every' man, he created the first 'pair'.
He also then gave us the ability to have billions of mini-mes.

Resulting, ultimately, in the over 7 billion people now populating this planet.

God didn't make 10,000 people to start off with. He made two.

You'd have to put a lot of 'greats' like great-great-great (to about the millionith) grandparents, Adam and Eve.

Because even Noah would, ultimately, be a descendant of Adam.

So, here we go.



Shortly after the part about a garden began...