No.

It speaks of direct blood relations.

Mother - son.
Father - daughter.
Brother - sister.

To put it more simply:

The Bible does not forbid cousins from marrying; only close blood relations. Such as those I listed.

It is close relations in deems a sin.

If anything, an alternate interpretation could be Endogamy.

perhaps that is the excuse you use to sleep with your cousins..but if you notice I always mention that according to the bible and/or according to religious belief that mankind could have only arosed from incest ....

jeez...you're sure trying to find a way to score at your family reunion...but unfortunately...incest is incest

..and there you go making it personal again.

Please tell me where I stated, "I sleep with my cousins."

..and I did notice and am telling you..
You are doing what you always do.

Taking one word to the core of its meaning.
While you ignore all the rest.

Stop doing that.
You'll be far better off.

Egyptians, from the Biblical days, actually forbid their daughters from marrying outside their direct family line. Cousins only. Imagine that.

Deuteronomic Code.
Leviticus.

Do you read the whole bible?
..or you still stuck in Genesis?

..and again, making it personal.

Is it because you have no viable argument?
Indeed.

To us, yes, incest is incest but my friend..

Aren't we speaking according to the bible?
Because according to the Bible --it isn't.

Oh snap!
Again, I proved you wrong.

So, go head.
Keep running your mouth.

Dig your hole.
Just hope your comfy sleeping in it.

sorry ...but all that matters are Adam and Eve or Noah and crew because they were commanded by God to committ incest and repopulate The Earth

..and again..

In the Biblical sense.
It wasn't incest.
Therefore, not a sin in the eyes of God.

I stated about the Egyptians as an example of Endogamy.

incest is incest ...especially trying to sleep with first cousins

Agreed.
And I stated that above wrong.
I meant it wasn't a sin.
Maybe it's still not, idk.

But according to the Bible, cousins that mate.
Is not a sin and last I checked.
That's what we were debating.

cousins that mate would be a sin because it's still incest..next you will be saying that sleeping with an aunt or a grandmother is not a sin ....

No, it's not.

If what you said was true, and seeing as how though during these times were so devout and strict to adhering to their religion; they would have done like what happened to Tamar in 2 Samuel; and been put to death. They wouldn't have thrived.

Genesis 35:22

--a shameful act that was condemned and penalized.

Leviticus. Corinthians.

They even prove you wrong.

So, seriously, deal with it.

Furthermore:

"But if any man [father] thinks that he is behaving himself improperly [by refusing his daughter permission to marry due to impending persecution] with reference to his virgin [daughter] and if she is past the flower of age [maturity level] and if that need so requires [more compelling factor than that of persecution] let him [again the father] us his own judgement and grant her permission to marry in spite of the apostle's general advice to remain single; as such, he will not be deemed a sinner."

That's from the Bible.

It is literally giving a father the right to marry his daughter off to a relative if their are extreme circumstances.

Lack of humans on Earth, would that not be classified as an extreme circumstance?

Now we do this today, yes, it is probably a sin.

However, when there is 8 people on Earth..
No, no it is not.

..care to argue the bible some more?

God deemed incest to be a sin...you deem that it's ok to mate with Grandmothers Aunts Uncles and cousins ...what's to debate about

I just quoted the Bible stating that you are lying.

This isn't my belief.

My belief is the same as yours.
Incest is incest.

However, we are debating the Bible.
The Bible, or God in this case, does not condone cousin relations.
Thus, he does not consider cousin to cousin - incest.
Therefore; it is not a sin.
Because he allows it.

In fact, all I've been doing is quoting the Bible, bro.

..not to mention, the fact you ignored everything before this question.

Proves your ignorance.

Proclaim your false victory.
I'm done proving you wrong.

Yes, proving you wrong, not debating it with you.
Because for that to happen, you need to bring forth evidence to contradict or override my evidence.

You have not and cannot do that.

So, bye-bye.
Come again.

no..I was debating about those on Noah's Ark engaging in incest to repopulate the world...you went off into space someplace

dude..up to you..Cowboy is a freaking Einstein

I can think of no other way this can be said.

Forgive if I offend.

Flood history interpretation.

Your assertation is invalid.

Proof: Noah (our ancestor) was limited by his tools. He had no available way of correctly observing the entire earth.

His world view was then limited to that part where he traveled.

And the stars he could see in the heavens.

This would have been the 'whole world' to him.

And so he stated in his history to the future.

Yet the Earth is larger by far than even the wanderings of a wandering tribe can see in the lifetime of many generations.

When they walk on feet.