Topic: If we split the country in two halfs and... | |
---|---|
put all the democrats on one side and all the republicans on the other what would happen? Which side would have a higher unemployment rate? which side would have higher taxes? Which side would flourish or die and which side would succeed or fail and why?
|
|
|
|
hmmmm didn't we try that before? Just before the civil war?
|
|
|
|
I think they would both wither and collapse
we need the liberals and conservatives and Republicans and Democrats to balance and check the excesses of each |
|
|
|
Which would you have rather lived in?
East Or West Germany.. That should about answer your question.. |
|
|
|
put all the democrats on one side and all the republicans on the other what would happen? Which side would have a higher unemployment rate? which side would have higher taxes? Which side would flourish or die and which side would succeed or fail and why? As it stands, I imagine democrats would be more unemployed because those with money and power tend to be republican and network with other republicans. If we are talking about two separate governments, I imagine democrats would have higher taxes because they are generally the party of social investment and contribution. I think republicans would not die or fail in tending to their own priorities, which I think are money and power. I think democrats would not die or fail to tend to their priority, which I think is social equality. Both sides would be weaker without uniting to create a healthy medium of the two ideals. |
|
|
|
put all the democrats on one side and all the republicans on the other what would happen? Which side would have a higher unemployment rate? which side would have higher taxes? Which side would flourish or die and which side would succeed or fail and why? |
|
|
|
put all the democrats on one side and all the republicans on the other what would happen? Which side would have a higher unemployment rate? which side would have higher taxes? Which side would flourish or die and which side would succeed or fail and why? Whichever side accepts the largest government would fare worse. Both repubs and dems have a long history of Statism, so there's no guaranteed outcome just because of partisan division. They are, as the old saying goes, simply 2 wings of 1 bird of prey. |
|
|
|
hmmmm didn't we try that before? Just before the civil war? Yes we did and the republicans won the civil war! |
|
|
|
I think they would both wither and collapse we need the liberals and conservatives and Republicans and Democrats to balance and check the excesses of each some truth to that! |
|
|
|
Which would you have rather lived in? East Or West Germany.. That should about answer your question.. neither i wouldnt choose communism or socialism! |
|
|
|
put all the democrats on one side and all the republicans on the other what would happen? Which side would have a higher unemployment rate? which side would have higher taxes? Which side would flourish or die and which side would succeed or fail and why? As it stands, I imagine democrats would be more unemployed because those with money and power tend to be republican and network with other republicans. If we are talking about two separate governments, I imagine democrats would have higher taxes because they are generally the party of social investment and contribution. I think republicans would not die or fail in tending to their own priorities, which I think are money and power. I think democrats would not die or fail to tend to their priority, which I think is social equality. Both sides would be weaker without uniting to create a healthy medium of the two ideals. your honest in your veiws! thats rare! What is social equality? I don't get what that means? I feel i have equality! I work toward it and have never had a social entitlement program benefit me! |
|
|
|
Hmm,,,social equality (to me) is when the natural prejudices and built in privileges of society no longer influence the quality or accessibility of basic needs and rights, such as education, healthcare, employment,,,,etc,,,
We can never make things perfect, but we should always strive to make them better,,,for EVERYONE. |
|
|
|
I think if we split the country in half it should be
Texas and the other half |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 11/14/09 09:33 AM
|
|
I think if we split the country in half it should be Texas and the other half lol,,,Only if texas takes california with them,,,,then its a deal.. |
|
|
|
But I want to stay in the mountains and I don't belong to either party...what do ya do with those of us...???
|
|
|
|
I think if we split the country in half it should be Texas and the other half |
|
|
|
Hmm,,,social equality (to me) is when the natural prejudices and built in privileges of society no longer influence the quality or accessibility of basic needs and rights, such as education, healthcare, employment,,,,etc,,, We can never make things perfect, but we should always strive to make them better,,,for EVERYONE. well it's not that we disagree, really we don't! Except i dont think people are entilted to be given those things by others. They should work for them on their own. So healthcare being another huge tax i have to pay without any benefit to me sucks! My healthcare cost is merely a $100 a month and that tax is gonna be far higher! Half my income is enough, now they want 60%, thats wrong! |
|
|
|
put all the democrats on one side and all the republicans on the other what would happen? Which side would have a higher unemployment rate? which side would have higher taxes? Which side would flourish or die and which side would succeed or fail and why? What about independents and unaffiliated (me), where would they fit? |
|
|
|
Republicans would become so overbearing with their outlandish ideals that they would end up having a revolution within a few years. Religion would be the major revolution, over whose is right.
Then the richer would make sure that the poorer stay in their place causing a revolution. Then the gay republicans would be found out and lynched. Etc... I would rather be on the Democratic side because even though there would be problems it would be hell on the Republican side. |
|
|
|
Republicans would become so overbearing with their outlandish ideals that they would end up having a revolution within a few years. Religion would be the major revolution, over whose is right. Then the richer would make sure that the poorer stay in their place causing a revolution. Then the gay republicans would be found out and lynched. Etc... I would rather be on the Democratic side because even though there would be problems it would be hell on the Republican side. |
|
|