Topic: Shocking Things Fox News Viewers Believe | |
---|---|
I am not doing a poll and the majority here makes no difference to the validity of the poll. There are threads in the political forums that prove this poll correct at many levels. That validates the poll. No matter who votes against it, it is still validated on this site. it does because that was your claim, was it not? If some people think it's true and some don't then the theory cancels out. Threads started by one side. There are just as many threads started by the other....so their polls would be accurate too? They can't all be accurate when they oppose each other. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One of many studies this one was done by tbe University of Maryland. One would have to take the time to see that this study was and taken for the most accurate results possible. It is a university study for petes sake. They have no agenda beyond accuate results. To say it is agenda driven is absurd. "Looking at the misperceptions one at a time, people were asked, for example, if the U.S. had discovered the alleged stockpiles of WMD in Iraq since the war began. Just 11% of those who relied on newspapers as their “primary news source” incorrectly believed that U.S. forces had made such a discovery. Only slightly more — 17% — of those who relied on NPR and PBS were wrong. Yet 33% of Fox News viewers were wrong, far ahead of those who relied on any other outlet." http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archives/714.html Heya Yellow Rose ![]() what??? no smirkingchimp??? You know how much that sight makes me giggle....come on...I want the chimp ![]() love ya doll |
|
|
|
hey...I;m allergic to that stuff |
|
|
|
I am not doing a poll to see what people think of the poll.
I am here to say that the verification to the poll can be seen on this site and it is a sad state of affairs. Faux loves them some easily lead astray people that is for sure. |
|
|
|
I am not doing a poll to see what people think of the poll. I am here to say that the verification to the poll can be seen on this site and it is a sad state of affairs. Faux loves them some easily lead astray people that is for sure. not true Just like MSNBC and all of those other site do too ![]() |
|
|
|
I rarely debate these days and I choose to debate about polls
![]() |
|
|
|
I am not doing a poll and the majority here makes no difference to the validity of the poll. There are threads in the political forums that prove this poll correct at many levels. That validates the poll. No matter who votes against it, it is still validated on this site. it does because that was your claim, was it not? If some people think it's true and some don't then the theory cancels out. Threads started by one side. There are just as many threads started by the other....so their polls would be accurate too? They can't all be accurate when they oppose each other. This is still irrelevant to the verification of the validity of this poll on this site. Making the poll accurate at some levels regardless to who likes it or not. |
|
|
|
But it would make it inaccurate as well by those standards....hence it makes the polls invalid
|
|
|
|
I've had enough fun for the day...
|
|
|
|
I have to go to lunch now.
|
|
|
|
I've had enough fun for the day... finally ![]() |
|
|
|
i cant believe that people think fox news is real news
|
|
|
|
I've had enough fun for the day... |
|
|
|
I think I proved my point over and over and most can see it. So I will stop spinning my wheels now ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
I think I proved my point over and over and most can see it. So I will stop spinning my wheels now ![]() ![]() ![]() but you are more level headed than I am ![]() |
|
|
|
Wishing here that someone really could prove it false but it has already been proven pretty accurate in this site alone. The burden of proof is on the person(s) making a positive claim. ![]() a positive claim,, meaning what? IF I said, HEavenly didnt graduate college(I actually think you did, just using it as a refrence though) , am I relieved from having to prove it? but if I say Heavenly DID graduate college, I am not relieved from having to prove it? |
|
|
|
Wishing here that someone really could prove it false but it has already been proven pretty accurate in this site alone. The burden of proof is on the person(s) making a positive claim. ![]() a positive claim,, meaning what? IF I said, HEavenly didnt graduate college(I actually think you did, just using it as a refrence though) , am I relieved from having to prove it? but if I say Heavenly DID graduate college, I am not relieved from having to prove it? I didn't see that post that way. I can see it could be taken that way too (now lol) I took it as positive as in "I'm certain this is true" not positive versus negative. Thank again....I'm hard headed ![]() |
|
|
|
Wishing here that someone really could prove it false but it has already been proven pretty accurate in this site alone. The burden of proof is on the person(s) making a positive claim. ![]() a positive claim,, meaning what? IF I said, HEavenly didnt graduate college(I actually think you did, just using it as a refrence though) , am I relieved from having to prove it? but if I say Heavenly DID graduate college, I am not relieved from having to prove it? I didn't see that post that way. I can see it could be taken that way too (now lol) I took it as positive as in "I'm certain this is true" not positive versus negative. Thank again....I'm hard headed ![]() Yeah, I think that is probably right the person who makes the INITIAL claim(as opposed to positive or negative) but then its a slippery slope, like in a court where the prosecution must prove a case with preponderance of evidence OR beyond a reasonable doubt,, it seems like the burden is on them BUT the defense is actually burdened with injecting some reasonable doubt (disproof),,,,,so its hard to say,, |
|
|
|
I think those who believe the poll should be the ones who's intelligence needs to be questioned.
|
|
|